English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 109952/140887 (78%)
Visitors : 46378656      Online Users : 767
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 會計學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/146829
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/146829


    Title: 數位經濟課稅對企業影響之研究
    The Impact of Taxation of the Digitalized Economy on Enterprises
    Authors: 朱芷萱
    Chu, Chih-Hsuan
    Contributors: 陳明進
    Chen, Ming-Chin
    朱芷萱
    Chu, Chih-Hsuan
    Keywords: 數位經濟課稅
    支柱一
    過渡性措施
    國際稅法
    Digital Economy Taxation
    Pillar One
    Interim measures
    International Tax Law
    Date: 2023
    Issue Date: 2023-09-01 14:41:08 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 在國際貿易、數位經濟的盛行之下,企業往往運用稅制差異與資訊不對稱進行避稅(Tax Avoidance),進而造成稅基流失,使跨國企業「全球利潤分配」與「反避稅」成為關注議題。2015年OECD頒布BEPS(Base Erosion and Profit Shifting)行動計畫1(Action 1),並提出四種過渡性措施(Interim measures)作為暫時性因應辦法,各國遂陸續採用其建議。然而,前開措施引起許多爭議,故OECD於2019年提出雙支柱(Two-Pillar)概念,確立一致性課稅方法(unified approach),稱為支柱一(Pillar One)。本研究先介紹過渡性措施與支柱一,說明稅制的運作與內容,再以大型跨國數位企業為個案,探討前開稅制對企業的影響。最後,回歸到台灣企業,以台積電為個案,探討支柱一對公司的影響。本研究指出過渡性措施對企業之收入、成本、有效稅率均產生影響,且企業傾向以稅負轉嫁消弭增額成本;而在支柱一下,企業之有效稅率仍受影響,但企業可由稅額扣抵(Tax Credit)、實質營運之方式,降低無效率之稅負。
    With the prevalence of international trade and the digital economy, multinational companies can engage in tax avoidance by using the discrepancies in tax and information asymmetry, resulting in base erosion. As the result , making multinational enterprises’s "global profit allocation" and "anti-tax avoidance" become highly concerned.
    In 2015, the OECD released BEPS (Base Erosion and Profit Shifting) Action 1, which has mentioned four interim measures as temporary solutions for taxation in digital economy. Several countries subsequently began adopting OECD`s recommendations. However, these measures have sparked considerable controversy. Therefore, in 2019, the OECD proposed the concept of "Two-Pillar" and established Pillar One as a unified approach for the digital economy.
    This thesis introduces the content of interim measures and Pillar One first, and then discuss the impact of the interim measures and Pillar One on businesses by using multinational digital enterprises as cases. Finally, returning to local enterprises, taking TSMC as a case to discuss the effects of Pillar One on the company. The thesis indicates that under the interim measures, the revenue, costs, and effective tax rate of companies are affected, by using tax shifting. Under Pillar One, the effective tax rate of companies is impacted, however, the thesis suggested that companies can reduce inefficient tax through tax credit or substantial operation.
    Reference: 一、中文文獻
    (期刊)
    包文凱與王瑀璇,2021,經濟數位化之國際所得稅制度發展簡析,財稅研究,第50卷,第5期:116–141。
    江雅綺、陳俞廷,2022,跨境數位稅制的發展與挑戰,華岡法粹,第72期:95–142。
    何曉燕,2020,Netflix的全球戰略與「中劇」登陸Netflix的理性思考,編輯之友,第8期:102–108。
    吳俊志,2020,對於跨境電商課稅機制的國內外變革-以臺灣跨境電商落地及 歐洲數位稅為中心,全國律師,第24卷,第1期:7–17。
    汪瑞芝,2013,中國反資本弱化條款對臺商融資決策之影響,會計審計論叢,第3卷,第2期:81–125。
    周潔如、范慕晗,2015,Netflix公司商業模式創新研究–基於價值創造的邏輯,上海管理科學,第37卷,第6期:28–31。
    周霈翎,2020,臺版數位稅先行2020年全面落實-專訪財政部賦稅署署長 李慶華,會計研究月刊,第414期:69–73。
    周霈翎,2020,擋不住的數位稅,會計研究月刊,第414期:64–68。
    林鴻志,2010,積體電路技術,科學發展,第451期:12–19。
    邱冬梅,2019,從谷歌集團稅務風波看後BEPS時代國際稅收政策與環境之變遷,國際經濟法學刊,第2期:119–144。
    柯格鐘,2017,國際租稅之原理原則與實際計算,月旦法學雜誌,第268期:110–134。
    徐丞毅,2022,數位經濟稅中支柱一的國際發展趨勢簡介,財稅法令半月刊,第9期:48–56。
    梁建道,2019,數位經濟對國際稅法之衝擊與常設機構之最新發展趨勢(上),財稅法令半月刊,第42卷,第9期:20–39。
    梁建道,2019,數位經濟對國際稅法之衝擊與常設機構之最新發展趨勢(下),財稅法令半月刊,第42卷,第11期:36–59。
    郭婉君、曾子耘與吳朝欽,2017,稅制改革對企業實體投資與研發投資之影響,財稅研究,第46卷,第2期:52–79。
    陳衍任,2019,國際稅法在「數位經濟」面臨的衝擊與挑戰:評「BEPS第1號行動方案」對我國跨境電商課稅制度的影響,臺大法學論叢,第48卷,第1期:263–327。
    陳清秀,2022,國際稅法上數位經濟之課稅問題探討–以OECD「數位經濟之課稅挑戰」之研究報告為中心,高大法學論叢,第18卷,第1期:53–128。
    黃小曉,2019,Netflix對我國流媒體的借鑑意義探討,新媒體研究,第7期:80–81。
    黃志平,2009,Google 的商業模式研究:基於第三方付費營銷戰略,生產力研究,第23期:182–200。
    劉一家,2018,美國在線影視業務發展模式探析–以Netflix公司為例,第4期:87–88。
    (學位論文)
    王金鳳,2019,數位經濟課稅問題之研究,東吳大學法學院法律學系碩士在職專班涉外商務談判法律組碩士論文。
    吳昌錦,2018,移轉訂價法規對跨國企業內部借款的影響,國立政治大學社會科學院財政學系碩士論文。
    林上軒,2019,跨境電子商務營利事業所得稅之研究–以BEPS第一號行動計畫為中心,國立臺灣大學法律學院法律研究所碩士論文。
    柯天路,2020,經濟數位化下的國際課稅趨勢:以價值創造原則為核心,國立臺灣大學法律學院科際整合法律學研究所論文。
    張壯為,2022,台積電自由現金流量及償債能力分析,國立中山大學財務管理學系碩士論文。
    張恩慈,2019,BEPS行動計畫前後的有效稅率比較,國立臺灣大學管理學院會計學研究所碩士論文。
    謝孟純,2022,全球最低稅負制之研究–我國稅制因應之探討,國立政治大學商學院會計學系碩士論文。


    (報告)
    台灣積體電路製造股份有限公司,2020-2022,民國109-111年度年報。
    安永台灣,2022,安永稅務剖析- G20財長會議 重申實行雙支柱方案之決心 並提供其他國際稅務更新動向。
    安永台灣,2022,安永稅務剖析- OECD 兩大支柱方案及其他稅務最新動向。
    安永台灣,2022,安永稅務剖析- OECD發布支柱一規範範本草稿。
    資誠台灣,2022,國際租稅要聞第240期: OECD針對第一支柱立法範本草案中稅基確定徵詢公開意見。
    資誠台灣,2022,國際租稅要聞第242期: OECD發布全球利潤分配稅制(Pillar One)細節法規架構(Model Rules)草案的意見徵求稿。
    (網路資料)
    MoneyDT理財網,2021,法國財經部長:在OECD稅改方案2023年生效實施前,將持續徵收國內數位服務稅。取自:https://www.moneydj.com/kmdj/news/newsviewer.aspx?a=7970febc-9446-4b2c-b63e-26dcb8091033,最後瀏覽日期:2023年4月9日。
    SEMI,2022,半導體是什麼?晶片產業一次看懂。取自:https://www.semi.org/zh/technology-trends/what-is-a-semiconductor,最後瀏覽日期:2023年4月15日。
    TRADING ECONOMICS,企業所得稅稅率–國家列表–G20。取自:https://zh.tradingeconomics.com/country-list/corporate-tax-rate?continent=g20,最後瀏覽日期:2023年6月10日。
    中央社,2021,避免兩大稅改搶? 會計師籲修法或加入多邊租稅架構。取自:https://tw.news.yahoo.com/news/%E9%81%BF%E5%85%8D%E5%85%A9%E5%A4%A7%E7%A8%85%E6%94%B9%E6%90%B6-%E6%9C%83%E8%A8%88%E5%B8%AB%E7%B1%B2%E4%BF%AE%E6%B3%95%E6%88%96%E5%8A%A0%E5%85%A5%E5%A4%9A%E9%82%8A%E7%A7%9F%E7%A8%85%E6%9E%B6%E6%A7%8B-125107959.html,最後瀏覽日期:2022年9月19日。
    台灣積體電路製造股份有限公司,2020第四季法人說明會,取自:https://investor.tsmc.com/chinese/encrypt/files/encrypt_file/reports/2021-01/4Q20Presentation%28C%29.pdf,最後瀏覽日期:2023年4月27日。
    台灣積體電路製造股份有限公司,2021第四季法人說明會,取自:https://investor.tsmc.com/chinese/encrypt/files/encrypt_file/reports/2022-01/2f56c4fb8adb17d3027f1b9115583f6e0337ced5/4Q21Presentation%28C%29.pdf,最後瀏覽日期:2023年4月27日。
    台灣積體電路製造股份有限公司,2022Q4營運績效報告,取自:https://investor.tsmc.com/chinese/encrypt/files/encrypt_file/reports/2023-01/91107cbb4214c395a1a26e73edb31f5c1813c599/4Q22ManagementReport.pdf,最後瀏覽日期:2023年4月27日。
    台灣積體電路製造股份有限公司,2022第四季法人說明會,取自:https://investor.tsmc.com/chinese/encrypt/files/encrypt_file/reports/2023-01/07a3818c2b38939c1ee003d66e3d5756c2d5e354/4Q22Presentation%28C%29.pdf,最後瀏覽日期:2023年4月27日。
    安永台灣,2022,美國總統拜登公布2023年度預算案 預計提高企業和富人所得稅率。取自:https://www.ey.com/zh_tw/taiwan-tax-alerts/itts-tax-alert-20220330,最後瀏覽日期:2023年5月17日。
    產業價值鏈資訊平台,半導體產業鏈簡介。取自:https://ic.tpex.org.tw/introduce.php?ic=D000,最後瀏覽日期:2023年4月15日。
    經濟日報,2023,日本4月實施稅改 資誠解析三大重點。取自:https://money.udn.com/money/story/5621/6988478,最後瀏覽日期:2023年5月25日。
    IFA x Deloitte,2022,數位浪潮暨國際租稅發展研討會。取自:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n0cTt0Lb6Tg&ab_channel=DeloitteTaiwan,最後瀏覽日期:2023年6月4日。
    二、英文文獻
    (專書)
    Auerbach, A. J. 2002. Chapter 19 - Taxation and Corporate Financial Policy. Handbook of Public Economics3. North-Holland.
    Bowman, J. P. 1996. The digital economy: promise and peril in the age of networked intelligence. Academy of Management Perspectives.
    Porter, M. E. 1985. Competitive advantage of nations: creating and sustaining superior performance. Simon and Schuster.
    (期刊)
    Cummins, J. G., K. A. Hassett, and R. G. Hubbard. 1996. Tax reforms and investment: A cross-country comparison. Journal of Public Economics 62: 237–273.
    Dyreng, S., M. Hanlon, E. Maydew, and J. Thornock. 2017. Changes in Corporate Effective Tax Rates Over the Past 25 years. Journal of Financial Economics, forthcoming. Journal of Financial Economics 124(3): 441–463.
    Hall, R. E., and D. W. Jorgenson. 1967. Tax policy and investment behavior. The American Economic Review 57(3): 391-414.
    Harpaz, A. 2021. Taxation of the Digital Economy:Adapting a Twentieth-Century Tax System to aTwenty-First-Century Economy.Yale Journal of International Law 46: 57–101.
    Kavelaars, P. 2013. EU and OECD: Fighting against Tax Avoidance. Intertax 41(10): 507–515.
    Klein, D., C. A. Ludwig, and C. Spengel. 2022. Taxing the Digital Economy: Investor Reaction to the European Commission’s Digital Tax Proposals. National Tax Journal 75: 61– 92.
    MacKie-Mason, J. K. 1990. Do Taxes Affect Corporate Financing Decisions? The Journal of Finance 45(5): 1471–1493.
    Olbert, M., C. Spengel. 2017. International Taxation in the Digital Economy :Challenge Accepted? World Tax Journal 9(February): 3–46.
    Riedel, N. 2018. Quantifying International Tax Avoidance: A Review of the Academic Literature. Review of Economics 69(2): 169–181.
    Summers, L. H. 1981. Taxation and Corporate Investment: A q-Theory Approach. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 1981(1): 67–140.
    Swenson, D. L. 2001. Tax reforms and evidence of transfer pricing. National Tax Journal 54(1): 7–25.
    Kofler, G., Sinnig, J. 2019. Equalization taxes and the EU’s ‘digital services tax’. Intertax 47(2) : 176–200.
    Stabell, C. B., and Fjeldstad, D. 1998. Configuring value for competitive advantage: on chains, shops, and networks. Strategic Management journal, 19(5), 413–437.

    (Working Paper)
    Avi-Yonah, R., Y. R. Kim, and K. Sam. 2022. A New Framework for Digital Taxation. Working paper, University of Michigan Law School.
    Beer, S., R. d. Mooij, and L. Liu. 2018. International Corporate Tax Avoidance: A Review of the Channels, Magnitudes, and Blind Spots. Working paper, International Money Fund.
    Bukht, R., & Heeks, R. 2017. Defining, conceptualising and measuring the digital economy. Development Informatics working paper, University of Manchester.
    Adams, T .S. 1929. International and Interstate Aspects of Double Taxation. National Tax Association 22: 192–199.
    Avi-Yonah, R. S. 1997. International Taxation of Electronic Commerce. N.Y.U. Tax Law Review 52: 507–556.
    (報告)
    Amazon . 2015-2022. FORM 10-K.
    Apple . 2015-2022. FORM 10-K.
    Bruins, S. Einaudi, E. R. Seligman, and J. C. Stamp. 1923. Report on Double Taxation.
    European Commission. 2013. Expert Group On Taxation Of The Digital Economy Rules Of Procedure.
    European Commission. 2018. Proposal for a Council Directive laying down rules relating to the corporate taxation of a significant digital presence and Proposal for a Council Directive on the common system of a digital services tax on revenues resulting from the provision of certain digital services.
    Fair Tax Mark. 2019. The Silicon Six and their $100 billion global tax gap.
    General Motors. 2015-2022. FORM 10-K.
    Google . 2015-2022. FORM 10-K.
    KPMG.US. 2023. Taxation of the Digitalized Economy: Developments Summary.
    Netflix. 2015-2022. FORM 10-K.
    OECD. 2012. The Digital Economy.
    OECD. 2014. Addressing the Tax Challenges of the Digital Economy.
    OECD. 2015. Addressing the Tax Challenges of the Digital Economy:Action 1,Final Report.
    OECD. 2018. Tax Challenges Arising from Digitalisation – Interim Report 2018.
    OECD. 2020. Tax Challenges Arising from Digitalisation – Report on Pillar One Blueprint.
    OECD. 2021. Statement on a Two-Pillar Solution to Address the Tax Challenges Arising from the Digitalisation of the Economy.
    OECD. 2022. Pillar One – Amount A: Draft Model Rules for Domestic Legislation on Scope.
    OECD. 2022. Pillar One – Amount A: Draft Model Rules for Nexus and Revenue Sourcing.
    OECD. 2022. Pillar One – Amount A: Draft Model Rules for Tax Base Determinations.
    OECD. 2022. Progress Report On Amount A Of Pillar One.
    Pellefigue, J. 2019. The French Digital Service Tax An Economic Impact Assessment.
    United states trade representative . 2019. Section 301 Investigation Report on France’s Digital Services Tax.
    (碩士論文)
    Margherio, L. et al., 1999. The Emerging Digital Economy, Department of Commerce, Washington, D.C.
    Thorne, D. 2013. The Double Irish and Dutch Sandwich tax strategies: Could a general anti-avoidance rule counteract the problems caused by the utilisation of these structures? Master thesis, Victoria University of Wellington.
    (法令規章)
    European Commission. Proposal for a COUNCIL DIRECTIVE on the common system of a digital services tax on revenues resulting from the provision of certain digital services. Available online at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=COM%3A2018%3A148%3AFIN. Accessed: March 6 , 2023.
    GOV.UK. Policy paper Digital Services Tax. Available online at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/introduction-of-the-digital-services-tax/digital-services-tax. Accessed: February 15 , 2023.
    Income Tax Department Government of India. Equalisation Levy. Available online at: https://incometaxindia.gov.in/pages/acts/equalisation-levy.aspx. Accessed: March 8 , 2023.
    Income Tax Department Government of India. Indian Income-Tax Act, 1922. Available online at: https://incometaxindia.gov.in/pages/acts/income-tax-act-1922.aspx. Accessed: March 8 , 2023.
    Legislation.gov.uk. Finance Act 2020 Part 2. Available online at: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2020/14/part/2/enacted. Accessed: February 15 , 2023.
    (網路)
    Apple. Upcoming tax and price changes for apps and in-app purchases. Available online at: https://developer.apple.com/news/?id=oyy56t2r. Accessed: March 18 , 2023.
    Bloomberg. Google 2.4% Rate Shows How $60 Billion Is Lost to Tax Loopholes. Available online at:https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2010-10-21/google-2-4-rate-shows-how-60-billion-u-s-revenue-lost-to-tax-loopholes?leadSource=uverify%20wall. Accessed: September 18 , 2022.
    EDGAR. Alphabet Inc. Available online at: https://www.sec.gov/edgar/browse/?CIK=1652044. Accessed: March 5 , 2023.
    EDGAR. AMAZON COM INC. Available online at: https://www.sec.gov/edgar/browse/?CIK=1018724. Accessed: March 6 , 2023.
    EDGAR. Apple Inc. Available online at: https://www.sec.gov/edgar/browse/?CIK=320193&owner=exclude. Accessed: March 3 , 2023.
    EDGAR. General Motors Co. Available online at: https://www.sec.gov/edgar/browse/?CIK=1467858&owner=exclude. Accessed: March 14 , 2023.
    EDGAR. NETFLIX INC. Available online at: https://www.sec.gov/edgar/browse/?CIK=1065280. Accessed: March 9 , 2023.
    International Monetary Fund (IMF). GDP, current prices. Available online at: https://www.imf.org/external/datamapper/NGDPD@WEO/OEMDC/ADVEC/WEOWORLD. Accessed: April 30, 2023.
    NIKKEI Asia. Asia becomes Google`s fastest-growing market amid overall slowdown. Available online at: https://asia.nikkei.com/Business/Companies/Asia-becomes-Google-s-fastest-growing-market-amid-overall-slowdown. Accessed: May 20 , 2023.
    Pwc. Digital Services Tax. Available online at: https://pwc.to/2Wdn3P8. Accessed: February 12 , 2023.
    Tax Foundation. A Summary of Criticisms of the EU Digital Tax. Available online at: https://taxfoundation.org/eu-digital-tax-criticisms/. Accessed: October 3 , 2022.
    TechTarget. Digital Economy. Available online at: http://searchcio.techtarget.com/definition/digital-economy. Accessed: February 4, 2023.
    The Verge. Apple, Google, and Amazon respond to European tech taxes by passing on costs. Available online at: https://www.theverge.com/2020/9/2/21418114/european-uk-digital-tax-services-apple-google-amazon-raise-prices. Accessed: March 20 , 2023.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    會計學系
    110353103
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0110353103
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[會計學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    310301.pdf5705KbAdobe PDF20View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback