Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/157652
|
| Title: | 影迷的評論書寫及線上自我呈現：以Letterboxd為例
Film Review Writing and Online Self-Presentation of Film Fans: A Case Study of Letterboxd |
| Authors: | 詹子斳
Chan, Tzu-Chin |
| Contributors: | 陳聖智
Chen, Sheng-Chih
詹子斳
Chan, Tzu-Chin |
| Keywords: | Letterboxd
影迷
影評
自我呈現
社群媒體
Letterboxd
film fans
film review
self-presentation
social media |
| Date: | 2025 |
| Issue Date: | 2025-07-01 14:10:50 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 本研究聚焦於數位時代影迷在社群媒體平台Letterboxd上的評論書寫與自我呈現，探討其如何透過Letterboxd書寫影評並建構身份及情感認同。研究採用質性研究方法，透過深度訪談與觀察法，招募受訪者進行深度訪談，並結合Letterboxd評論文本進行分析，從使用者的視角剖析其在平台上的書寫特徵與線上社群參與。
研究結果顯示，Letterboxd上的評論具有多元特色，可分為論述評析型與迷因短句型兩大類型，前者闡釋對電影的深度分析及感想，後者則以簡短的語句連結至其他文本或流行文化，進行創意表達，且在這些評論中，展現出觀影後立即筆記、自我揭露情感、幽默化特性等性質。統整研究結果，發現在數位社群時代中「影評」一詞的詮釋發生偏移，凡能達成傳達個人觀點、達到推薦之效，並能發揮影響力，喚起討論者，便具有影評的意涵。
此外，本研究發現，影迷成為Letterboxd使用者後，藉由四部最喜愛的電影、評分分布與觀影數量等個人檔案要素進行自我呈現，揭示自己的觀影喜好和品味。然而，比起Letterboxd介面上呈現的自我形象，使用者更關注從評論中展露出的觀點和內涵，且使用Letterboxd能提升影迷認同感，顯示出社群對個人身份認同的影響。
This study examines how film fans engage in review writing and self-presentation on the social media platform Letterboxd in the digital age, focusing on how they construct identity and emotional resonance through their reviews. Using qualitative methods, including in-depth interviews and analysis of review texts, the study explores users' writing styles and participation in the platform's community.
The findings identify two main review types on Letterboxd: analytical-discursive and meme-like short-form reviews. The former provides in-depth reflections, while the latter uses concise, creative expressions linked to pop culture. Reviews often feature attributes like immediate post-viewing notes, emotional self-disclosure, and humor. The study highlights a shift in the concept of "film review" in the digital age, encompassing any commentary that conveys personal perspectives, recommends films, and sparks discussions.
Film fans also use profile elements like favorite films and viewing stats for self-presentation, showcasing their tastes. However, users prioritize the perspectives expressed in their reviews over their platform profile. The study concludes that Letterboxd fosters a stronger sense of identity among users, demonstrating the role of online communities in shaping personal identity. |
| Reference: | ioauue（2023年5月）。〈我們喜歡看電影——釀電影讀者大調查 & Letterboxd攻略秘笈〉，《釀電影》。12: 58-65。
白玫佳黛（2021）。〈媽媽愛你：中國親媽粉、偶像產業、性別和親密烏托邦〉。《傳播與社會學刊》，57：127-158。
石安伶、李政忠（2014）。〈雙重消費、多重愉悅：小說改編電影之互文／互媒愉悅經驗〉。新聞學研究，(118)，1-53。
朱華瑄譯（2009）。《探索迷文化》。新北：韋伯。（原書Hills, M. [2002] Fan Cultures. London, UK: Routledge.）
何詩韻（2012）。〈統一超商企業公仔代言人OPEN家族之符號消費與迷群樣態〉。政治大學新聞研究所碩士論文。
吳廷勻（2006）。〈藝術電影迷與台灣電影消費階層化之研究：以布迪厄（Bourdieu）文化社會學為研究取徑〉。淡江大學大眾傳播學系碩士班碩士論文。
吳姿嫻（2011）。〈論「新媒介科技迷」〉，《中華傳播學刊》，19：97-146。
吳彥明（2008）。〈「迷」之迷團—迷研究的過去、現在與未來〉，《廣告學研究》，30：127-131。
吳叡人譯（1999）。《想像的共同體：民族主義的起源與散布》。台北：時報。（原書Anderson, B.[1983]. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.）
李明璁（2003）。〈這裡想像，那裡實踐：「日劇場景之旅」與台灣年輕人的跨文化認同〉，《媒介擬想：日本流行文化在台灣與亞洲（II）》，2: 42-73。
李信漢、杜綺文（2007）。〈Web 2.0，麥克魯漢知多少？〉，《新聞學研究》，92：183-192。
李建強（2011）。〈網絡影評的興起與發展——一個值得關注和期待的電影批評現象〉，《上海交通大學學報（哲學社會科學版）》，19(2)：43-51。
李楠（2019）。《習性：布爾迪厄實踐理論路標》。北京：中國社會科學出版社。
林志信（2023）。〈我承認，我是薪水小偷：薪水小偷的日常自我呈現〉。臺灣師範大學科技運用與人力資源發展學系碩士論文。
林宜風、張淑楨、鈕則勳（2023）。〈迷因應用於行銷和政治領域的策略與效果研究〉。《中國廣告學刊》，(28)，75-100。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=18176763-N202304180004-00005
林雨澄（2005）。〈影舞者的夢醒時分：小眾影迷習癖與場域之分析〉。交通大學語言與文化研究所碩士論文。
林南（2005）。《社會資本：關於社會結構與行動的理論》。上海：上海人民出版社。
林昱（2013）。〈台灣影評活動的文化政治與經濟：從「新電影」到「後—新電影〉。政治大學廣播電視研究所碩士論文。
邱天助（2002）。《布爾迪厄文化再製理論》，台北：桂冠。
徐韻婷（2014）。〈社群媒體與音樂消費：以KPOP迷群為例〉。政治大學科技管理與智慧財產研究所碩士論文。
朗天（2012）。〈我們需要電影評論比賽〉，《香港電影》，9 (46)，香港影評庫。https://www.filmcritics.org.hk/film-review/node/2015/06/30/我們需要電影評論比賽
秦雪（2021）。〈對融媒體環境下影視評論現象的關注和思考〉，《今傳媒（學術版）》，29(6)，50-52。
高宣揚（2002）。《布爾迪厄》。台北：生智。
高淑清（2008）。《質性研究的18堂課—首航初探之旅》。高雄：麗文。
張哲豪（2009）。〈影迷的盛宴：台北金馬影展觀眾的儀式性參與〉。政治大學廣播電視研究所碩士論文。
張惠嵐（2008）。〈擬仿時代？真人實境節目下「過度的」閱聽人－以《超級星光大道》為例〉，《傳播與管理研究》，8(1)：85-124。
張譯軒（2010）。〈臺灣星際大戰(Star Wars)社群之迷創作與著作權邊界初探〉。臺灣藝術大學藝術管理與文化政策研究所碩士論文。
畢恆達（2020）。《教授為什麼沒有告訴我（2020進化版）》。新北：小畢空間。
許劍橋（2022）。〈製作「南丁格爾」：臺灣護理書寫的自我呈現與世代衍異〉，《漢學研究集刊》，12(35)，173-212。
郭幼龍（2004）。〈民眾對臺灣電影的評價與電影消費行為之關係研究〉。世新大學傳播研究所碩士論文。
郭佩捷（2023）。〈追劇的線上共感時代：初探韓劇迷文本的生產與消費〉。政治大學傳播學院傳播碩士學位學程碩士論文。
陳正國譯（1993）。《瞭解庶民文化》。台北：萬象。（原書Fiske, J.[1993]. Understanding popular culture. Boston, Massachusetts: Unwin Hyman.）
湯博堯（2013）。〈從虛擬到實體—寶萊塢影迷的現身〉。國防大學政治作戰學院新聞學系碩士論文。
黃沛瑜（2015）。〈論台灣電影部落客之勞動與盈利模式〉。臺灣師範大學大眾傳播研究所碩士論文。
黃煜文譯（2023）。《日常生活中的自我呈現》。台北：商周。（原書Goffman, E. [1959]. The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, N.Y. : Doubleday.）
齊隆壬（1987）。〈台灣電影批評的傾向：「觀眾電影」影評與「作者電影」影評〉，焦雄屏編《台灣新電影》，頁 40-46。台北：時報。
蔣昕（2010）。〈臉書上的一張臉譜：社交網站上的劃界與展演〉。清華大學社會學研究所碩士論文。
鄭岳翔（2013）。〈新世代影癡觀影體驗——以好萊塢超級英雄電影為例〉。東吳大學社會學系碩士論文。
鄭明萱譯（2006）。《認識媒體：人的延伸》。台北：貓頭鷹。（原書 McLuhan, M. [1964]. Understanding media: The extensions of man. McGraw-Hill.）
鄭郁欣譯（2009）。《笑聲與嘲弄：幽默的社會批判》。新北：韋伯。（原書Billig, M. [2005]. Laughter and ridicule: Towards a social critique of humour. SAGE Publications.）
鄭廣泉、李雅靖（2022）。〈唯有腐女愛耽美？中國腐男喜好本土電視劇中腐向CP的動機研究〉，《新聞學研究》，153: 141-194。
謝佳錦（2022）。〈數位時代以降的台灣電影評論觀察〉，《台灣電影年鑑2022》，100-114。
簡妙如（1996）。〈過度的閱聽人：「迷」之初探〉。中正大學電訊傳播研究所碩士論文。
龎袿方（2019）。〈迷的情感經濟與勞動：防彈少年團（BTS）與迷的社群媒體實踐〉。政治大學傳播學院傳播碩士學位學程碩士論文。
西文部分
Ahmed, S. (2004). The Cultural Politics of Emotion. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Ang, I. (1982). Watching Dallas: Soap Opera and the Melodramatic Imagination (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315002477
Attardo, S. (1993). Violation of conversational maxims and cooperation: the case of jokes. Journal of Pragmatics, 19, 537-58.
Battaglia, J. (2010). Everyone’s a Critic: Film Criticism Through History and Into the Digital Age [Master’s thesis]. Available from Brockport Senior Honors Theses.
Baym, N. K. (2010). Personal Connections in the Digital Age. Cambridge: Polity.
Bienvenido, H. P., & Bruna, C. S. (2019). Mirada sociológica al software lúdico - A Sociological Look at Gaming Software: la dramaturgia de Erving Goffman en los videojuegos. Reis: Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas, 166, 135–152. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26633336
Bordwell, D. (2018). On the History of Film Style (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Boyd, D. M. (2004). Friendster and publicly articulated social networking. In CHI'04 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems (pp. 1279-1282).
Boyd, D. M. (2007). Why Youth (Heart) Social Network Sites: The Role of Networked Publics in Teenage Social Life. MacArthur Foundation Series on Digital Learning – Youth, Identity, and Digital Media Volume (ed. David Buckingham). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chang, B.-H., & Ki, E.-J. (2005). Devising a practical model for predicting theatrical movie success: Focusing on the experience good property. Journal of Media Economics, 18, 247-269.
Cialdini, R. B. (2007). Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion. Harper Business.
Colosi, R., Cowen N., & Todd, M. (2023). Sexual and gender identity work on social media. Socialogy Compass, 17(6). https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.13073
Corrigan, T. (2011). A Short Guide to Writing about Film. Pearson.
Couldry, N. (2012). Media, society, world: Social theory and digital media practice. Polity.
Cubitt, S. (2004). The cinema effect. MIT Press.
Desai, K. K., & Basuroy, S. (2005). Interactive influence of genre familiarity, star power, and critics’ reviews in the cultural goods industry: The case of motion pictures. Psychology and Marketing, 22, 203-223.
Donath, J. (1998). Identity and deception in the virtual community. In M. Smith & P. Kollack (Eds.), Communities in cyberspace (pp. 29-59). London, UK: Routledge.
Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C. & Lampe, C. (2007). The Benefits of Facebook ‘Friends’: Social Capital and College Students’ Use of Online Social Network Sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12, 1143-1168.
Enverga, M. R., & Enverga, E. R. (2023). Performing without a script: a dramaturgical analysis of the first cohort of Senior High School teachers in the history of Philippine education. Teachers and Teaching, 1–15.
Fiske, J. (1989). Moments of Television: Neither the Text nor the Audience. In Seiter, E. et al.(eds.) Remote Control. London and NY: Routledge.
Fiske, J. (1992). The Cultural Economy of Fandom. In Lewis, L.A. (ed.) The Adoring Audience : Fan Culture and Popular Media (pp.30-49.) London and NY: Routledge.
Frey, M. (2015). Introduction: Critical questions. In Frey, M. & Sayad, D. (ed.), Film Criticism in the Digital Age (pp. 1-20). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Sandvoss, C., Gray, J., & Harrington, C. L. (2017). Introduction: Why Still Study Fans? In J. Gray, C. Sandvoss, & C. L. Harrington (Eds.), Fandom: Identities and Communities in a Mediated World (2 ed., pp. 1-26). NYU Press.
Gemser, G., Van Oostrum, M., & Leenders, M.A.A.M. (2007). The impact of film reviews on the box office performance of art house versus mainstream motion pictures. J Cult Econ 31, 43–63 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s10824-006-9025-4
Gibbs, J., & Pye, D. (2005). Style and Meaning: Studies in the Detailed Analysis of Film. Manchester University Press.
Greengard, S. (2012). Digitally possessed. Communications of the ACM, 55, 14–16.
Grossberg, L. (1992). Is there a fan in the house? : the affective sensibility of fandom. In Lewis, L.A., (Eds.), The Adoring Audience: Fan Culture and Popular Media (pp. 50-65). London and NY: Routledge.
Guo, T. (2023). Fan translation and film criticism in China Re-reviewing The Wandering Earth (2019) through translation. Translation and Interpreting Studies, 18(3), 378-398.
Hakoköngäs, E., Halmesvaara, O., & Sakki, I. (2020). Persuasion through bitter humor: Multimodal discourse analysis of rhetoric in internet memes of two far-right groups in Finland. Social Media+ Society, 6(2), 1-11.
Hay, J. (2000). Functions of humor in the conversations of men and women. Journal of Pragmatics, 32(6), 709-742. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00069-7
Hewitt, A., & Forte, A. (2006). Crossing boundaries: Identity management and student/faculty relationships on the Facebook. Poster session presented at CSCW, Banff, Alberta, Canada.
Hogan, B. (2010). The Presentation of Self in the Age of Social Media: Distinguishing Performances and Exhibitions Online. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 30(6), 377-386.
Horky, T., Grimmer, C. G., & Theobalt, C. (2021). Social personalities in sports: an analysis of the differences in individuals’ self-presentation on social networks. Media, Culture & Society, 43(1), 3-22.
Jarvie, I. (1961). Towards an Objective Film Criticism. Film Quarterly , 14(3), 19-23.
Jenkins, H. (1992). Textual Poachers: Television Fans & Participatory Culture. NY: Routledge.
Jenkins, H. (2006). Fans, bloggers, and gamers: Exploring participatory culture. NYU Press.
Lewis, K., Kaufman, J., & Christakis, N. (2008). The taste for privacy: An analysis of college student privacy settings in an online social network. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14, 79-100.
Lewis, L. A. (1992). Introduction. In L. A. Lewis (Ed.), The adoring audience: Fan culture and popular media (pp. 1-6). London, UK: Routledge.
Marshall, P. D. (2010). The promotion and presentation of the self: Celebrity as marker of presentational media. Celebrity Studies, 1, 35-48.
Massarani, L., Waltz, I., Leal, T. & Medeiros, A. (2023). Science, Gender, and Race in conversations about Hidden Figures | Ciência, gênero e raça nas conversações sobre Estrelas Além do Tempo. Revista Estudos Feministas, 31(2), e84158.
McWhirter, A. (2016). Film Criticism and Digital Cultures: Journalism, Social Media and the Democratization of Opinion. London: I.B. Tauris.
Meikle, G. & Young, S. (2011). Media Convergence: Networked Digital Media in Everyday Life. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Miguel, C., Lutz, C., Majetić, F., & Perez-Vega, R. (2023). Working from paradise? An analysis of the representation of digital nomads’ values and lifestyle on Instagram. New Media & Society, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448231205892
Miltner, K. M. (2014). “There’s no place for lulz on LOLCats”: The role of genre, gender, and group identity in the interpretation and enjoyment of an Internet meme. First Monday, 19(8). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v19i8.5391
Moon, S., Bergey, P. K., & Iacobucci, D. (2010). Dynamic effects among movie ratings, movie revenues, and viewer satisfaction. Journal of Marketing, 74(1), 108-121.
Mulvey, L. (1975). Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema. Screen, 16(3), 6-18
Murrell, A.J., Jamie, K. & Penfold-Mounce, R. (2023). ‘It was the easiest way to kind of announce it’: exploring death announcements on social media through a dramaturgical lens. Mortality, 28(3), 411–428.
Myers, M. D., & Newman, M. (2007). The qualitative interview in IS research: Examining the craft. Information and Organization, 17(1), 2-26.
Pavlík, O. (2021). Fans, Fun and Homophobia: Mischievous Criticism on the Czecho-Slovak Film Database. In: Kristensen, N.N., From, U., Haastrup, H.K. (eds) Rethinking Cultural Criticism. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-7474-0_4
Pramaggiore, M., & Wallis, T. (2005). Film: A Critical Introduction. Laurence King Publishing.
Pullen, K. (2000). I-love-Xena.com: Creating Online Fan Communities. In D. Gauntlett (Ed.), Web Studies: Rewiring Media Studies for the Digital Age, 52-61. London: Hodder Education.
Riley, M., & Robertson, B. (2022). The virtual good farmer: Farmers’ use of social media and the (re)presentation of “good farming”. Socialogia Ruralis, 62(3), 437-458.
Roesler, U. (2019). Between Self-Expression and Convention: Tibetan Reflections on Autobiographical Writing. Life Writing, 17(2), 163–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/14484528.2019.1620581
Schroeder, R. (2002). The social life of avatars: Presence and interaction in shared virtual environments. In R. Schroeder (Ed.), Social interaction in virtual environments: Key issues, common themes, and a framework for research (pp. 1-18). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
Shifman, L. (2013). Memes in a digital world: Reconciling with a conceptual troublemaker. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 18(3), 362-377.
網路資料：中文部分
Alfredo（2013年1月12日）。〈Letterboxd：新的電影網路社交平台〉。【Blog on Cinema】。取自https://www.blogoncinema.net/
丹眼看電影（2020年6月2日）。〈【台北電影節完整片單 Letterboxd分數大解密】〉。【臉書動態更新】。取自https://www.facebook.com/DansLeCinema/posts/1640250592799623/
林佳蕙（2020年12月16日）。〈非典型串流策略：線上線下策展，「Giloo紀實影音」建立知識導向的影音社群〉。《500輯》。https://500times.udn.com/wtimes/story/12672/5096239
金樹懶獎 Golden Sloth Awards（2024年2月18日）。〈二月電影評分—可憐的東西Poor Things〉。【臉書動態更新】。取自https://www.facebook.com/plugins/post.php?href=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.facebook.com%2FGoldenSlothAwards%2Fposts%2Fpfbid05QE6vjxjaHrgHwTnMyppmYnuuU1g6HRGFD34wYPtXi7FyxDrAMKmd7PBqwSeYe8Ll&show_text=true&width=500
映畫手民 Cinezen（2024年2月2日）。〈【映畫手民關閉網站公告】〉。【臉書動態更新】。取自https://www.facebook.com/DansLeCinema/posts/1640250592799623/
韋晢（2022年10月30日）。〈【任由這樣的電影代言歷史，才是毫無尊嚴的自卑】〉。【臉書動態更新】。取自https://www.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=pfbid0gFCSsJKz1Qxa8QAX9FajQSPf2FkJyuicrN5f8nbYFF5HW8F82NvvyPnnkoiQfiAbl&id=100002040725316&paipv=0&eav=AfZQQLy6XcYVBxq9oyi7tZoh6Wfxpu_G_EtnBN5xU0-aR7XQ5TsAOFchlOJPNtdVfrg&_rdr
張硯拓（2024年6月14日）。〈九年前的《腦筋急轉彎》在我心底貼著兩張標籤〉。【Letterboxd】。取自https://letterboxd.com/yentuo/film/inside-out-2-2024/1/
許榮哲（2024年3月26日）。〈魏導在找一群人〉。【臉書動態更新】。取自https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=7393003687434217&set=a.106735962727729&type=3&ref=embed_post
陳穎（2023年7月25日）。〈多元再現之外：《芭比》的酷兒召喚術與看婦產科之必要〉。《映畫手民》。https://www.cinezen.hk/?p=9895#google_vignette
壁虎先生（2021年2月15日）。〈一、前言：請客吃飯〉。【壁虎先生】。取自https://mrgeckopapa.blogspot.com/2021/02/blog-post_15.html
壁虎先生（2021年2月15日）。〈二、多力多滋人文主義：2020台灣劇情電影的一種傾向〉。【壁虎先生】。取自https://mrgeckopapa.blogspot.com/2021/02/blog-post_15.html
網路資料：西文部分
2023 Worldwide Box Office. Retrieved from https://www.boxofficemojo.com/year/world/2023/
boyd, d. (2006, December). Friends, friendster and MySpace top 8: Writing community into being on social network sites. First Monday, 11. Retrieved from https://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/1418/1336
Corliss, R. (1990, March-April). All Thumbs: Or, Is There a Future for Film Criticism?. Film Comments. Retrieved from https://www.filmcomment.com/article/richard-corliss-all-thumbs-or-is-there-a-future-for-film-criticism/
David Ehrlich (2023, January 21). Past Lives. Letterboxd. Retrieved from https://letterboxd.com/davidehrlich/film/past-lives/
Deguzman, K.(2024, March 31). What is a Film Review — Definition, Examples & Top Critics. Studio Binder. Retrieved from https://www.studiobinder.com/blog/what-is-a-film-review-definition/
Goldstein, J. M. (2023, December 18).Letterboxd feels like vintage internet. Can it stay that way?. The Washington Post. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/style/of-interest/2023/12/18/letterboxd-fans-movies/
Letterboxd on X. Retrieved from https://x.com/letterboxd
Letterboxd. Retrieved from https://letterboxd.com/about/faq/
Mullin, B. (2023, September 29). Letterboxd, Online Haven for Film Nerds, Gets a New Owner. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2023/09/29/business/media/letterboxd-new-owner.html
Reviews & Criticism. Queen’s University Library. https://guides.library.queensu.ca/film-media/reviews-criticism
Reviews vs Film Criticism. The University of Vermont Libraries. https://researchguides.uvm.edu/c.php?g=953842&p=6891494#s-lg-box-21866607
Rufo, Y. (2024, October 17). 'Very demure, very mindful' - are we missing the joke of viral trend? BBC News. Retrieved from https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cm23zye08j4o
Sawers, P. (2013, February 8). Letterboxd, the social network for movie buffs, goes freemium and finally opens to everyone. The Next Web. Retrieved from https://thenextweb.com/news/letterboxd-the-social-network-for-movie-buffs-rolls-out-of-beta
Scott, A. O. (2008, April 13). Roger Egbert, the Critic Behind the Thumbs. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/13/movies/13scot.html
Solnik, C. (2009, September 24). With social media, moviegoers become reviewers. Long Island Business News. Retrieved from https://libn.com/2009/09/24/with-social-media-moviegoers-become-reviewers/
Tobias, S. (2020, September 18). The Future of Film Talk Is on Letterboxd. The Ringer. Retrieved from https://www.theringer.com/movies/2020/9/18/21444082/letterboxd-film-discussion-site-streaming-movies
Year in Review 2023. Letterboxd. Retrieved from https://letterboxd.com/2023/#welcome |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
傳播學院傳播碩士學位學程
111464007 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0111464007 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [傳播學院傳播碩士學位學程] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Description |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 400701.pdf | | 13183Kb | Adobe PDF | 0 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
