English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 109952/140887 (78%)
Visitors : 46343488      Online Users : 922
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 會計學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/145873
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/145873


    Title: 獨立董事財務背景與盈餘管理之關聯
    The association between financial background of independent directors and earnings management
    Authors: 吳冠萱
    Wu, Kuan-Hsuan
    Contributors: 潘健民
    Pan, Chien- Min
    吳冠萱
    Wu, Kuan-Hsuan
    Keywords: 公司治理
    應計項目盈餘管理
    實質盈餘管理
    獨立董事
    財務背景
    Corporate governance
    Accrual-based earnings management
    Real activities manipulation
    Independent director
    Financial background
    Date: 2023
    Issue Date: 2023-07-06 16:49:28 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 獨立董事係維護公司治理之重要機制,而財務報導品質為衡量企業公司治理好壞之關鍵因素。然而公司經理人往往出於自利動機、政策誘因等不同原因而有從事盈餘管理之行為。盈餘管理不同於常見之財務報表舞弊,多運用會計準則所賦予的彈性或企業決策之自主裁量權進行,對企業揭露品質和長期經營有重大影響,因此獨立董事往往被期許能對企業盈餘管理行為產生有力的監督效果。由於日本並未強制規範所有公司皆須設置獨立董事,因此本文得以探討獨立董事的設置與企業盈餘管理行為的關聯性。本研究以日本東京證券交易所上市公司為研究樣本,探討聘用獨立董事與否和聘用之獨立董事比率,對於盈餘管理之影響。實證結果顯示,僅設立獨立董事一職無法對盈餘操縱行為產生顯著抑制作用,惟當獨立董事比率愈高時,企業確實會減少應計項目和實質盈餘管理行為。同時,本研究亦探討獨立董事之財務專業背景是否能對盈餘管理產生較佳之監督效果,結果顯示董事會中具財務背景的獨立董事比例愈高,企業反而會傾向於增加應計項目盈餘管理行為,此一結果與先前研究假說相悖,推測原因為具財務背景之獨立董事往往與企業有密切往來,因此未能發揮獨立董事應有之監督效果。再者,本研究也以企業是否聘僱具財務背景獨立董事此一虛擬變數替換主要變數,以論證具財務背景獨立董事是否同樣需佔董事會一定比例才會導致盈餘管理程度的改變。惟研究顯示相比於獨立董事皆不具財務背景之企業,聘有具財務背景獨立董事之企業其應計項目盈餘管理程度會增加。由此可推知財務背景獨立董事不僅無法發揮其監督效果,且當其存在於董事會中,僅有聘任的事實就能對盈餘管理程度造成影響。
    Managers have incentives to manage earnings and independent director plays an important role in corporate governance to safeguard financial reporting quality. Earnings management stems from managers exploit the flexibility and discretion given by accounting policies to achieve an earnings target. On the other hand, independent directors are expected to monitor the managers and safeguard the financial reporting quality of the firm. Taking the advantage that independent directors are not mandated in Japan, we examine the association between independent directors and earnings management behaviors using the data from firms listed on the Tokyo Stock Exchange. Consistent with the prior studies, the empirical results show that the existence of independent directors in the board of director have no association with earnings management, but as the ratio of independent director in the board gets higher, the level of earnings management gets lower.
    To our surprise, the analyses show that independent directors with financial background increase the level of accrual-based earnings management. Further analyses also show that the existence of independent director in the board can increase the level of accrual-based earnings management.
    Reference: Aggarwal, R., I. Erel, M. Ferreira, and P. Matos. 2011. Does governance travel around the world? Evidence from institutional investors. Journal of Financial Economics 100 (1): 154-181.
    Ahmed, A. S., and S. Duellman. 2007. Accounting conservatism and board of director characteristics: An empirical analysis. Journal of Accounting and Economics 43 (2-3): 411-437.
    Barton, J., and P. J. Simko. 2002. The balance sheet as an earnings management constraint. Accounting Review 77 (1): 1-27.
    Bartov, E., F. A. Gul, and J. S. L. Tsui. 2000. Discretionary-accruals models and audit qualifications. Journal of Accounting and Economics 30 (3): 421-452.
    Beasley, M. S. 1996. An empirical analysis of the relation between the board of director composition and financial statement fraud. Accounting Review 71 (4): 443-465.
    Berle, A., and G. Means. 1932. The Modern Corporation and Private Property. New York, NY: Macmillan.
    Bernard, V. L., and J. K. Thomas. 1990. Evidence that stock prices do not fully reflect the implications of current earnings for future earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics 13 (4): 305-340.
    Brennan, M. J., and H. H. Cao. 1997. International portfolio investment flows. Journal of Finance 52 (5): 1851-1880.
    Bushee, B. J. 1998. The influence of institutional investors on myopic R&D investment behavior. Accounting Review 73 (3): 305-333.
    Cadbury, A. 1992. Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance. London: GEE.
    Chava, S., and M. R. Roberts. 2008. How does financing impact investment? The role of debt covenants. Journal of Finance 63 (5): 2085-2121.
    Chen, J. F., R. R. Duh, A. W. H. Hsu, and C. M. Pan. 2015. Can Anglo-Saxon audit committee scheme improve earnings quality in non-Anglo-Saxon environments? Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics 11 (1): 61-74.
    Cheng, S. 2008. Board size and the variability of corporate performance. Journal of Financial Economics 87 (1): 157-176.
    Chi, W., L. L. Lisic, and M. Pevzner. 2011. Is enhanced audit quality associated with greater real earnings management? Accounting Horizons 25 (2): 315-335.
    Chung, R., M. Firth, and J. B. Kim. 2002. Institutional monitoring and opportunistic earnings management. Journal of Corporate Finance 8 (1): 29-48.
    Cohen, D. A., A. Dey, and T. Z. Lys. 2008. Real and accrual-based earnings management in the pre- and post- Sarbanes Oxley periods. Journal of Corporate Finance 83 (3): 757-787.
    Cohen, D. A., and P. Zarowin. 2010. Accrual-based and real earnings management activities around seasoned equity offerings. Journal of Accounting and Economics 50 (1): 2-19.
    Cohen, J. R., U. Hoitash, G. Krishnamoorthy, and A. M. Wright. 2014. The effect of audit committee industry expertise on monitoring the financial reporting process. Accounting Review 89 (1): 243-273.
    Dass, N., O. Kini, V. Nanda, B. Onal, and J. Wang. 2014. Board expertise: Do directors from related industries help bridge the information gap? Review of Financial Studies 27 (5): 1533-1592.
    DeAngelo, H., L. DeAngelo, and D. J. Skinner. 1994. Accounting choice in troubled companies. Journal of Accounting and Economics 17 (1-2): 113-143.
    Dechow, P. M. 1994. Accounting earnings and cash flows as measures of firm performance: The role of accounting accruals. Journal of Accounting and Economics 18 (1): 3-42.
    Dechow, P. M., and D. J. Skinner. 2000. Earnings management: Reconciling the views of accounting academics, practitioners and regulators. Accounting Horizons 14 (2): 235-250.
    Dechow, P. M., R. G. Sloan, and A. P. Sweeney. 1995. Detecting earnings management. Accounting Review 70 (2): 193-225.
    Dechow, P. M., R. G. Sloan, and A. P. Sweeney. 1996. Causes and consequences of earnings manipulation: An analysis of firms subject to enforcement actions by the SEC. Contemporary Accounting Research 13 (1): 1-36.
    Degeorge, F., J. Patel, and R. Zeckhauser. 1999. Earnings management to exceed thresholds. Journal of Business 72 (1): 1-33.
    Fama, E. F. 1980. Agency problems and the theory of the firm. Journal of Political Economy 88 (2): 288-307.
    Fama, E. F., and M. C. Jensen. 1983. Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law & Economics 26 (2): 301-325.
    Graham, J. R., C. R. Harvey, and S. Rajgopal. 2005. The economic implications of corporate financial reporting. Journal of Accounting and Economics 40 (1-3): 3-73.
    Gunny, K. A. 2010. The relationship between earnings management using real activities manipulation and future performance: Evidence from meeting earnings benchmarks. Contemporary Accounting Research 27 (3): 855-888.
    Gupta, M., M. Pevzner, and C. Seethamraju. 2010. The implications of absorption cost accounting and production decisions for future firm performance and valuation. Contemporary Accounting Research 27 (3): 889-922.
    Hartzell, J. C., and L. T. Starks. 2003. Institutional investors and executive compensation. Journal of Finance 58 (6): 2351-2374.
    Healy, P. M., A. P. Hutton, and K. G. Palepu. 1999. Stock performance and intermediation changes surrounding sustained increases in disclosure. Contemporary Accounting Research 16 (3): 485-520.
    Healy, P. M., and J. M. Wahlen. 1999. A review of the earnings management literature and its implications for standard setting. Accounting Horizons 13 (4): 365-383.
    Jensen, M. C. 1993. The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems. Journal of Finance 48 (3): 831-880.
    Jensen, M. C., and W. H. Meckling. 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3 (4): 305-360.
    Jones, J. J. 1991. Earnings management during import relief investigations. Journal of Accounting Research 29 (2): 193-228.
    Klein, A. 2002. Audit committee, board of director characteristics, and earnings management. Journal of Accounting and Economics 33 (3): 375-400.
    Lipton, M., and J. W. Lorsch. 1992. A modest proposal for improved corporate governance. Business Lawyer 48 (1): 59-77.
    Matsumoto, D. A. 2002. Management`s incentives to avoid negative earnings surprises. Accounting Review 77 (3): 483-514.
    Merton, R. C. 1987. A simple model of capital market equilibrium with incomplete information. Journal of Finance 42 (3): 483-510.
    Morck, R., A. Shleifer, and R. W. Vishny. 1988. Management ownership and market valuation: An empirical analysis. Journal of Financial Economics 20 (1-2): 293-315.
    Morck, R., and M. Nakamura. 1999. Banks and corporate control in Japan. Journal of Finance 54 (1): 319-339.
    Nagata, K., and P. Nguyen. 2017. Ownership structure and disclosure quality: Evidence from management forecasts revisions in Japan. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 36 (6): 451-467.
    Nakano, M., and P. Nguyen. 2012. Board size and corporate risk taking: Further evidence from Japan. Corporate Governance: An International Review 20 (4): 369-387.
    Nelson, M. W., J. A. Elliott, and R. L. Tarpley. 2002. Evidence from auditors about managers’ and auditors’ earnings management decisions. Accounting Review 77 (1): 175-202.
    Pearce, J. A., and S. A. Zahra. 1992. Board composition from a strategic contingency perspective. Journal of Management Studies 29 (4): 411-438.
    Phan, P. H., and T. Yoshikawa. 2000. Agency theory and Japanese corporate governance. Asia Pacific Journal of Management 17 (1): 1-27.
    Pinkowitz, L., and R. Williamson. 2001. Bank power and cash holdings: Evidence from Japan. Review of Financial Studies 14 (4): 1059-1082
    Rangan, S. 1998. Earnings management and the performance of seasoned equity offerings. Journal of Financial Economics 50 (1): 101-122.
    Rosenstein, S., and J. G. Wyatt. 1990. Outside directors, board independence, and shareholder wealth. Journal of Financial Economics 26 (2):175-191.
    Roychowdhury, S. 2006. Earnings management through real activities manipulation. Journal of Accounting and Economics 42 (3): 335-370.
    Sato, S., and F. Takeda. 2017. IFRS adoption and stock prices of Japanese firms in governance system transition. International Journal of Accounting 52 (4): 319-337.
    Schipper, K. 1989. Earnings management. Accounting Horizons 3 (4): 91-102.
    Singhvi, S. S., and H. B. Desai. 1971. An empirical analysis of the quality of corporate financial disclosure. Accounting Review 46 (1): 129-138.
    Teoh, S. H., I. Welch, and T. J. Wong. 1998. Earnings management and the long-run market performance of initial public offerings. Journal of Finance 53 (6): 1935-1974.
    Wallace, R. S. O., and K. Naser. 1995. Firm-specific determinants of the comprehensiveness of mandatory disclosure in the corporate annual reports of firms listed on the stock exchange of Hong Kong. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 14 (4): 311-368.
    Warfield, T. D., J. J. Wild, and K. L. Wild. 1995. Managerial ownership, accounting choices, and informativeness of earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics 20 (1): 61-91.
    Watts, R. L., and J. L. Zimmerman. 1986. Positive Accounting Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
    Watts, R. L., and J. L. Zimmerman. 1990. Positive accounting theory: A ten-year perspective. Accounting Review 65 (1): 131-156.
    Weisbach, M. S. 1988. Outside directors and CEO turnover. Journal of Financial Economics 20 (1-3): 431-460.
    Williamson, O. E. 1983. Organization form, residual claimants, and corporate control. Journal of Law and Economics 26 (2): 351-366.
    Williamson, O. E. 1984. The economics of governance: Framework and implications. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 140 (1): 195-223.
    Zang, A. Y. 2012. Evidence on the trade-off between real activities manipulation and accrual-based earnings management. Accounting Review 87 (2): 675-703.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    會計學系
    110353017
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0110353017
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[會計學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    301701.pdf2491KbAdobe PDF20View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback