English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 112881/143847 (78%)
Visitors : 50292463      Online Users : 804
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/152756


    Title: 航空產業創新生態系統策略研究 —以香港載旗航空公司為例
    Innovation Ecosystem Strategy of the Airline Industry: A Case Study of a Hong Kong Flag Carrier
    Authors: 阮偉賢
    Yuen, Wai-Yin
    Contributors: 羅明琇
    Lo, Ming-Shiow
    阮偉賢
    Yuen, Wai-Yin
    Keywords: 創新
    生態系統
    策略
    航空產業
    載旗航空公司
    Innovation
    Ecosystem
    Strategy
    Airline Industry
    Flag Carrier
    Date: 2024
    Issue Date: 2024-08-05 13:47:56 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: The airline business has a vital role in supporting a country’s economic development and is cyclical and dynamic, characterised by specifics of value creation, innovation, and changes to the industry’s value proposition. Airlines are keen to find innovative partners and integrate internal, collaborative, and external innovation elements strategically in order to accelerate innovation and value generation. The study attempted to accomplish the research objective through an in-depth case study of a Hong Kong flag carrier, a member of a sizable international aviation conglomerate with numerous product lines. The results showed that the carrier’s innovation ecosystem comprises a set of actors that contribute to the focal offer’s user value proposition, including a focal firm, suppliers, complementors, the community, and customers, across levels. Further, interpreting the collected data, this study draws on different research streams of innovation ecosystem strategy to identify five primary strategies that are being implemented by the carrier, including “component”, “be-my-friend”, “supplier co-creation”, “expert co-creation”, and “customer co-creation”.

    Overall, the innovation strategy that a carrier facilitates should be matched to the roles of the actors and strongly linked to the factors of the focal firm’s internal resources, internal technical maturity, and innovation focuses in order to effectively help the manager decide the direction and process of innovation development. The findings contribute to strengthening the robustness of the theoretical implications and content of the ecosystems-as-structure perspective, theories on ecosystem life cycle, and how to promote a sustainable innovation ecosystem strategically in a flag carrier to narrow the gap between theory and practice.
    Reference: ACI. (2024). Top 10 busiest airports in the world shift with the rise of international air travel demand, Press Releases.

    Adner, R. (2006). Match Your Innovation Strategy to Your Innovation Ecosystem. Harvard Business Review, 84(4), (pp. 98).

    Adner, R. (2012). The Wide Lens: What Successful Innovators See That Others Miss. New York, NY: Penguin Books.

    Adner, R. (2017). Ecosystem as Structure: An Actionable Construct for Strategy. Journal of Management, 43(1), (pp. 39–58).

    Adner, R., & Kapoor, R. (2010). Value Creation in Innovation Ecosystems: How the Structure of Technological Interdependence Affects Firm Performance in New Technology Generations. Strategic Management Journal, 31(3), (pp. 306–333).

    Adner, R., & Kapoor, R. (2016). Innovation Ecosystems and the Pace of Substitution: Re-examining Technology S-curves. Strategic Management Journal, 37(4), (pp. 625–648).

    Adner, R., Oxley, J. E., & Silverman, B. S. (2013). Introduction to Collaboration and Competition in Business Ecosystems. Advances in Strategic Management, Vol. 30: ix–xvii. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

    Altman, E. J., Nagle, F., & Tushman, M. L. (2022). The Translucent Hand of Managed Ecosystems: Engaging Communities for Value Creation and Capture. Academy of Management Annals, 16(1), (pp. 70–101).

    Ansari, S., Garud, R., & Kumaraswamy, A. (2016). The Disruptor’s Dilemma: TiVo and the U.S. Television Ecosystem. Strategic Management Journal, 37(9), (pp. 1829–1853).

    Arora, A., & Bokhari, F. A. (2007). Open versus Closed Firms and the Dynamics of Industry Evolution. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 55(3), (pp. 499–527).

    Autio, E., & Thomas, L. (2014). Innovation Ecosystems: Implication for Innovation Management. In M., Dodgson,D. M., Gann,N. Phillips, (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Innovation Management, (pp. 204–228). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Baker, G., Gibbons, R., & Murphy, K. J. (2002). Relational Contracts and the Theory of the Firm. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117 (1), (pp. 39–84).

    Baldwin, C. Y., & Clark, K. B. (2000). Design Rules. In: The Power of Modularity. Vol. 1. Boston, MA: MIT Press.

    Barriball, K. L., & While, A.E. (1994) Collecting Data Using a Semi-Structured Interview: A Discussion Paper. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 19(2), (pp. 328–335).

    Besen, S. M., & Farrell, J. (1994). Choosing How to Compete: Strategies and Tactics in Standardization. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8 (2), (pp. 117–131).

    Boudreau, K. (2010). Open Platform Strategies and Innovation: Granting Access vs. Devolving Control. Management Science, 56, (pp. 1849–1872).

    Bowonder, B., & Miyake, T. (2000). Technology management: A knowledge ecology perspective. International Journal of Technology Management, 19(7–8), (pp. 662–684).

    Brandenburger A. M., & Nalebuff B. J. (1996). Co-opetition. New York, NY: Crown Business.

    Casadesus-Masanell, R., & Yoffie, D. (2007). Wintel: Cooperation and Conflict. Management Science, 53, (pp. 584–598).

    Coombs, R., & Georghiou, L. (2002). A New “Industrial Ecology”. SCIENCE, 296, (pp. 471).

    Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. L. (2015). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Dattée, B., Alexy, O., & Autio, E. (2018). Maneuvering in poor visibility: How firms play the ecosystem game when uncertainty is high. Academy of Management Journal, 61 (2), (pp. 466–498).

    Das, T. K., & Teng, B-S. (2000). Instabilities of Strategic Alliances: An Internal Tensions Perspective. Organization Science, 11(1), (pp. 77–101).

    Dhanaraj, C., & Parkhe, A. (2006). Orchestrating Innovation Networks. Academy of Management Review, 31, 659669.

    Ethiraj, S. K. (2007). Allocation of Inventive Effort in Complex Product Systems. Strategic Management Journal, 28, (pp. 563–584).

    Farrell, J., Monroe, H. K., & Saloner, G. (1998). The Vertical Organization of Industry: Systems Competition versus Component Competition. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 7(2), (pp. 143–182).

    Ferdinand, J. P., & Meyer, U. (2017). The social dynamics of heterogeneous innovation ecosystems: Effects of openness on community-firm relations. International Journal of Engineering Business Management, 9, (pp. 1–16).

    Foss, N. J., Schmidt, J., & Teece, D. J. (2023). Ecosystem Leadership as a Dynamic Capability. Long Range Planning, 56(1), 102270.

    Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2015). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education (10th ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.

    Fuller, J., Jacobides, M. G., & Reeves, M. (2019). The Myths and Realities of Business Ecosystems. MIT Sloan Management Review, 60(3), (pp. 1–9).

    Ganco, M., Kapoor, R., & Lee, G. K. (2020). From Rugged Landscapes to Rugged Ecosystems: Structure of Interdependencies and Firms’ Innovative Search. Academy of Management Review, 45(3), (pp. 646–674).

    Gawer, A., & Cusumano, M.A. (2002). Platform Leadership: How Intel, Microsoft, and Cisco
    Drive Industry Innovation. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Gawer, A., & Cusumano, M. A. (2013). Industry Platforms and Ecosystem Innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(3), (pp. 417–433).

    Gawer, A., & Henderson, R. (2007). Platform Owner Entry and Innovation in Complementary Markets: Evidence from Intel. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 16(1), (pp. 1–34).

    Gomes, L. A., Facin, A. L. F., Salerno, M. S., & Ikenami, R. K. (2018). Unpacking the innovation ecosystem construct: Evolution, gaps and trends. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 136, (pp. 30–48).

    Gulati, R., Puranam, P., & Tushman M. L. (2012). Meta-Organizational Design: Rethinking Design in Inter-Organizational and Community Contexts. Strategic Management Journal, 33(6), (pp. 571–586).

    Hannah, D. (2018), Collaborative Strategy and Value Capture in Innovation Ecosystems. 78th Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, AOM.

    Hannah, D., Bremner, R., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (2016). Resource Redeployment in Business Ecosystems. Advances in Strategic Management, Vol. 35, (pp. 19–48).

    Hannah, D., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (2018). How Firms Navigate Cooperation and Competition in Nascent Ecosystems. Strategic Management Journal, 39(12), (pp. 3163–92).

    Hawley, A. H. (1981). Human Ecology. American Behavioral Scientist, 24(3), (pp. 423–444).

    Holström O., H., & Bosch, J. (2017). From ad hoc to strategic ecosys-tem management: The“three-layer ecosystem strategy model”(TeLESM). Software: Evolution and Process, 29, (pp. 1–24).

    Hutchison, S., & Skodol-Wilson, H. (1992) Validity Threats in Scheduled Semi-Structured Research Interviews. Nursing Research, 41, (pp. 117).

    Iansiti, M., & Levien, R. (2004). Strategy as Ecology. Harvard Business Review, 82(3), (pp. 68–78).

    Iansiti, M., & Levien, R. (2004). The Keystone Advantage: What the New Dynamics of Business Ecosystems Mean for Strategy, Innovation, and Sustainability. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    IATA. (2024a). Air Passenger Monthly Analysis – February 2024.

    IATA. (2024b). Air Cargo Monthly Analysis – February 2024.

    ITF. (2019). Air Liberalisation (ITF Research Reports, No. 70). Paris, France: OECD Publishing.

    Iyer, B., & Lee, C.-H., & Venkatraman, N. (2006). Managing in a “Small World Ecosystem”: Lessons from the Software Sector. California Management Review, 48(3), (pp. 28–47).

    Jacobides, M. G., Cennamo, C., & Gawer, A. (2018). Towards a Theory of Ecosystems. Strategic Management Journal, 39(8), (pp. 2255–2276).

    Jacobides, M. G., Knudsen, T, & Augier, M. (2006). Benefiting from Innovation: Value Creation, Value Appropriation and the Role of Industry Architectures. Research Policy, Vol. 35(8), (pp. 1200–1221).

    Jacobides, M. G., MacDuffie, J. P., & Tae, C. J. (2016). Agency, Structure, and the Dominance of OEMs: Change and Stability in the Automotive Sector. Strategic Management Journal, 37(9), (pp. 1942–1967).

    Jacobides, M. G., & Tae, C. J. (2015). Kingpins, Bottlenecks, and Value Dynamics Along a Sector. Organization Science, 26, (pp. 889–907).

    Jing, Z., & Xiong-Jian, L. (2011). Business ecosystem strategies of mobile network operators in the 3G era: the case of China mobile. Telecommun. Policy 35(2), (pp. 156–171).

    Kapoor, R. (2013). Collaborating with Complementors: What Do Firms Do?. Advances in Strategic Management, 30, (pp. 3–25).

    Kapoor, R. (2018). Ecosystems: broadening the locus of value creation. Journal of Organization Design, 7(1), (pp. 1–16).

    Kapoor, R., & Lee, J. M. (2013). Coordinating and Competing in Ecosystems: How Organizational Forms Shape New Technology Investments. Strategic Management Journal, 34(3), (pp. 274–296).

    Kondracki, N. L.,& Wellman,N.S. (2002). Content Analysis: Review of Methods and Their Applications in Nutrition Education. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 34, (pp. 224–230).

    Lee, G. K., & Alnahedh, M. A. (2016). Industries’ Potential for Interdependency and Profitability: A Panel of 135 Industries, 1988–1996. Strategy Science, 1(4), (pp. 285–308).

    Lenox M. J., Rockart S. F., & Lewin A.Y. (2010). Telaah Artikel: Does Interdependency Affect firm And Industry Profitability? An Empirical Test. Strategic Management Journal, 31(2), (pp. 121–139).

    Lieberman, M. B., & Montgomery, D. B. (1998). First-Mover (Dis) Advantages: Retrospective and Link with the Resource-Based View. Strategic Management Journal, 19, (pp. 1111–1125).

    Makowski, L., & Ostroy, J. M. (2001). Perfect Competition and the Creativity of the Market. Journal of Economic Literature, 39(2), (pp. 479–535).

    Mantovani, A., & Ruiz-Aliseda, F. (2016). Equilibrium Innovation Ecosystems: The Dark Side of Collaborating with Complementors. Management Science, 62(2), (pp. 534–549).

    Mayring, P. (2000) Qualitative Content Analysis, Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 1, 20.

    Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Milgrom, P., & Roberts, J. (1992). Economics, Organization and Management. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Moore, J. F. (1993). Predators and Prey: A New Ecology of Competition. Harvard Business Review. 71(3), (pp. 75–86).

    Moore, J. F. (2006). Business Ecosystems and the View from the Firm. The Antitrust Bulletin, 51, (pp. 31–75).

    Moore, J. F. (1996). The Death of Competition : Leadership and Strategy in the Age of Business Ecosystems. New York, NY: Harper Business.

    Nambisan, S., & Baron, R. A. (2013). Entrepreneurship in Innovation Ecosystems: Entrepreneurs’ Self–Regulatory Processes and Their Implications for New Venture Success. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 37(5), (pp. 1071–1097).

    Nambisan, S., & Sawhney, M. (2011). Orchestration Processes in Network-Centric Innovation: Evidence from the Field. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 25, (pp. 40–57).

    Ozcan, P., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (2009). Origin of Alliance Portfolios: Entrepreneurs, Network Strategies, and Firm Performance. Academy of Management Journal, 52(2), (pp. 246–279).

    Ozcan, P., & Santos, F. M. (2014). The Market that Never was: Turf Wars and Failed Alliances in Mobile Payments. Strategic Management Journal, 36(10), (pp. 1486–1512).

    Pagani, M. (2013). Digital Business Strategy and Value Creation: Framing the Dynamic Cycle of Control Points. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 37, (pp. 617–632).

    Pearce, B. (2012). The state of air transport markets and the airline industry after the great recession. Journal of Air Transport Management, 21, (pp. 3-9).

    Priem, R. L., Butler, J. E., & Li, S. (2013). Toward Reimagining Strategy Research: Retrospection and Prospection on the 2011 AMR Decade Award Article. Academy of Management Review, 38(4), (pp. 471–489).

    Rauth, I., Carlgren, L., & Elmquist, M. (2015). Making It Happen: Legitimizing Design Thinking in Large Organizations. Design Management Journal, 9(1), (pp. 47–60).

    Reeves, M., Lotan, H., Legrand, J., & Jacobides, M. G. (2019). How Business Ecosystems Rise (and Often Fall). MIT Sloan Management Review, 1, (pp. 1–8).

    Ritala, P., & Almpanopoulou, A. (2017). In defense of ‘eco’ in innovation ecosystem. Technovation, 60–61, (pp. 39–42).

    Rothaermel, F. T., & Deeds, D. L. (2006). Alliance type, alliance experience and alliance management capability in high-technology ventures. Journal of Business Venturing, 21, (pp. 429–460).

    Shipilov, A., & Gawer, A. (2020). Integrating Research on Interorganizational Networks and Ecosystems. Academy of Management Annals, 14(1), (pp. 92–121).

    Suarez, F., & Lanzolla, G. (2005). The Half-Truth of First-Mover Advantage. Harvard Business Review, 83, (pp. 121–127).

    Teece, D. J. (1984). Economic Analysis and Strategic Management. California Management Review, 26 (3), (pp. 87–110).

    Teece, D. J. (1986). Profiting from Technological Innovation: Implications for Integration, Collaboration, Licensing and Public Policy. Research Policy, 15(6), (pp. 285–305).

    Teece, D. J. (2009). Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management: Organizing for Innovation and Growth. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Teece, D. J. (2016). The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Strategic Management. London: Palgrave Macmillan, (pp. 1–4).

    Tilson, D., Lyytinen, K., & Sørensen, C. (2010). Research Commentary—Digital Infrastructures: The Missing IS Research Agenda. Information Systems Research, 21, (pp. 748–759).

    UNFCCC. (2017). Technology Executive Committee. Performance. Activities. – October 2017.

    Uwe, F. (2013). The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Data Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Walrave, B., Talmar, M., Podoynitsyna, K. S., Romme, A. G. L., & Verbong, G. P. J. (2018). A multi-level perspective on innovation eco-systems for path-breaking innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change,136, (pp. 103–113).

    Wareham, J., Fox, P. B., & Cano Giner, J. L. (2014). Technology Ecosystem Governance. Organization Science, 25, (pp. 1195–1215).

    Williamson, O. E. (1996). The Mechanisms of Governance. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Williamson, O. E. (1985). The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. New York, NY: The Free Press.

    Williamson, O. E. (1991). Comparative Economic Organization: The Analysis of Discrete Structural Alternatives. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, (pp. 269–296).

    Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Yoffie, D. B., & Rossano, P. (2012). Apple Inc. in 2012. Harvard Business School Case, (pp. 712–490).
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    國際經營管理英語碩士學位學程(IMBA)
    111933051
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0111933051
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[國際經營管理英語碩士學程IMBA] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    There are no files associated with this item.



    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback