English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 112881/143847 (78%)
Visitors : 50296143      Online Users : 772
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 會計學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/152494
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/152494


    Title: 企業策略類型對ESG與財務績效關係之影響
    The Impact of Corporate Business Strategy on the Relationship between ESG and Financial Performance
    Authors: 陳偲翎
    Chen, Sih-Ling
    Contributors: 陳明進
    陳偲翎
    Chen, Sih-Ling
    Keywords: 企業策略類型
    ESG
    財務績效
    Business strategy
    ESG
    Financial performance
    Date: 2024
    Issue Date: 2024-08-05 12:22:59 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究按Miles and Snow (1978)之企業策略類型分類理論作為企業策略分類之依據,以2018年至2022年臺灣上市(櫃)公司為樣本,探討我國企業的企業策略類型對於ESG成效以及財務績效之間的影響。以普通最小平方法進行實證分析,結果顯示ESG成效與財務績效之間具有關聯,而TESG排名分數裡獲得分數越高者,對財務績效的獲利能力、企業價值都會產生正向影響;企業策略類型之因素確實影響著ESG與財務績效,防禦型企業策略多會使財務績效有所下降,而探勘型企業策略多令財務績效提升,但探勘型企業較防禦型企業的ESG成效,不一定對於財務績效會有較佳表現。此外額外測試顯示固定效果與產業特性對於企業策略類型、ESG成效、財務績效間之關聯性有所影響,後續相關研究應將此二因素皆納入考量。
    This study uses Miles and Snow's (1978) corporate strategy type classification theory as the basis for corporate strategy classification, taking Taiwan's listed OTC companies from 2018 to 2022 as a sample to explore the impact of corporate business strategy on the relationship between ESG and financial performance. The empirical results show that there is a correlation between ESG investment and financial performance, and the higher the TESG ranking score, the higher the score will have a positive impact on financial performance, profitability, and corporate value; corporate strategy type factors do affect ESG and financial performance. Defender tends to reduce financial performance, while Prospector tends to improve financial performance. However, compared to Defender companies, Prospector corporations investing in ESG do not necessarily have better performance on financial performance. In addition, additional tests show that fixed effects and industry characteristics have an impact on the correlation between corporate business strategy, ESG, and financial performance. Subsequent relevant research should take these two factors into consideration.
    Reference: Alareeni, B. A., & A. Hamdan (2020). ESG impact on performance of US S&P 500-listed firms. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 20(7): 1409-1428.
    Alsayegh, M. F., Abdul Rahman, R., & Homayoun, S. (2020). Corporate economic, environmental, and social sustainability performance transformation through ESG disclosure. Sustainability, 12(9), 3910.
    Andersen, M.L. and Dejoy, J.S. (2011). Corporate social and financial performance: the role of size, industry, risk, R&D and advertising expenses as control variables. Business and Society Review, Vol. 116 No. 2, pp. 237-256.
    Attig, N., El Ghoul, S., Guedhami, O., & Suh, J. (2013). Corporate social responsibility and credit ratings. Journal of business ethics, 117, 679-694..
    Bentley, K. A., Omer, T. C., & Sharp, N. Y. (2013). Business strategy, financial reporting irregularities, and audit effort. Contemporary accounting research, 30(2), 780-817.
    Branco, M. C., & Rodrigues, L. L. (2006). Corporate social responsibility and resource-based perspectives. Journal of business Ethics, 69, 111-132.
    Chen, Z., & Xie, G. (2022). ESG disclosure and financial performance: Moderating role of ESG investors. International Review of Financial Analysis, 83, 102291.
    Cheng, B., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). Corporate social responsibility and access to finance. Strategic management journal, 35(1), 1-23.
    Deng, B., Ji, L., & Liu, Z. (2022). The effect of strategic corporate social responsibility on financial performance: evidence from China. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 58(6), 1726-1739.
    Drempetic, S., Klein, C., & Zwergel, B. (2020). The influence of firm size on the ESG score: Corporate sustainability ratings under review. Journal of business ethics, 167(2), 333-360.
    Fatemi, A., Fooladi, I., & Tehranian, H. (2015). Valuation effects of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Banking & Finance, 59, 182-192.
    Fauzi, H., & Idris, K. (2009). The relationship of CSR and financial performance: New evidence from Indonesian companies. Issues in Social and Environmental Accounting, 3(1).
    Friedman, M. (2007). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. In Corporate ethics and corporate governance (pp. 173-178). Springer.
    Galbreath, J. (2010). The impact of strategic orientation on corporate social responsibility. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 18(1), 23-40.
    Garcia, A. S., Mendes-Da-Silva, W., & Orsato, R. J. (2017). Sensitive industries produce better ESG performance: Evidence from emerging markets. Journal of cleaner production, 150, 135-147.
    Ghosh, A. (2013). Corporate sustainability and corporate financial performance: the Indian context. Indian Institute of Management, Calcutta, Working Paper Series WPS No. 721/January 2013.
    Hambrick, D. C. (1983). Some tests of the effectiveness and functional attributes of Miles and Snow's strategic types. Academy of Management journal, 26(1), 5-26.
    Han, J. J., Kim, H. J., & Yu, J. (2016). Empirical study on relationship between corporate social responsibility and financial performance in Korea. Asian Journal of Sustainability and Social Responsibility, 1, 61-76.
    Hemingway, C. A., & Maclagan, P. W. (2004). Managers' personal values as drivers of corporate social responsibility. Journal of business ethics, 50, 33-44.
    Ittner, C. D., Larcker, D. F., & Rajan, M. V. (1997). The choice of performance measures in annual bonus contracts. Accounting Review, 231-255.
    Kim, S., & Li, Z. (2021). Understanding the impact of ESG practices in corporate finance. Sustainability, 13(7), 3746
    Lian, Y., & Weng, X. (2024). ESG performance and investment efficiency. Finance Research Letters, 62, 105084.
    Lins, K. V., Servaes, H., & Tamayo, A. (2017). Social capital, trust, and firm performance: The value of corporate social responsibility during the financial crisis. the Journal of Finance, 72(4), 1785-1824.
    March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization science, 2(1), 71-87.
    Margolis, J. D., Elfenbein, H. A., & Walsh, J. P. (2009). Does it pay to be good... and does it matter? A meta-analysis of the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. Working paper, Harvard University.
    Miles, P. C., & Angelis, J. N. (2022). Untangling innovation: an examination of compensation, corporate social responsibility, and corporate financial performance. Social Responsibility Journal, 18(8), 1567-1586.
    Miles, R. E., Snow, C. C., Meyer, A. D., & Coleman Jr, H. J. (1978). Organizational strategy, structure, and process. Academy of management review, 3(3), 546-562.
    Nirino, N., Santoro, G., Miglietta, N., & Quaglia, R. (2021). Corporate controversies and company's financial performance: Exploring the moderating role of ESG practices. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 162, 120341.
    Park, J. G., Park, K., Noh, H., & Kim, Y. G. (2023). Characterization of CSR, ESG, and corporate citizenship through a text mining-based review of literature. Sustainability, 15(5), 3892.
    Porter, M. (1980), Competitive Strategy. Free Press, New York, NY.
    Porter, M. (1985), Competitive Advantage. Free Press, New York, NY.
    Prior, D., Surroca, J., & Tribó, J. A. (2008). Are socially responsible managers really ethical? Exploring the relationship between earnings management and corporate social responsibility. Corporate governance: An international review, 16(3), 160-177.
    Schuler, D. A., & Cording, M. (2006). A corporate social performance–corporate financial performance behavioral model for consumers. Academy of management Review, 31(3), 540-558.
    Treacy, M., & Wiersema, F. (2007). The discipline of market leaders: Choose your customers, narrow your focus, dominate your market. Hachette UK.
    Velte, P. (2017). Does ESG performance have an impact on financial performance? Evidence from Germany. Journal of global responsibility, 8(2), 169-178.
    Yuan, Y., Lu, L. Y., Tian, G., & Yu, Y. (2020). Business strategy and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 162, 359-377.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    會計學系
    111353046
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0111353046
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[會計學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    304601.pdf2965KbAdobe PDF0View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback