English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 118295/149332 (79%)
造访人次 : 78162974      在线人数 : 1542
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧：
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据
    •  进阶搜寻
    政大機構典藏 > 法學院 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/156545


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/156545


    题名: 評限制對保險契約權利為強制執行之立法草案──以2024年6月預告之保險法第174條之2草案為中心
    Commentary on the Legislative Exemption from Execution of the Right of Insurance Contract－Focusing on the Draft Amendment to Article 174-2 of Insurance Act in June 2024
    作者: 葉啓洲
    贡献者: 法學院
    关键词: 保險契約;強制執行;解約金;保險給付;生存保障
    Insurance contract;Compulsory enforcement;Surrender value;Insurance benefit;Survival protection
    日期: 2024-11
    上传时间: 2025-04-14 09:50:00 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 人壽保險契約解約金債權或保險金給付債權，性質均為普通金錢債權，自屬要保人之責任財產，得為強制執行之標的。執行債務人依保險契約所生權利時，固應顧及比例原則及債務人之生存保障，然而保險法修正草案第 174 條之 2 所豁免執行保險契約權利之情形，均欠缺理論基礎，嚴重偏離豁免強制執行之基本原則。且修正草案所豁免執行之金額，遠高於債務人及其同居親屬基本生活所需，有違憲法保護債權人財產權之意旨，且不符比例原則。本文認為，本條草案無增訂之必要，應予捨棄。
    The surrender value of a life insurance contract and the entitlement to insurance benefits are both categorized as ordinary monetary claims, which fall under the property of the policyholder. Furthermore, Civil Grand Chamber in the Supreme Court has ruled that the enforcement court is authorized to execute the claim of the surrender value, under the premise of consideration of the principle of proportionality and the debtor's right to a basic standard of living. However, the exemption from execution of rights under insurance contracts proposed in the draft amendment to Article 174-2 of Insurance Act lacks a theoretical basis, and the exempted amount significantly exceeds the necessities for basic living of the debtor and his/her cohabiting relatives. This draft amendment contravenes the constitutional mandate to protect the property rights of creditors and does not align with the principle of proportionality. Accordingly, this article urges that the competent authority should withdraw the draft amendment.
    關聯: 月旦法學雜誌, No.354, pp.102-117
    数据类型: article
    显示于类别:[法學院] 期刊論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 描述 大小格式浏览次数
    index.html0KbHTML188检视/开启


    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈