English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 109952/140887 (78%)
Visitors : 46364835      Online Users : 1527
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/150381


    Title: 金融消費者保護之再進化：英國新消費者義務之介紹與啟示
    Other Titles: Evolution of Financial Consumer Protection: Introduction and Implication of UK's New Consumer Duty
    Authors: 陳俊元
    Chen, Chun-yuan
    Contributors: 風管系
    Keywords: 金融消費者保護法;公平待客;新消費者義務;原則監理;結果監理
    Financial Consumer Protection Law;Treating customer fairly;New consumer duty;Principle-based regulation;Outcome-based regulation
    Date: 2023-08
    Issue Date: 2024-03-05 16:16:25 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 英國新近推動「新消費者義務」，旨在強調消費者義務之概念，係確保消費者利益為公司每個決定之中心。在此概念下，公司應致力及證明其所提供之成果符合消費者義務的概念。其適用範圍涵蓋分銷鏈中的生產者或經銷商，亦強調公司文化、治理與課責之重要性。本文認為此內容值得參考，但臺灣如欲進一步引進，則應強化調查與回饋，並界定清楚與既有法律體系之關係。又英國以原則監理之架構，且較少賦予私人訴權，與有FOS之妥適運作以及公平合理原則作為彈性救濟有相關。我國亦應注意英國之整體架構，重新思考監理政策與評議機制之設計。
    The U.K. recently introduces “New Consumer Duty”, aims to emphasize the liability to consumer and ensure the interest of consumer central to every decision made by firms. Within this framework, firms should improve and prove the results satisfying consumer duty. The application scope of this duty includes producer and distributor in distribution chain. This duty also emphasizes the importance of firms’ culture, governance and accountability. The author of this article believes that the duty is worth of consideration for Taiwan. However, the authority should improve investigation and response, and clarify the relation with current legal system in Taiwan. The U.K.’s framework of outcome-based regulation without private right of action, may be related to the proper unction of FOS and flexible application of fair and reasonable rule. Thus, Taiwan is suggested to reconsider the regulation policy and operation of Financial Ombudsman Institution, with the caution of the overall framework of the U.K.
    Relation: 月旦法學雜誌, No.339, pp.6-18
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: https://dx.doi.org/10.53106/1025593133901
    DOI: 10.53106/1025593133901
    Appears in Collections:[風險管理與保險學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML36View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback