English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 110934/141854 (78%)
造訪人次 : 47816750      線上人數 : 607
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋
    政大機構典藏 > 法學院 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/149983


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/149983


    題名: 德國締約上過失理論之發展
    其他題名: The Development of Culpa in Contrahendo in German
    作者: 向明恩
    Hsiang, Ming-en
    貢獻者: 法學院
    關鍵詞: 締約上過失;侵權責任;前契約債之關係;信賴原則;違反前契約義務;第三人締約上過失責任;德國新債法
    Culpa in contrahendo;Torts;Preliminary obligation;Principle of reliance;Breach of preliminary contractual duty;Duty of culpa in contrahendo on third party;German law of obligations act
    日期: 2009-06
    上傳時間: 2024-02-21 15:21:59 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 德國締約上過失制度，百餘年來歷經學說與判例交互影響，終於在2002年德國新修訂之債法中予以明文化。本文乃以宏觀角度出發，探究德國締約上過失從未明文化進入明文化之發展歷程，並逐一分析學說上對於締約過失責任所提出之理論依據，以釐清締約過失責任之建構基礎，其中又以學者巴勒史泰德(Ballerstedt)氏所提出之信賴理論，對締約上過失責任在縱向與橫向發展之建構最具影響力，甚至爲具體明文化之締約上過失規範所徵引。除探究學說上相關見解外，並整理相關實務判決，以具體呈現學說與實務交互運作之情形。此外，並解構明文化之當事人與第三人締約上過失責任之構成要件與其法律效果。文末就德國締約上過失責任之理論與法制檢視我國締約過失之相關規範，以嘗試重新型塑我國締約上過失之制度。
    The doctrine of culpa in contrahendo in Germany had previously come to be recognized praeter legem. On 1 January 2002 the Modernization of the German Law of Obligations Act entered into force. The living law of culpa in cotrahendo reflects in the wording of the code. Of course, it has to be acknowledged that the courts und the scholars established the doctrine of culpa in contrahendo. This article begins with analysis of the development and the legal theory of culpa in contrahendo. As a result, the culpa in cotrahendo is based on the principle of reliance. Furthermore, this article explains the requirements und legal consequences of die duty of culpa in contrahendo on the other party (§ 311 Ⅱ BGB) und die duty of culpa in contrahendo on the part of third parties (§ 311 Ⅲ BGB). Lastly, the purpose of this article is to compare Taiwanese and German law and to make relevant suggestions.
    關聯: 臺北大學法學論叢, No.70, pp.1-79
    資料類型: article
    DOI 連結: https://doi.org/10.6774/TULR.200906.0001
    DOI: 10.6774/TULR.200906.0001
    顯示於類別:[法學院] 期刊論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    index.html0KbHTML21檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋