政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/150274
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 110442/141355 (78%)
Visitors : 46988610      Online Users : 753
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/150274


    Title: 非正式空間中的城市共生動態過程:寶藏巖案例
    The Dynamics of Urban Symbiosis Processes Within Informal Spaces: The Case of Treasure Hill
    Authors: 何子麒
    Larkin, Tobias Ho
    Contributors: 陳虹穎
    Chen, Hung-Ying
    何子麒
    Larkin, Tobias Ho
    Keywords: 寶藏巖
    城市共生
    非正式聚落
    Treasure Hill
    Urban Symbiosis
    Informal Settlement
    Date: 2024
    Issue Date: 2024-03-01 14:18:24 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本論文探討台灣台北市寶藏巖的「城市共生」動態。在這個非正式的聚落中,各種不同的利害關係者進行日常維護、合作和社區活化,共同構想並創造所謂的「藝居共生」。本研究嘗試將寶藏巖推動「藝居共生」與城市非正式性和「地方創生」相連結,以理解為什麼「城市共生」會成為寶藏巖不同利害關係者的共同關注?以及,在這個非正式聚落中,不同利害關係人如何理解並經驗「城市共生」?透過一系列質性研究方法,我以三個主題──「活保存」,「管理和治理」與「地方創生」──探討關於寶藏巖文化治理和保存的多元觀點。我主張非正式聚落的生存充滿挑戰。此過程中,寶藏巖居民透過實踐和分享他們的社區傳統和聚落文化,以持續參與於文化治理與成為(被)保存的主體。本論文主要貢獻在於記敘2021年-2023年間,原居民們租約到期,臺北市文化局頒布新使用辦法之多重治理框架協商過程.
    This thesis explores the dynamics of “Urban Symbiosis” in Taipei City’s Treasure Hill community. In this informal settlement, various stakeholders engage in daily maintenance, cooperation, and community activation, collectively envisioning and creating what is known as “Artist-Resident Symbiosis”. This study seeks to link the promotion of “Artist-Resident Symbiosis” in Treasure Hill with urban informality literature and “Regional Revitalization” policy, aiming to understand why “Urban Symbiosis” has become a common concern for different stakeholders in Treasure Hill. Additionally, it examines how different stakeholders both understand and experience “Urban Symbiosis” within this informal settlement. Through a series of qualitative research methods, this thesis discusses diverse perspectives on cultural governance and preservation in Treasure Hill, focusing on three themes: “Living Conservation”, “Management and Governance”, and “Community Revitalization”. I argue that the survival of informal settlements is filled with challenges. In this process of survival, Treasure Hill residents continue to participate in cultural governance and become (or are) subjects of preservation by practicing and sharing their community traditions and settlement culture. The main contribution of this thesis lies in narrating the multiple governance framework negotiation processes between original residents whose leases expired between 2021 and 2023 and Taipei City’s Department of Cultural Affairs (DCA), which issued new usage regulations during this period.
    Reference: Aguilar et al. (2003). Globalization, regional development, and mega-city expansion in Latin
    America: Analyzing Mexico City’s peri-urban hinterland. Cities, 20(1), 3-21.
    Appadurai, A. (2001). Deep democracy: Urban governmentality and the horizon of politics.
    Environment and Urbanization, 13(2), 23–43.
    Banks et al. (2020). “Urban informality as a site of critical analysis”. The Journal of
    Development Studies, 56(2), 223–238.
    Caldeira, T. (2017). Peripheral urbanization: Autoconstruction, transversal logics, and
    politics in cities of the global south. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space,
    35(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775816658479
    Casagrande, M. (2019). From urban acupuncture to the third generation city. In Nature
    Driven Urbanism (pp.131–153). Springer International Publishing.
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26717-9_7
    Chang & Chou, P.C. (2020). The influence of the regional revitalization policy on Taiwan’s
    land planning: Taking Pingtung county township as an example”. IOP Conference
    Series. Earth and Environmental Science, 588(4), 42014–.
    https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/588/4/042014
    Chuang et al. (2021). Examining the key drivers for regional revitalization based upon social
    network analysis: A case study of Badouzi in Taiwan. Marine Policy, 133, 104754–.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2021.104754
    Cobbinah, P.B. (2023). The oddity of desiring informality. Dialogues in Human Geography,
    0(0), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1177/20438206231191737.
    De Soto, H. (2000). The mystery of capital: Why capitalism triumphs in the West and
    fails everywhere else. Perseus Books Group.
    El Ouardi & Montambeault, F. (2023). Collectively gardening the urban public space in
    Mexico City: When informal practices interact with the state. International Journal of
    Urban and Regional Research, 47(2), 201–220.
    Freire-Medeiros, B. (2009). The favela and its touristic transits. Geoforum 40.4, 580–88.
    Fujimoto, I. (1992). Lessons from Abroad in Rural Community Revitalization: The One Village,
    One Product Movement in Japan. Community Development Journal, 27(1), 10–20.
    http://www.jstor.org/stable/44259233
    Giombini, L. (2022). Respect in Conservation Ethics: A Philosophical Inquiry, Studies in
    Conservation, 67:1-2, 100-108, DOI: 10.1080/00393630.2021.1940797
    Glass, R. (1964). London: Aspects of Change. London: MacGibbon & Kee.
    Gonzalez, S. (2011). Bilbao and Barcelona “in motion”. How urban regeneration “models”
    travel and mutate in the global flows of policy tourism. Urban Studies, 48(7), 1397–1418.
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098010374510
    Greenbaum, R. & Bondonio, D. (2004). Losing focus: A comparative evaluation of spatially
    targeted economic revitalization programmes in the US and the EU, Regional Studies,
    38(3), 319-334, https://doi.org/10.1080/003434042000211042
    Hall, P. & Pfeiffer, U. (2000). Urban future 21: A global agenda for twenty-first century
    cities (1st ed.). Routledge.
    Harvey, D. (2006). Paris, capital of modernity. Routledge.
    Hetherington, K. (2015). Foucault and the Museum. In The International Handbooks of Museum
    Studies (eds S. Macdonald and H. Rees Leahy). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118829059.wbihms102
    Hooper-Greenhill, E. (2000). Museums and the Interpretation of Visual Culture (1st ed.).
    Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003124450
    Hooper-Greenhill, E. (2003). Museums and the Shaping of Knowledge / Eilean
    Hooper-Greenhill. London ; Routledge, 2003. Print.
    Hsiao, H. (2022). From squatter settlements to cultural heritage: The preservation and
    revitalization as “group of buildings” based on the case experience of Treasure Hill Art
    Village in Taipei City, Taiwan, Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering,
    21(2), 644-661, http://doi.org/10.1080/13467581.2020.1838910
    Inoue et al. (2022). Exploring the impact of depopulation on a country's population geography:
    Lessons learned from Japan. Population, Space and Place, 28(5), e2543.
    https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.2543
    Jacobs, J. (1961). The death and life of great American cities. Random House.
    Jou et al. (2016). Gentrification and revanchist urbanism in Taipei? Urban Studies, 53(3),
    560-576.
    Kang, M. (2006). Altered space: Squatting and legitimizing Treasure Hill, Taipei. Presented at
    Cultural Development Network’s Forum: ‘Artivism: The role of arts in regeneration’. 1-6.
    Kim, K. & Kim, E.J. (2021). Tourism as a key for regional revitalization?: A quantitative
    evaluation of tourism zone development in Japan.” Sustainability,
    13(13), 7478–. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13137478
    King, K. (2013). Jane Jacobs and “The need for aged buildings”: Neighbourhood historical
    development pace and community social relations”. Urban Studies, 50(12),
    2,407-2,424.
    King, R. (2023). Informality as process and the social construction of slums. In Mayne, A. (Ed.),
    The Oxford Handbook of the Modern Slum, Chapter 4 (p.73-84). Oxford University
    Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190879457.001.0001.
    Knell, S. (Ed.). (2007). Museums in the material world. Taylor & Francis Group.
    Lefebvre, H. (1968). The Right to the City (Le Droit à la ville). Anthropos, Paris (1996).
    Li et al. (2022). A cultural approach to preserving squatter settlements: The case of
    Treasure Hill village in Taipei, International Journal of Heritage Studies, 28(4), 460-475, https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2021.2010234.
    Liu, J. (2022). The impacts of Taiwan’s rural rejuvenation program on rural migration,
    2022 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Anaheim, California 322350, Agricultural and
    Applied Economics Association.
    Marx et al. (2013). The economics of slums in the developing world. Journal of Economic
    Perspectives, Vol.27 (4), 187–210.
    McFarlane, C. (2012). Rethinking informality: politics, crisis, and the city. Planning
    Theory & Practice, 13(1), 89–108.
    Mo, Y. (2007). Residents occupy Treasure Hill. Taipei Times.
    https://www.taipeitimes.com/News/taiwan/archives/2007/01/27/2003346517
    Muzaini, H. (2021). Rethinking the living museum concept “from below”, Journal of
    Cultural Geography, 38:1, 81-101, DOI: 10.1080/08873631.2020.1800320
    National Strategic Plan for Regional Revitalization. (2018). National Development Council,
    Executive Yuan. 1-16
    https://ws.ndc.gov.tw/Download.ashx?u=LzAwMS9hZG1pbmlzdHJhdG9yLzExL3JlbGZpbGUvMC8xMjQ3NC9mMzY0ZTM0Zi1hMzBiLTQ3ZTgtYWQzMi1jNWE2YWQ2ODIzMGQucGRm&n=TmF0aW9uYWwgU3RyYXRlZ2ljIFBsYW4gZm9yIFJlZ2lvbmFsIFJldml0YWxpemF0aW9uKOaIsOeVpeioiOeVq%2BiLseitr%2BeJiCko5L%2BuKS5wZGY%3D&icon=..pdf
    Ng, M. K. (2015). Knowledge and power in regenerating lived space in Treasure Hill, Taipei
    1960s-2010: From squatter settlement to a co-living artist village. Planning Perspectives, 30(2), 253–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/02665433.2014.934711
    Osamu, S. (May 2019). Interview with Akiko Ito: Director General, Secretariat of the
    Headquarters for Overcoming Population Decline and Vitalizing Local Economy in
    Japan, Public Relations Office, Government of Japan.
    Regional Revitalization: National Strategic Plan for Regional Revitalization. (2019). National
    Development Council, Executive Yuan. 1-26.
    https://ws.ndc.gov.tw/Download.ashx?u=LzAwMS9hZG1pbmlzdHJhdG9yLzExL3JlbGZpbGUvMC8xMjQ3NC9lYmY2MDYxNS01ZDMwLTQxNDYtOGFlMS0wMTVhNDVmZDhkMDgucGRm&n=5Zyw5pa55Ym155Sf5ZyL5a625oiw55Wl6KiI55Wr57Ch5aCxKOiLseaWh%2BeJiCkxMDgwNjIw54mILnBkZg%3D%3D&icon=..pdf
    Ren et al. (2020). Effects of the northeast China revitalization strategy on regional economic
    growth and social development. Chinese Geographical Science, 30(5): 791–809.
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-020-1149-5
    Robinson, J. (2011). 2010 urban geography plenary lecture—The travels of urban
    neoliberalism: Taking stock of the internationalization of urban theory”, Urban Geography, 32(8), 1087-1109, https://doi.org/10.2747/0272-3638.32.8.1087
    Rogelja, I. (2021). The museumification of Treasure Hill: Authenticity, authority and art in a
    Taiwanese urban village. The China Quarterly, 245, 227-247. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0305741020000090
    Rostow, W. W. (1960). The stages of economic growth: A non-communist manifesto.
    Cambridge University Press.
    Roy, A. (2005). Urban informality: Toward an epistemology of planning”, Journal of the
    American Planning Association, 71, 147–158.
    Roy, A. (2011). Slumdog cities: Rethinking subaltern urbanism. International Journal of
    Urban and Regional Research, 35(2), 223–238. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2011.01051.x
    Shin et al. (2016). Introduction: Locating gentrification in the Global East. Urban Studies.
    Vol.53(3), 455-470.
    Simone, A. (2010). City life from Dakar to Jakarta. Routledge.
    Smith, N. (1987). Gentrification and the rent gap. Annals of the Association of American
    Geographers, 77(3), 462–465.
    Su, L. (2019). Going local: Taiwan kicks off regional revitalization effort”. Taiwan Panorama.
    台北市寶藏巖文化村協會 (Treasure Hill Cultural Village Association, Taipei City). (2021).
    0911座談會文字稿 (9/11 Symposium Transcript)。
    https://memory.culture.tw/Story/Detail?Id=2138&IndexCode=member_story
    台北市寶藏巖文化村協會 (Treasure Hill Cultural Village Association, Taipei City). (2021).
    0917座談會文字稿 (9/17 Symposium Transcript)。
    https://memory.culture.tw/Story/Detail?Id=2138&IndexCode=member_story
    台北市寶藏巖文化村協會 (Treasure Hill Cultural Village Association, Taipei City). (2021).
    1001座談會文字稿 (10/1 Symposium Transcript)。
    https://memory.culture.tw/Story/Detail?Id=2138&IndexCode=member_story
    台北市寶藏巖文化村協會 (Treasure Hill Cultural Village Association, Taipei City). (2021).
    1128寶藏巖共生聚落居住策略願景論壇文字稿 (1128 Treasure Hill Sustainable
    Community Residential Strategy Vision Forum Transcript)。
    https://memory.culture.tw/Story/Detail?Id=2138&IndexCode=member_story
    Ulldemolins, J. R. (2014). Culture and authenticity in urban regeneration processes:
    Place branding in central Barcelona. Urban Studies (Edinburgh, Scotland), 51(14),
    3026–3045. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098013515762
    Vasudevan, A. (2015). The makeshift city: Towards a global geography of squatting. Progress in
    Human Geography, 39(3), 338-359. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132514531471
    Waley, P.T. (2016) Speaking gentrification in the languages of the Global East, Urban
    Studies, Vol.53(3). 615-625.
    Watson, S. (Ed.). (2007). Museums and their Communities (1st ed.). Routledge.
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203944752
    Yang, O. (2003-2010). Taipei Nooks — Living Treasures of the Past 角落台北 ‧ 尋寶徒。
    http://nookcity.tw/index.html
    Yiftachel, O. (2009). Theoretical notes on “gray cities”: The coming of urban apartheid?
    Planning Theory, 8.1, 88–100.
    張之穎(Chang, C.). (2008). 寶藏巖藝術村不只是個高級動物園. 文化研究月報, 120期(09).
    49-53. https://doi.org/10.7012/CSM.201109.0049
    張立本 (Chang, L.). (2005). 都市治理與社會運動的文化策略:台北市寶藏巖違建運動. 中
    外文學, 33(9), 109–142. https://doi.org/10.6637/CWLQ.2005.33(9).109-142
    張立本(Chang, L.). (2011). 曲扭的鏡子:寶藏巖的民眾、抗爭者、規劃師、藝術與體制
    (上). 文化研究月報, 122期(11), 57-64. https://doi.org/10.7012/CSM.201111.0057
    徐聖情 (Hsu, S.). (2006). 拒絕再做軟柿子,新市府請硬起來。公共論壇。
    https://www.coolloud.org.tw/node/64075
    洪伯邑[等]著 (Hung, P.). (2021). 田野敲敲門 : 現地研究基本功。洪伯邑主編 (初版). 國立臺
    灣大學出版中心.
    郭淇瑋 (Kuo, C.). (2010). 寶藏巖––藝術介入空間的公共性。小地方新聞網。
    廖世璋(Liao, S.). (2014). 後博物館的地方實踐––寶藏巖. 博物館學季刊, 28(2). 35-69.
    https://doi.org/10.6686/MuseQ.201404_28(2).0002
    林倩如(Lin, C.). (2021). 【講座筆記】劉可強╳彭揚凱:寶藏巖十年的省思與展望,續住
    與發展會持續對話。步入城市#38。https://ours.org.tw/2021/02/07/lecture38-2/
    劉益誠 (Liu, I.). (2007). 一個柿子不斷變硬的社區抗爭過程 ─ 敬答徐聖情女士。苦勞網。
    https://www.coolloud.org.tw/node/1195
    慕思勉(Mu, S.). (2023). 寶藏巖社區:臺大城鄉基金會三十年:變革中的專業者。 台
    灣建築雜誌,Vol.329. https://www.ta-mag.net/ta/News.php?id=2185
    宝窩 TREASURE HIVE。(2005-2007)。 http://treasurehive.blogspot.com/
    王志弘(Wang, C.). (2003). 台北市文化治理的性質與轉變,1967-2002。台灣社會研究
    季刊,(52),121-186。https://doi.org/10.29816/TARQSS.200312.0003
    衛紅(Wei, H.). (2006). 寶藏巖公社連意識形態也不是。破週報。
    http://praxis.tw/archive/post-26.php
    游崴(Yu, W.). (2007). 寶藏巖改建爭議未息,部分藝術家持續抗爭中。本文刊登於《典藏
    .今藝術》,172期 。https://neogenova.blogspot.com/2007/02/blog-post.html
    臺北國際藝術村/寶藏巖國際藝術村。(2021)。 台北市文化局。
    https://culture.gov.taipei/cp.aspx?n=20994098C3459E18
    蟾蜍山煥民新村。(2021)。台北市文化局。
    https://culture.gov.taipei/cp.aspx?n=66A2914C14F403C7
    關於藝術村。(2023)。財團法人台北市文化基金會藝術村營運部。
    https://www.artistvillage.org/about.php
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    亞太研究英語碩士學位學程(IMAS)
    110926028
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0110926028
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[International Program in Asia-Pacific Studies\n(IMAS/IDAS)] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    602801.pdf6768KbAdobe PDF0View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback