政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/153232
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113648/144635 (79%)
Visitors : 51666792      Online Users : 249
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/153232


    Title: 中國「夥伴關係外交」對「北約組織的聯盟緊密程度」之影響
    The impact of China’s “partnership diplomacy” on the cohesion of the NATO alliance
    Authors: 劉家豪
    Liou, Chia-Hao
    Contributors: 薛健吾
    Hsueh, Chien-Wu
    劉家豪
    Liou, Chia-Hao
    Keywords: 聯盟理論
    中國夥伴關係外交
    北約
    共同利益
    威脅認知
    Alliance Theory
    China's Partnership Diplomacy
    NATO
    Common Interests
    Threat Perception
    Date: 2024
    Issue Date: 2024-09-04 14:23:29 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 在21世紀「夥伴關係外交」已逐漸取代傳統聯盟，成為炙手可熱的新外交工具。中國自1993年起，對外建立以自身為核心之夥伴關係網絡，且與過半的北約成員國建立夥伴關係。本文欲回答的研究問題是中國採取「夥伴關係外交」對「北約傳統聯盟體系」的穩定程度是否造成影響。本文爬梳有關傳統聯盟之形成背景與造成聯盟鬆散程度等文獻，整理出外部威脅和內部分歧是影響聯盟穩固的兩大類別，對中國的夥伴關係影響進行檢視。利用聯合國大會投票所建構之外交政策利益相似程度和進出口貿易額占比，以及排除華為5G在北約的適用和烏俄戰爭的態度進行判斷，其結果顯示大部分中國夥伴關係外交能夠增加中國與本文17個北約成員國間的利益相似程度和進出口貿易往來；但無明顯影響這17國在排除華為5G在北約的適用和烏俄戰爭的態度。最後本文梳理其17個與中國建立夥伴關係之北約成員國對北約的態度，發現這些國家對北約的態度並未轉變，且更加配合北約。本文發現，中國的夥伴關係外交，雖然可以增加與這17個北約成員國之間的共同利益，但卻不會影響到北約聯盟的緊密程度。
    In the 21st century,“partnership diplomacy”has gradually replaced traditional alliances, becoming a popular new diplomatic tool. Since 1993, China has been establishing a network of partnerships centered around itself, including partnerships with over half of the NATO member states. This paper seeks to answer the research question of whether China's adoption of “partnership diplomacy” has impacted the stability of the “NATO traditional alliance system. ” The paper reviews the literature on the background of traditional alliance formation and the factors contributing to alliance looseness, identifying external threats and internal divisions as the two main categories affecting alliance stability. It then examines the impact of China's partnership relations based on the similarity of foreign policy interests constructed from United Nations General Assembly voting records, the proportion of trade volumes, attitudes towards the exclusion of Huawei 5G within NATO, and positions on the Russia-Ukraine war. The results indicate that China's partnership diplomacy generally increases the similarity of interests and trade exchanges between China and 17 NATO member states studied. However, it does not significantly influence these 17 countries’ attitudes towards excluding Huawei 5G within NATO or their stances on the Russia-Ukraine war. Finally, the paper reviews the attitudes of these 17 NATO member states that have established partnerships with China towards NATO and finds that these countries’ attitudes towards NATO have not changed; they are, in fact, more aligned with NATO. The paper concludes that although China’s partnership diplomacy can enhance mutual interests with these 17 NATO member states, it does not affect the cohesiveness of the NATO alliance.
    Reference: 中文部分
    專書
    胡聲平，2015。《中國對外政策—從江澤民到習近平》。臺北：思行文化。
    黃瓊萩，2021。〈國際環境與外交戰略〉，王信賢、寇健文主編，《中國大陸概論》。臺北：五南圖書。頁303-320。
    楊三億，2023。〈中東歐國家的區域整合路徑：俄烏戰爭觀察〉，蘇宏達、張景安主編，《分裂的世界？：21世紀全球區域化崛起》。臺北：聯經。頁120-151。
    鄧小平，1993。《鄧小平文選》。北京：人民出版社。
    鄭啟榮，2008。《改革開放以來的中國外交》。北京：世界知識出版社。

    期刊論文
    王巧榮，2022/5。〈新時代中國夥伴關係外交的特點及發展方向〉，《中國井岡山幹部學院學報》，第15卷第3期，頁79-87。
    王尊彥，2022/12。〈俄烏戰爭與日中台三角關係〉，《國防安全研究院》，頁 139-148。
    王綉雯，2021/6。〈5G網路建設與地緣政治〉，《國防安全雙週報》，第30期，頁35-39。
    吳柏寬，2022/5。〈淺析烏俄戰爭下，歐盟與中國大陸因應之道〉，《經濟前瞻》，第 201 期，頁 69-73。
    吳柏寬、王國臣，2019/11。〈從大國崛起看中國大陸的夥伴外交發展〉，《經濟前瞻》，第186期，頁73-76。
    李哲全、陳鴻鈞，2018/7。〈2018年美國與北約防衛預算支出問題評析〉，《國防安全雙週報》，第5期，頁1-3。
    李博一，2021。〈中國夥伴關係的變化〉，《戰略決策研究》，第3期，頁36-66。
    周建仁，2012。〈聯盟形成理論：評估及對中國的政策啟示〉，《當代亞太》，第3期，頁39-63。
    門洪華、劉笑陽，2015/3。〈中國夥伴關係戰略評估與展望〉，《世界經濟與政治》，第2期，頁65-95。
    孫海泳，2019/1。〈美國對華科技施壓戰略：發展態勢、戰略邏輯與影響因素〉，《現代國際關係》，第1期，頁 38-45。
    許志嘉，2007/7。〈中國新睦鄰外交政策：戰略意涵與作為〉，《遠景基金會季刊》，第8卷第3期，頁43-90。
    陳麒安，2008/7。〈聯盟理論之研究：現實主義的觀點〉，《國際關係學報》，第26期，頁133-167。
    陶季邑，2012/3。〈美國學術界關於二十世紀九十年代中國夥伴外交戰略研究述評〉，《中共黨史研究》，第2期，頁113-120。
    曾怡碩，2019/7。〈華為提議「無間諜協議」之分析〉，《國防安全週報》，第 56 期，頁 13-16。
    鄭宇碩，2009/12。〈十七大以來的中國外交政策〉，《二十一世紀雙月刊》，第116期，頁11-20。
    薛健吾，2022/8。〈北約對中戰略分析：「中俄關係」與「北約各國的國內政治」是兩大關鍵〉，《亞洲政經與和平研究》，第10期，頁29-40。
    譚偉恩，2006/7。〈權力平衡理論之研究：現實主義的觀點〉，《國際學報》，第22期，頁129-165。

    網際網路
    Adam Satariano & Eliza Triantafillou，2023/10/17。〈華為如何在希臘進行遊說活動：向政府官員送禮〉，《紐約時報中文網》，<https://cn.nytimes.com/technology/20231017/huawei-greece-lobbying-campaign/zh-hant/>。
    BBC News，2023/3/20。〈伊拉克戰爭20週年：美國及其盟友為何入侵伊拉克？〉，《BBC News 中文》，<https://www.bbc.com/zhongwen/trad/world-65013874>。
    中央社，2024/2/14。〈反擊川普狂言 北約：18成員國今年國防支出將達標〉，《中央社》，<https://www.cna.com.tw/news/aopl/202402140163.aspx>。
    中共中央黨史和文獻研究院，1997/9/12。〈江澤民在中國共產黨第十五次全國代表大會上的報告〉，《中共中央黨史和文獻研究院》，<https://www.dswxyjy.org.cn/BIG5/n/2013/0301/c244516-20644634-5.html>。
    中國共產黨新聞網，1982/9/2。〈鄧小平在中國共產黨第十二次全國代表大會上的開幕詞〉，《中國共產黨新聞網》，<http://cpc.people.com.cn/BIG5/64162/64168/64565/65448/4429495.html>。
    中國共產黨新聞網，1992/10/18。〈中國共產黨第十四次全國代表大會中國共產黨章程〉，《中國共產黨新聞網》，<http://cpc.people.com.cn/BIG5/64162/64168/64567/65446/6415682.html>。
    中國共產黨新聞網，2012/11/8。〈胡錦濤在中國共產黨第十八次全國代表大會上的報告〉，頁11，《中國共產黨新聞網》，<http://cpc.people.com.cn/n/2012/1118/c64094-19612151-11.html>。
    中國共產黨新聞網，2013/10/24。〈堅持親、誠、惠、容的共同外交理念〉，《中國共產黨新聞網》，<http://cpc.people.com.cn/xuexi/BIG5/n/2015/0721/c397563-27338114.html>。
    中國共產黨新聞網，2022/6/25。〈習近平主持全球發展高層對話會並發表重要講話—構建高質量夥伴關係共創全球發展新時代〉，《中國共產黨新聞網》，<http://cpc.people.com.cn/BIG5/n1/2022/0625/c64094-32456203.html>。
    中華人民共和國中央人民政府，2002/11。《江澤民在中國共產黨第十六次全國代表大會上的報告》，頁9，《中華人民共和國中央人民政府》，<https://www.gov.cn/test/2008-08/01/content_1061490.htm>。
    中華人民共和國中央人民政府，2003/10。〈中國對歐盟政策文件〉，2003年第33號，《國務院公報》，<https://www.gov.cn/gongbao/content/2003/content_62478.htm>。
    中華人民共和國中央人民政府，2004/1/27。〈中法聯合聲明 深化中法全面戰略夥伴關係〉，2004年第7號，《國務院公報》，<https://www.gov.cn/gongbao/content/2004/content_63114.htm>。
    中華人民共和國中央人民政府，2022/2/4。〈中華人民共和國和俄羅斯聯邦關於新時代國際關係和全球可持續發展的聯合聲明（全文）〉，《中華人民共和國中央人民政府》，<https://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2022-02/04/content_5672025.htm>。
    中華人民共和國外交部，1997/5/16。〈中法聯合聲明 建立全面夥伴關係〉，《中華人民共和國外交部聲明公報》，<https://www.mfa.gov.cn/web/zyxw/199705/t19970516_269837.shtml>。
    中華人民共和國外交部，2005/9/16。〈胡錦濤在聯合國成立60周年首腦會議上的講話(全文)〉，《中華人民共和國外交部》，<https://www.mfa.gov.cn/web/gjhdq_676201/gjhdqzz_681964/lhg_681966/zyjh_681976/200509/t20050916_9381324.shtml>。
    中華人民共和國外交部。〈中俄戰略協作夥伴關係〉，《中華人民共和國外交部》，<https://www.mfa.gov.cn/web/ziliao_674904/wjs_674919/2159_674923/200011/t20001107_10251020.shtml>。
    中華人民共和國外交部。〈中國與巴西長期穩定、互利的戰略夥伴關係〉，《中華人民共和國外交部》，<https://www.mfa.gov.cn/web/ziliao_674904/wjs_674919/2159_674923/200011/t20001107_7950064.shtml>。
    中華人民共和國商務部，〈貿易國別報告資料〉，《中華人民共和國商務部》，<https://countryreport.mofcom.gov.cn/record/index110209.asp?p_coun=%B7%A8%B9%FA>。
    扎伊德·伊斯利姆，2024/4/4。〈從邊緣到領導土耳其正在加強其在北約中的作用〉，《半島電視台》，<https://chinese.aljazeera.net/news/political/2024/4/4/%E4%BB%8E%E8%BE%B9%E7%BC%98%E5%88%B0%E9%A2%86%E5%AF%BC%E5%9C%9F%E8%80%B3%E5%85%B6%E6%AD%A3%E5%9C%A8%E5%8A%A0%E5%BC%BA%E5%85%B6%E5%9C%A8%E5%8C%97%E7%BA%A6%E4%B8%AD%E7%9A%84%E4%BD%9C%E7%94%A8#:~:text=%E9%87%8D%E8%A6%81%E6%94%AF%E6%9F%B1,%E4%B8%8D%E5%8F%AF%E6%88%96%E7%BC%BA%E7%9A%84%E8%B4%A1%E7%8C%AE%E3%80%82>。
    東亞日報，2004/4/19。〈西班牙：將從伊拉克撤軍〉，《東亞日報》，<https://www.donga.com/tw/article/all/20040419/368265/1>。
    林柏宏，2023/6/1。〈華為在歐洲市場恐再受挫中葡關係回不去了？〉，《美國之音》，<https://www.voacantonese.com/a/portugal-paves-way-to-a-huawei-ban-on-country-s-5g-network/7118284.html>。
    林薏禎，2019/9/3。〈美國、波蘭簽署5G合作聲明 華為後續發展添未知〉， 《yahoo！股市》，<https://tw.stock.yahoo.com/news/%E7%BE%8E%E5%9C%8B-%E6%B3%A2%E8%98%AD%E7%B0%BD%E7%BD%B25g%E5%90%88%E4%BD%9C%E8%81%B2%E6%98%8E-%E8%8F%AF%E7%82%BA%E5%BE%8C%E7%BA%8C%E7%99%BC%E5%B1%95%E6%B7%BB%E6%9C%AA%E7%9F%A5-031928621.html>。
    法廣，2020/8/17。〈歐洲各國紛紛抵制華為 美國施壓德國跟進〉，《法國國際廣播電台》，<https://www.rfi.fr/tw/%E4%B8%AD%E5%9C%8B/20200817-%E6%AD%90%E6%B4%B2%E5%90%84%E5%9C%8B%E7%B4%9B%E7%B4%9B%E6%8A%B5%E5%88%B6%E8%8F%AF%E7%82%BA-%E7%BE%8E%E5%9C%8B%E6%96%BD%E5%A3%93%E5%BE%B7%E5%9C%8B%E8%B7%9F%E9%80%B2>。
    法廣，2021/4/16。〈羅馬尼亞政府批准法案 禁止中國和華為參與5G網絡〉，《法國國際廣播電台》，<https://www.rfi.fr/cn/%E6%AC%A7%E6%B4%B2/20210416-%E7%BD%97%E9%A9%AC%E5%B0%BC%E4%BA%9A%E6%94%BF%E5%BA%9C%E6%89%B9%E5%87%86%E6%B3%95%E6%A1%88-%E7%A6%81%E6%AD%A2%E4%B8%AD%E5%9B%BD%E5%92%8C%E5%8D%8E%E4%B8%BA%E5%8F%82%E4%B8%8E5g%E7%BD%91%E7%BB%9C>。
    施欣妤，2020/10/13。〈比利時5G放棄華為 改用北歐組合〉，《青年日報》，<https://www.ydn.com.tw/news/newsInsidePage?chapterID=1273843>。
    美國之音，2019/2/5。〈馬其頓總理：國家為加入北約等待了27年〉，《美國之音》，<https://www.voacantonese.com/a/macedonia-nato-20190204/4773054.html>。
    美國之音，2020/9/10。〈波蘭公佈網絡安全法草案華為擔心會被排除在該國5G建設之外〉，《美國之音》，<https://www.voacantonese.com/a/poland-to-exclude-huawei-09092020/5578053.html>。
    范晏儒，2019/6。〈布拉格提案(The Prague Proposal)〉，《科技法律研究所》，<https://stli.iii.org.tw/article-detail.aspx?no=57&tp=5&d=8255>。
    郜敏，2020/10/26。〈義大利封殺華為5G！保加利亞、北馬其頓跟進〉《yahoo！新聞》，<https://tw.news.yahoo.com/%E7%BE%A9%E5%A4%A7%E5%88%A9%E5%B0%81%E6%AE%BA%E8%8F%AF%E7%82%BA5g-%E4%BF%9D%E5%8A%A0%E5%88%A9%E4%BA%9E-%E5%8C%97%E9%A6%AC%E5%85%B6%E9%A0%93%E8%B7%9F%E9%80%B2-033218232.html>。
    彭琤琳，2019/3/20。〈【華為風波】丹麥最大電訊集團TDC選愛立信建5G網絡　華為出局〉，《香港01》，<https://www.hk01.com/article/308105?utm_source=01articlecopy&utm_medium=referral>。
    黃啟霖，2015/4/9。〈北約在捷克荷蘭 測試快速反應部隊〉，《yahoo！新聞》，<https://tw.news.yahoo.com/%E5%8C%97%E7%B4%84%E5%9C%A8%E6%8D%B7%E5%85%8B%E8%8D%B7%E8%98%AD-%E6%B8%AC%E8%A9%A6%E5%BF%AB%E9%80%9F%E5%8F%8D%E6%87%89%E9%83%A8%E9%9A%8A-104500897.html>。
    德國之聲，2004/4/19。〈西班牙撤軍，外界反應不一〉，《德國之聲》，<https://www.dw.com/zh-hant/%E8%A5%BF%E7%8F%AD%E7%89%99%E6%92%A4%E8%BB%8D%E5%A4%96%E7%95%8C%E5%8F%8D%E6%87%89%E4%B8%8D%E4%B8%80/a-1174089>。
    駐西班牙台北經濟文化辦事處經濟組，2023/6/5。〈葡萄牙頃禁止「高風險」5G設備或服務供應商參與電信營運商之網路佈建〉，《經濟部國際貿易署》，<https://www.trade.gov.tw/Pages/Detail.aspx?nodeID=45&pid=763039>。
    駐西班牙台北經濟文化辦事處經濟組，2023/6/6。〈各界對葡萄牙禁止「高風險」5G設備或服務供應商參與電信營運商網路佈建之討論與意見〉，《經濟部國際貿易署》，<https://www.trade.gov.tw/Pages/Detail.aspx?nodeID=45&pid=763073>。
    駐荷蘭台北代表處，2019/7/2。〈荷蘭內閣不禁止華為提供5G設備〉，《駐荷蘭台北代表處 經濟商務新聞》，<https://www.roc-taiwan.org/nl/post/6962.html>。

    英文部分

    專書
    Menon, Rajan, 2007. The End of Alliances. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
    Morgenthau, Hans J., 1985. Politics among Nations: the Struggle for Power and　Peace 6th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
    Nadkarni, Vidya, 2010. Strategic Partnerships in Asia: Balancing without Alliances. New York: Routledge.
    Osgood, Robert E., 1968. Alliance and American Foreign Policy. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press.
    Poast, Paul, 2019. Arguing about Alliances: The Art of Agreement in Military-Pact Negotiations. New York: Cornell University Press.
    Snyder, Glenn H., 1997. Alliance Politics. New York: Cornell University Press.
    Walt, Stephen M., 1990. The Origins of Alliances. New York: Cornell University Press.
    Waltz, Kenneth N., 1979. Theory of International Politics. Mass.: Addison-Wesley Pub. Co.
    期刊論文
    Christensen, Thomas J. & Jack Snyder, 1990/3-5. “Chain Gangs and Passed Bucks: Predicting Alliance Patterns in Multipolarity,” International Organization, Vol. 44, No. 2, pp. 137-168.
    Christensen, Thomas J., 1997/12-2. “Perceptions and Alliances in Europe 1865-1940,” International Organization, Vol. 51, No.1, pp. 65-97.
    Crawford, Timothy W., 2011/3-5. “Preventing Enemy Coalitions: How Wedge Strategies Shape Power Politics,” International Security, Vol.35, No. 4, pp.155-189.
    Goldstein, Avery.,2021/12. “The Diplomatic Face of China’s Grand Strategy: A Rising Power’s Emerging Choice.” The China Quarterly, No. 168 , pp. 835-864.
    Kozłowski, Grzegorz, 2021/5. “Defence Expenditures of Nato Member States in the Times of Covid and the New Us Administration:Selected Observations,” Journal on Baltic Security, Vol.7, Issue 1, pp. 17-26.
    Leeds, Brett Ashley & Burcu Savun, 2007/11. “Terminating Alliances: Why Do States Abrogate Agreements? ,” The Journal of Politics, Vol. 69 , No. 4 , pp. 1118-1132.
    Leeds, Brett Ashley, 2003/9-11. “Alliance Reliability in Times of War: Explaining State Decisions to Violate Treaties,” International Organization, Vol. 57, No. 4, pp. 801-827.
    Leeds, Brett Ashley, Andrew G. Long & Sara McLaughlin Mitchell, 2002/10.　“Reevaluating Alliance Reliability Specific Threats, Specific Promises,” The Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 44, No. 5, pp. 686-699.
    Leeds, Brett Ashley, Jeffery M. Ritter, Sara Mclaughlin Mitchell & Andrew G. Long, 2002. “Alliance Treaty Obligations and Provisions,1815-1944,” International Interactions, Vol. 28 Issue 3, pp. 237-260.
    Liu, Yaying, Jin Chen&Churen Sun, 2022/9.“Partnership Diplomacy and China’s Exports,”Sustainability 14, No. 19:12147, pp. 1-22.
    Medeiros, Evan S., 2005/12-2006/1-2. “Strategic Hedging and the Future of Asia-Pacific Stability,” Washington Quarterly, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 145-167.
    Michael A. Bailey, Anton Strezhnev & Erik Voeten, 2017/2. “Estimating Dynamic State Preferences from United Nations Voting Data,” Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 61, No. 2, pp. 430-456。
    Morrow, James D., 1991/11. “Alliances and Asymmetry: An Alternative to the Capability Aggregation Model of Alliances,” American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 35, No. 4, pp. 904-933.
    Morrow, James D., 2000/6. “Alliances: Why Write Them Down?,” Annual Review of Political Science, Vol. 3 , pp. 63-83.
    Nien-Chung Chang-Liao, 2023/2. “The limits of strategic partnerships: Implications for China’s role in the Russia-Ukraine war,” Contemporary Security Policy, Vol. 44, NO. 2, pp. 226-247.
    Rose, Gideon, 1998/10. “Neoclassical Realism and Theories of Foreign Policy,”　World Politics, Vol. 51, No. 1, pp. 144-172
    Russett, Bruce M., 1968/9. “Components of an Operational Theory of International Alliance Formation,” The Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 285-301.
    Schweller, Randall L., 1994/6-8. “Bandwagoning for Profit: Bringing the Revisionist State Back In,” International Security, Vol. 19, No. 1, pp.72-107.
    Strüver, Georg, 2017/1. “China's Partnership Diplomacy: International Alignment Based on Interests or Ideology,” The Chinese Journal of International Politics, Vol. 10, Issue 1, pp. 31-65.
    Sweeney, Kevin & Paul Fritz, 2004/5. “Jumping on the Bandwagon: An Interest-Based Explanation for Great Power Alliances,” The Journal of Politics, Vol. 66, No. 2, pp. 428-449.
    Weiss, Tomáš, 2019/5.“Between NATO and a hard place: defence spending debate in Germany and Czechia,” European Security，Vol. 28, NO. 2, pp.193-211.
    Wilkins, Thomas S., 2012/1. “ ‘Alignment’, not ‘alliance’ – the shifting paradigm of international security cooperation: toward a conceptual taxonomy of alignment,” Review of International Studies, Vol. 38, Issue 1, No. 1, pp. 53-76.
    Womack, Brantly, 2014/6. “China's Future in a Multinodal World Order,” Pacific Affairs, Vol. 87, No. 2, pp. 265-284.

    網路資料
    Atlantic Council, 2011/3/14.“Turkey opposes NATO Libya intervention,” Atlantic Council, <https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/natosource/turkey-opposes-nato-libya-intervention-pm/>.
    Atlantic Council, 2022/7/1.“Experts react: What the NATO summit breakthrough means for Turkey and the Alliance,” Atlantic Council, <https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/turkeysource/experts-react-what-the-nato-summit-breakthrough-means-for-turkey-and-the-alliance/>.
    BBC News, 2017/11/18.“Turkey abandons Nato drill over portrayal as the enemy, BBC News, <https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-42031131>.
    Black, Ian, 2003/2/12.“Nato deadlocked as France and Germany refuse to back down, The Guardian, <https://www.theguardian.com/world/2003/feb/12/iraq.nato>.
    Burkitt-Gray, Alan, 2020/10/9. “Belgian operators ‘drop Huawei’ and pick Ericsson and Nokia for 5G,” Capacity Media, <https://www.capacitymedia.com/article/29otckqx2h8okpwbr9fy9/news/belgian-operators-drop-huawei-and-pick-ericsson-and-nokia-for-5g>.
    CBS, 2003/7/15.“France: No Troops To Iraq,”CBS NEWS, <https://www.cbsnews.com/news/france-no-troops-to-iraq/>.
    Cerules, Laurens, 2021/4/23.“Germany falls in line with EU on Huawei,” Politico, <https://www.politico.eu/article/germany-europe-huawei-5g-data-privacy-cybersecurity/>.
    Chazan, Guy&Nic Fildes, 2020/10/1. “Germany crackdown set to exclude Huawei from 5G rollout,” Financial Times, <https://www.ft.com/content/35197477-acef-4429-a1d8-71743ee8d8e3>.
    Chrisafis, Angelique, 2009/3/11. “Sarkozy to end France's 40-year Nato feud, ” The Guardian, <https://www.theguardian.com/world/2009/mar/11/france-sarkozy-nato>.
    Chrisafis, Angelique, 2018/8/27. “Europe can no longer rely on US for security, says Emmanuel Macron,” The Guardian, <https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/aug/27/europe-can-no-longer-rely-on-us-for-security-says-emmanuel-macron>.
    Chrisafis, Angelique, 2019/11/7. “Macron criticised by US and Germany over Nato 'brain death' claims,” The Guardian, <https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/nov/07/macron-warns-of-nato-brain-death-as-us-turns-its-back-on-allies>.
    Duckett, Chris, 2020/10/25. “Four more European nations sign onto US 5G security agreements,” ZDNET, <https://www.zdnet.com/article/four-more-european-nations-sign-onto-us-5g-security-agreements/>.
    DW, 2003/3/19. “Russia, Germany, France Criticize United States On Iraq,” DW, <https://www.dw.com/en/russia-germany-france-criticize-united-states-on-iraq/a-812501>.
    DW, 2019/11/07. “Merkel condemns Macron's 'drastic words' on NATO,” DW, <https://www.dw.com/en/angela-merkel-condemns-macrons-drastic-words-on-nato/a-51154583>.
    DW, 2020/10/1. “Greece, Turkey agree to NATO deal to avoid conflict,” DW, <https://www.dw.com/en/greece-turkey-agree-to-nato-deal-to-avoid-conflict-in-mediterranean/a-55127024>.
    Evans, Tom, 2010/1/29.“French minister: No more combat troops to Afghanistan,” CNN, <https://edition.cnn.com/2010/WORLD/asiapcf/01/28/afghanistan.france.pakistan/index.html>.
    Grady, John, 2021/2/8. “French President Macron Calls For European‘Strategic Autonomy,” USNI News, <https://news.usni.org/2021/02/08/french-president-macron-calls-for-european-strategic-autonomy>.
    Hansler, Jennifer, Betsy Klein & Sugam Pokharel, 2023/7/10.“Turkey has agreed to back Sweden’s NATO bid, alliance chief says,” CNN News, <https://edition.cnn.com/2023/07/10/politics/turkey-sweden-nato/index.html>.
    Heath, Ryan, 2019/3/12.“Alliance divided: Breaking down NATO’s factions,” Politico, <https://www.politico.com/news/2019/12/03/breaking-down-nato-alliance-factions-074855>.
    Hincks, Joseph, 2020/8/28.“How Dangerous Is Greece and Turkey’s Mediterranean Standoff ?,” Time, <https://time.com/5884397/turkey-greece-tensions/>.
    Huggler, Justin, 2019/11/27.“Nato 'more important now than in the Cold War', Angela Merkel says in rebuke of Emmanuel Macron,” The Telegraph, <https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/11/27/nato-important-now-cold-war-angela-merkel-says-rebuke-emmanuel/>.
    Impey, Joanna, 2010/1/1.“Dutch leave Afghanistan,” DW, <https://www.dw.com/en/dutch-withdraw-from-afghanistan/a-5855602>.
    Jakes, Lara, 2020/12/14.“U.S. Imposes Sanctions on Turkey Over 2017 Purchase of Russian Missile Defenses,” The New Year Times, <https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/14/us/politics/trump-turkey-missile-defense-sanctions.html>.
    Kolen, Babette, 2022/9/21.“Hungry clashes with EU, but what about NATO?,” Clingendael Spectator, <https://spectator.clingendael.org/en/publication/hungary-clashes-eu-what-about-nato >.
    Lukov, Yaroslav & Matt Murphy, 2022/5/17.“Turkey threatens to block Finland and Sweden Nato bids,” BBC News, <https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-61472021>.
    MAÏA de la Baume&David M. Herszenhorn, 2018/11/13.“Merkel joins Macron in calling for EU army to complement NATO,” Politico, <https://www.politico.eu/article/angela-merkel-emmanuel-macron-eu-army-to-complement-nato/>.
    Muhammed Enes Calli, 2023/12/6.“Türkiye, Greece can resolve any issue through dialogue, based on mutual goodwill, Turkish president says,” Anadolu Agency, <https://www.aa.com.tr/en/europe/turkiye-greece-can-resolve-any-issue-through-dialogue-based-on-mutual-goodwill-turkish-president-says/3074953>.
    NATO News, 2020/10/1.“Military de-confliction mechanism between Greece and Turkey established at NATO,” NATO News, <https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/news_178523.htm>.
    North Atlantic Treaty Organization News Room, 2019/12/3-4. “London Declaration,” NATO News,〈https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/official_texts_171584.htm〉.
    North Atlantic Treaty Organization News Room, 2021/6/14. “Brussels Summit Communiqué,” NATO News,〈https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/news_185000.htm?selectedLocale=en〉.
    North Atlantic Treaty Organization, 1949/4/4. “The North Atlantic Treaty,” North Atlantic Treaty Organization Official texts, <https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/official_texts_17120.htm>.
    North Atlantic Treaty Organization, 2014/9/5. “Wales Summit Declaration,” NATO summits, <https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/official_texts_112964.htm>.
    North Atlantic Treaty Organization, 2021/6/14. “Brussels Summit Communiqué,” NATO News, <https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/news_185000.htm>.
    North Atlantic Treaty Organization, 2022/6/29.“Madrid Summit Declaration,” NATO News, < https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/official_texts_196951.htm>.
    North Atlantic Treaty Organization, 2022/6/29.“NATO 2022 Strategic Concept,”NATO,<https://www.nato.int/nato_static_fl2014/assets/pdf/2022/6/pdf/290622-strategic-concept.pdf>.
    North Atlantic Treaty Organization, 2023/7/11.“Vilnius Summit Communiqué,” NATO News, <https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/official_texts_217320.htm>.
    North Atlantic Treaty Organization, 2024/3/14.“Defence expenditure of NATO countries (2014-2023),” NATO News, <https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/news_223304.htm>.
    North Atlantic Treaty Organization, 2024/4/4. NATO summits,” NATO, <https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_50115.htm#previous>.
    Priest, Dana, 1999/9/20.“France Played Skeptic on Kosovo Attacks,” Washington post, <https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/national/daily/sept99/airwar20.htm>.
    Reuters, 2019/11/5. “Hungarian minister opens door to Huawei for 5G network rollout,” Reuters Business, <https://www.reuters.com/article/us-hungary-telecoms-huawei/hungarian-minister-opens-door-to-huawei-for-5g-network-rollout-idUSKBN1XF12U/>.
    Reuters, 2022/2/12.“Turkcell signs agreement to use Huawei's HMS -Huawei official,” Reuters Technology, <https://www.reuters.com/article/us-turkcell-huawei/turkcell-signs-agreement-to-use-huaweis-hms-huawei-official-idUSKBN2060SR/>.
    Rosemain, Mathieu & Gwénaëlle Barzic, 2020/7/22. “Exclusive: French limits on Huawei 5G equipment amount to de facto ban by 2028,” Reuters, <https://www.reuters.com/article/us-france-huawei-5g-security-exclusive/exclusive-french-limits-on-huawei-5g-equipment-amount-to-de-facto-ban-by-2028-idUSKCN24N26R/>.
    Sevastopulo, Demetri, Kana Inagaki, Henry Foy & Leila Abboud, 2023/6/5. “France objects to Nato plan for office in Tokyo,” Financial Times, <https://www.ft.com/content/204e595f-5e05-4c06-a05e-fffa61e09b27>.
    SPIEGEL International, 2008/3/4. “France and Germany Thwart Bush's Plans,” SPIEGEL International, <https://www.spiegel.de/international/world/nato-expansion-defeat-france-and-germany-thwart-bush-s-plans-a-545078.html>.
    The Economist Europe, 2019/11/7. “Emmanuel Macron warns Europe: NATO is becoming brain-dead,” The Economist, <https://www.economist.com/europe/2019/11/07/emmanuel-macron-warns-europe-nato-is-becoming-brain-dead>.
    The Guardian, 2019/11/29. “Macron's criticism of Syria invasion 'sick and shallow', says Erdoğan,” The Guardian, <https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/nov/29/macrons-criticism-of-syria-invasion-sick-and-shallow-says-erdogan>.
    Traynor, Ian, 2009/4/5. “Bitter Turkey finally lifts veto on Danish PM as Nato chief,” The Guardian, <https://www.theguardian.com/world/2009/apr/05/nato-eu-denmark-turkey>.
    U.S. Department of State.“The Clean Network,” U.S. Department of State,<https://2017-2021.state.gov/the-clean-network/index.html>.
    U.S. Embassy in Ukrain, “5G Clean Networks,” U.S. Embassy in Ukrain, <https://ua.usembassy.gov/5g-clean-networks/>.
    United Nations General Assembly Voting Data，<https://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataset.xhtml?persistentId=doi:10.7910/DVN/LEJUQZ>.
    United Nations General Assembly, 2022/10/12. “Territorial integrity of Ukraine : defending the principles of the Charter of the United Nations,” United Nations Digital Library, <https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/3990400?ln=en>.
    United Nations General Assembly, 2022/11/14.“Furtherance of remedy and reparation for aggression against Ukraine,” United Nations Digital Library, <https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/3994052?ln=en>.
    United Nations General Assembly, 2022/2/23.“Principles of the Charter of the United Nations underlying a comprehensive, just and lasting peace in Ukraine,” United Nations Digital Library, <https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/4003921?ln=en>.
    United Nations General Assembly, 2022/3/2. &quot;Aggression against Ukraine,&quot; United Nations Digital Library, <https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/3959039?ln=en>.
    United Nations General Assembly, 2022/3/24. &quot;Humanitarian consequences of the aggression against Ukraine,&quot; United Nations Digital Library, <https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/3965954?ln=en>.
    United Nations General Assembly, 2022/4/7. &quot;Suspension of the rights of membership of the Russian Federation in the Human Rights Council,&quot; United Nations Digital Library, <https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/3967778?ln=en>.
    United Nations. “UN General Assembly Resolutions Tables : Emergency Special Sessions” UN General Assembly Resolutions Tables, <https://research.un.org/en/docs/ga/quick/emergency>.
    World Integrated Trade Solution(WITS)，<https://wits.worldbank.org/Default.aspx?lang=en>.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    東亞研究所
    110260006
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0110260006
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[Graduate Institute of East Asia Studies] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    000601.pdf5756KbAdobe PDF1View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback