政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/150274
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 110189/141115 (78%)
造访人次 : 46789182      在线人数 : 408
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧:
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号",以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻,建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段,可获得较完整数据
  • 进阶搜寻

    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/150274

    题名: 非正式空間中的城市共生動態過程:寶藏巖案例
    The Dynamics of Urban Symbiosis Processes Within Informal Spaces: The Case of Treasure Hill
    作者: 何子麒
    Larkin, Tobias Ho
    贡献者: 陳虹穎
    Chen, Hung-Ying
    Larkin, Tobias Ho
    关键词: 寶藏巖
    Treasure Hill
    Urban Symbiosis
    Informal Settlement
    日期: 2024
    上传时间: 2024-03-01 14:18:24 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 本論文探討台灣台北市寶藏巖的「城市共生」動態。在這個非正式的聚落中,各種不同的利害關係者進行日常維護、合作和社區活化,共同構想並創造所謂的「藝居共生」。本研究嘗試將寶藏巖推動「藝居共生」與城市非正式性和「地方創生」相連結,以理解為什麼「城市共生」會成為寶藏巖不同利害關係者的共同關注?以及,在這個非正式聚落中,不同利害關係人如何理解並經驗「城市共生」?透過一系列質性研究方法,我以三個主題──「活保存」,「管理和治理」與「地方創生」──探討關於寶藏巖文化治理和保存的多元觀點。我主張非正式聚落的生存充滿挑戰。此過程中,寶藏巖居民透過實踐和分享他們的社區傳統和聚落文化,以持續參與於文化治理與成為(被)保存的主體。本論文主要貢獻在於記敘2021年-2023年間,原居民們租約到期,臺北市文化局頒布新使用辦法之多重治理框架協商過程.
    This thesis explores the dynamics of “Urban Symbiosis” in Taipei City’s Treasure Hill community. In this informal settlement, various stakeholders engage in daily maintenance, cooperation, and community activation, collectively envisioning and creating what is known as “Artist-Resident Symbiosis”. This study seeks to link the promotion of “Artist-Resident Symbiosis” in Treasure Hill with urban informality literature and “Regional Revitalization” policy, aiming to understand why “Urban Symbiosis” has become a common concern for different stakeholders in Treasure Hill. Additionally, it examines how different stakeholders both understand and experience “Urban Symbiosis” within this informal settlement. Through a series of qualitative research methods, this thesis discusses diverse perspectives on cultural governance and preservation in Treasure Hill, focusing on three themes: “Living Conservation”, “Management and Governance”, and “Community Revitalization”. I argue that the survival of informal settlements is filled with challenges. In this process of survival, Treasure Hill residents continue to participate in cultural governance and become (or are) subjects of preservation by practicing and sharing their community traditions and settlement culture. The main contribution of this thesis lies in narrating the multiple governance framework negotiation processes between original residents whose leases expired between 2021 and 2023 and Taipei City’s Department of Cultural Affairs (DCA), which issued new usage regulations during this period.
    參考文獻: Aguilar et al. (2003). Globalization, regional development, and mega-city expansion in Latin
    America: Analyzing Mexico City’s peri-urban hinterland. Cities, 20(1), 3-21.
    Appadurai, A. (2001). Deep democracy: Urban governmentality and the horizon of politics.
    Environment and Urbanization, 13(2), 23–43.
    Banks et al. (2020). “Urban informality as a site of critical analysis”. The Journal of
    Development Studies, 56(2), 223–238.
    Caldeira, T. (2017). Peripheral urbanization: Autoconstruction, transversal logics, and
    politics in cities of the global south. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space,
    35(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775816658479
    Casagrande, M. (2019). From urban acupuncture to the third generation city. In Nature
    Driven Urbanism (pp.131–153). Springer International Publishing.
    Chang & Chou, P.C. (2020). The influence of the regional revitalization policy on Taiwan’s
    land planning: Taking Pingtung county township as an example”. IOP Conference
    Series. Earth and Environmental Science, 588(4), 42014–.
    Chuang et al. (2021). Examining the key drivers for regional revitalization based upon social
    network analysis: A case study of Badouzi in Taiwan. Marine Policy, 133, 104754–.
    Cobbinah, P.B. (2023). The oddity of desiring informality. Dialogues in Human Geography,
    0(0), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1177/20438206231191737.
    De Soto, H. (2000). The mystery of capital: Why capitalism triumphs in the West and
    fails everywhere else. Perseus Books Group.
    El Ouardi & Montambeault, F. (2023). Collectively gardening the urban public space in
    Mexico City: When informal practices interact with the state. International Journal of
    Urban and Regional Research, 47(2), 201–220.
    Freire-Medeiros, B. (2009). The favela and its touristic transits. Geoforum 40.4, 580–88.
    Fujimoto, I. (1992). Lessons from Abroad in Rural Community Revitalization: The One Village,
    One Product Movement in Japan. Community Development Journal, 27(1), 10–20.
    Giombini, L. (2022). Respect in Conservation Ethics: A Philosophical Inquiry, Studies in
    Conservation, 67:1-2, 100-108, DOI: 10.1080/00393630.2021.1940797
    Glass, R. (1964). London: Aspects of Change. London: MacGibbon & Kee.
    Gonzalez, S. (2011). Bilbao and Barcelona “in motion”. How urban regeneration “models”
    travel and mutate in the global flows of policy tourism. Urban Studies, 48(7), 1397–1418.
    Greenbaum, R. & Bondonio, D. (2004). Losing focus: A comparative evaluation of spatially
    targeted economic revitalization programmes in the US and the EU, Regional Studies,
    38(3), 319-334, https://doi.org/10.1080/003434042000211042
    Hall, P. & Pfeiffer, U. (2000). Urban future 21: A global agenda for twenty-first century
    cities (1st ed.). Routledge.
    Harvey, D. (2006). Paris, capital of modernity. Routledge.
    Hetherington, K. (2015). Foucault and the Museum. In The International Handbooks of Museum
    Studies (eds S. Macdonald and H. Rees Leahy). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118829059.wbihms102
    Hooper-Greenhill, E. (2000). Museums and the Interpretation of Visual Culture (1st ed.).
    Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003124450
    Hooper-Greenhill, E. (2003). Museums and the Shaping of Knowledge / Eilean
    Hooper-Greenhill. London ; Routledge, 2003. Print.
    Hsiao, H. (2022). From squatter settlements to cultural heritage: The preservation and
    revitalization as “group of buildings” based on the case experience of Treasure Hill Art
    Village in Taipei City, Taiwan, Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering,
    21(2), 644-661, http://doi.org/10.1080/13467581.2020.1838910
    Inoue et al. (2022). Exploring the impact of depopulation on a country's population geography:
    Lessons learned from Japan. Population, Space and Place, 28(5), e2543.
    Jacobs, J. (1961). The death and life of great American cities. Random House.
    Jou et al. (2016). Gentrification and revanchist urbanism in Taipei? Urban Studies, 53(3),
    Kang, M. (2006). Altered space: Squatting and legitimizing Treasure Hill, Taipei. Presented at
    Cultural Development Network’s Forum: ‘Artivism: The role of arts in regeneration’. 1-6.
    Kim, K. & Kim, E.J. (2021). Tourism as a key for regional revitalization?: A quantitative
    evaluation of tourism zone development in Japan.” Sustainability,
    13(13), 7478–. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13137478
    King, K. (2013). Jane Jacobs and “The need for aged buildings”: Neighbourhood historical
    development pace and community social relations”. Urban Studies, 50(12),
    King, R. (2023). Informality as process and the social construction of slums. In Mayne, A. (Ed.),
    The Oxford Handbook of the Modern Slum, Chapter 4 (p.73-84). Oxford University
    Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190879457.001.0001.
    Knell, S. (Ed.). (2007). Museums in the material world. Taylor & Francis Group.
    Lefebvre, H. (1968). The Right to the City (Le Droit à la ville). Anthropos, Paris (1996).
    Li et al. (2022). A cultural approach to preserving squatter settlements: The case of
    Treasure Hill village in Taipei, International Journal of Heritage Studies, 28(4), 460-475, https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2021.2010234.
    Liu, J. (2022). The impacts of Taiwan’s rural rejuvenation program on rural migration,
    2022 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Anaheim, California 322350, Agricultural and
    Applied Economics Association.
    Marx et al. (2013). The economics of slums in the developing world. Journal of Economic
    Perspectives, Vol.27 (4), 187–210.
    McFarlane, C. (2012). Rethinking informality: politics, crisis, and the city. Planning
    Theory & Practice, 13(1), 89–108.
    Mo, Y. (2007). Residents occupy Treasure Hill. Taipei Times.
    Muzaini, H. (2021). Rethinking the living museum concept “from below”, Journal of
    Cultural Geography, 38:1, 81-101, DOI: 10.1080/08873631.2020.1800320
    National Strategic Plan for Regional Revitalization. (2018). National Development Council,
    Executive Yuan. 1-16
    Ng, M. K. (2015). Knowledge and power in regenerating lived space in Treasure Hill, Taipei
    1960s-2010: From squatter settlement to a co-living artist village. Planning Perspectives, 30(2), 253–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/02665433.2014.934711
    Osamu, S. (May 2019). Interview with Akiko Ito: Director General, Secretariat of the
    Headquarters for Overcoming Population Decline and Vitalizing Local Economy in
    Japan, Public Relations Office, Government of Japan.
    Regional Revitalization: National Strategic Plan for Regional Revitalization. (2019). National
    Development Council, Executive Yuan. 1-26.
    Ren et al. (2020). Effects of the northeast China revitalization strategy on regional economic
    growth and social development. Chinese Geographical Science, 30(5): 791–809.
    Robinson, J. (2011). 2010 urban geography plenary lecture—The travels of urban
    neoliberalism: Taking stock of the internationalization of urban theory”, Urban Geography, 32(8), 1087-1109, https://doi.org/10.2747/0272-3638.32.8.1087
    Rogelja, I. (2021). The museumification of Treasure Hill: Authenticity, authority and art in a
    Taiwanese urban village. The China Quarterly, 245, 227-247. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0305741020000090
    Rostow, W. W. (1960). The stages of economic growth: A non-communist manifesto.
    Cambridge University Press.
    Roy, A. (2005). Urban informality: Toward an epistemology of planning”, Journal of the
    American Planning Association, 71, 147–158.
    Roy, A. (2011). Slumdog cities: Rethinking subaltern urbanism. International Journal of
    Urban and Regional Research, 35(2), 223–238. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2011.01051.x
    Shin et al. (2016). Introduction: Locating gentrification in the Global East. Urban Studies.
    Vol.53(3), 455-470.
    Simone, A. (2010). City life from Dakar to Jakarta. Routledge.
    Smith, N. (1987). Gentrification and the rent gap. Annals of the Association of American
    Geographers, 77(3), 462–465.
    Su, L. (2019). Going local: Taiwan kicks off regional revitalization effort”. Taiwan Panorama.
    台北市寶藏巖文化村協會 (Treasure Hill Cultural Village Association, Taipei City). (2021).
    0911座談會文字稿 (9/11 Symposium Transcript)。
    台北市寶藏巖文化村協會 (Treasure Hill Cultural Village Association, Taipei City). (2021).
    0917座談會文字稿 (9/17 Symposium Transcript)。
    台北市寶藏巖文化村協會 (Treasure Hill Cultural Village Association, Taipei City). (2021).
    1001座談會文字稿 (10/1 Symposium Transcript)。
    台北市寶藏巖文化村協會 (Treasure Hill Cultural Village Association, Taipei City). (2021).
    1128寶藏巖共生聚落居住策略願景論壇文字稿 (1128 Treasure Hill Sustainable
    Community Residential Strategy Vision Forum Transcript)。
    Ulldemolins, J. R. (2014). Culture and authenticity in urban regeneration processes:
    Place branding in central Barcelona. Urban Studies (Edinburgh, Scotland), 51(14),
    3026–3045. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098013515762
    Vasudevan, A. (2015). The makeshift city: Towards a global geography of squatting. Progress in
    Human Geography, 39(3), 338-359. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132514531471
    Waley, P.T. (2016) Speaking gentrification in the languages of the Global East, Urban
    Studies, Vol.53(3). 615-625.
    Watson, S. (Ed.). (2007). Museums and their Communities (1st ed.). Routledge.
    Yang, O. (2003-2010). Taipei Nooks — Living Treasures of the Past 角落台北 ‧ 尋寶徒。
    Yiftachel, O. (2009). Theoretical notes on “gray cities”: The coming of urban apartheid?
    Planning Theory, 8.1, 88–100.
    張之穎(Chang, C.). (2008). 寶藏巖藝術村不只是個高級動物園. 文化研究月報, 120期(09).
    49-53. https://doi.org/10.7012/CSM.201109.0049
    張立本 (Chang, L.). (2005). 都市治理與社會運動的文化策略:台北市寶藏巖違建運動. 中
    外文學, 33(9), 109–142. https://doi.org/10.6637/CWLQ.2005.33(9).109-142
    張立本(Chang, L.). (2011). 曲扭的鏡子:寶藏巖的民眾、抗爭者、規劃師、藝術與體制
    (上). 文化研究月報, 122期(11), 57-64. https://doi.org/10.7012/CSM.201111.0057
    徐聖情 (Hsu, S.). (2006). 拒絕再做軟柿子,新市府請硬起來。公共論壇。
    洪伯邑[等]著 (Hung, P.). (2021). 田野敲敲門 : 現地研究基本功。洪伯邑主編 (初版). 國立臺
    郭淇瑋 (Kuo, C.). (2010). 寶藏巖––藝術介入空間的公共性。小地方新聞網。
    廖世璋(Liao, S.). (2014). 後博物館的地方實踐––寶藏巖. 博物館學季刊, 28(2). 35-69.
    林倩如(Lin, C.). (2021). 【講座筆記】劉可強╳彭揚凱:寶藏巖十年的省思與展望,續住
    劉益誠 (Liu, I.). (2007). 一個柿子不斷變硬的社區抗爭過程 ─ 敬答徐聖情女士。苦勞網。
    慕思勉(Mu, S.). (2023). 寶藏巖社區:臺大城鄉基金會三十年:變革中的專業者。 台
    灣建築雜誌,Vol.329. https://www.ta-mag.net/ta/News.php?id=2185
    宝窩 TREASURE HIVE。(2005-2007)。 http://treasurehive.blogspot.com/
    王志弘(Wang, C.). (2003). 台北市文化治理的性質與轉變,1967-2002。台灣社會研究
    衛紅(Wei, H.). (2006). 寶藏巖公社連意識形態也不是。破週報。
    游崴(Yu, W.). (2007). 寶藏巖改建爭議未息,部分藝術家持續抗爭中。本文刊登於《典藏
    .今藝術》,172期 。https://neogenova.blogspot.com/2007/02/blog-post.html
    臺北國際藝術村/寶藏巖國際藝術村。(2021)。 台北市文化局。
    描述: 碩士
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0110926028
    数据类型: thesis
    显示于类别:[亞太研究英語博/碩士學位學程(IDAS/IMAS)] 學位論文


    档案 描述 大小格式浏览次数
    602801.pdf6768KbAdobe PDF0检视/开启


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈