English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 109952/140891 (78%)
Visitors : 46236518      Online Users : 934
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 財務管理學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/146277
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/146277


    Title: ESG評分和公司債報酬
    ESG scores and return of corporate bonds
    Authors: 陳仟袖
    Chen, Chien-Hsiu
    Contributors: 岳夢蘭
    Yueh, Meng-Lan
    陳仟袖
    Chen, Chien-Hsiu
    Keywords: 企業社會責任
    ESG
    債券報酬
    Corporate social responsibility
    ESG
    Bond return
    Date: 2023
    Issue Date: 2023-08-02 12:57:31 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究採用2003年1月至2021年9月期間共4,518間美國企業所發行的債券資料及Refinitiv資料庫中的公司ESG分數,探討ESG與債券報酬間的關係。實證結果顯示,ESG分數與債券超額報酬呈負相關。以債券信用評等分類並控制風險因子後,投機級債券的ESG分數與超額報酬呈正相關,投資級債券則呈小程度負相關。
    此外,由環境、社會、公司治理項目分數的分析結果,顯示整體而言細項評分與ESG總分對債券超額報酬的影響趨勢一致,將樣本依信用評等分組並控制風險因子後,對於投機級債券,環境分數的影響最為顯著、公司治理分數無顯著影響;對於投資級債券,則為公司治理分數的影響較社會分數及環境分數顯著。
    This study examines the relationship between ESG and bond return, using bond data of 4,518 US companies from January 2003 to September 2021 and companies’ ESG scores from Refinitiv database. The empirical results show that ESG scores are negatively correlated with bond excess returns. When categorized by bond credit rating and controlling risk, ESG scores for speculative-grade bonds are positively correlated with risk-adjusted excess returns, while investment-grade bonds are negatively correlated with risk-adjusted excess returns for a small degree.
    In addition, the analysis results of environmental, social, and governance scores show that the sub-item scores and ESG total scores have the similar impact on bond excess returns. After classifying samples according to credit ratings, for speculative-grade bonds, environmental score shows the most significant impact on risk-adjusted excess return, while governance score does not show significant impact; for investment-grade bonds, the impact of governance score is more significant than social and environmental scores.
    Reference: Apergis, N., Poufinas, T., & Antonopoulos, A. (2022). ESG scores and cost of debt. Energy Economics, 112, 106186.
    Ashwin Kumar, N. C., Smith, C., Badis, L., Wang, N., Ambrosy, P., & Tavares, R. (2016). ESG factors and risk-adjusted performance: A new quantitative model. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 6(4), 292-300.
    Avramov, D., Chordia, T., Jostova, G., & Philipov, A. (2007). Momentum and credit rating. The Journal of Finance, 62(5), 2503-2520.
    Bai, J., Bali, T. G., & Wen, Q. (2019). Common risk factors in the cross-section of corporate bond returns. Journal of Financial Economics, 131(3), 619-642.
    Bai, J., Bali, T. G., & Wen, Q. (2021). Is there a risk-return tradeoff in the corporate bond market? Time-series and cross-sectional evidence. Journal of Financial Economics, 142(3), 1017-1037.
    Baker, M., Bergstresser, D., Serafeim, G., & Wurgler, J. (2022). The pricing and ownership of US green bonds. Annual Review of Financial Economics, 14, 415-437.
    Bannier, C. E., Bofinger, Y., & Rock, B. (2019). Doing safe by doing good: ESG investing and corporate social responsibility in the US and Europe (No. 621). CFS Working Paper Series.
    Bao, J., Pan, J., & Wang, J. (2011). The illiquidity of corporate bonds. The Journal of Finance, 66(3), 911-946.
    Bauer, R., & Hann, D. (2010). Corporate environmental management and credit risk. Available at SSRN 1660470.
    Ben Slimane, M., Le Guenedal, T., Roncalli, T., & Sekine, T. (2019). ESG investing in corporate bonds: Mind the gap. Théo and Roncalli, Thierry and Sekine, Takaya, ESG Investing in Corporate Bonds: Mind the Gap (November 30, 2019).
    Bessembinder, H., Panayides, M., & Venkataraman, K. (2009). Hidden liquidity: an analysis of order exposure strategies in electronic stock markets. Journal of Financial Economics, 94(3), 361-383.
    Bhojraj, S., & Sengupta, P. (2003). Effect of corporate governance on bond ratings and yields: The role of institutional investors and outside directors. Journal of Business, 76(3), 455-475.
    Brammer, S., Brooks, C., & Pavelin, S. (2006). Corporate social performance and stock returns: UK evidence from disaggregate measures. Financial Management, 35(3), 97-116.
    Breedt, A., Ciliberti, S., Gualdi, S., & Seager, P. (2019). Is ESG an Equity Factor or Just an Investment Guide?. The Journal of Investing, 28(2), 32-42.
    Brennan, M. J., Chordia, T., & Subrahmanyam, A. (1998). Alternative factor specifications, security characteristics, and the cross-section of expected stock returns. Journal of Financial Economics, 49(3), 345-373.
    Elton, E. J., Gruber, M. J., & Blake, C. R. (1995). Fundamental economic variables, expected returns, and bond fund performance. The Journal of Finance, 50(4), 1229-1256.
    Engelhardt, N., Ekkenga, J., & Posch, P. (2021). ESG ratings and stock performance during the COVID-19 crisis. Sustainability, 13(13), 7133.
    Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1993). Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. Journal of Financial Economics, 33(1), 3-56.
    Fama, E. F., & MacBeth, J. D. (1973). Risk, return, and equilibrium: Empirical tests. Journal of Political Economy, 81(3), 607-636.
    Fatemi, A., Glaum, M., & Kaiser, S. (2018). ESG performance and firm value: The moderating role of disclosure. Global Finance Journal, 38, 45-64.
    Friede, G., Busch, T., & Bassen, A. (2015). ESG and financial performance: aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 5(4), 210-233.
    Greenwood, R., & Hanson, S. G. (2013). Issuer quality and corporate bond returns. Review of Financial Studies, 26(6), 1483-1525.
    Halbritter, G., & Dorfleitner, G. (2015). The wages of social responsibility—where are they? A critical review of ESG investing. Review of Financial Economics, 26, 25-35.
    Hovakimian, A., Kayhan, A., & Titman, S. (2009). Credit rating targets. Available at SSRN 1098351.
    Jostova, G., Nikolova, S., Philipov, A., & Stahel, C. W. (2013). Momentum in corporate bond returns. Review of Financial Studies, 26(7), 1649-1693.
    Kaiser, L. (2020). ESG integration: Value, growth and momentum. Journal of Asset Management, 21(1), 32-51.
    Kim, S., & Li, Z. (2021). Understanding the impact of ESG practices in corporate finance. Sustainability, 13(7), 3746.
    Kim, S., Kumar, N., Lee, J., & Oh, J. (2022). ESG lending. In Proceedings of Paris December 2021 Finance Meeting EUROFIDAI-ESSEC.
    Li, H., Zhang, X., & Zhao, Y. (2022). ESG and firm`s default risk. Finance Research Letters, 47, 102713.
    Lin, H., Wang, J., & Wu, C. (2011). Liquidity risk and expected corporate bond returns. Journal of Financial Economics, 99(3), 628-650.
    Lins, K. V., Servaes, H., & Tamayo, A. (2017). Social capital, trust, and firm performance: The value of corporate social responsibility during the financial crisis. Journal of Finance, 72(4), 1785-1824.
    Newey, W. K., & West, K. D. (1986). A simple, positive semi-definite, heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrix.
    Polbennikov, S., Desclée, A., Dynkin, L., & Maitra, A. (2016). ESG ratings and performance of corporate bonds. The Journal of Fixed Income, 26(1), 21-41.
    Preston, L. E., & O`bannon, D. P. (1997). The corporate social-financial performance relationship: A typology and analysis. Business & Society, 36(4), 419-429.
    Sassen, R., Hinze, A. K., & Hardeck, I. (2016). Impact of ESG factors on firm risk in Europe. Journal of Business Economics, 86, 867-904.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    財務管理學系
    110357003
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0110357003
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[財務管理學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML297View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback