Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/144606
|
| Title: | 印太大國關係對四方安全對話之影響 (2000-2020)
The Influence of Indo-Pacific Major Power Relations on the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue (QUAD), 2000-2020 |
| Authors: | 劉家伶
Liu, Chia-Ling |
| Contributors: | 黃奎博
Huang, Kwei-Bo
劉家伶
Liu, Chia-Ling |
| Keywords: | 四方安全對話
印太戰略
美國
日本
印度
澳洲
中國 |
| Date: | 2023 |
| Issue Date: | 2023-05-02 15:07:07 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 本文研究重點是把時間點設定於2000-2020年，把中國當作區域競逐的量尺，將聚焦在印太國際關係裡的主體國家之間的互動情形，俾能了解此等相互牽引的量能形式對四方安全對話的影響，而透過文本分析法詳細梳理印太國際關係的歷史脈絡後，將續以新古典現實主義觀點了解探究印太國際關係場域互動的理論背景。
研究內容，分別探討美國、日本、印度、澳洲國內政策，對於國家外交政策的影響。當初原先的周遭地區僅是把注意力集中在新興發展的亞洲地緣影響力上面，但如今美國外交戰略劍指中國的意圖明確，美日印澳的四方安全對話即是深受美國印太戰略影響所重新發展的安排。
從結果顯示，對於來自中國的不對稱性挑戰，西方世界也皆為此付出許多政治戰略上的考量與批判，尤其是四方安全國家所引領倡議的抑中之詞，的確向外界傳達了清楚的戰略訊息。印太戰略含納所謂東方與西方共同融合整併的向前驅動力，且隨著印太一詞的頻繁出現，也更是反映了於亞洲有政治實力的美國為其中關鍵的新式地緣政經安排。
The research focus of this paper is to set the time point from 2000 to 2020, and to regard China as the measuring stick of regional competition. It will focus on the interaction between the main countries in the Indo-Pacific international relations, as to understand the mutual traction. Quantitative forms of influence on the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue(QUAD), and after combing the historical context of Indo-Pacific international relations in detail through text analysis, will continue to understand and explore the theoretical background of the field interaction of Indo-Pacific international relations from the perspective of neoclassical realism.
The content of this research is to explore the domestic policies of the United States, Japan, India, and Australia, and their impact on the country`s foreign policy. At the beginning, the surrounding areas only focused on the emerging geopolitical influence of Asia, but now the US diplomatic strategy has a clear intention to target China. Quadrilateral Security Dialogue between the US, Japan, India and Australia is deeply influenced by the US Indo-Pacific strategy.
The results show that the Western world has also paid a lot of political and strategic considerations and criticisms for the asymmetric challenge from China, especially the restraint of the initiative led by the four-party security countries, which indeed conveyed a clear message to the outside world. The Indo-Pacific strategy contains the forward driving force of the integration of the East and the West, and with the frequent appearance of the term Indo-Pacific, it also reflects the new geopolitical and economic arrangements in which the United States, which has political power in Asia, is the key. |
| Reference: | 參考文獻
壹、 官方出版品
Australian Department of Defence, 2016. 2016 Defense White Paper. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.
Australian Minister of Foreign Affairs, 2017. 2017 Foreign Policy White Paper. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.
Australian Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, 2020/10/6. “Media release,” Australia-India-Japan-United States Quad Foreign Ministers` Meeting, <https://www.foreignminister.gov.au/minister/marise-payne/media-release/australia-india-japan-united-states-quad-foreign-ministers-meeting>.
U. S. Department of Defense, 2018. Summary of the National Defense Strategy of The United States of America: Sharping the American Military’s Competitive Edge.
U. S. Department of Defense, 2019. Indo-Pacific Strategic Report: Preparedness, Partnerships, and Promoting a Networked Region.
White House, The, 2022/2. Indo-Pacific Strategy of the United States, <https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/U.S.-Indo-Pacific-Strategy.pdf>.
White House, The, 2017. National Security Strategy of The United States of America.
White House, The, 2018/10/4. Remarks by Vice President Pence on the Administration’s Policy Toward China, <https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/briefings-statements/remarks-vice-president-pence-administrations-policy-toward-china/>.
White House, The, 2021. U.S Strategic Framework for the Indo-Pacific.
White House, The, 2021/3/12. “Statements and releases,” Quad Leaders’ Joint Statement: ‘The Spirit of the Quad, <https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2021/03/12/quad-leaders-joint-statement-the-spirit-of-the-quad/>.
White House, The, 2022/5/23. “Statements and releases,” FACT SHEET: Quad Leaders’ Tokyo Summit 2022, <https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2022/05/23/fact-sheet-quad-leaders-tokyo-summit-2022/>.
White House, The, 2021/9/24. “Statements and releases,” Fact Sheet: Quad Leaders’ Summit, <https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2021/09/24/fact-sheet-quad-leaders-summit/>.
中華民國大陸委員會，2021年4月。〈三、「四方安全對話」（Quad） 峰會與美印太戰略觀察-趙文志主稿〉，《大陸與兩岸情勢簡報》，頁1-4。<https://www.mac.gov.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=78702647C7A5B61B&sms=25D4C64CAEE1E128&s=CC7E5E6347A88E1B>。
貳、 中外文專書及篇章
Acharya, Amitav, 2009. Constructing a Security Community in Southeast Asia: ASEAN and the Problem of Regional Order, London & New York: Taylor & Francis.
Bader, Jeffrey, 2020/11. “Meeting the China Challenge: A Strategic competitor, Not an enemy,” in Ryan Hass eds., The Future of US policy toward China: Recommendations for the Biden administration, Brookings Institution. pp. 1-6. <https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Future-U.S.-policy-toward-China-v8.pdf>.
Lake, David A, 2009. Hierarchy in International Relations. New York: Cornell University Press.
Ripsman, Norrin M., Jeffrey W. Taliaferro & Steven E. Lobell, 2016. Neoclassical Realist Theory of International Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Scobell, Andrew, Edmund J. Burke et al., 2020. China’s Grand Strategy: Trends, Trajectories, and Long-Term Competition. Santa Monica, California: RAND Corporation, <https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR2798.html>.
Kaplan, Robert D.著，吳照禮、毛悅澤譯，2013。《季風：印度洋與美國權力的未來》(Monsoon: The Indian Ocean and The Future of American Power)。北京：社會科學文獻出版社。
Medcalf, Rory著，李明譯，2020。《印太競逐：美中衝突的前線，全球戰略競爭新熱點》(Contest for The Indo-Pacific: Why China Won’t Map the Future)。台北：商周。
賴怡忠，2020。〈推薦序：尋找印太戰略知識建構的歷史脈絡〉，Rory Medcalf著，李明譯，《印太競逐：美中衝突的前線，全球戰略競爭新熱點》(Contest for The Indo-Pacific: Why China Won’t Map the Future)。台北：商周，頁9-16。
黃恩浩，2021。〈澳洲在美國印太戰略架構中的角色與作為〉，沈明室、劉蕭翔主編，《2021印太戰略安全情勢評估報告》。台北：國防安全研究院，頁91-102，<https://indsr.org.tw/uploads/Download/印太年報完稿全書PDF(1221).pdf>。
參、 中外文期刊文章
Auslin, Michael, 2011/12, “The Struggle for Power in the Indo-Pacific,” Turkish Policy Quarterly, Vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 145-151.
Baruah, Darshana M., 2020/6/30. “India in the Indo-Pacific: New Delhi’s Theater of Opportunity,” Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. <https://carnegieendowment.org/2020/06/30/india-in-indo-pacific-new-delhi-s-theater-of-opportunity-pub-82205>.
Chang, Che, 2021/2/24. “Japan Is the New Leader of Asia’s Liberal Order: Washington Must Learn to Follow Its Longtime Ally in the Indo-Pacific,” Foreign Affairs. <https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/united-states/2021-02-24/japan-new-leader-asias-liberal-order>.
Curtis, Lisa et al., 2011/11/3. “Shared Goals, Converging Interests: A Plan for U.S-Australia-India Cooperation in the Indo-Pacific,” Heritage Foundation. <https://www.heritage.org/asia/report/shared-goals-converging-interests-plan-us-australia-india-cooperation-the-indo-pacific>.
Melvin, Neil, 2021/5/24. “Russia and the Indo-Pacific Security Concept,” Emerging Insights, Royal United Services Institute. <https://rusi.org/explore-our-research/publications/emerging-insights/russia-and-indo-pacific-security-concept>.
Saeed, Muhammad, 2017/Winter. “From the Asia-Pacific to the Indo-Pacific: Expanding Sino-U.S. Strategic Competition,” China Quarterly of International Strategic Studies, Vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 499-512.
黃介正，2009/12。〈歐巴馬亞洲行與美國亞太戰略轉型〉，《展望與探索》，第7卷第12期，頁1-4。
王信力，2019/6。〈川普能重構亞洲權力平衡？解析美國印太戰略的虛實〉，《臺灣國際研究季刊》，第15卷第2期，頁67-102。
李大中，2019/8。〈川普的印太戰略與美中戰略競爭〉，《軍事社會科學專刊》，第15期，頁3-14。
高朗，2004/9。〈後冷戰時期中共外交政策之變與不變〉，《政治科學論叢》，第21期，頁19-48。
張棋炘，2016/7。〈印度對外政策剖析：從「東望」邁向「東進」〉，《國際與公共事務》，第4期，頁67-102。
陳欣之，2006/4。〈單極體系的形成、維繫與轉換〉，《問題與研究》，第45卷第2期，頁111-140。
陳牧民、李賜賢，2015/10。〈國際安全研究中的區域主義：理論與發展簡介與評估〉，《全球政治評論》，第52期，頁59-84。
游美惠，2000。〈內容分析、文本分析與論述分析在社會研究的運用〉，《調查研究－方法與應用》，第8期，頁5-42。
黃恩浩，2013/12。〈2013年澳洲國會大選分析與其未來亞洲政策走向〉，《戰略安全研析》，第104期，頁51-59。
鄭端耀，2005/2。〈國際關係新古典現實主義理論〉，《問題與研究》，第44卷第1期，頁115-140。
黎氏姮娥，2020/4。〈印度莫迪總理周邊政策評析〉，《歐亞研究》，第11期，頁67-76。
關中，2002/12。〈後冷戰時代美國外交政策的批判（上）〉，《遠景季刊》，第3卷第1期，頁1-26。
肆、 中外文報紙或網站
Bergeron, Louis, Nick Iorio, and Jeff Payne, 2021/2/11. “The US Needs a New Indian Ocean Strategy, Now It’s time to prioritize the ‘Indo’ in ‘Indo-Pacific,’” The Diplomat, <https://thediplomat.com/2021/02/the-us-needs-a-new-indian-ocean-strategy-now/>.
Evans, Gareth, 2021/5/9. “Talking up war over Taiwan flouts reason, fact, judgment and Australia’s national interest,” East Asia Forum, <https://www.eastasiaforum.org/2021/05/09/talking-up-war-over-taiwan-flouts-reason-fact-judgment-and-australias-national-interest/>.
Nair, Remya, 2021/7/23. “How Narasimha Rao and Manmohan Singh rescued India in 1991 and made history,” The Print, <https://theprint.in/economy/how-narasimha-rao-and-manmohan-singh-rescued-india-in-1991-and-made-history/700893/>.
Roche, Elizabeth, 2017/11/12. “Asean Summit: The ‘quad’ meets in Manila ahead of Modi’s arrival,” Mint, <https://www.livemint.com/Politics/shMBdUJiIW3qrmusX10VpL/Asean-Summit-Narendra-Modi-arrives-in-Manila-to-give-boost.html>.
Sullivan, Jake & Walter Russell Mead, 2020/5/11. “Dialogues on American Foreign Policy and World Affairs: Discussing the Future of U.S. Foreign Policy and National Security with Jake Sullivan,” Hudson Institute, <https://www.hudson.org/national-security-defense/transcript-dialogues-on-american-foreign-policy-and-world-affairs-discussing-the-future-of-u-s-foreign-policy-and-national-security-with-jake-sullivan>.
Tillerson, Rex & John J. Hamre, 2017/10/18. “Defining Our Relationship with India for the Next Century,” Center for Strategic and International Studies, <https://www.csis.org/analysis/defining-our-relationship-india-next-century-address-us-secretary-state-rex-tillerson>.
Twining, Daniel, 2010/3/1. “How the West Can Enlarge Its Community of Values and Interests in the Indo-Pacific Region,” The German Marshall Fund of the United States. <https://lib.ugent.be/catalog/ebk01:4100000007700708>.
Wardell, Jane and Colin Packham, 2018/2/19. “Australia, U.S., India and Japan in talks to establish Belt and Road alternative: report,” Reuters, <https://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-beltandroad-quad-idUSKCN1G20WG>.
2022/5/22. “China’s Wang Yi Says US’s Indo-Pacific Strategy ‘Doomed to Fail’”, Bloomberg News, 2022/5/22. “China’s Wang Yi Says US’s Indo-Pacific Strategy ‘Doomed to Fail’”, Bloomberg News, <https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-05-22/china-s-wang-yi-says-us-s-indo-pacific-strategy-doomed-to-fail#xj4y7vzkg>.
Trygve Throntveit著，許睿洋譯，2017/5/9。〈在川普時代選擇追隨威爾遜的鬼魂，或是美國優先?〉(Woodrow Wilson`s Ghost in the Age of Donald Trump) ，《The News Lens關鍵評論》，< https://www.thenewslens.com/feature/timefortune/67363>。
2012/9/20。〈中日雙方願就釣魚島「保持溝通」〉，《BBC中文網》，<https://www.bbc.com/zhongwen/trad/rolling_news/2012/09/120920_rolling_china_japan_island>。
2021/1/15。〈美國印太戰略：幫助印度崛起 聯合抗衡中國〉，《BBC News 中文》<https://www.bbc.com/zhongwen/trad/world-55684095>。
托克維爾，2018/8/31。〈美國「印太戰略」必須克服結構性因素〉，《自由評論網》，< https://talk.ltn.com.tw/article/breakingnews/2537179>。
林宜萱編，2020/10/6。〈美國務卿蓬佩奧與日澳印四方安全對話效果有限，外交政策建議最好悄悄解散〉，《The News Lens關鍵評論》，<https://www.thenewslens.com/article/141496>。
林賢參，2022/4/28。〈2022印太安全論壇1：劍指中國！印太戰略是美日同盟擴大與西歐合作的戰略方針〉，《Newtalk新聞》，<https://newtalk.tw/news/view/2022-04-28/746399>。
松田康博，2021/5/23。〈日本外交的平衡感〉，《自由評論網》，<https://talk.ltn.com.tw/article/paper/1450421>。
邱智淵，2018/7/25。〈拒當世界警察 美國放棄再當世界保護者〉，《Newtalk 新聞》， < https://newtalk.tw/news/view/2018-07-25/132743>。
恕我無法支持，2020/10/28。〈安倍的印太戰略（一）：拋出「自由與繁榮之弧」構想後，安倍等待了整整十年〉，《The News Lens關鍵評論》，<https://www.thenewslens.com/article/142414/fullpage>。
康世人，2020/7/21。〈印度外長：遵守不結盟政策 強化印太安全對話〉，《中央社》，<https://www.cna.com.tw/news/aopl/202007210209.aspx>。
陳方隅，2020/6/2。〈美國本世紀最大示威衝突的背後:種族問題的深層焦慮川普、策略之謎〉，《報導者》，< https://www.twreporter.org/a/opinion-usa-black -lives-matter-protests>。
張俊華，2020/7/15。〈川普的孤立主義，不利於香港與台灣得到其他民主國家的支持〉，《The News Lens關鍵評論》，<https://www.thenewslens.com/article/137637>。
童倩，2012/9/22。〈日本右翼舉行大規模反華示威〉，《BBC中文網》，<https://www.bbc.com/zhongwen/trad/multimedia/2012/09/120922_picturegallery_japan_antichinademo>。
蘇靜好，2020/10/2。〈對抗中共 川普政府擬組建「亞洲北約」〉，《台灣大紀元》，<https://www.epochtimes.com.tw/n324463/對抗中共-川普政府擬組建亞洲北約.html>。
伍、 其他
黃恩浩，2019。〈澳洲印太戰略思維與作為〉，《台北論壇—台北觀點》， <http://140.119.184.164/SuChi/file/%E6%BE%B3%E6%B4%B2%E7%9A%84%E5%8D%B0%E5%A4%AA%E6%88%B0%E7%95%A5%E6%80%9D%E7%B6%AD%E8%88%87%E4%BD%9C%E7%82%BA%20%20%20%E9%BB%83%E6%81%A9%E6%B5%A9.pdf>。 |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
外交學系
107862002 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0107862002 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [外交學系] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| index.html | 0Kb | HTML2 | 105 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
