English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 110097/141043 (78%)
Visitors : 46420873      Online Users : 1058
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 會計學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/146406
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/146406


    Title: ESG策略形成與執行及成本效益分析—永續經營之個案研究
    ESG Strategy Formulation, Implementation, and Cost-Benefit Analysis— A Case Study on Sustainable Development
    Authors: 古宗鑫
    Ku, Tsung-Hsin
    Contributors: 黃政仁
    Huang, Cheng-Jen
    古宗鑫
    Ku, Tsung-Hsin
    Keywords: ESG
    永續經營
    策略形成
    策略執行
    成本效益分析
    ESG
    Sustainable Development
    Strategy Formulation
    Strategy Implementation
    Cost-Benefit Analysis
    Date: 2023
    Issue Date: 2023-08-02 13:27:20 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究之個案公司因其所屬產業面臨之困境及本世紀蔚為主流之永續浪潮,期望扭轉產業困境並掌握永續經營之契機。本研究希冀透過策略形成、策略執行與成本效益分析,以永續經營之個案為主軸,提出如何應用於ESG。首先基於個案公司之使命、願景及價值觀,透過策略形成系統-SO計分卡,形成個案公司之永續策略;藉策略執行系統-永續平衡計分卡,協助執行永續策略。接著運用作業價值管理,產生ESG資訊,以進行ESG之成本效益分析,並作為企業內部管理與外部溝通之基礎。本研究認為策略形成與執行及成本效益分析於ESG之應用,能幫助企業有效與有效率地進行永續策略之形成、執行、衡量與價值管理,落實企業永續轉型,達成企業之使命、願景與永續經營,提升企業與利害關係人之競爭力與永續力。
    The company featured in this case study aims to address the challenges within its industry and seize the opportunities presented by sustainable development, which has emerged as a prominent trend in the 21st century. This research intends to propose the application of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) perspectives through strategy formulation, strategy implementation, and cost-benefit analysis. Firstly, a sustainable strategy is formulated based on the company`s mission, vision, and values, utilizing the Strategy Formulation System known as the SO Scorecard. Next, the implementation of the sustainable strategy is facilitated by the Strategy Implementation System, employing the Sustainable Balanced Scorecard (SBSC). Furthermore, activity value management is utilized to generate ESG information that conducts cost-benefit analysis on ESG and serves as the foundation for internal management and external communication within the company. This research believes that the application of strategy formulation, strategy implementation, and cost-benefit analysis in ESG can assist companies in effectively and efficiently undertaking the formulation, implementation, measurement, and value management of sustainable strategies. This facilitates the realization of corporate sustainability transformation, aligning with the company`s mission, vision, and sustainable business practices. It enhances the competitiveness and sustainability of the company with its stakeholders.
    Reference: 台灣區表面處理工業同業公會,2019,產業概況,https://tsfa.vip/page.php?sid=8,擷取日期:2023年4月12日。
    吳安妮,2003,以策略為焦點 促效益之提昇 平衡計分卡之精髓、範疇及整合 (上),會計研究月刊,第211期:45-54。
    吳安妮,2007,確立管理方向 設計專屬 ABC 作業基礎成本制之發展與整合. 會計研究月刊,第263期:60-74。
    吳安妮,2017,談以SO計分卡形成「創新策略」,哈佛商業評論數位版,https://www.hbrtaiwan.com/article/16960/use-scorecard-to-make-a-new-innovative-strategy,擷取日期:2023年5月4日。
    吳安妮,2021,企業策略的終極答案:用「作業價值管理AVM」破除成本迷思,掌握正確因果資訊,做對決策賺到「管理財」,台北:臉譜出版。
    吳安妮,2022,作業價值管理(AVM)之跨域結合:產學研之整合,人文與社會科學簡訊,第二十三卷,第3期:37-47。
    經濟部統計處,2022,109年工廠校正及營運調查報告,經濟部統計處。
    Alsyouf, I. 2006. Measuring maintenance performance using a balanced scorecard approach. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering 12 (2):133-149.
    Amel-Zadeh, A., and G. Serafeim. 2018. Why and how investors use ESG information: Evidence from a global survey. Financial Analysts Journal 74 (3):87-103.
    Asiaei, K., and N. Bontis. 2019. Using a balanced scorecard to manage corporate social responsibility. Knowledge and Process Management 26 (4):371-379.
    Bieker, T., and B. Waxenberger. 2002. Sustainability balanced scorecard and business ethics-developing a balanced scorecard for integrity management. In Proceedings of 10th International Conference of the Greening of Industry Network. Göteborg.
    Brown, T. S., and L. Norberg. 2001. Building Executive alignment, buy-in, and focus with the Balanced Scorecard SWOT. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Publishing.
    Butler, J. B., S. C. Henderson, and C. Raiborn. 2011. Sustainability and the balanced scorecard: Integrating green measures into business reporting. Management Accounting Quarterly 12 (2):1-10.
    Chalmeta, R., and S. Palomero. 2011. Methodological proposal for business sustainability management by means of the Balanced Scorecard. Journal of the Operational Research Society 62 (7):1344-1356.
    Chandra, D., and D. Kumar. 2021. Evaluating the effect of key performance indicators of vaccine supply chain on sustainable development of mission indradhanush: A structural equation modeling approach. Omega 101:102258.
    Claver‐Cortés, E., M. D. López‐Gamero, J. F. Molina‐Azorín, and P. D. C. Zaragoza‐Sáez. 2007. Intellectual and environmental capital. Journal of Intellectual Capital 8 (1):171-182.
    Cox, J. 2021. The higher education environment driving academic library strategy: A political, economic, social and technological (PEST) analysis. The Journal of Academic Librarianship 47 (1):102219.
    Cuc, S. 2009. Balanced scorecard and the management instrument’s complementarity. The USV Annals of Economics and Public Administration 9 (2):119-124.
    Deng, D., S. Wen, F.-H. Chen, and S.-L. Lin. 2018. A hybrid multiple criteria decision making model of sustainability performance evaluation for Taiwanese Certified Public Accountant firms. Journal of Cleaner Production 180:603-616.
    Dias-Sardinha, I., L. Reijnders, and P. Antunes. 2002. From environmental performance evaluation to eco-efficiency and sustainability balanced scorecards. Environmental Quality Management 12 (2):51-51.
    Dias‐Sardinha, I., L. Reijnders, and P. Antunes. 2007. Developing sustainability balanced scorecards for environmental services: A study of three large Portuguese companies. Environmental Quality Management 16 (4):13-34.
    Epstein, M. J., and M.-J. Roy. 2004. How does your board rate? Strategic Finance 85 (8):24-31.
    Epstein, M. J., and P. S. Wisner. 2001. Using a balanced scorecard to implement sustainability. Environmental Quality Management 11 (2):1-10.
    Fahey, L., and V. K. Narayanan. 1986. Macroenvironmental analysis for strategic management. Saint Paul, MN: Cengage Learning.
    Figge, F., T. Hahn, S. Schaltegger, and M. Wagner. 2002. The sustainability balanced scorecard–linking sustainability management to business strategy. Business Strategy and the Environment 11 (5):269-284.
    Fülöp, G., B. Hernadi, M. Jalali, I. Meidute-Kavaliauskiene, and F. Ferreira. 2014. Developing of sustainability balanced scorecard for the chemical industry: preliminary evidence from a case analysis. Engineering Economics (3):341-349.
    Gibaly, M., and A. A. A. Diab. 2012. A model to integrate of the ABC and the BSC in the Egyptian companies: aligning strategic efficiency and performance improvement (field study). Journal of American Science 8 (6):543-554.
    Glaister, K. W., and J. R. Falshaw. 1999. Strategic planning: still going strong? Long Range Planning 32 (1):107-116.
    Gminder, C. U., and T. Bieker. 2002. Managing corporate social responsibility by using the ‘sustainability-balanced scorecard’. In Proceedings of 10th International Conference of the Greening of Industry Network. Göteborg.
    Haghighi, S. M., S. Torabi, and R. Ghasemi. 2016. An integrated approach for performance evaluation in sustainable supply chain networks (with a case study). Journal of Cleaner Production 137:579-597.
    Halaychik, C. 2016. Lessons in library leadership: a primer for library managers and unit leaders. Oxford: Chandos Publishing.
    Hansen, E. G., and S. Schaltegger. 2016. The sustainability balanced scorecard: A systematic review of architectures. Journal of Business Ethics 133 (2):193-221.
    Hansen, E. G., M. Sextl, and R. Reichwald. 2010. Managing strategic alliances through a community‐enabled balanced scorecard: The case of Merck Ltd, Thailand. Business Strategy and the Environment 19 (6):387-399.
    Hsu, C.-W., A. H. Hu, C.-Y. Chiou, and T.-C. Chen. 2011. Using the FDM and ANP to construct a sustainability balanced scorecard for the semiconductor industry. Expert Systems with Applications 38 (10):12891-12899.
    Hubbard, G. 2009. Measuring organizational performance: beyond the triple bottom line. Business Strategy and the Environment 18 (3):177-191.
    IFAC. 2005. Environmental management accounting–International guidance document. New York, NY: International Federation of Accountants.
    Joseph, G. 2008. A rationale for stakeholder‐based management in developing nations. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change 4 (2):136-161.
    Journeault, M. 2016. The Integrated Scorecard in support of corporate sustainability strategies. Journal of Environmental Management 182:214-229.
    Junior, A. N., M. C. de Oliveira, and A. L. Helleno. 2018. Sustainability evaluation model for manufacturing systems based on the correlation between triple bottom line dimensions and balanced scorecard perspectives. Journal of Cleaner Production 190:84-93.
    Kaplan, R., and D. McMillan. 2021. Reimagining the balanced scorecard for the ESG era: Harvard Business Review, Available at: https://hbr.org/2021/2002/reimagining-the-balanced-scorecard-for-the-esg-era. Accessed: June 2028, 2023.
    Kaplan, R. S., and S. R. Anderson. 2004. Time-driven activity-based costing. Harvard Business Review 82 (11):131-138,150.
    Kaplan, R. S., and R. Cooper. 1998. Cost & effect: using integrated cost systems to drive profitability and performance. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Review Press.
    Kaplan, R. S., and D. P. Norton. 1992. The balanced scorecard: measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review 70 (1):71-79.
    Kaplan, R. S., and D. P. Norton. 1996a. The balanced scorecard: translating strategy into action. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Review Press.
    Kaplan, R. S., and D. P. Norton. 1996b. Linking the balanced scorecard to strategy. California Management Review 39 (1):53-79.
    Kaplan, R. S., and D. P. Norton. 1996c. Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system. Harvard Business Review 74 (1):75-85.
    Kaplan, R. S., and D. P. Norton. 2000. Having trouble with your strategy? Then map it. Harvard Business Review 78 (5):167-176.
    Kaplan, R. S., and K. Ramanna. 2021. Accounting for climate change. Harvard Business Review 99 (6):120-131.
    Kurien, G., and M. Qureshi. 2012. Performance measurement systems for green supply chains using modified balanced score card and analytical hierarchical process. Scientific Research and Essays 7 (36):3149-3161.
    Liberatore, M. J., and T. Miller. 1998. A Framework for Integrating Activity-Based Costing and the Balanced Scorecard into the Logistics Strategy Development and Monitori. Journal of 13 Business Logistics 19 (2):131-154.
    Lu, M.-T., C.-C. Hsu, J. J. Liou, and H.-W. Lo. 2018. A hybrid MCDM and sustainability-balanced scorecard model to establish sustainable performance evaluation for international airports. Journal of Air Transport Management 71:9-19.
    Maiga, A. S., and F. A. Jacobs. 2003. Balanced scorecard, activity-based costing and company performance: an empirical analysis. Journal of Managerial Issues 15 (3):283-301.
    Maltz, A. C., A. J. Shenhar, and R. R. Reilly. 2003. Beyond the balanced scorecard:: Refining the search for organizational success measures. Long Range Planning 36 (2):187-204.
    Mendes, P., A. C. Santos, F. Perna, and M. R. Teixeira. 2012. The balanced scorecard as an integrated model applied to the Portuguese public service: a case study in the waste sector. Journal of Cleaner Production 24:20-29.
    Möller, A., and S. Schaltegger. 2005. The sustainability balanced scorecard as a framework for eco‐efficiency analysis. Journal of Industrial Ecology 9 (4):73-83.
    Morsing, M., and D. Oswald. 2009. Sustainable leadership: management control systems and organizational culture in Novo Nordisk A/S. Corporate Governance: International Journal of Business in Society 9 (1):83-99.
    Nikolaou, I. E., and T. A. Tsalis. 2013. Development of a sustainable balanced scorecard framework. Ecological Indicators 34:76-86.
    Nouri, F. A., M. S. Nikabadi, and L. Olfat. 2018. Developing the framework of sustainable service supply chain balanced scorecard (SSSC BSC). International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management 68 (1):148-170.
    OECD. 2015. G20/OECD principles of corporate governance. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
    Panayiotou, N. A., K. G. Aravossis, and P. Moschou. 2009. A new methodology approach for measuring corporate social responsibility performance. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution: Focus 9 (1):129-138.
    Pember, A., and M. Lemon. 2012. Measuring and managing environmental sustainability: Using activity-based costing/management (ABC/M). Austin, TX: The Consortium for Advanced Management–International.
    Pörtner, H.-O., D. C. Roberts, H. Adams, C. Adler, P. Aldunce, E. Ali, R. A. Begum, R. Betts, R. B. Kerr, and R. Biesbroek. 2022. Climate change 2022: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Geneva: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
    Reefke, H., and M. Trocchi. 2013. Balanced scorecard for sustainable supply chains: design and development guidelines. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management 62 (8):805-826.
    Scavone, G. M. 2006. Challenges in internal environmental management reporting in Argentina. Journal of Cleaner Production 14 (14):1276-1285.
    Schaltegger, S. 2011. Sustainability as a driver for corporate economic success: Consequences for the development of sustainability management control. Society and Economy 33 (1):15-28.
    Schaltegger, S., and M. Wagner. 2006a. Integrative management of sustainability performance, measurement and reporting. International Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Performance Evaluation 3 (1):1-19.
    Schaltegger, S., and M. Wagner. 2006b. Managing sustainability performance measurement and reporting in an integrated manner. Sustainability accounting as the link between the sustainability balanced scorecard and sustainability reporting. In Sustainability Accounting and Reporting. Dordrecht: Springer, 681-697.
    Schneider, R., and R. Vieira. 2010. Insights from action research: implementing the balanced scorecard at a wind‐farm company. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management 59 (5):493-507.
    Sidiropoulos, M., Y. Mouzakitis, E. Adamides, and S. Goutsos. 2004. Applying sustainable indicators to corporate strategy: the eco-balanced scorecard. Environmental Research, Engineering and Management 1 (27):28-33.
    Staubus, G. J. 1971. Activity costing and input-output accounting. Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin.
    Tawse, A., and P. Tabesh. 2023. Thirty years with the balanced scorecard: What we have learned. Business Horizons 66 (1):123-132.
    Tsai, F. M., T.-D. Bui, M.-L. Tseng, K.-J. Wu, and A. S. Chiu. 2020. A performance assessment approach for integrated solid waste management using a sustainable balanced scorecard approach. Journal of Cleaner Production 251:119740.
    Tsai, W.-H., T. W. Lin, and W.-C. Chou. 2010. Integrating activity-based costing and environmental cost accounting systems: a case study. International Journal of Business and Systems Research 4 (2):186-208.
    Tsamenyi, M., J. Onumah, and E. Tetteh-Kumah. 2010. Post-privatization performance and organizational changes: Case studies from Ghana. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 21 (5):428-442.
    Tseng, M.-L., L. W. Lan, R. Wang, A. Chiu, and H.-P. Cheng. 2011. Using hybrid method to evaluate the green performance in uncertainty. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 175 (1):367-385.
    Tseng, M., M. Lim, and W. P. Wong. 2015. Sustainable supply chain management: A closed-loop network hierarchical approach. Industrial Management & Data Systems 115 (3):436-461.
    Tung, A., K. Baird, and H. P. Schoch. 2011. Factors influencing the effectiveness of performance measurement systems. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 31 (12):1287-1310.
    UN Global Compact. 2004. Who cares wins: Connecting financial markets to a changing world. New York, NY: UN Global Compact.
    UNDSD. 2001. Environmental management accounting: procedures and principles. New York, NY: United Nations Division for Sustainable Development.
    Venkatramanan, A. 2006. Developing a strategic cost management model: combininig the balanced scorecard and activity-based costing in the context of diabetes education, University of Lethbridge.
    Vieira, R., B. O’Dwyer, and R. Schneider. 2017. Aligning strategy and performance management systems: The case of the wind-farm industry. Organization & Environment 30 (1):3-26.
    Walsh, P. R. 2005. Dealing with the uncertainties of environmental change by adding scenario planning to the strategy reformulation equation. Management Decision 43 (1):113-122.
    Weihrich, H. 1982. The TOWS matrix—A tool for situational analysis. Long Range Planning 15 (2):54-66.
    White, A. L., and D. E. Savage. 1995. Budgeting for environmental projects: a survey. Strategic Finance 77 (4):48.
    Wynder, M., K.-U. Wellner, and K. Reinhard. 2013. Rhetoric or reality? Do accounting education and experience increase weighting on environmental performance in a balanced scorecard? Accounting Education 22 (4):366-381.
    Yang, C.-H., and K.-C. Lee. 2020. Developing a strategy map for forensic accounting with fraud risk management: An integrated balanced scorecard-based decision model. Evaluation and Program Planning 80:101780.
    Yanine, F., F. M. Cordova, and C. Duran. 2020. The Impact of Dynamic Balanced Scorecard in Knowledge-Intensive Organizations’Business Process Management: A New Approach Evidenced by Small and Medium-Size Enterprises in Latin America. Journal of Information Technology Management 12 (2):131-152.
    Yin, R. K. 2009. Case study research: Design and methods. Vol. 5. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
    Zhao, H., and N. Li. 2015. Evaluating the performance of thermal power enterprises using sustainability balanced scorecard, fuzzy Delphic and hybrid multi-criteria decision making approaches for sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production 108:569-582.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    會計學系
    110353042
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0110353042
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[會計學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    304201.pdf4309KbAdobe PDF286View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback