English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 116346/147380 (79%)
Visitors : 60546428      Online Users : 3354
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/157560


    Title: 公務員唯才體制之實踐與效果：兩岸三地之比較研究
    Practices and Impacts of Meritocracy of Civil Service Systems: a Comparative Study of Mainland China, Taiwan and Hong Kong
    Authors: 蘇偉業
    Contributors: 公行系
    Keywords: 公務員制度;進用制度;專業主義;回應性;唯才體制
    civil service system;recruitment and selection;professionalism;responsiveness;meritocracy
    Date: 2019-10
    Issue Date: 2025-06-25 13:09:42 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本計畫比較中國大陸、臺灣與香港三個華人地區的公務員制度，以唯才體制作為概念框架，分析三地公務員進用制度之異同、專業主義及回應性之類型與差異程度。本研究將透過「誰選才、如何選才與為誰選才」三項分析，探討三地的進用制度之特性取向，並作歸類；同時衡量各進用制度對公務員技術職能之影響。此分析會與專業自主性結合，衡量三地公務員的專業主義程度；再衡量三地公務員之民眾回應性程度，以分析三地公務員之唯才體制類型。為此，本研究提出四類唯才體制類型：行政性唯才體制、臣服性政治唯才體制、民粹性政治唯才體制、代表性唯才體制。本研究會利用問卷調查方式進行三地公務員類型之檢定，並利用文獻分析與深度訪談對三地公務員制度進行比較分類。
    This project is to compare and contrast the civil service systems of Mainland China, Taiwan and Hong Kong through the conceptual framework of meritocracy, in which the recruitment and selection system, professionalism, and responsiveness in the three systems would be examined. This study would explore the characteristics of the recruitment and selections systems in terms of "who select? how to select? select for what" and thus develop the typology for the systems; at the same time measure the impact of the system on the technical competence of civil servants. This analysis would combine with the analysis of the professional autonomy to measure the level of professionalism. Further alongside with the analysis of bureaucratic responsiveness to the public, it would develop the typologies of meritocracy for three systems. This study proposes four types of meritocracy: administrative, subject political, populist political, and representative. This study would make use of a questionnaire survey to test the three systems, and of documentary analysis and in-depth interviews to compare and classify the civil service systems in the three places.
    Relation: 科技部, MOST107-2410-H004-144, 107.08-108.07
    Data Type: report
    Appears in Collections:[公共行政學系] 國科會研究計畫

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML6View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback