English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 110934/141854 (78%)
造訪人次 : 47815243      線上人數 : 722
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋
    政大機構典藏 > 法學院 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/149980


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/149980


    題名: 對我國民法第245條之1之反省與檢討
    其他題名: Retrospection and Re-evaluation on the Article 245-1 Civil Code of Taiwan
    作者: 向明恩
    Hsiang, Ming-en
    貢獻者: 法學院
    關鍵詞: 締約上過失;前契約義務;信賴原則;侵權行為;無權代理;自始客觀不能;不完全給付;物之瑕疵擔保;信賴利益之損害賠償;履行利益之損害賠償
    Culpa in contrahendo;Pre-contractual duty;Principle of reliance;Torts;Falsus procurator;Objective impossibility of performance;Deficient performance;Warranty;Damages to protect reliance interest;Damages to protect performance interest
    日期: 2011-09
    上傳時間: 2024-02-21 15:21:57 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 我國民法債編於民國 18年 11月 22日公布，翌年的 5月 5日施行，在歷經 60個年頭後，為因應社會經濟的變遷與滿足國民法律情感的需求，終於在民國 88年 4月大幅修正債編之相關規定，其中備受矚目的是在民法第 245條之 1所增訂的締約上過失責任，我國立法者雖為此責任制度在民法典中找到停泊處，然因立法者保守態度，致使該條規範內容凌亂不一，存有許多應予並有待釐清之疑問。本文首先從發現締約過失制度之德國談起，藉由解析此制度在彼邦發展與明文化之過程，重新尋找與確認民法第 245條之 1之定位與功能。接著，呈現締約上過失制度這十年來在我國之發展狀況，藉以凸顯學界對於條文之描繪是如何分歧，實務界為避此紛爭又是採取如何保守態度。最後基於保護當事人契約磋商階段之利益與貫徹信賴原則，以重新檢討我國現行民法第 245條之 1之規範。
    The Obligations (PART II) of Taiwan’s Civil Code were promulgated on November 22 1929 and became effective on May 5 1930. Following the evolution of the economy and responding to the requirements of the population’s new consciences of law, the Articles in the Obligations went through many modifications in 1999. The most conspicuous modification is the amendment of Article 245-1, pre-contractual duty, finally inserted into the Civil Code by the legislature. However, the legislature’s conservative attitude left the article in chaos, causing many problems that required clarification. The main purpose of this thesis is to introduce the system of pre-contractual liability, which originated in Germany. By analyzing the development of the system in Germany, we can research and locate the position and understand the function of Article 245-1 in Taiwan’s Civil Code. The Second part will discuss the current development of Article 245-1 in Taiwan and illustrate how divergent are the points of view toward this issue. The final part will re-evaluate the current Article based on how well it protects the interests of all parties in the pre-contract phase as well as reliability protection.
    關聯: 臺北大學法學論叢, No.79, pp.145-205
    資料類型: article
    顯示於類別:[法學院] 期刊論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    index.html0KbHTML19檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋