English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 112704/143671 (78%)
Visitors : 49721616      Online Users : 603
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/153317


    Title: 風險社會下的醫療困境與解方-《醫療事故預防及爭議處理法》之研究
    The Medical Dilemma and Solutions in the Risk Society: A Study on the Medical Accident Prevention and Dispute Resolution Act
    Authors: 蕭易知
    Shiao, Yi-Chih
    Contributors: 李聖傑
    Lee, Sheng-Chieh
    蕭易知
    Shiao, Yi-Chih
    Keywords: 風險社會
    過失
    醫療行為
    醫療爭議
    醫療事故預防及爭議處理法
    Risk society
    negligence
    medical practices
    medical disputes
    Medical Accident Prevention and Dispute Resolution Act
    Date: 2024
    Issue Date: 2024-09-04 14:43:25 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 許多醫療困難隨著科技發展成功克服,然而,爭議發生之風險在社會中仍無所不在,如何於其生成毀敗之間即時、有效因應,挑戰人類智慧。本文嘗試從社會學觀點出發,以德國著名社會學家烏爾里希·貝克(Ulrich Beck)與其論述「風險社會(risk society)」、「第二現代性(second modernity)」、「反思性現代化(reflexive modernization)」討論現代風險之不確定性和不可控性,隨後將焦點置於醫療行為本身,包含醫療行為時之水準、醫療業務主隨與分工性質、醫療行為瑕疵、與後續衍生之醫療爭議。臺灣長年有許多前輩致力於醫療爭議化解的領域,其背後的根本目的與表象預防手段,在在突顯此議題背後耗費的社會成本及社會隱憂。《醫療事故預防及爭議處理法》,匯聚眾人智慧的結晶,從1998年「醫療糾紛處理及補償條例」草案版本,直到2022年立法院針對「醫療事故預防及爭議處理法」三讀通過,這部法案的三大精神「即時關懷」、「調解先行」、「事故預防」,給予臺灣社會在爭議處理的完美框架,期望爭端開始前,透過有效作為來應對可能長年爭訟導致兩敗俱傷之局面。然而,制度訂定也意味著新的風險叢生,向病方於時效內進行說明、溝通與關懷,是否隱含醫療指示性過失;再者,調解先行制度,其美意本是希冀爭端兩造能夠充分溝通,若今欲以制度規定繞過制度設計,則可於提出爭議調解申請至爭議調解程序終結前,依相關運作辦法將調解申請撤回,撤回者,以一事不再理原則,調解會得不受理相關醫療爭議。透過制度理解社會對於醫療爭議處理的盼望,但同時也發現可能的潛在危機。回應前開風險社會的宗旨與核心,現代醫療已不再是尖端科技的代名詞,更反映尖端科技伴隨的高風險性,醫療爭議,僅僅是眾多紛擾中的一小角,但藉此所產生的反思,得以促使我們對於問題本身的理解,並且在將來以更高層次的見解回應。
    Many medical challenges have been successfully overcome with the advancement of technology; however, the risk of disputes remains pervasive in society. The challenge lies in how to respond promptly and effectively to these disputes before they escalate, testing human wisdom. This paper attempts to approach the issue from a sociological perspective, drawing on the theories of the renowned German sociologist Ulrich Beck, particularly his discussions on the "risk society," "second modernity," and "reflexive modernization," to explore the uncertainty and uncontrollability of modern risks.
    The focus then shifts to the medical profession itself, encompassing the standards of medical practice, the nature of medical duties and their division, flaws in medical actions, and the subsequent medical disputes that arise. In Taiwan, many predecessors have long been dedicated to resolving medical disputes. The fundamental causes behind these disputes, as well as the preventive measures, highlight the social costs and concerns associated with this issue. The Medical Accident Prevention and Dispute Resolution Act is the culmination of collective wisdom. From the draft of the "Medical Dispute Handling and Compensation Ordinance" in 1998 to the Legislative Yuan's passage of the "Medical Accident Prevention and Dispute Resolution Act" in 2022, the three main principles of this law—"immediate care," "mediation first," and "accident prevention"—provide a comprehensive framework for dispute resolution. It aims to implement efficient measures to address potentially protracted and mutually damaging litigation before disputes arise.
    However, the establishment of such a system also introduces new risks. For instance, providing explanations, communication, and care to patients might imply a presumption of medical negligence. Additionally, the mediation-first system, though well-intentioned to ensure adequate communication between disputing parties, could be circumvented through procedural loopholes. Parties could withdraw their mediation applications before the conclusion of the mediation process, and according to the principle of res judicata, the mediation committee may then refuse to accept related medical disputes.
    Understanding this system helps to grasp society's expectations regarding the resolution of medical disputes, while also revealing potential underlying risks. Responding to the principles and core of the risk society, modern healthcare is no longer synonymous with cutting-edge technology; rather, it reflects the high-risk nature that accompanies such technology. Medical disputes are just a small part of the broader turmoil, but the reflections they generate can deepen our understanding of the issues and lead to more profound insights in addressing them in the future.
    Reference: 一、中文文獻
    (一)專書
    王志嘉、林宏榮、施玲娜、黃鈺媖、李毅、林秀峰、廖熏香、溫信學、黃莉蓉、沈若楠、吳宛倫、吳俐葦、周珮瑜、陳欣欣、陳稜怡、張雅雯、葉品咸(2022)。醫療爭議關懷指引手冊。臺灣:衛生福利部。
    台灣家庭醫學醫學會(2022)。家庭醫學(第五版)。
    林東茂(2023)。刑法總則(第4版)。
    林書楷(2024)。刑法總則(增訂第6版)。臺北市:五南。
    林鈺雄(2023)。新刑法總則(第11版)。臺北市:元照。
    許澤天(2024)。刑法總則(第5版)。臺北市:新學林。
    陳聰富(2019)。醫療責任的形成與展開(修訂版)。臺北:國立臺灣大學出版中心。
    曾淑瑜(1998)。醫療過失與因果關係(下)。臺北市:翰蘆圖書。
    (二)期刊論文
    Wolfgang Frisch、蔡聖偉(2011)。客觀之結果歸責-結果歸責理論的發展、基本路線與未決之問題。法學新論,32,1-44。
    王志嘉(2014)。醫療爭議調解介紹系列(一):淺談醫療爭議「三段五級」調解機制之建立。台北市醫師公會會刊,58(2),10-15。
    王志嘉(2019)。建立基層醫療事故關懷機制之支援資源,108年9月28日醫療安全暨品質研討系列《107》-醫療事故爭議處理及支援機制分享。臺灣醫界,62(11),40-47。
    王志嘉(2020)。醫學院校醫事法律課程之現況與展望-以作者15年之教學實踐經驗為核心。醫事法學,26(1-2),1-25。
    王秀雲(2020)。醫學教育的必要養分─醫學人文。國家科學及技術委員會人文與社會科學簡訊,21(4),7-11。
    王怡人、徐錦池(2019)。醫療風險管理及危機處理。醫學與健康期刊,8(1),115-130。
    王皇玉(2024)。醫療法第82條修正後醫療常規與合理臨床專業裁量之法界現況探討。台灣醫學,28(3),330-336。
    吳志正(2019)。變動中之民事醫療過失判定基準。政大法學評論,158,87-159。
    吳俊穎、楊增暐、陳榮基(2013)。實證法學研究之基礎建設:「醫療糾紛判決資料庫」建置計畫。人文與社會科學簡訊,14(2),69-79。
    李聖傑(2001)。風險變更之結果客觀歸責。中原財經法學,7,47-72。
    李聖傑(2002)。因果關係的判斷在刑法中的思考。中原財經法學,8,117-145。
    李聖傑(2007)。交通事故中過失行為的刑法處遇思考。月旦法學教室,57,77-86。
    汪秀玲、謝明彥、楊淵韓、蘇裕峯、黃炫迪、黃志富(2021)。再探非訟醫糾調處之成效:臺灣《醫預法(草案)》改革前哨。醫療品質雜誌,15(3),32-43。
    沈冠伶、莊錦秀(2012)。民事醫療訴訟之證明法則與實務運作。政大法學評論,127,167-266。
    林東茂(1996)。信賴原則的適用範疇與界限。東海大學法學研究,1996,11,129-136。
    林東龍、陳郁雯(2012)。他山之石-美國和澳洲執行「公開揭露」機制之經驗與啟示。台灣公共衛生雜誌,31(3),205-216。
    林鈺雄(2013)。初探德國醫療糾紛鑑定調解會制度-兼論解決醫療糾紛之立法原則。月旦法學雜誌,217,207-230。
    邱玟惠(2011)。從美國醫療失當改革立法談臺灣規範之趨勢。法學新論,28,75-98。
    邱慧洳(2015)。醫療分工、信賴原則與過失責任歸屬-以醫師與護理師間關係為例。全國律師,19(11),77-90。
    金佩齡(2003)。致命的一針。醫改會訊,6,1-2。
    侯英泠(2018)。從最高法院106年度台上字第1048號民事判決看臺灣醫事民事責任之新趨勢。月旦民商法雜誌,62,163-177。
    財團法人藥害救濟基金會(2018)。化解潛在醫糾,醫師不再孤軍奮戰。臺中醫林,98。
    張美眉(2016)。新興法律問題學術研討會—談醫療糾紛之訴訟外紛爭解決機制。司法新聲,118,12-36。
    張麗卿(2010)。信賴原則在醫療分工之適用-以護士麻醉致死案為例。東海大學法學研究,33,45-77。
    張麗卿(2019)。醫療法第82條修法之法學意涵。台灣醫學,23(4),474-479。
    郭宇傑(2022)。醫療過失與因果關係之舉證責任-以最高法院兩則判決為例。月旦醫事法報告,65,151-172。
    陳再晉、林廷育、陳冠文、鍾珮純(2019)。醫療事故處理機制倡議。臺灣醫界雜誌,62(8),63-65。
    陳煥武、楊秀儀(2023)。論信賴原則於醫療糾紛中的適用範圍—以放射線科為例。月旦醫事法報告,202301,138-159。
    陳榮基、謝啟瑞(1992)。醫療糾紛對醫療成本的影響—台灣西醫師的研究。行政院衛生署八十年度委託研究計畫。
    陳學德(2023)。醫療爭議之訴訟外紛爭解決機制。月旦醫事法報告,77,7-17。
    曾昭愷(2023)。不得於本案訴訟採為證據或裁判基礎。月旦醫事法報告,77,32-41。
    曾淑瑜(2008)。建構醫療糾紛裁判外紛爭解決模式――引進日本ADR制度。月旦法學雜誌,160,19-36。
    黃一珊(2019)。病人安全的最後一哩路-醫療事故預防與爭議處理法。醫療品質雜誌,13(6),4-6。
    黃鈺媖(2005)。從醫療水準談婦產科醫療責任注意義務之認定。律師雜誌,308,36-47。
    黃鈺媖(2024)。翻轉醫療爭議─從三輸到三贏的新契機─醫療事故預防及爭議處理法簡介。臺大校友雙月刊,152,47-50。
    楊全斌(2015)。醫療糾紛處理及醫療事故補償法草案之探討。台灣牙醫界,34(7),2-12。
    楊秀儀(2007)。請對症下藥─無過失補償制度不能解決台灣的醫療糾紛問題。財團法人台灣醫療改革基金會會訊,18,1-2。
    楊秀儀、黃鈺媖(2015)。當法律遇見醫療-醫療糾紛立法論上的兩個主張。司法新聲,115,頁7-31。
    葛謹(2010)。遲來的解釋-台灣桃園地方法院八十八年度易字第二○○二號刑事判決評釋。月旦法學雜誌,176,274-294。
    廖熏香(2011)。指標系統再進化-臺灣臨床成效指標介紹。醫療品質雜誌,5(3),26-29。
    蘇凱平。再訪法實證研究概念與價值:以簡單量化方法研究我國減刑政策為例。國立臺灣大學法學論叢,45(3),979-1043。
    (三)學位論文
    王志嘉(2013)。病人自主的刑法效應〔博士論文,私立東吳大學〕。
    卓育璇(2008)。醫療分工與信賴原則-我國與德國法之比較研究〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。
    張耘慈(2010)。台灣地方法院民事醫療糾紛判決之實證研究﹝碩士論文。國立陽明大學﹞。
    黃秉勤(2018)。醫療訴訟爭議處理機制之法律經濟分析﹝碩士論文。東吳大學﹞。
    劉邦揚(2009)。我國地方法院刑事醫療糾紛判決之實證研究﹝碩士論文。國立陽明大學﹞。
    劉惠芝(2010)。醫療糾紛之理論與實證研究﹝碩士論文。國立政治大學﹞。
    (四)網路資料
    BBC News 中文(2024年4月3日)。台灣地震:花蓮外海發生7.2級強震,921大地震25年來最大震級。檢自:https:// www.bbc.com/zhongwen/trad/chinese-news-68720120(最後瀏覽日:2024年4月16日)
    Elsevier (2024). 2023「全球前 2% 頂尖科學家」最新發布 臺灣排名維持 19,增至 1,600 多位學者入榜。檢自:https:// www.elsevier.com/zh-tw/resources/worlds-top-2-percent-scientists-2023-taiwan(最後瀏覽日:2024年1月8日)
    ET today健康雲生活中心(2024年7月12日)。 北榮創紀錄!一圖看懂亞洲首例「分肝種腎」讓8歲童擺脫洗腎。檢自:https://health.ettoday.net/news/2775794(最後瀏覽日:2024年7月19日)
    TVBS新聞網記者王薏絜、張鎮安(2024年3月15日)。醫學系第一名搶走皮膚科!救醜難救命的台灣未來?國家須保障風險高科別。檢自:https://tw.news.yahoo.com/ %E9%86%AB%E5%AD%B8%E7%B3%BB%E7%AC%AC-%E5%90%8D%E6%90%B6%E8%B5%B0%E7%9A%A E%E8%86%9A%E7%A7%91-%E6%95%91%E9%86%9C %E9%9B%A3%E6%95%91%E5%91%BD%E7%9A%84%E5%8F%B0%E7%81%A3%E6%9C%AA%E4%BE%86-%E5%9C%8B%E5%AE%B6%E9%A0%88%E4%BF%9D%E9%9A%9C%E9%A2%A8%E9%9A%AA%E9%AB%98%E7%A7%91%E5%88%A5-144943158.html (最後瀏覽日:2024年4月12日)
    中央災害防救會報(2015年7月1日)。2015-2030 仙台減災綱領中文版本(Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015-2030)。檢自:https://cdprc.ey.gov.tw/ Page/102B58FEB2E0F261/f5b3bb3a-114a-481f-8760-271d0 74aac56(最後瀏覽日:2024年2月15日)
    中央社記者曾以寧(2023年10月22日)。變裝諷職場「累到變成鬼」,醫療人員上街爭勞權。檢自:https://www. cna.com.tw/news/ahel/202310220120.aspx(最後瀏覽日:2024年2月11日)
    中央社記者董俊志、林巧璉(2024年4月11日)。高雄民生醫院開錯刀,交接班時刻主刀醫師未遵SOP。檢自:https:// www.cna.com.tw/news/ahel/202404110312.aspx(最後瀏覽日:2024年5月5日)
    中央社記者謝幸恩(2024年4月24日)。台北慈濟醫院護理師涉散布病人隱私照十萬元交保。檢自:https://www. cna.com.tw/news/asoc/202404240015.aspx(最後瀏覽日:2024年5月5日)
    中華民國醫師公會全國聯合會(2024年1月1日)。醫預法專區。檢自:https://www.tma.tw/mpt/#:~:text=%E8%AA% AA%E6%98%8E%EF%BC%9A,%E6%9C%881%E6%97%A5%E6%AD%A3%E5%BC%8F%E5%AF%A6%E6%96%BD%E3%80%82(最後瀏覽日:2024年2月14日)
    今周刊記者翁申霖(2023年5月11日)。三總醫拒開巴氏量表,遭家屬重毆6拳嗆「違反醫療法又怎樣」!他揭背後辛酸:開不開都可能出事。檢自:https://www. businesstoday.com.tw/article/category/183027/post/202305110031/(最後瀏覽日:2024年4月9日)
    元氣網記者鄒尚謙(2024年4月30日)。食藥署下令回收重鬱症藥物6萬錠,主因是檢出「致癌物」。檢自:https://health.udn.com/health/story/6012/7934040(最後瀏覽日:2024年5月2日)
    天下雜誌彭子珊、林倖妃(2024年3月19日)。世界第一的健保,可能看不好你的病,壽命輸韓國、糖尿病死亡率是日本7倍。檢自:https://www.cw.com.tw/article/5129668 (最後瀏覽日:2024年3月27日)
    司法院行政訴訟及懲戒廳(2023年7月13日)。調解與和解有何差異?檢自:https://www.judicial.gov.tw/tw/cp-1654-902671-940e8-1.html(最後瀏覽日:2024年3月6日)
    立法院(2014年5月29日)。醫療糾紛處理及醫療事故補償法草案-立法院朝野黨政保留條文尚待協商版本。檢自:https://www.tma.tw/Medical_Dispute/files/1-%E9%86%AB %E7%99%82%E7%B3%BE%E7%B4%9B%E8%99%95%E7%90%86%E5%8F%8A%E9%86%AB%E7%99%82%E4%BA%8B%E6%95%85%E8%A3%9C%E5%84%9F%E6%B3%95%EF%BC%88103%2005%2029%EF%BC%89.doc(最後瀏覽日:2024年3月5日)
    立法院李麗莉(2020年1月13日)。減少醫療爭訟問題之探討。檢自:https://www.ly.gov.tw/Pages/Detail.aspx?nodeid= 6590&pid=191307(最後瀏覽日:2024年4月13日)
    立法院楊盛旺(2022)。醫療事故預防及爭議處理法草案。檢自:https://www.ly.gov.tw/Pages/Detail.aspx?nodeid=6588& pid=219494(最後瀏覽日:2024年4月22日)
    政大大學報專題記者張寬逸、張碩、楊進傑、鄭雅方、黃慧文(2017年5月5日)。兒童醫療人才斷層 未來重症恐須至國外求醫。檢自:https://unews.nccu.edu.tw/unews/ %E5%85%92%E7%AB%A5%E9%86%AB%E7%99%82%E4%BA%BA%E6%89%8D%E6%96%B7%E5%B1%A4%E3%80%80%E6%9C%AA%E4%BE%86%E9%87%8D%E7%97%87%E6%81%90%E9%A0%88%E8%87%B3%E5%9C%8B%E5%A4%96%E6%B1%82%E9%86%AB/(最後瀏覽日:2024年4月11日)
    財團法人民間司法改革基金會(2021年2月8日)。黃慧夫案。檢自:https://www.jrf.org.tw/keywords/87(最後瀏覽日:2024年3月26日)
    國家發展委員會(2020年9月)。行政院及所屬各機關風險管理及危機處理作業手冊。檢自:https://www.ndc.gov.tw/ Content_List.aspx?n=47CBA512BC0478E9(最後瀏覽日:2024年2月22日)
    國家衛生研究院電子報(2023年5月4日)。從MDGs、SDGs、ESG到美好生活目標。檢自:https://enews.nhri. edu.tw/latest/9310/(最後瀏覽日:2024年2月17日)
    康健雜誌邱淑宜(2020年7月30日)。36種含「雷尼替丁」成分胃藥有致癌風險8月1日國內下架回收。檢自:https://www.commonhealth.com.tw/article/82386(最後瀏覽日:2024年2月25日)
    教育部重編國語辭典修訂本。針對「醫療」一詞之解釋。檢自:https://dict.revised.moe.edu.tw/dictView.jsp?ID=150250&la=0&powerMode=0(最後瀏覽日:2024年5月17日)
    劍橋英文辭典。針對「醫療」一詞之解釋。檢自:https://dictionary. cambridge.org/dictionary/english/healthcare(最後瀏覽日:2024年5月20日)
    衛生福利部(2018年1月20日)。醫療事故預防及處理法草案,促進醫病和諧,創造社會共贏。檢自:https://www.mohw.gov.tw/cp-3790-39278-1.html(最後瀏覽日:2024年4月13日)
    衛生福利部(2018年5月22日)。衛福部推動醫療事故處理法制化,創造醫病雙贏。檢自:https://www.mohw.gov.tw/cp-3794-41283-1.html(最後瀏覽日:2024年5月2日)
    衛生福利部(2024年3月28日)。陳揆指示中央地方加強合作儘速釐清寶林茶室疑似食物中毒案真相讓民眾安全、安心飲食。檢自:https://www.mohw.gov.tw/cp-16-78200-1.html(最後瀏覽日:2024年4月8日)
    衛生福利部中央健康保險署(2017年4月19日)。分級醫療及雙向轉診政策,健保署將於半年內檢討修正。檢自:https://www.mohw.gov.tw/cp-2737-8923-1.html(最後瀏覽日:2024年3月2日)
    衛生福利部中央健康保險署。111年當年統計-「表38 保險對象人數-按性別及年齡別分」。檢自:https://www.nhi.gov.tw/ch/dl-50820-323ec62045c545f0b1a8 0892e544ba51-1.xls (最後瀏覽日:2024年3月22日)
    衛生福利部食品藥物管理署(2024年2月27日)。無論邊境或後市場,只要檢出蘇丹紅,立即停止輸入查驗。檢自:https://www.mohw.gov.tw/cp-16-77785-1.html(最後瀏覽日:2024年3月5日)
    衛生福利部食品藥物管理署(2024年2月6日)。食藥署回應媒體報導台糖梅花肉片檢出Cimbuterol不符規定之相關疑點。檢自:https://www.mohw.gov.tw/cp-6654-77615-1.html(最後瀏覽日:2024年2月15日)
    衛生福利部臺灣病人安全資訊網(2024)。2023年第二季季報表。檢自:https://www.patientsafety.mohw.gov.tw/files/file_ pool/1/0n345629401546150324/2023%e5%b9%b4%e7%ac%ac2%e5%ad%a3%e5%ad%a3%e5%a0%b1%e8%a1%a8f.pdf (最後瀏覽日:2024年7月4日)
    衛生福利部醫事司(2016年7月26日)。強化醫療糾紛處理機制促進醫病關係和諧。檢自:https://www.mohw. gov.tw/cp-2629-18937-1.html#:~:text=%E8%8B%A5%E7% 9C%9F%E7%9A%84%E7%99%BC%E7%94%9F%E4%B8%8D%E5%B9%B8,%E5%8D%94%E5%8A%A9%E9%9B%99%E6%96%B9%E6%BA%9D%E9%80%9A%EF%BC%8C%E5%8C%96%E8%A7%A3%E7%88%AD%E8%AD%B0%E3%80%82(最後瀏覽日:2024年4月17日)
    衛生福利部護理及健康照護司(2023年10月11日)。護理執業人力每年持續增加 但改善護理執業環境仍刻不容緩。檢自:https://www.mohw.gov.tw/cp-16-76213-1.html(最後瀏覽日:2024年2月22日)
    衛生福利部護理及健康照護司(2024年1月26日)。醫院三班護病比標準公告,同步啟動40億投資三班輪值夜班護理人員直接奬勵。檢自:https://www.mohw.gov.tw/cp-6656-77368-1.html(最後瀏覽日:2024年2月10日)
    聯合報記者沈能元、魏忻忻(2024年6月2日)。關床危機2/護理師爭奪戰 寧願關床讓護理師休假留人。檢自:https://udn.com/news/story/7266/8005339(最後瀏覽日:2024年6月11日)
    聯合報記者林琮恩、陳雨鑫、李樹人(2024年2月21日)。住院醫師荒,台大長庚也缺人。聯合新聞網,檢自:https://udn.com/news/story/7266/7781473(最後瀏覽日:2024年4月11日)
    聯合新聞網記者陳雨鑫(2023年11月12日)。不只醫護,醫院各職類都缺,流動率也高。檢自:https://udn. com/news/story/7266/7567992(最後瀏覽日:2024年2月24日)
    聯合新聞網記者鄒尚謙(2023年10月14日)。醫院藥師荒1/醫院藥師人力不足 領藥等到天荒地老。檢自:https:// udn.com/news/story/7266/7505718(最後瀏覽日:2024年2月23日)
    二、英文文獻
    (一)專書
    Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity (M. Ritter, Trans.) (Vol. 17). SAGE Publications. (Original work published 1986)
    Beck, U. (2006). Risk Society Revisited: Theory, Politics and Research Programmes. In The sociology of risk and gambling reader. Routledge.
    Beck, U., & Beck-Gernsheim, E. (2001). Individualization: Institutionalized individualism and its social and political consequences. SAGE Publications.
    Beck, U., Giddens, A., & Lash, S. (1994). Reflexive modernization: Politics, tradition and aesthetics in the modern social order. Stanford University Press.
    Habermas, J. (1987). The theory of communicative action. Vol. 2: Lifeworld and system: A critique of functionalist reason. Boston, MA: Bacon Press.
    Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. (2001). Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. National Academies Press (US).
    Jaeger, C. C., Webler, T., Rosa, E. A., & Renn, O. (2013). Risk, uncertainty and rational action. Routledge.
    Mills, C. W. (2018). The power elite. In Inequality in the 21st Century. Routledge.
    Sørensen, M., & Christiansen, A. (2012). Ulrich Beck: An introduction to the theory of second modernity and the risk society. Routledge.
    World Health Organization (WHO). (2020). Patient safety incident reporting and learning systems: technical report and guidance. World Health Organization (WHO).
    (二)期刊論文
    Alshrari, A. S., Hudu, S. A., Imran, M., Asdaq, S. M. B., Ali, A. M., & Rabbani, S. I. (2022). Innovations and development of Covid-19 vaccines: A patent review. Journal of infection and public health, 15(1), 123–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiph. 2021.10.021
    Anderson, J. E., Kodate, N., Walters, R., & Dodds, A. (2013). Can incident reporting improve safety? Healthcare practitioners' views of the effectiveness of incident reporting. International journal for quality in health care: journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care, 25(2), 141–150. https://doi. org/10.1093/intqhc/mzs081
    Angeletti LR, Gazzaniga V. Milano: Masson; 2004. Storia, filosofia ed etica generale della medicina.
    Arvind, T. T., & McMahon, A. M. (2020). Responsiveness and the Role of Rights in Medical Law: Lessons from Montgomery†. Medical law review, 28(3), 445–477. https://doi.org/10. 1093/medlaw/fwaa006
    Aven, T. (2016). Risk Assessment and Risk Management: Review of Recent Advances on Their Foundation. European Journal of Operational Research, 253, 1-13.
    Bierwiaczonek, K., Kunst, J. R., & Pich, O. (2020). Belief in COVID-19 Conspiracy Theories Reduces Social Distancing over Time. Applied psychology. Health and well-being, 12(4), 1270–1285. https://doi.org/10.1111/aphw.12223
    Bishop, T. F., Federman, A. D., & Keyhani, S. (2010). Physicians' views on defensive medicine: a national survey. Archives of internal medicine, 170(12), 1081–1083. https://doi.org/10. 1001/archinternmed.2010.155
    Bono MJ, Wermuth HR, Hipskind JE. Medical Malpractice. [Updated 2022 Oct 31]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls. Publishing; 2024 Jan-. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK470573/
    Braschi E, Stacey D, Légaré F, Grad R, Archibald D. Evidence-based medicine, shared decision making and the hidden curriculum: a qualitative content analysis. Perspect Med Educ. 2020;9(3):173–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-020-0057 8-0.
    Breathnach O, Cousins G, Dunne D, Ryan K, Smith D, O’Byrne J. A review of adverse event reporting in Irish surgical specialties. Clinical Risk. 2011;17(2):43-49. https://doi.org/ 10.1258/cr.2010.010070
    Campbell, P., Trockman, S. J., & Walker, A. R. (2011). Strengthening hazard vulnerability analysis: results of recent research in Maine. Public health reports (Washington, D.C.: 1974), 126(2), 290–293. https://doi.org/10.1177/00333549 1112600222
    Chen, W. T., Fu, C. P., Chang, Y. D., Shiao, Y. C., Chen, P. Y., & Wang, C. C. (2022). Developing an innovative medical ethics and law curriculum-constructing a situation-based, interdisciplinary, court-based learning course: a mixed methods study. BMC medical education, 22(1), 284. https:// doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03349-z
    Cheng T. M. (2015). Reflections on the 20th anniversary of Taiwan's single-payer National Health Insurance System. Health affairs (Project Hope), 34(3), 502–510. https://doi.org/ 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.1332
    Chiang T. L. (1997). Taiwan's 1995 health care reform. Health policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 39(3), 228. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/s0168-8510(96)00877-9
    Conti AA. Albrecht von Haller: an encyclopaedic cosmopolite in the history of Swiss medicine. Clin Ter. 2013;164:e445–448.
    Cousins, D. H., Gerrett, D., & Warner, B. (2012). A review of medication incidents reported to the National Reporting and Learning System in England and Wales over 6 years (2005-2010). British journal of clinical pharmacology, 74(4), 597–604. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2125.2011.04166.x
    Dionne, G. (2013). Risk Management: History, Definition, and Critique. Risk Management and Insurance Review, 16(2), 147-166.
    Edgar, L., Roberts, S., & Holmboe, E. (2018). Milestones 2.0: A Step Forward. Journal of graduate medical education, 10(3), 367–369. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-18-00372.1
    Eisenberg, Theodore, The Origins, Nature, and Promise of Empirical Legal Studies and a Response to Concerns (December 17, 2010). Cornell Legal Studies Research Paper, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1727538 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1727538
    Emanuel, E. J., & Emanuel, L. L. (1992). Four models of the physician-patient relationship. JAMA, 267(16), 2221–2226.
    Erkkilä, V. (2019). The Conceptual Change of Conscience: Franz Wieacker and German Legal Historiography 1933–1968. Mohr Siebeck GmbH and Co. KG. http://www.jstor.org/ stable/j.ctvf3w2r4
    Evans, A., & Refrow-Rutala, D. (2010). Medico-legal education: a pilot curriculum to fill the identified knowledge gap. Journal of graduate medical education, 2(4), 595–599. https://doi.org/ 10.4300/JGME-D-10-00114.1
    Farrell AM, Brazier M. Not so new directions in the law of consent? Examining Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board. J Med Ethics. 2016;42:85–8.
    Fischhoff, B., Slovic, P., Lichtenstein, S. et al. How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards techno-logical risks and benefits. Policy Science, 9, 127–152 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00143739
    Fischhoff, B., Watson, S.R. & Hope, C. Defining risk. Policy Sci 17, 123–139 (1984).
    Flage, R., Aven, T., Zio, E., & Baraldi, P. (2014). Concerns, challenges, and directions of development for the issue of representing uncertainty in risk assessment. Risk analysis: an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis, 34(7), 1196–1207.
    Garon-Sayegh P. (2019). Analysis of medical malpractice claims to improve quality of care: Cautionary remarks. Journal of evaluation in clinical practice, 25(5), 744–750. https://doi. org/10.1111/jep.13178
    Gillon R. (1986). The principle of double effect and medical ethics. British medical journal (Clinical research ed.), 292(6514), 193–194. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.292.6514.193
    Havighurst, C. C., & Tancredi, L. R. (1973). "Medical Adversity Insurance"--a no-fault approach to medical malpractice and quality assurance. The Milbank Memorial Fund quarterly. Health and society, 51(2), 125–168.
    Heath J. What is a validity claim? Philosophy & Social Criticism. 1998;24(4):23-41. https://doi.org/10.1177/019145379802400 402
    Hiyama, T., Yoshihara, M., Tanaka, S., Urabe, Y., Ikegami, Y., Fukuhara, T., & Chayama, K. (2006). Defensive medicine practices among gastroenterologists in Japan. World journal of gastroenterology, 12(47), 7671–7675. https://doi.org/10. 3748/ wjg.v12.i47.7671
    Hsu, W. F., Chang, C. Y., Chang, C. C., Chang, L. C., Chen, C. H., Lin, C. C., Lin, Y. M., Lee, C. L., Wu, H. Y., Lee, H. C., Lee, Y. C., Su, M. Y., Lin, L. J., Chia, S. L., Wu, M. S., Chiu, H. M., & Colonoscopy Quality Assurance Joint Working Group of Taiwan Colorectal Cancer Screening Program and Di-gestive Endoscopy Society of Taiwan (2022). Risk of colono-scopy-related complications in a fecal immunochemical test-based population colorectal cancer screening program. Endoscopy, 54(3), 290–298. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1328-5126
    Hutchings, M. I., Truman, A. W., & Wilkinson, B. (2019). Antibiotics: past, present and future. Current opinion in microbiology, 51, 72–80.
    Iommi Echeverría V. (2010). Girolamo Fracastoro y la invención de la sífilis. Historia, ciencias, saude--Manguinhos, 17(4), 877–884.
    Jena, A. B., Seabury, S., Lakdawalla, D., & Chandra, A. (2011). Malpractice risk according to physician specialty. The New England journal of medicine, 365(7), 629–636. https://doi. org/10.1056/NEJMsa1012370
    Jones J. W. (2000). The healthcare professional and the Bolam test. British dental journal, 188(5), 237–240. https://doi.org/10. 1038/sj.bdj.4800441
    Kasperson RE, Renn O, Slovic P, Brown HS, Emel J, Goble R, Kasperson JX, Ratick S (1988) The social amplification of risk: a conceptual framework. Risk Anal 8(2):177–187
    Kraman, S. S., Cranfill, L., Hamm, G., & Woodard, T. (2002). John M. Eisenberg Patient Safety Awards. Advocacy: the Lexington Veterans Affairs Medical Center. The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement, 28(12), 646–650. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1070-3241(02)28069-4
    Kreng, V. B., & Yang, C. T. (2011). The equality of resource allocation in health care under the National Health Insurance System in Taiwan. Health policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 100(2-3), 203–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2010. 08.003
    Lash, S. (2018). Introduction: ulrich beck: risk as indeterminate modernity. Theory, Culture & Society, 35(7-8), 117-129.
    Lee, J. K., Liles, E. G., Bent, S., Levin, T. R., & Corley, D. A. (2014). Accuracy of fecal immunochemical tests for colorectal cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. Annals of internal medicine, 160(3), 171. https://doi.org/ 10.7326/M13-1484
    Lee, Y. H., Ang, T. F. A., Chiang, T. C., & Kaplan, W. A. (2018). Growing concerns and controversies to Taiwan's National Health Insurance-what are the lessons from mainland China, South Korea and Singapore?. The International journal of health planning and management, 33(1), e357–e366. https:// doi.org/10.1002/hpm.2387
    Leonard, J. B., Munir, K. M., & Kim, H. K. (2018). Metoclopramide induced pheochromocytoma crisis. The A-merican journal of emergency medicine, 36(6), 1124.e1–1124.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2018.03.009
    Lewis, M. H., Gohagan, J. K., & Merenstein, D. J. (2007). The locality rule and the physician's dilemma: local medical practices vs the national standard of care. JAMA, 297(23), 2634. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.297.23.2633
    Lin, Y. Y., & Huang, C. S. (2016). Aging in Taiwan: Building a Society for Active Aging and Aging in Place. The Gero-ntologist, 56(2), 176–183. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/ gnv107
    Liu, Y. C., Kuo, R. L., & Shih, S. R. (2020). COVID-19: The first documented coronavirus pandemic in history. Biomedical journal, 43(4), 328–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bj.2020. 04.007
    Ljung, R., Petrini, P., & Nilsson, I. M. (1990). Diagnostic symptoms of severe and moderate haemophilia A and B. A survey of 140 cases. Acta paediatrica Scandinavica, 79(2), 196–200. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1651-2227.1990.tb11438.x
    Mardon, R. E., Khanna, K., Sorra, J., Dyer, N., & Famolaro, T. (2010). Exploring relationships between hospital patient safety culture and adverse events. Journal of patient safety, 6(4), 226–232. https://doi.org/10.1097/PTS.0b013e3181 fd1a00
    Mello, M. M., Frakes, M. D., Blumenkranz, E., & Studdert, D. M. (2020). Malpractice Liability and Health Care Quality: A Review. JAMA, 323(4), 352–366. https://doi.org/10.1001/ jama.2019.21411
    Merton, Robert C. "Option Pricing When Underlying Stock Returns are Discontinuous." Journal of Financial Economics 3 (January–February 1976): 125–144.
    Michaleas, S. N., Laios, K., Charalabopoulos, A., Samonis, G., & Karamanou, M. (2022). Joseph Lister (1827-1912): A Pioneer of Antiseptic Surgery. Cureus, 14(12), e32777.
    Moen, R.D., & Norman, C. (2010). Clearing up myths about the Deming cycle and seeing how it keeps evolving. Quality Progress, 43, 22-28.
    Montgomery, J., & Montgomery, E. (2016). Montgomery on informed consent: an inexpert decision?. Journal of medical ethics, 42(2), 89–94. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2015-102862
    Newell, K., Prinz, R. A., Braithwaite, S., & Brooks, M. (1988). Pheochromocytoma crisis. American journal of hypertension, 1(3 Pt 3), 189S–191S. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajh/1.3.189s
    Nieva, V. F., & Sorra, J. (2003). Safety culture assessment: a tool for improving patient safety in healthcare organizations. Quality & safety in health care, 12 Suppl 2(Suppl 2), ii17–ii23. https://doi.org/10.1136/qhc.12.suppl_2.ii17
    Oeppen, J., & Vaupel, J. W. (2002). Demography. Broken limits to life expectancy. Science (New York, N.Y.), 296(5570), 1029–1031. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1069675
    O'Leary KJ, Choi J, Watson K, Williams MV. Medical students' and residents' clinical and educational experiences with defensive medicine. Acad Med. 2012;87(2):142–8.
    OLG Koblenz. (2015). Urt. v. 21.10.2015 – 5 U 263/15 (LG Trier). Zum Schutzzweckzusammenhang einer anästhesiologischen Pflichtverletzung. MedR, 34(5), 277–279. https://doi.org/10. 1007/s00350-016-4251-z
    Onyoh, E. F., Hsu, W. F., Chang, L. C., Lee, Y. C., Wu, M. S., & Chiu, H. M. (2019). The Rise of Colorectal Cancer in Asia: Epidemiology, Screening, and Management. Current gastro-enterology reports, 21(8), 36. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11894-019-0703-8
    Ortashi, O., Virdee, J., Hassan, R., Mutrynowski, T., & Abu-Zidan, F. (2013). The practice of defensive medicine among hospital doctors in the United Kingdom. BMC medical ethics, 14, 42. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-14-42
    Panella, M., Rinaldi, C., Leigheb, F., Knesse, S., Donnarumma, C., Kul, S., Vanhaecht, K., & Di Stanislao, F. (2017). Prevalence and costs of defensive medicine: a national survey of Italian physicians. Journal of health services research & policy, 22 (4), 211–217. https://doi.org/10.1177/1355819617707224
    Peabody F. W. (1984). Landmark article March 19, 1927: The care of the patient. By Francis W. Peabody. JAMA, 252(6), 813–818. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.252.6.813
    Przetacznik, S. (2022). The evolution of risk management. Zeszyty Naukowe Małopolskiej Wyższej Szkoły Ekonomicznej w Tarnowie, 53(1-2), 98. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO97805 11488580.005
    QT, Inc. v. Mayo Clinic Jacksonville, 2006 US Dist. LEXIS 33668, at 10 (N.D. III. May 15, 2006.
    Resio, B. J., Chiu, A. S., Zhang, Y., & Pei, K. Y. (2020). Characterization of High Mortality Probability Operations at National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Hospitals. JAMA surgery, 155(1), 85–88. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama surg.2019.3750
    Robert Perrucci, Robert M. Anderson, Dan E. Schendel, Leon E (1980). Trachtman, Whistle-Blowing: Professionals' Resistance to Organizational Authority. Social Problems 28(2), 149–164, https://doi.org/10.2307/800148
    Robinson, D. H., & Toledo, A. H. (2012). Historical development of modern anesthesia. Journal of investigative surgery: the official journal of the Academy of Surgical Research, 25(3), 141–149.
    Rosenberg C. E. (2002). The tyranny of diagnosis: specific entities and individual experience. The Milbank quarterly, 80(2), 237–260. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0009.t01-1-00003
    Rout, B. K., & Sikdar, B. K. (2017). Hazard Identification, Risk Assessment, and Control Measures as an Effective Tool of Occupational Health Assessment of Hazardous Process in an Iron Ore Pelletizing Industry. Indian journal of occupational and environmental medicine, 21(2), 56–76. https://doi. org/10.4103/ijoem.IJOEM_19_16
    Sekhar, M. S., & Vyas, N. (2013). Defensive medicine: a bane to healthcare. Annals of medical and health sciences research, 3(2), 295–296. https://doi.org/10.4103/2141-9248.113688
    Spigelman, A. D., & Swan, J. (2005). Review of the Australian incident monitoring system. ANZ journal of surgery, 75(8), 657–661. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1445-2197.2005.03482.x
    Studdert, D. M., Mello, M. M., Sage, W. M., DesRoches, C. M., Peugh, J., Zapert, K., & Brennan, T. A. (2005). Defensive medicine among high-risk specialist physicians in a volatile malpractice environment. JAMA, 293(21), 2609–2617. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.293.21.2609
    SZASZ, T. S., & HOLLENDER, M. H. (1956). A contribution to the philosophy of medicine; the basic models of the doctor-patient relationship. A.M.A. archives of internal medicine, 97(5), 585–592. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.1956.00250 230079008
    Tancredi, L. R., & Barondess, J. A. (1978). The problem of defensive medicine. Science (New York, N.Y.), 200(4344), 879–882. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.644329
    Taniguchi, K., Watari, T., & Nagoshi, K. (2023). Characteristics and trends of medical malpractice claims in Japan between 2006 and 2021. PloS one, 18(12), e0296155. https://doi.org/10. 1371/journal.pone.0296155
    Ten Cate O. (2013). Nuts and bolts of entrustable professional activities. Journal of graduate medical education, 5(1), 157–158. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-12-00380.1
    Tiao, C. H., Tsai, L. C., Chen, L. C., Liao, Y. M., & Sun, L. C. (2021). Healthcare Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (HFMEA) as an Effective Mechanism in Preventing Infection Caused by Accompanying Caregivers During COVID-19-Experience of a City Medical Center in Taiwan. Quality management in health care, 30(1), 61–68. https://doi.org/10. 1097/QMH.0000000000000295
    Varkey B. (2021). Principles of Clinical Ethics and Their Application to Practice. Medical principles and practice: international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre, 30(1), 17–28. https://doi.org/10.1159/000509119
    Vedder, R. K. (1968). THE IMPACT OF THE FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION ON BANKING STABILITY. Papers of the Annual Meeting of the Business History Conference, 15, 87.
    Vicentini, C. B., & Contini, C. (2020). Control measures of a 400-year-old plague epidemic: an example of past efficiency at controlling disease and similarities with current epidemics. Le infezioni in medicina, 28(4), 621–633.
    Vincent, C., Aylin, P., Franklin, B. D., Holmes, A., Iskander, S., Jacklin, A., & Moorthy, K. (2008). Is health care getting safer?. BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 337, a2426. https://doi.org/10. 1136/bmj.a2426
    Vincent, C., Young, M., & Phillips, A. (1994). Why do people sue doctors? A study of patients and relatives taking legal action. Lancet (London, England), 343(8913), 1609–1613. https://doi. org/10.1016/s0140-6736(94)93062-7
    Walton, M., Harrison, R., Smith-Merry, J., Kelly, P., Manias, E., Jorm, C., & Iedema, R. (2019). Disclosure of adverse events: a data linkage study reporting patient experiences among Australian adults aged ≥45 years. Australian health review: a publication of the Australian Hospital Association, 43(3), 268 –275. https://doi.org/10.1071/AH17179
    Wu, C. Y., Weng, H. C., & Chen, R. C. (2013). Time trends of assessments for medical dispute cases in Taiwan: a 20-year nationwide study. Internal medicine journal, 43(9), 1023–1030. https://doi.org/10.1111/imj.12105
    Wu, T. Y., Majeed, A., & Kuo, K. N. (2010). An overview of the healthcare system in Taiwan. London journal of primary care, 3(2), 115–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/17571472.2010.1149 3315
    Zhang, X., Donnan, P. T., Bell, S., & Guthrie, B. (2017). Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug induced acute kidney injury in the community dwelling general population and people with chronic kidney disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC nephrology, 18(1), 256. https://doi.org/10. 1186/s12882-017-0673-8
    (三)政府機關資料
    Aviation Safety Reporting System (ASRS) of National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). https://asrs.arc.nasa.gov/ uassafety.html
    (四)網路資料
    Gröber, A. (2024). Biography. Retrieved from Institut für Soziologie der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München. Retrieved from https://webarchiv-ulrich-beck.soziologie.uni-muenchen.de/en/biography/(visited on 2024/2/23)
    Introduction of Dame Hazel Genn. https://profiles.ucl.ac.uk/1373(visited on 2024/3/29)
    John P.A. Ioannidis (2023). October 2023 data-update for "Updated science-wide author databases of standardized citation indicators." Elsevier Data Repository. Retrieved from https://elsevier.digitalcommonsdata.com/datasets/btchxktzyw/6(visited on 2024/2/29)
    Robin Marantz Hening. BODY & MIND; High-Tech Fortunetelling. The New York Times Magazine. December 24, 1989, Section 6. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/ 1989/12/24/magazine/body-mind-high-tech-fortunetelling. html(visited on 2024/3/24)
    UNDRR. Hyogo Framework for Action 2005-2015: Building the resilience of nations and communities to disasters - full text. Retrieved from https://www.undrr.org/publication/hyogo-framework-action-2005-2015-building-resilience-nations-and-communities-disasters(visited on 2024/2/15)
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    法學院碩士在職專班
    111961005
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0111961005
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[法學院碩士在職專班] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    100501.pdf3505KbAdobe PDF0View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback