English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113648/144635 (79%)
Visitors : 51662644      Online Users : 2012
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/153254


    Title: 偏離理性的住宅交易?台北市住宅市場處分效果與房地合一稅
    Deviations from Rationality in Housing Transactions? Disposition Effect in Taipei's Residential Market and the House and Land Transactions Income Tax
    Authors: 李佳怡
    Li, Chia-Yi
    Contributors: 林子欽
    Lin, Tzu-Chin
    李佳怡
    Li, Chia-Yi
    Keywords: 處分效果
    房地合一稅
    重複交易資料
    行為經濟學
    住宅市場
    Disposition effect
    House and Land Transactions Income Tax
    Repeat-sales data
    Behavioral economics
    Residential market
    Date: 2024
    Issue Date: 2024-09-04 14:28:19 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 許多報章媒體將賺取價差的短期投機客視為房價上漲的推手,但鮮少有針對短期交易者行為與心理的研究。過往若干研究認為台北市住宅市場的投資人受到處分效果影響,在面對獲利的交易時會想盡快出售;在有損失的交易時卻繼續持有。於此同時,2016年實施的房地合一稅制以差別稅率的方式重課短期交易,可能減弱處分效果的影響,卻尚無實證研究驗證。因此,本研究填補過往研究缺口,將住宅區位特徵及移轉稅制改變納入迴歸模型後,發現台北市住宅市場的處分效果已不存在。此外,在房地合一稅實施前,短期投機者確實受到處分效果影響,但在政策實施後,投機客變得更為理性。房地合一稅的實施,雖無法完全消除短期交易,但卻大幅減少處分效果的影響,並使得投資人更為理性地面對市場交易的賺與賠。
    While media often attribute housing price soaring to short-term speculators, research on their behavior and psychology is limited. Some previous studies suggest that investors in Taipei's residential market are influenced by the disposition effect, prompting quick sales of profitable properties while retaining losing investments. The House and Land Transactions Income Tax, implemented in 2016, imposes a higher tax rate on short-term transactions through a differential rate system, potentially weakening the influence of the disposition effect, yet no empirical research has verified this. This study addresses this research gap by incorporating residential location characteristics and tax system changes into regression models. Results indicate the disposition effect has dissipated in Taipei City's residential market. Pre-tax implementation, short-term speculators exhibited the disposition effect; post-implementation, they demonstrated increased rationality. While not eliminating short-term transactions entirely, the tax significantly reduces the disposition effect's impact, fostering more rational investment decisions regarding market gains and losses.
    Reference: 1. 中文參考文獻
    林左裕、傅聖元,2015,「住宅市場處置效應之研究」,『都市與計劃』,42(3),doi: 10.6128/CP.42.3.273。

    屠美亞、黃耀輝,2014,「不動產特銷稅有效性之實證研究:對短期交易與所得的衝擊」,『住宅學報』,23(2):1-20。

    張懿,2016,「臺北市房屋短期重複交易對周圍房價影響之研究」,國立台灣大學社會科學院公共事務研究所碩士論文:台北。

    2. 外文參考文獻
    Amarnani, N., 2010, "Disposition Effect: A Review of Literature", Microeconomics: General Equilibrium & Disequilibrium Models of Financial Markets eJournal. Retrieved September 1, 2023, from https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:155081601

    Barber, B. M., Lee, Y. T., Liu, Y. J. and Odean, T., 2007, "Is the Aggregate Investor Reluctant to Realise Losses? Evidence from Taiwan", European Financial Management, 13(3): 423-447.

    Barber, B. M., Lee, Y. T., Liu, Y. J. and Odean, T., 2009, "Just How Much Do Individual Investors Lose by Trading?", Review of Financial Studies, 22(2): 609-632.

    Barberis, N. and Xiong, W., 2009, "What drives the disposition effect? An analysis of a long‐standing preference‐based explanation", The Journal of Finance, 64(2): 751-784.

    Ben-David, I. and Hirshleifer, D., 2012, "Are Investors Really Reluctant to Realize Their Losses? Trading Responses to Past Returns and the Disposition Effect", Review of Financial Studies, 25(8): 2485-2532.

    Brown, P., Chappel, N., Da Silva Rosa, R. and Walter, T., 2006, "The Reach of the Disposition Effect: Large Sample Evidence Across Investor Classes", International Review of Finance, 6(1-2): 43-78.

    Buchinsky, M., 1998, "Recent Advances in Quantile Regression Models: A Practical Guideline for Empirical Research", The Journal of Human Resources, 33(1): 88-126.

    Buisson, F., 2016, "Prospect Theory and Loss Aversion in the Housing Market", Journal of Real Estate Research, 38(2): 229-250.

    Chang, C. C., Chao, C. H. and Yeh, J. H., 2014, "Comprehensive Disposition Effect in Real Estate Market", Paper presented at the 30th Australasian Finance and Banking Conference, Sydney.

    Chang, T. Y., Solomon, D. H. and Westerfield, M. M., 2016, "Looking for Someone to Blame: Delegation, Cognitive Dissonance, and the Disposition Effect", The Journal of Finance, 71(1): 267-302.

    Chen, G., Kim, K. A., Nofsinger, J. R. and Rui, O. M., 2007, "Trading performance, disposition effect, overconfidence, representativeness bias, and experience of emerging market investors", Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 20(4): 425-451.

    Dhar, R. and Zhu, N., 2006, "Up Close and Personal: Investor Sophistication and the Disposition Effect", Management Science, 52(5): 726-740.

    Feng, L. and Seasholes, M. S., 2005, "Do Investor Sophistication and Trading Experience Eliminate Behavioral Biases in Financial Markets?", Review of Finance, 9(3): 305-351.

    Ferris, S. P., Haugen, R. A. and Makhija, A. K., 1988, "Predicting Contemporary Volume with Historic Volume at Differential Price Levels: Evidence Supporting the Disposition Effect", The Journal of Finance, 43(3): 677-697.

    Garvey, R. and Murphy, A., 2004, "Are Professional Traders Too Slow to Realize Their Losses?", Financial Analysts Journal, 60(4): 35-43.

    Genesove, D. and Mayer, C., 2001, "Loss aversion and seller behavior: Evidence from the housing market", The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(4): 1233-1260.

    Heckman, J. J., 1979, "Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error", Econometrica, 47(1): 153-161.

    Hens, T. and Vlcek, M., 2011, "Does Prospect Theory Explain the Disposition Effect?", Journal of Behavioral Finance, 12(3): 141-157.

    Ivković, Z., Poterba, J. and Weisbenner, S., 2005, "Tax-Motivated Trading by Individual Investors", The American Economic Review, 95(5): 1605-1630.

    Joshipura, M., Joshipura, N. and Sharma, A., 2023, "Demystifying disposition effect: past, present and future", Qualitative Research in Financial Markets, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print).

    Kadous, K., Tayler, W. B., Thayer, J. M. and Young, D., 2014, "Individual Characteristics and the Disposition Effect: The Opposing Effects of Confidence and Self-Regard", Journal of Behavioral Finance, 15(3): 235-250.

    Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A., 1979, "Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk", Econometrica, 47(2): 263-291.

    Koenker, R., 2017, "Quantile regression: 40 years on", Annual Review of Economics, 9(1): 155-176.

    Leal, C. C., Armada, M. J. R. and Duque, J. L., 2006, "New evidences on the disposition effect of individual investors", Faculade de Economia Da Universidade Do Porto Working Paper, 1-30.

    Lee, J. S., Yen, P. H. and Chan, K. C., 2013, "Market states and disposition effect: evidence from Taiwan mutual fund investors", Applied Economics, 45(10): 1331-1342.

    Malpezzi, S., 2003, "Hedonic pricing models: a selective and applied review", Housing Economics and Public Policy, 1: 67-89.

    Odean, T., 1998, "Are Investors Reluctant to Realize Their Losses?", The Journal of Finance, 53(5): 1775-1798.

    Rosen, S., 1974, "Hedonic Prices and Implicit Markets: Product Differentiation in Pure Competition", Journal of Political Economy, 82(1): 34-55.

    Shafir, E., Diamond, P. and Tversky, A., 1997, "Money Illusion*", The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(2): 341-374.

    Shapira, Z. and Venezia, I., 2001, "Patterns of behavior of professionally managed and independent investors", Journal of Banking & Finance, 25(8): 1573-1587.

    Shefrin, H. and Statman, M., 1985, "The Disposition to Sell Winners Too Early and Ride Losers Too Long: Theory and Evidence", The Journal of Finance, 40(3): 777-790.

    Smith, L. B., Rosen, K. T. and Fallis, G., 1988, "Recent Developments in Economic Models of Housing Markets", Journal of Economic Literature, 26(1): 29-64.

    Weber, M. and Welfens, F., 2008, "Splitting the Disposition Effect: Asymmetric Reactions Towards "Selling Winners" and "Holding Losers"", SSRN Electronic Journal.

    White, H., 1980, "A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity", Econometrica, 48(4): 817-838.

    Wong, K. to., 2013, "Disposition effect in the housing market : empirical evidence from Hong Kong", Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong SAR.

    Yiu, C. Y. E., Chau, K. W. and Wong, S. K., 2008, "What Makes Housing Owners Hold?", SSRN Electronic Journal.

    3. 綱頁參考文獻
    財政部北區國稅局,2023,房地合一(1.0),常見問答。https://www.ntbna.gov.tw/singlehtml/ca5bf361b3e04ef987a5303753f0f37f?cntId=0275a616e0fb4ee2a8b5c2afb4b01e9c#gsc.tab=0 (檢索日期:2023年5月29日)。

    好房網News,2022,全台「炒短線」45%重稅沒在怕!專家籲「短期交易形同房屋詐騙!」,10月5日。https://news.housefun.com.tw/news/article/190763350948.html (檢索日期:2023年5月29日)。

    翁至威,2023,財長莊翠雲:房地合一2.0上路以來 短期交易減少15%,聯合新聞網,5月25日。https://udn.com/news/story/7243/7189327 (檢索日期:2023年5月29日)。

    蕭又安,2020,研究數據 台北「重複交易」賠售比例最高!,MyGoNews買購房地產新聞,3月29日。https://www.mygonews.com/news/detail/news_id/132030 (檢索日期:2023年5月29日)。

    游智文,2022,炒房短進短出一年賺220億 房仲老總:形同詐騙,好房網News,10月7日。https://news.housefun.com.tw/news/article/952189351189.html (檢索日期:2023年5月29日)。

    朱曼寧,2023,房市短期交易案獲利達334億元 專家曝:不肖房仲聯手投機客造成,聯合新聞網,5月2日。https://udn.com/news/story/7243/7136772 (檢索日期:2023年5月29日)。
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    地政學系
    111257024
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0111257024
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[地政學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    702401.pdf2264KbAdobe PDF0View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback