English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 110934/141854 (78%)
Visitors : 47774989      Online Users : 340
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/151227


    Title: 人工智慧於司法實務之可能運用與挑戰
    Possible Application and Challenge of Artificial Intelligence in Judicial Practice
    Authors: 莊弘鈺;龍建宇
    Chuang, Luke Hung-yu;Long, Chien-yu
    Contributors: 科管智財所
    Keywords: 人工智慧;風險評估工具;量刑基準;正當法律程序;鑑識科學;預測性執法;歧視;隱私權;合理懷疑;一般資料保護規則;透明與監督
    Artificial intelligence;AI;Risk-need assessment tool;Sentencing guideline;Due process;Forensic science;Predictive policing;Discrimination;Privacy;Reasonable suspicion;General Data Protection Regulation;GDPR;Transparency and supervision
    Date: 2019-01
    Issue Date: 2024-05-24 11:00:14 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 人工智慧乃是以電腦程式模仿人類思考模式之結果，以更有效率之電腦運算，進行資料蒐集、分析。現行的人工智慧在司法審判中可用作法律檢索分析、風險評估工具、計算量刑基準、鑑識輔助系統，在專利商標實務中作為判斷侵權及核駁之依據，在執法上也可用於推算出可能的犯罪熱點而進行預測性執法。人工智慧雖然可有效運用在司法實務上，但其可能無法處理法律邏輯與常識之問題，可能對特定族群產生歧視或是對於隱私權產生侵害。另系統本身之透明性與可受監督上亦存有疑問，且在實際應用時可能受制於法令上的限制。準此，本文就人工智慧於司法實務上之可能運用與挑戰，進行全面性地探討，並提出結論與建議。
    Artificial Intelligence (＂AI＂) is a computer program imitating human thinking process, which uses efficient means to gather and analyze data. The AI technology has already been used in judicial practice for legal analysis, risk assessment, sentencing guideline, and forensic science. This technology could also be used to determine patent and trademark infringement and prosecution. Moreover, AI can also be used in analyzing crime hotspot and subsequently in predictive policing. Despite these benefits, some challenges indeed exist when applying AI in judicial practice. Artificial Intelligence could hardly deal with issues relating to logic and general knowledge. The AI decision-making process often creates discrimination and privacy concerns. Additionally, it is worth debating how to make the algorithm transparent and supervised. Using the algorithm and personal data should also comply with current legal rules. This article aims to address all the possible applications and challenges while using AI in judiciary, and then to conclude and suggest for the future usage.
    Relation: 中正大學法學集刊, No.62, pp.43-108
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[科技管理與智慧財產研究所] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML26View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback