English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 112704/143671 (78%)
Visitors : 49721570      Online Users : 566
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/153321


    Title: 臺灣縣市合併與升格對地方財政之影響
    The Fiscal Impact of City-County Mergers on Local Governments in Taiwan
    Authors: 黃婷萱
    Contributors: 陳國樑
    羅時萬

    黃婷萱
    Keywords: 縣市合併
    地方自治
    財政自主
    規模經濟
    地方財務狀況
    City-county merger
    Local autonomy
    Fiscal autonomy
    Economies of scale
    Local financial condition
    Date: 2024
    Issue Date: 2024-09-04 14:44:40 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 臺灣「縣市合併」議題近年來因大新竹合併案而重返大眾目光。在推動縣市合併前,需對其可能產生之各種影響進行通盤的考量與評估,然而過往臺灣對於此議題的研究卻大多著重於財政自主性的討論;此外,與他國相比臺灣縣市合併還伴隨著升格為直轄市,升格後新政府除了可獲得更多權力外,也需肩負比原先更多的責任義務。綜合上述,臺灣縣市合併對地方產生之影響需有更進一步的分析及探討。
    本研究透過差異中的差異法 (difference-in-differences, DID),以「不同改制方式」為依據,將縣市分類成實驗組及控制組,利用民國90年至111年臺灣地方政府的追蹤資料 (panel data) ,分析縣市合併或升格於財政收入面、公共支出面、財務結構面以及經濟發展面等四個面向之影響。結果發現在財政收入面上,自有財源占比的顯著增加來自於升格後可獲配更多中央統籌分配稅款,而將與補助款性質相近的中央統籌分配稅款減除後,自籌財源占比的實證結果卻大多轉為不顯著,以該兩項結果對照來看合併或升格對地方財政自主的改善有限;在公共支出面上,僅有一般政務支出、經濟發展支出以及其他支出項目上有發現人均支出下降的趨勢,然而效果大多不顯著。在財務結構面,合併或升格反而使地方政府的預算償付能力、教科文服務償付能力以及社會福利服務償付能力的情況更加惡化;最後在經濟發展面,雖從失業率、營利事業銷售額以及每戶可支配所得中位數的結果看到合併較可能達成促進地方經濟發展的目標,然而前兩者的實證結果並不顯著。因此就結果來看,臺灣縣市合併於四個面向上皆未獲得顯著的改善,而在與純升格相比之下也未產生額外的助益。
    In recent years, the proposal of city-county merger for Hsinchu has drawn public attention to the issue in Taiwan. The various impacts of city-county mergers must be carefully evaluated before promoting; however, most of the past studies focus on fiscal autonomy in Taiwan. Furthermore, compared to other countries, city-county mergers in Taiwan involve upgrading to municipal, resulting in gaining more authority but also bearing more responsibilities and costs post-merger. Therefore, further analysis and discussion are required regarding the impacts of city-county mergers in Taiwan.
    This study employs difference-in-differences (DID) method and divides the local governments into treatment and control groups based on different types of reforms. By using panel data from 2001 to 2022 of local governments in Taiwan, this study comprehensively examines the impacts of mergers on four dimensions: local government revenue, public expenditure, financial condition, and economic development.
    The results indicate that city-county mergers do not guarantee substantial improvement on local fiscal autonomy, and only in the category of general administration, economic development, and others did the per capita spending decrease, however the effects were insignificant. Furthermore, city-county mergers worsen the local governments’ budgetary solvency and service-level solvency on education and social welfare. Finally, even though the results of unemployment, sales amount, and median disposable income per household suggest that city-county mergers appear to promote local economic development, but the empirical results of the first two are insignificant.
    Therefore, from the results of this study, city-county mergers in Taiwan did not show significant improvements on local government revenue, public expenditure, financial condition, and economic development, nor did it bring additional benefits compared to upgrading a city/county to municipal.
    Reference: 林恭正 (2018),「地方財政狀況評估介紹」,《主計月刊》,745,50–55。
    林恭正、姚名鴻、黃崇哲與蘇建榮 (2015),「直轄市及縣市政府財政指標建置之初探」,《財稅研究》,44(1),1–27。
    林健次與蔡吉源 (2003),「地方財政自我負責機制與財政收支劃分」,《公共行政學報》,9,1–33。
    姚名鴻 (2011) ,「我國地方財政赤字之理論與實證分析」,《公共行政學報》,39,37–70。
    姚名鴻 (2012),「我國一般性與計畫型補助款分配之政治經濟分析」,《臺灣民主季刊》,9(4),191–225。
    姚名鴻、林恭正、黃崇哲與蘇建榮 (2019),「衡量我國地方政府財務狀況及其影響因素之分析」,《應用經濟論叢》,105,123–173。
    徐仁輝 (2015),「六都後中央與地方財政關係的探討」,《財稅研究》,44(2),1–16。
    郝雪卿 (2020),「合併升格滿10年 盧秀燕:加乘效果帶動台中發展」,《中央通訊社》,2020年12月20日。
    陳國樑 (2024),「任由『死人之手』劃分財政收支」,《聯合新聞網》,2024年2月29日。
    許義忠、廖君華與廖素玉 (2018),「財政自主與地方經濟發展之研究」,《財稅研究》,47(4),73–96。
    張其祿 (2010),「影響地方稅法通則執行因素之研究」,《行政暨政策學報》,51,1–46。
    張筵儀 (2021),「大新竹市合併,一切都是政治因素」,《Nownews今日新聞》,2021年12月30日。
    黃世鑫與郭建中 (2002),「自有財源與地方財政自主?地方自治內涵之省視」,《政策研究學報》,7,1–34。
    黃瓊如、何艷宏與王富賢 (2015),「政經因素對我國地方財政健康之影響」,《財稅研究》,44(4),25–60。
    趙永茂 (1977),「地方政府組織設計與組織重組問題之探討-兼論台灣地方政府組織重組問題」,《政治科學論叢》,8,183–212。
    樊家忠 (2018),「尋找平行世界-Difference-in-Difference之方法與應用」,《會計審計論叢》,8(1),1–13。
    Allers, M. A. and J. B. Geertsema (2016), “The Effect of Local Government Amalgamation on Public Spending, Taxation, and Service Levels: Evidence from 15 Years of Municipal Consolidation,” Journal of Regional Science, 56(4), 659–682.
    Ashworth, J., E. Galli, and F. Padovano (2013), “Decentralization as a Constraint to Leviathan: A Panel Cointegration Analysis,” Public Choice, 156, 491–516.
    Bird, R. M. and A. V. Tarasov (2004), “Closing the Gap: Fiscal Imbalances and Intergovernmental Transfers in Developed Federations,” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 22(1), 77–102.
    Blesse, S. and T. Baskaran (2016), “Do Municipal Mergers Reduce Costs? Evidence from a German Federal State,” Regional Science and Urban Economics, 59, 54–74.
    Blom-Hansen, J., K. Houlberg, and S. Serritzlew (2014), “Size, Democracy, and the Economic Costs of Running the Political System,” American Journal of Political Science, 58(4), 790–803.
    Brennan, G. and J. M. Buchanan (1977), “Towards a Tax Constitution for Leviathan,” Journal of Public Economics, 8(3), 255–273.
    Brennan, G. and J. M. Buchanan (1980). The Power to Tax: Analytical Foundation of a Fiscal Constitution, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Carr, J. B. and R. C. Feiock (1999), “Metropolitan Government and Economic Development,” Urban Affairs Review, 34(3), 476–488.
    Carr, J. B., S. S. Bae, and W. Lu (2006), “City-County Government and Promises of Economic Development: A Tale of Two Cities,” State and Local Government Review, 38(3), 131–141.
    Faulk, D. and E. Schansberg (2009), “An Examination of Selected Economic Development Outcomes from Consolidation,” State and Local Government Review, 41(3), 193–200.
    Feiock, R. C. and J. B. Carr (1997), “A Reassessment of City/County Consolidation: Economic Development Impacts,” State and Local Government Review, 29(3), 166–171.
    Fisher, R. C. (2022), State and Local Public Finance, London: Routledge Press.
    Grossman, P. J. (1989b), “Fiscal Decentralization and Government Size: An Extension,” Public Choice, 62(1), 63–69.
    Hall, J. C., J. Matti, and Y. Zhou (2020), “The Economic Impact of City-County Consolidations: A Synthetic Control Approach,” Public Choice, 184(1), 43–77.
    Hansen, S. W., K. Houlberg, and L. H. Pedersen (2014), “Do Municipal Mergers Improve Fiscal Outcome?” Scandinavian Political Studies, 37(2), 196–214.
    Hirsch, W. Z. (1959), “Expenditure Implication of Metropolitan Growth and Consolidation,” The Review of Economics and Statistics, 41(3), 232–241.
    Leland, S. and K. Thurmaier (2005), “When Efficiency is Unbelievable: Normative Lessons from 30 Years of City-County Consolidations,” Public Administration Review, 65(4), 475–489.
    Moisio, A. and R. Uusitalo (2013), “The Impact of Municipal Mergers on Local Public Expenditures in Finland,” Public Finance and Management, 13(3), 148–166.
    Oates, W. E. (1972), Fiscal Federalism, New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Press.
    Oates, W. E. (1985), “Searching for Leviathan: An Empirical Study,” The American Economic Review, 75(4), 748–57.
    Reingewertz, Y. (2012), “Do Municipal Amalgamation Work? Evidence from Municipalities in Israel,” Journal of Urban Economics, 72(2–3), 240–251.
    Roesel, F. (2017), “Do Mergers of Large Local Governments Reduce Expenditures? Evidence from Germany Using the Synthetic Control Method,” European Journal of Political Economy, 50, 22–36.
    Rosen, H. S. and T. Gayer (2014), Public Finance, New York: McGraw-Hill Education Press.
    Savitch, H. V., R. K. Vogel, and Y. Lin (2010), “Beyond the Rhetoric-Lessons from Louisville’s Consolidation,” The American Review of Public Administration, 40(1), 3–28.
    Shadbegian, R. J. (1999), “Fiscal Federalism, Collusion, and Government Size: Evidence from the States,” Public Finance Review, 27(3), 262–281.
    Wallis, J. J. and W. E. Oates (1988a), “Decentralization in the Public Sector: An Empirical Study of State and Local Government,” in H. S. Rosen (ed.), Fiscal Federalism: Quantitative Studies, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    Wang, X., L. Dennis, and Y. S. Tu (2007), “Measuring Financial Condition: A Study of U.S. States,” Public Budgeting & Finance, 27(2), 1–21.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    財政學系
    111255005
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0111255005
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[財政學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    500501.pdf4338KbAdobe PDF0View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback