Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/148522
|
| Title: | 探究創新生態系統形成之策略利基管理： 以台灣居家能源管理發展為例
Exploring Strategic Niche Management of Innovation Ecosystem Formation: A Case Study of Home Energy Management System in Taiwan |
| Authors: | 陳思如
Chen, Szu-Ju |
| Contributors: | 柯玉佳
Ko, Yu-Chia
陳思如
Chen, Szu-Ju |
| Keywords: | 居家能源管理系統
創新生態系統
策略利基管理
Home energy management system
Innovation ecosystem
Strategic niche management |
| Date: | 2023 |
| Issue Date: | 2023-12-01 11:55:45 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 因應全球能源危機，各國開始發展再生能源、追求淨零碳排，我國政府亦制定了2050年達成全面淨零碳排的政策目標，針對基礎建設、再生能源補助全面制定與檢討。然而，對於一般民眾而言，相較於淨零碳排亦或是再生能源，民眾對於缺電感受更深刻。許多國家針對於低壓用戶的用電需求面管理，已有完整的解決方案給終端用戶，然而國內相關產業仍相對進展緩慢，如何克服外部困難，與異業結合，創造新價值主張，給予終端用戶新的能源管理方案，成為該領域業者待解決的議題。
本研究使用個案研究法，並透過研究者於該產業的實務經驗與業界人士的多次訪談及網路上的次級資料，以個案公司所承攬的研究案與推廣活動為核心，分析居家能源管理生態系統各階段內各要素。過去探討創新生態系統文獻時多以生態系統內部行動者之間的協作為主，並考慮研究個案產業於國內為新興產業，探討產業背景的文獻極少，為了彌足缺口，本研究以創新生態系統文獻中的階段切入，並引入了利基策略管理理論以補全外部環境。研究者於綜合以上資料分析整理，本研究得出的主要結論如下：
結論一、目前居家能源管理生態系統具有誕生困難，以個案公司技術為核心的利基有受到保護但不足夠。
結論二、我國居家能源管理系統中的利基間彼此學習、建構網路，隨著階段推展，期望趨於一致。
結論三、我國能源管理業者在建構創新生態系統的過程中，系統成員逐漸增多，系統中的成員擔任複數角色，關係以合作為主，缺少競爭關係。
另於本研究最後闡述本研究的學術貢獻、及針對個案公司、台電與政府給予實務建議並給予後續研究者研究建議。
In response to the global energy crisis, countries have begun to develop renewable energy and pursue net-zero carbon emissions, and our government has also set a policy goal of achieving net-zero carbon emissions by 2050, with comprehensive development and review of infrastructure and renewable energy subsidies. However, to the general public, the problem of electricity shortage is more deeply felt than net-zero carbon emissions or renewable energy. Many countries have already developed complete solutions for end-users to manage the demand side of low-voltage consumers, but the domestic industry is still making relatively slow progress. How to overcome the external difficulties, combine with other industries, create new value propositions, and provide end-users with new energy management solutions has become a problem to be solved by the industry in this field.
This study uses the case study approach and analyzes each element in the various stages of the home energy management innovation ecosystem through the researcher's practical experience in the industry, interviews with industry actors, and secondary data on the Internet, with a focus on social experiments contracted by the case company and the campaign for promoting the company’s service. In the past, literature on Innovation Ecosystems was mostly focused on the collaboration between actors within the ecosystem. Considering that the home energy management system is an emerging industry domestically, there is very little literature discussing the industrial background. In order to fill these gaps, this study starts with the stages of the Innovation Ecosystem and introduces the perspective of Strategic Niche Management to complement the externalities. After analyzing the above data, the main conclusions of this study are as follows:
Conclusion 1: The current home energy management ecosystem is difficult to birth, and the niche centered on the technology of the case company is protected but not enough.
Conclusion 2: The niches in domestic home energy management ecosystem are learning from each other and building networks, and with the progress of the stage, the expectations are becoming more consistent.
Conclusion 3: In the process of creating new ecosystems, the number of system members is gradually increasing, and members of the system play multiple roles, and the relationship is based on cooperation but lack of competition.
At the end of the thesis, the academic contribution, practical implications for the case company, Tai Power Company and the government and follow-up research suggestions are further elaborated. |
| Reference: | 英文文獻
Aaker, D. A., & Keller, K. L. (1993). Interpreting cross-cultural replications of brand extension research. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 10(1), 55-59.
Adner, R. (2006). Match your innovation strategy to your innovation ecosystem. Harvard business review, 84(4), 98.
Adner, R. (2012). The wide lens: A new strategy for innovation (Vol. 34). Penguin Uk.
Adner, R. (2017). Ecosystem as structure: An actionable construct for strategy. Journal of management, 43(1), 39-58.
Adner, R. (2021). Winning the right game: How to disrupt, defend, and deliver in a changing world. MIT Press.
Adner, R., & Kapoor, R. (2010). Value creation in innovation ecosystems: How the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations. Strategic management journal, 31(3), 306-333.
Adner, R., & Kapoor, R. (2016). Innovation ecosystems and the pace of substitution: Re‐examining technology S‐curves. Strategic management journal, 37(4), 625-648.
Albadi, M. H., & El-Saadany, E. F. (2007). Demand response in electricity markets: An overview. 2007 IEEE power engineering society general meeting,
Almpanopoulou, A., Ritala, P., & Blomqvist, K. (2019). Innovation ecosystem emergence barriers: Institutional perspective.
Asare-Bediako, B., Kling, W., & Ribeiro, P. (2012). Home energy management systems: Evolution, trends and frameworks. 2012 47th International Universities Power Engineering Conference (UPEC),
Autio, E., & Thomas, L. (2014). Innovation ecosystems. The Oxford handbook of innovation management.
Dattée, B., Alexy, O., & Autio, E. (2018). Maneuvering in poor visibility: How firms play the ecosystem game when uncertainty is high. Academy of Management Journal, 61(2), 466-498.
de Vasconcelos Gomes, L. A., Facin, A. L. F., Salerno, M. S., & Ikenami, R. K. (2018). Unpacking the innovation ecosystem construct: Evolution, gaps and trends. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 136, 30-48.
Dedehayir, O., Mäkinen, S. J., & Ortt, J. R. (2018). Roles during innovation ecosystem genesis: A literature review. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 136, 18-29.
Dedehayir, O., Mäkinen, S. J., & Ortt, J. R. (2022). Innovation ecosystems as structures: Actor roles, timing of their entrance, and interactions. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 183, 121875.
Dedehayir, O., & Seppänen, M. (2015). Birth and expansion of innovation ecosystems: A case study of copper production. Journal of technology management & innovation, 10(2), 145-154.
Ding, L., & Wu, J. (2017). Innovation ecosystem of CNG vehicles: A case study of its cultivation and characteristics in Sichuan, China. Sustainability, 10(1), 39.
Geels, F., & Raven, R. (2006). Non-linearity and expectations in niche-development trajectories: ups and downs in Dutch biogas development (1973–2003). Technology analysis & strategic management, 18(3-4), 375-392.
Geels, F. W. (2002). Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research Policy, 31(8-9), 1257-1274.
Geels, F. W., & Schot, J. (2007). Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways. Research Policy, 36(3), 399-417.
Geels, F. W., & Smit, W. A. (2000). Failed technology futures: pitfalls and lessons from a historical survey. Futures, 32(9-10), 867-885.
Geels, F. W., Sovacool, B. K., Schwanen, T., & Sorrell, S. (2017). Sociotechnical transitions for deep decarbonization. Science, 357(6357), 1242-1244.
Granstrand, O., & Holgersson, M. (2020). Innovation ecosystems: A conceptual review and a new definition. Technovation, 90, 102098.
Gu, Y., Hu, L., Zhang, H., & Hou, C. (2021). Innovation ecosystem research: Emerging trends and future research. Sustainability, 13(20), 11458.
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. Handbook of qualitative research, 2(163-194), 105.
Hall, S., & Roelich, K. (2016). Business model innovation in electricity supply markets: The role of complex value in the United Kingdom. Energy Policy, 92, 286-298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.02.019
Heale, R., & Twycross, A. (2018). What is a case study? In (Vol. 21, pp. 7-8): Royal College of Nursing.
Hiremath, R. B., Shikha, S., & Ravindranath, N. (2007). Decentralized energy planning; modeling and application—a review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 11(5), 729-752.
Hoogma, R., Kemp, R., Schot, J., & Truffer, B. (2002). Experimenting for sustainable transport. Taylor & Francis.
Iansiti, M., & Levien, R. (2004). Strategy as ecology. Harvard business review, 82(3), 68-78, 126.
Jacobides, M. G., Cennamo, C., & Gawer, A. (2018). Towards a theory of ecosystems. Strategic management journal, 39(8), 2255-2276.
Kemp, R., Schot, J., & Hoogma, R. (1998). Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation: the approach of strategic niche management. Technology analysis & strategic management, 10(2), 175-198.
Koirala, B. P., van Oost, E., & van der Windt, H. (2018). Community energy storage: A responsible innovation towards a sustainable energy system? Applied energy, 231, 570-585.
Kotilainen, K., Mäkinen, S. J., Järvetausta, P., Rautiainen, A., & Markkula, J. (2016). The role of residential prosumers initiating the energy innovation ecosystem to future flexible energy system. 2016 13th International Conference on the European Energy Market (EEM),
Law, J., & Callon, M. (1992). The life and death of an aircraft: a network analysis of technical change. Shaping technology/building society: Studies in sociotechnical change, 21-52.
Levinthal, D. A. (1998). The slow pace of rapid technological change: gradualism and punctuation in technological change. Industrial and corporate change, 7(2), 217-247.
Lie, M., & Sørensen, K. H. (1996). Making technology our own?: domesticating technology into everyday life. (No Title).
Lopolito, A., Morone, P., & Sisto, R. (2011). Innovation niches and socio-technical transition: A case study of bio-refinery production. Futures, 43(1), 27-38.
Moore, J. F. (1993). Predators and prey: a new ecology of competition. Harvard business review, 71(3), 75-86.
Musante, K. (2015). Participant observation. Handbook of methods in cultural anthropology, 251-292.
Nambisan, S., & Baron, R. A. (2013). Entrepreneurship in innovation ecosystems: Entrepreneurs’ self–regulatory processes and their implications for new venture success. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 37(5), 1071-1097.
Oh, D.-S., Phillips, F., Park, S., & Lee, E. (2016). Innovation ecosystems: A critical examination. Technovation, 54, 1-6.
Overholm, H. (2015). Collectively created opportunities in emerging ecosystems: the case of solar service ventures. Technovation, 39, 14-25.
Pushpananthan, G., & Elmquist, M. (2022). Joining forces to create value: The emergence of an innovation ecosystem. Technovation, 115, 102453.
Raven, R., Van den Bosch, S., & Weterings, R. (2010). Transitions and strategic niche management: towards a competence kit for practitioners. International journal of technology management, 51(1), 57-74.
Raven, R. P. J. M. (2005). Strategic niche management for biomass: A comparative study on the experimental introduction of bioenergy technologies in the Netherlands and Denmark.
Ritala, P., Agouridas, V., Assimakopoulos, D., & Gies, O. (2013). Value creation and capture mechanisms in innovation ecosystems: a comparative case study. International journal of technology management, 63(3-4), 244-267.
Ritala, P., & Almpanopoulou, A. (2017). In defense of ‘eco’in innovation ecosystem. Technovation, 60, 39-42.
Rogers, E. M., Singhal, A., & Quinlan, M. M. (2014). Diffusion of innovations. In An integrated approach to communication theory and research (pp. 432-448). Routledge.
Russel, M., Huhtamaki, J., Still, K., & Rubens, N. (2011). Business Angels and Investment Organizations as Networked Co-creators of the Finnish Innovation Ecosystem.
Schot, J., & Geels, F. W. (2008). Strategic niche management and sustainable innovation journeys: theory, findings, research agenda, and policy. Technology analysis & strategic management, 20(5), 537-554.
Schot, J., Hoogma, R., & Elzen, B. (1994). Strategies for shifting technological systems: the case of the automobile system. Futures, 26(10), 1060-1076.
Seyfang, G., Hielscher, S., Hargreaves, T., Martiskainen, M., & Smith, A. (2014). A grassroots sustainable energy niche? Reflections on community energy in the UK. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 13, 21-44.
Seyfang, G., & Longhurst, N. (2016). What influences the diffusion of grassroots innovations for sustainability? Investigating community currency niches. Technology analysis & strategic management, 28(1), 1-23.
Still, K., Huhtamäki, J., Russell, M. G., & Rubens, N. (2014). Insights for orchestrating innovation ecosystems: the case of EIT ICT Labs and data-driven network visualisations. International Journal of Technology Management 23, 66(2-3), 243-265.
Surie, G. (2017). Creating the innovation ecosystem for renewable energy via social entrepreneurship: Insights from India. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 121, 184-195.
Thomas, L. D., & Autio, E. (2019). Innovation ecosystems. Available at SSRN 3476925.
Walrave, B., Talmar, M., Podoynitsyna, K. S., Romme, A. G. L., & Verbong, G. P. (2018). A multi-level perspective on innovation ecosystems for path-breaking innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 136, 103-113.
Yaghmaie, P., & Vanhaverbeke, W. (2020). Identifying and describing constituents of innovation ecosystems: A systematic review of the literature. EuroMed Journal of Business, 15(3), 283-314.
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (Vol. 5). sage.
Zhou, B., Li, W., Chan, K. W., Cao, Y., Kuang, Y., Liu, X., & Wang, X. (2016). Smart home energy management systems: Concept, configurations, and scheduling strategies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 61, 30-40.
中文文獻
Adner, R. (2022). 生態系競爭策略：重新定義價值結構，在轉型中辨識正確的賽局，掌握策略工具，贏得先機. 天下雜誌. https://ic.tpex.org.tw/introduce.php?ic=AD10
Huang, J. (2020). 包容與創新：聯齊科技用文化塑形智慧能源的美好未來. 數位時代. Retrieved 10/29 from https://www.bnext.com.tw/article/46273/nextdrive-maktar-jerry-mactaris-story
王怡臻. (2013). 台灣能源管理系統產業概況. 工業污染防治
台灣電力公司. (2023). 財務報表. https://www.taipower.com.tw/tc/page.aspx?mid=195&cid=84&cchk=ded6964e-4a68-4e88-9d17-36694f964ed9
邱家琳. (2022). 聯齊科技與台電打造電力記帳本「1%能源行動家」 可秒查電費、設定超支提醒. https://www.upmedia.mg/news_info.php?Type=5&SerialNo=135015
紐文英. (2023). 質性研究方法與論文寫作（四版）. 雙葉書廊.
產業價值鏈資訊平台. 智慧電網產業鏈簡介. https://ic.tpex.org.tw/introduce.php?ic=AD10
許兆慶;翁嘉均. (2021). 智慧電表 vs. 用電隱私權：「用電資料」極可能反映用戶端機敏個資，不可不慎. Retrieved 10/22 from https://www.thenewslens.com/article/156772
陳映璇. (2022). 聯齊砸逾5000萬做家庭能源管理，免費提供1萬用戶使用！背後打什麼盤算？. 數位時代. https://www.bnext.com.tw/article/67223/nextdrive-hems-in-taiwan
潘淑滿. (2022). 質性研究: 理論與應用. 心理.
聯齊科技股份有限公司. (2022). 居家能源管理系統(HEMS)應用服務及商業模式研究完成報告. https://grbdef.stpi.narl.org.tw/fte/download4?docId=2517249&responseCode=1300&grb05Id=13926587 |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
科技管理與智慧財產研究所
109364124 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0109364124 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [科技管理與智慧財產研究所] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Description |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 412401.pdf | | 4513Kb | Adobe PDF | 0 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
