Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/149060
|
| Title: | 成為理工生：探討第一代大學生選擇STEM科系的影響因素
Navigating Pathways to STEM: Exploring Factors Influencing First-Generation Students’ Choice of College Major |
| Authors: | 林永沛
Lin, Yung-Pei |
| Contributors: | 姜以琳
Chiang, Yi-Lin
林永沛
Lin, Yung-Pei |
| Keywords: | 高等教育
第一代大學生
STEM教育
科系選擇
Higher education
first-generation students
STEM education
major choice |
| Date: | 2023 |
| Issue Date: | 2024-01-02 15:34:55 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 在當代社會，高等教育不僅被視為追求知識的重要渠道，更是個人地位取得的重要工具。高等教育的科系選擇影響職業機會、社會聲望與經濟報酬的獲取過程，進而形塑個體社會經濟流動的基礎。本研究旨在探討STEM （Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics，科學、技術、工程、數學）學生的教育背景差異。STEM高等教育的重要性在於，其文憑與科學、工程相關的專業工作有直接連結，為學生在社會地位提升與獲取經濟報酬的過程中提供了關鍵優勢。儘管過往西方文獻已指出第一代大學生（First Generation College Students, FGS）在STEM學科中的劣勢地位，然而卻鮮有研究驗證台灣第一代大學生與STEM科系的關聯性。本研究採用台灣教育長期追蹤資料庫（TEPS）及後續調查（TEPS-B）資料，深入檢驗家庭背景、父母社經地位、個人教育特徵、和性別，對於台灣第一代大學生選擇STEM高等教育科系的影響。運用線性機率模型（Linear Probability Model, LPM）分析發現，在台灣，第一代大學生選擇STEM主修的可能性顯著低於非第一代大學生。值得注意的是，從事STEM領域工作的父親對第一代大學生選擇STEM主修具有顯著的正向影響。受到經濟因素驅使、具有卓越數學能力、以及面對父母高度期望的第一代大學生，有更高的可能性選擇STEM主修。最後，本研究進一步指出家庭背景與個人動機對第一代大學生主修STEM科系的影響存在性別差異，不同於男性第一代大學生，母親的職業與女性第一代大學生是否選擇STEM科系有強烈關聯，經濟動機則不會驅使女性第一代大學生選擇STEM科系就讀。透過研究台灣第一代大學生在高等教育科系的選擇傾向，本研究旨在深化對台灣高等教育體系中第一代大學生的理解，並提出未來可能研究方向以及政策介入的建議。
In contemporary society, higher education is regarded as a pathway to individual success, embodying the pursuit of knowledge and offering opportunities for so-cio-economic mobility. This research explores disparities within the curricular path-ways of higher education degree holders, with a particular focus on the field of Sci-ence, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM). STEM education is dis-tinguished by its direct connection to science and engineering careers, providing the promise of enhanced status and financial rewards. This study explores how family background, individual educational traits, and gender dynamics shape the academic pathways of First-generation college students (FGS) in STEM fields in Taiwan. Using data from the Taiwan Education Panel Survey (TEPS) and its extension (TEPS-B), the study employs Linear Probability Model (LPM) regression to examine factors influencing FGS' choice of college major. The findings indicate that, in Taiwan, FGS face a significantly lower likelihood of choosing STEM majors. Notably, fathers em-ployed in STEM fields exert a substantial positive influence on the selection of STEM majors for FGS. FGS who are primarily motivated by economic considera-tions, demonstrate superior mathematical abilities, and face higher parental expecta-tions exhibit a heightened probability of pursuing STEM disciplines. Moreover, gen-der-based differences underscore the distinctive impact of family background factors and individual characteristics in the decision-making process, particularly among female FGS. The study contributes to the understanding of the dynamics of FGS in the Taiwanese higher education system and suggests potential areas for future re-search and policy intervention. |
| Reference: | Alon, S., & Gelbgiser, D. (2011). The female advantage in college academic achievements and horizontal sex segregation. Social Science Research, 40(1), 107–119.
Archer, L., Dawson, E., DeWitt, J., Seakins, A., & Wong, B. (2015). “Science capi-tal”: A conceptual, methodological, and empirical argument for extending bourdieusian notions of capital beyond the arts. Journal of Research in Sci-ence Teaching, 52(7), 922–948.
Arcidiacono, P., Bayer, P., & Hizmo, A. (2010). Beyond signaling and human capital: education and the revelation of ability. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 2(4), 76–104.
Arum, R., & Roksa, J. (2011). Academically adrift: Limited learning on college campuses.
Beattie, I. R. (2002). Are all “Adolescent econometricians” created equal? Racial, class, and gender differences in college enrollment. Sociology of Education, 75(1), 19.
Beede, D. N., Julian, T., Langdon, D., McKittrick, G., Khan, B., & Doms, M. (2011). Women in STEM: A Gender Gap to Innovation. Social Science Research Network.
Belser, C. T., Shillingford, M. A., Daire, A. P., Prescod, D. J., & Dagley, M. A. (2018). Factors influencing undergraduate student retention in STEM majors: career development, math ability, and demographics. The Professional Counselor, 8(3), 262–276.
Berube, C. T. (2014). STEM and the city: A Report on STEM Education in the Great American Urban Public School System.
Biblarz, T. J., & Raftery, A. E. (1999). Family structure, educational attainment, and Socioeconomic success: Rethinking the “Pathology of Matriarchy.” American Journal of Sociology, 105(2), 321–365.
Blau, P. M., & Duncan, O. D. (1968). The American occupational structure. Ameri-can Sociological Review, 33(2), 296.
Blickenstaff, J. C. (2005). Women and science careers: leaky pipeline or gender filter? Gender and Education, 17(4), 369–386.
Boggess, S. (1998). Family structure, economic status, and educational attainment. Journal of Population Economics, 11(2), 205–222.
Bouchey, H. A., Shoulberg, E. K., Jodl, K. M., & Eccles, J. S. (2010). Longitudinal links between older sibling features and younger siblings’ academic adjust-ment during early adolescence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(1), 197–211.
Bozick, R., Lauff, E., & Wirt, J. (2007). Education Longitudinal Study of 2002 (ELS:2002): A first look at the initial postsecondary experiences of the high school sophomore class of 2002. National Center for Education Statistics.
Bradley, R. H., & Corwyn, R. F. (2002). Socioeconomic status and child develop-ment. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 371–399.
Bryant, B. K., Zvonkovic, A. M., & Reynolds, P. (2006). Parenting in relation to child and adolescent vocational development. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 69(1), 149–175.
Bui, K. (2002). First-Generation College Students at a Four-Year University: back-ground characteristics, reasons for pursuing higher education, and First-Year Experiences. College Student Journal, 36(1), 3–12.
Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2021). Employment in STEM occupa-tions. https://www.bls.gov/emp/tables/stem-employment.htm
Bybee, R. W. (2013). The case for STEM education: Challenges and Opportunities. NSTA Press.
Chang, L. Y. (2011) The Handbook of Taiwan Education Panel Survey. Taipei: Aca-demia Sinica [in Chinese]
Chang, L. Y. (2021). Taiwan Education Panel Survey: Wave1(2001) Junior High School Students (C00124_B) [data file]. Available from Survey Research Data Archive, Academia Sinica.
Chang, L. Y. (2021). Taiwan Education Panel Survey: Wave2(2003) Junior High School Students (C00137_B) [data file]. Available from Survey Research Data Archive, Academia Sinica.
Chang, L. Y. (2021). Taiwan Education Panel Survey: Wave3 (2005) Senior (Voca-tional) High School and Junior College Students (C00175_A) [data file]. Available from Survey Research Data Archive, Academia Sinica.
Chang, L. Y. (2021). Taiwan Education Panel Survey: Wave 3 (2005) Senior (Voca-tional) High School and Junior College Parents (C00175_D) [data file]. Available from Survey Research Data Archive, Academia Sinica.
Chang, L. Y. (2021). Taiwan Education Panel Survey: Wave4 (2007) Senior (Voca-tional) High School and Junior College Parents (C00189_D) [data file]. Available from Survey Research Data Archive, Academia Sinica.
Chang, L. Y. (2021). Taiwan Education Panel Survey: Wave4 (2007) Senior (Voca-tional) High School and Junior College Students (C00189_A) [data file]. Available from Survey Research Data Archive, Academia Sinica.
Chang, Y. J., & Lin, T. H. (2015) How does the Expansion of Higher Education Re-produce Class Inequality? The Case of Taiwan. Taiwan Journal of Sociology of Education, 15(2), 85–129. 10.3966/168020042015121502003 [in Chinese]
Charles, M., & Bradley, K. (2009). Indulging our Gendered Selves? Sex Segregation by field of study in 44 countries. American Journal of Sociology, 114(4), 924–976.
Charles, M., Harr, B., Cech, E. A., & Hendley, A. (2014). Who likes math where? Gender differences in eighth-graders’ attitudes around the world. Internation-al Studies in Sociology of Education, 24(1), 85–112.
Chen, W. C. (2013) Causes and Consequences of High School Curriculum-Track Se-lection: Gender, Belief, Teacher's Gender, and Cognitive Development. Taiwanese Journal of Sociology. 25, 89–123.
Chen, X. (2009). Students who study science, technology, engineering, and mathe-matics (STEM) in postsecondary education. Stats in brief. NCES 2009-161. National Center for Education Statistics.
Chen, X. (2013). STEM Attrition: College Students’ Paths into and out of STEM Fields. Statistical Analysis Report. NCES 2014-001. National Center for Ed-ucation Statistics.
Chen, X., & Carroll, C. D. (2005). First-Generation Students in Postsecondary Edu-cation: A look at their college transcripts. Postsecondary Education Descrip-tive Analysis Report. NCES 2005-171. National Center for Education Statis-tics. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED485756.pdf
Cheng, C. (2018). Women’s education, intergenerational coresidence, and household Decision‐Making in China. Journal of Marriage and Family, 81(1), 115–132.
Cheryan, S., Ziegler, S. A., Montoya, A. K., & Jiang, L. (2017). Why are some STEM fields more gender balanced than others? Psychological Bulletin, 143(1), 1–35.
Cohen, E. G., & Rachel A. L. (1995). “Producing Equal-Status Interaction in the Heterogeneous Classroom.” American Educational Research Journal, 32 (1), 99–120.
Collier, P. J., & Morgan, D. L. (2007). “Is that paper really due today?”: differences in first-generation and traditional college students’ understandings of faculty expectations. Higher Education, 55(4), 425–446.
Collins, R., 1979, The Credential Society: An Historical Sociology of Education and Stratification. New York: Academic Press.
Dabney, K. P., Chakraverty, D., & Tai, R. H. (2013). The association of family in-fluence and initial interest in science. Science Education, 97(3), 395–409.
Datcher, L. (1982). Effects of community and family background on achievement. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 64(1), 32.
Davies, S., & Guppy, N. (1997). Fields of study, college selectivity, and student ine-qualities in higher education. Social Forces, 75(4), 1417.
De Graaf, N. D., De Graaf, P., & Kraaykamp, G. (2000). Parental Cultural Capital and Educational Attainment in the Netherlands: A Refinement of the Cultural Capital perspective. Sociology of Education, 73(2), 92.
DeBacker, J., & Routon, P. W. (2021). A culture of despair? Inequality and expecta-tions of educational success. Contemporary Economic Policy, 39(3), 573–588.
Dryler, H. (1998). Parental role models, gender and educational choice. British Journal of Sociology, 49(3), 375.
Field, A. J., Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (1977). Schooling in capitalist America: Educa-tional reform and the contradictions of economic life. Journal of Human Re-sources, 12(2), 275.
Gabay-Egozi, L., Nitsche, N., & Grieger, L. (2021). In their footsteps or shadow? Gender differences in choosing a STEM major as a function of sibling con-figuration and older sibling’s gender and math ability. Sex Roles, 86(1–2), 106–126.
Gibbons, M. M., Rhinehart, A., & Hardin, E. E. (2016). How First-Generation Col-lege Students adjust to College. Journal of College Student Retention: Re-search, Theory and Practice, 20(4), 488–510.
Ginther, D. K., & Pollak, R. A. (2003). Does family structure affect children’s educa-tional outcomes?
Gokcora, D., & DePaulo, D. (2018). Frequent quizzes and student improvement of reading: a pilot study in a community college setting. SAGE Open, 8(2), 215824401878258.
Goyette, K. A., & Mullen, A. L. (2006). Who studies the arts and sciences? Social background and the choice and consequences of undergraduate field of study. The Journal of Higher Education, 77(3), 497–538.
Granfield, R. (1991). MAKING IT BY FAKING IT. Journal of Contemporary Eth-nography, 20(3), 331–351.
Grodsky, E. (2010). Commentaries: Learning in the Shadows and in the Light of Day: A commentary on Shadow Education, American Style: Test Preparation, the SAT and College Enrollment. Social Forces, 89(2), 475–481.
Grodsky, E., & Riegle-Crumb, C. (2010). Those who choose and those who don’t: social background and college orientation. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 627(1), 14–35.
Hamilton, L. T., Roksa, J., & Nielsen, K. (2018). Providing a ‘“Leg Up”’: Parental Involvement and Opportunity Hoarding in College. Sociology of Education, 91(2), 111–131.
Harding, J. F., Morris, P., & Hughes, D. (2015). The Relationship between maternal education and Children’s academic Outcomes: A theoretical framework. Journal of Marriage and Family, 77(1), 60–76.
Hauser, R. M., Tsai, S., & Sewell, W. H. (1983). A Model of Stratification with Re-sponse Error in Social and Psychological Variables. Sociology of Education, 56(1), 20.
Hellevik, O. (2007). Linear versus logistic regression when the dependent variable is a dichotomy. Quality & Quantity, 43(1), 59–74.
Ho, M., La, V., Nguyen, M., Pham, T., Vuong, T., Vuong, H., Pham, H., & Hoang, A. (2020). An analytical view on STEM education and outcomes: Examples of the social gap and gender disparity in Vietnam. Children and Youth Services Review, 119, 105650.
Horn, L., & Nunez, A. (2000). Mapping the Road to College: First-Generation Stu-dents’ math track, planning strategies, and context of support. Education Sta-tistics Quarterly, 2(1), 81–86.
Hsieh, T., & Simpkins, S. D. (2022). The patterns of adolescents’ math and science motivational Beliefs: examining Within–Racial/Ethnic group changes and their relations to STEM outcomes. AERA Open, 8, 233285842210836.
Huang, Y. R. (2008). Backgrounds and Characteristics of First- Generation College Students in Taiwan. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 53(2), 111–130. 10.29882/JTNUE.200808.0005 [in Chinese]
Hurst, A. L. (2010). The burden of academic success: loyalists, renegades, and dou-ble agents.
Hyde, J. S. (2005). The gender similarities hypothesis. American Psychologist, 60(6), 581–592.
Jacob, B. A., & Wilder, T. (2010). Educational expectations and attainment.
Jensen, A. C., & McHale, S. M. (2015). What makes siblings different? The devel-opment of sibling differences in academic achievement and interests. Journal of Family Psychology, 29(3), 469–478.
Kuan, P. Y. (2017). Transition from school to work: An introduction to Taiwan edu-cation panel survey and its follow-up project – Taiwan education panel sur-vey and beyond. Journal of the Chinese Statistical Association, 55, 25–41. [in Chinese]
Kuan, P. Y., & Peng, S. J. (2019). TEPS-B technical report number 3: Constructing Weighting of odds of completing interviews with successful samples of the 2014 face-to-face survey of EPS-B Panel 1/2 CP sample. http://tepsb.nccu.edu.tw/download/TEPS-B_technical_report_no3.pdf [in Chinese]
Kuo, Y. C., & Sheu, S. J. (2011). The Impact of Mathematics Background and Gen-der on the Choice of Major in Taiwan's Senior High School. Taiwan Eco-nomic Review, 39(4), 541–597.
Kuan, P. Y. (2021). Taiwan Education Panel Survey and Beyond/2014: Face to Face Interview Follow-Up Survey of Panel-1/2 CP and Panel-1 NCP (Public Ac-cess Data) (E10259_3) [data file]. Available from Survey Research Data Ar-chive, Academia Sinica.
Lareau, A. (2015). Cultural knowledge and social inequality. American Sociological Review, 80(1), 1–27.
Lee, E. M. (2016). Class and campus life: Managing and Experiencing Inequality at an Elite College. Cornell University Press.
Lee, E. M., & Kramer, R. (2012). Out with the Old, In with the New? Habitus and Social Mobility at Selective Colleges. Sociology of Education, 86(1), 18–35.
Leppel, K., Williams, M. L., & Waldauer, C. (2001). The Impact of Parental Occu-pation and Socioeconomic Status on Choice of College Major. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 22(4), 373–394.
Liu, R. L., & Lin, D. S. (2012). First-Generation College Students: A Study of Their College Experiences, Learning Outcomes, and Destination after Graduation. Journal of Education Practice and Research, 25(2), 97–130.
Ma, Y. (2009). Family socioeconomic status, parental involvement, and college Ma-jor Choices—Gender, Race/Ethnic, and nativity patterns. Sociological Per-spectives, 52(2), 211–234.
Malgwi, C. A., Howe, M. A., & Burnaby, P. (2005). Influences on students’ choice of college major. Journal of Education for Business, 80(5), 275–282.
Mallman, M. (2017). The perceived inherent vice of working-class university stu-dents. The Sociological Review, 65(2), 235–250.
Maltese, A. V., & Tai, R. H. (2011). Pipeline persistence: Examining the association of educational experiences with earned degrees in STEM among U.S. stu-dents. Science Education, 95(5), 877–907.
Mann, A., & DiPrete, T. A. (2013). Trends in gender segregation in the choice of science and engineering majors. Social Science Research, 42(6), 1519–1541.
McCarron, G., & Inkelas, K. K. (2006). The Gap between Educational Aspirations and Attainment for First-Generation College Students and the Role of Paren-tal Involvement. Journal of College Student Development, 47(5), 534–549.
Mcmaster, N. C. (2017). Who studies STEM subjects at A level and degree in Eng-land? An investigation into the intersections between students’ family back-ground, gender and ethnicity in determining choice. British Educational Re-search Journal, 43(3), 528–553.
Ministry of Education. (2020). Education Statistics of The Republic of China (n.d.). https://stats.moe.gov.tw/files/ebook/Education_Statistics/106/106edu.pdf [in Chinese]
Ministry of Labor. (2019). Ministry of Labor Salary Survey for Occupational Catego-ries Status Query. (n.d.). https://pswst.mol.gov.tw/psdn/ [in Chinese]
Mullen, A. L. (2009). Elite destinations: pathways to attending an Ivy League uni-versity. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 30(1), 15–27.
Mulvenon, S. W., Ganley, B., & Fritts-Scott, K. (2001). The Impact of Socioeco-nomic Status on Performance: A Case Study of Arkansas Schools. Arkansas Educational Research and Policy Studies Journal, 1(1), 42–61.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2014, October 2). Profile of Undergraduate students: 2011-12 (Web tables). https://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2015167
Nunez, A., & Cuccaro-Alamin, S. (1998). First-Generation Students: Undergraduates Whose Parents Never Enrolled in Postsecondary Education. Statistical Anal-ysis Report. Postsecondary Education Descriptive Analysis Reports. Statisti-cal Analysis Report.
Ou, D., & Hou, Y. (2018). Bigger pie, bigger slice? The impact of higher education expansion on educational opportunity in China. Research in Higher Educa-tion, 60(3), 358–391.
Pascarella, E. T., Pierson, C. T., Wolniak, G. C., & Terenzini, P. T. (2004). First-Generation College Students: Additional Evidence on college experi-ences and Outcomes. The Journal of Higher Education, 75(3), 249–284.
Pascarella, E. T., Wolniak, G. C., Pierson, C. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (2003). Experi-ences and Outcomes of First-Generation Students in Community Colleges. Journal of College Student Development, 44(3), 420–429.
Quadlin, N. (2019). From major preferences to major Choices: gender and logics of major choice. Sociology of Education, 93(2), 91–109.
Rahaman, W. A., Mohammed, I., Turkson, F. E., & Baffour, P. T. (2023). Influences of parental occupation on children’s occupational choices. International Journal of Social Economics.
Ran, L. (2018). Gender-Math Stereotype, Biased Self-Assessment, and Aspiration in STEM Careers: The Gender Gap among Early Adolescents in China. Com-parative Education Review, 62(4), 522–541.
Ran, L. (2019). Do Family Privileges Bring Gender Equality? Instrumentalism and (De) Stereotyping of STEM Career Aspiration among Chinese Adolescents. Social Forces, 99(1), 230–254.
Reay, D., Crozier, G., & Clayton, J. (2009). ‘Strangers in Paradise’? Sociology, 43(6), 1103–1121.
Reid, M., & Moore, J. L. (2008). College readiness and academic preparation for postsecondary education. Urban Education, 43(2), 240–261.
Rodriguez, S. (2003). What helps some First-Generation students succeed. About Campus, 8(4), 17–22.
Roksa, J., & Levey, T. (2010). What Can You Do with That Degree? College Major and Occupational Status of College Graduates over Time. Social Forces, 89(2), 389–415.
Roksa, J., & Silver, B. R. (2019). “Do-It-Yourself” University: Institutional and fam-ily support in the transition out of college. The Review of Higher Education, 42(3), 1051–1071.
Rothwell, J. (2013). The hidden STEM economy. In Brookings Institution eBooks. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED580022
Ruder, A., & Van Noy, M. (2017). Knowledge of earnings risk and major choice: Evidence from an information experiment. Economics of Education Review, 57, 80–90.
Sandefur, G. D., & Wells, T. (1999). Does family structure really influence educa-tional attainment? Social Science Research, 28(4), 331–357.
Schofer, E., & Meyer, J. W. (2005). The worldwide expansion of higher education in the twentieth century. American Sociological Review, 70(6), 898–920.
Sewell, W. H., Haller, A. O., & Portes, A. (1969). The educational and early occupa-tional attainment process. American Sociological Review, 34(1), 82.
Shavit, Y., & Blossfeld, H. (1993). Persistent inequality: Changing Educational At-tainment in Thirteen Countries.
Sikora, J., & Pokropek, A. (2012). Gender segregation of adolescent science career plans in 50 countries. Science Education, 96(2), 234–264.
Sirin, S. R. (2005). Socioeconomic Status and Academic Achievement: A Me-ta-Analytic Review of Research. Review of Educational Research, 75(3), 417–453.
Smith, H. L., & Powell, B. (1990). Great expectations: Variations in income expecta-tions among college seniors. Sociology of Education, 63(3), 194.
Sonnert, G. (2009). Parents who influence their children to become scientists. Social Studies of Science, 39(6), 927–941.
Sorokin, P. (1959) Mechanism of social testing, selection, and distribution of indi-viduals within different social strata. Social and Cultural Mobility. 182–212.
Spelke, E. S. (2005). Sex Differences in Intrinsic Aptitude for Mathematics and Sci-ence?: A Critical Review. American Psychologist, 60(9), 950–958.
Stuber, J. (2009). Class, culture, and participation in the Collegiate Extra-Curriculum. Sociological Forum, 24(4), 877–900.
Stuber, J., Klugman, J., & Daniel, C. (2011). Gender, social class, and exclusion: collegiate peer cultures and social reproduction. Sociological Perspectives, 54(3), 431–451.
Su, K. H., & Yu, W. H. (2007). When Social Reproduction Fails: Explaining the De-creasing Ethnic Gap in Taiwan. Taiwanese Journal of Sociology, 39, 1–63.
Su, R., & Rounds, J. (2015). All STEM fields are not created equal: People and things interests explain gender disparities across STEM fields. Frontiers in Psychology, 6.
Tai, R. H., Liu, C. Q., Maltese, A. V., & Fan, X. (2006). Planning early for careers in science. Science, 312(5777), 1143–1144.
Terenzini, P. T., Springer, L., Yaeger, P. M., Pascarella, E. T., & Nora, A. (1996). First-generation college students: Characteristics, experiences, and cognitive development. Research in Higher Education, 37(1), 1–22.
Thoemmes, F., & Ong, A. D. (2015). A primer on inverse probability of treatment weighting and marginal structural models. Emerging Adulthood, 4(1), 40–59.
Tierney, R. D. (2013). Fairness in classroom assessment. In SAGE Publications, Inc. eBooks (pp. 124–144).
Trow, M. (1973). Problems in the Transition from Elite to Mass Higher Education.
Vaisey, S. (2010). What people want: rethinking poverty, culture, and educational attainment. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 629(1), 75–101.
Verdín, D., & Godwin, A. (2015). First in the family: A comparison of first-generation and non-first-generation engineering college students. 2015 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE).
Hippel, P. von. (2015, July 5). Linear vs. Logistic Probability Models: Which is Bet-ter, and When? Statistical Horizons. https://statisticalhorizons.com/linear-vs-logistic/
Hippel, P. von. (2017, March 8). When Can You Fit a Linear Probability Model? More Often Than You Think. https://statisticalhorizons.com/when-can-you-fit/
Wai, J., Lubinski, D., Benbow, C. P., & Steiger, J. H. (2010). Accomplishment in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) and its relation to STEM educational dose: A 25-year longitudinal study. Journal of Education-al Psychology, 102(4), 860–871.
Walpole, M. B. (2003). Socioeconomic Status and College: How SES affects college experiences and outcomes. The Review of Higher Education, 27(1), 45–73.
Wang, X. (2013). Why students choose STEM majors. American Educational Re-search Journal, 50(5), 1081–1121.
Ware, N. C., & Lee, V. E. (1988). Sex differences in choice of college science majors. American Educational Research Journal, 25(4), 593–614.
Wright, A. L., Roscigno, V. J., & Quadlin, N. (2021a). First-Generation students, college majors, and gendered pathways. Sociological Quarterly, 64(1), 67–90.
Wright, A. L., Roscigno, V. J., & Quadlin, N. (2021b). First-Generation students, college majors, and gendered pathways. Sociological Quarterly, 64(1), 67–90.
Xie, Y., Fang, M., & Shauman, K. A. (2015). STEM Education. Annual Review of Sociology, 41(1), 331–357. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-071312-145659
Xie, Y., & Killewald, A. (2012). Is American science in decline?
Xie, Y., & Shauman, K. A. (2003). Women in science: Career Processes and Out-comes.
Xu, Y. J. (2012). Career outcomes of STEM and Non-STEM college graduates: per-sistence in Majored-Field and influential factors in career choices. Research in Higher Education, 54(3), 349–382.
Yee, A. (2014). Major decisions: How social class shapes undergraduate achievement. University of Pennsylvania ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
Zuckerman, H. C., & Bruer, J. T. (1991). The outer circle: Women in the scientific community. W. Norton & Co. |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
社會學系
110254006 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0110254006 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [社會學系] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Description |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 400601.pdf | | 2887Kb | Adobe PDF | 5 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
