Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/157869
|
| Title: | 臺灣上市公司ESG績效及獲利能力影響因素之探討－聯立迴歸分析
A Study on the Influencing Factors of ESG Performance and Profitability of Taiwanese Listed Companies: Simultaneous Regression Analysis |
| Authors: | 蔡承佑
Tsai, Cheng-Yu |
| Contributors: | 王國樑
余威廷
Wang, Kuo-Liang
Yu, Wei-Ting
蔡承佑
Tsai, Cheng-Yu |
| Keywords: | ESG績效
獲利能力
產業特性
3SLS
ESG performance
Profitability
Industry characteristics
3SLS |
| Date: | 2025 |
| Issue Date: | 2025-07-01 15:36:33 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 参考ESG與獲利能力影響因素的既有文獻，本文首先建立包含ESG與獲利能力兩條方程式的聯立模型，依據2023年臺灣上市公司資料，透過3SLS分析影響ESG表現與公司獲利率之主要因素，並進一步探討兩者之間的交互關係。實證結果顯示，專利數量、董事會規模、董事會出席率與營業成本等變數對 ESG 分數具有正向影響，而董事長兼任總經理則呈負向影響，服務業ESG表現顯著優於非服務業。在獲利能力方面，權益法長期投資與大股東持股比例則為正向影響，而研發費用率與營業週轉天數對獲利率呈負向關係。ESG 與獲利率之間存在顯著雙向正向關係，形成良性循環。
Based on existing literature on the factors influencing ESG performance and profitability, this study first establishes a simultaneous regression model incorporating ESG and profitability. Using data from listed companies in Taiwan in 2023, this study employs a 3SLS approach to analyze the key determinants of ESG performance and corporate profitability and further explore their interaction. The empirical results indicate that variables such as patent count, board size, board meeting attendance, and operating costs positively affect ESG scores, whereas CEO duality has a negative impact. Additionally, ESG performance in the service industry is significantly superior to that in non-service industries. Regarding profitability, long-term equity investment and the shareholding ratio of major shareholders have a positive effect, while R&D expenditure ratio and operating cycle days negatively impact profitability. There is a significant bidirectional positive relationship between ESG and profitability, creating a virtuous cycle. |
| Reference: | 中文文獻
李淑華、簡雪芳、蔡彥卿（2014）。權益法長投之投資淨收益：盈餘持續性與股市反應。管理與系統， 21（3），483-516。
李淑華、蔡彥卿（2011）。合併財務報表規範、盈餘組成份子持續性及股市理性定價之研究。證券市場發展季刊，23（3），153-198。
英文文獻
Alkurdi, A., Al Amosh, H., & Khatib, S. F. A. (2024). The mediating role of carbon emissions in the relationship between board attributes and ESG performance: European evidence. EuroMed Journal of Business, 19(4), 1016-1041.
Alshehhi, A., Nobanee, H., & Khare, N. (2018). The impact of sustainability practices on corporate financial performance: Literature trends and future research potential. Sustainability, 10(2), 494.
Aydoğmuş, M., Gülay, G., & Ergun, K. (2022). Impact of ESG performance on firm value and profitability. Borsa İstanbul Review, 22(S2), S119-S127.
Batchimeg, B. (2017). Financial performance determinants of organizations: The case of Mongolian companies. Journal of Competitiveness, 9(3), 22-33.
Boussaada, R., & Hakimi, A. (2021). How multiple large shareholders affect bank profitability under the dispersion and the coalition hypotheses? An insight from the MENA region. International Journal of Managerial Finance, 17(1), 1-24.
Chang, C.-C. (2018). Cash conversion cycle and corporate performance: Global evidence. International Review of Economics and Finance, 56, 568-581.
Deari, F., & Palomba, G. (2024). Does the cash conversion cycle affect firm profitability? Some empirical evidence from listed firms in North Macedonia. Zagreb International Review of Economics & Business, 27(1), 63-77.
Díaz, V., Ibrushi, D., & Zhao, J. (2021). Reconsidering systematic factors during the Covid-19 pandemic – The rising importance of ESG. Finance Research Letters, 38, 101870.
Dicuonzo, G., Donofrio, F., Ranaldo, S., & Dell'Atti, V. (2022). The effect of innovation on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) practices. Meditari Accountancy Research, 30(4), 1191-1209.
Elkington, J. (1994). Towards the sustainable corporation: Win-win-win business strategies for sustainable development. California Management Review, 36(2), 90–100.
Fadillah, R. R., Taufik, T., & Muthia, F. (2024). Corporate social responsibility and firm value: The moderating effect of profitability. Jurnal Penelitian Ekonomi dan Bisnis, 9(1), 38-46.
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston, MA: Pitman.
Giannopoulos, G., Fagernes, R. V. K., Elmarzouky, M., & Hossain, K. A. B. M. A. (2022). The ESG disclosure and the financial performance of Norwegian listed firms. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 15(6), 237.
Guo, X., Guo, K., & Kong, L. (2023). Industrial agglomeration and corporate ESG performance: Empirical evidence from manufacturing and producer services. Sustainability, 15(16), 12445.
Gurol, B., & Lagasio, V. (2022). Women board members' impact on ESG disclosure with environment and social dimensions: Evidence from the European banking sector. Social Responsibility Journal, 19(1), 211-228.
Halid, S., Mahmud, R., Suffian, M. T. M., & Rahman, R. A. (2022). Does firm's board affect ESG? Malaysian evidence. International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, 12(1), 131-143.
Husted, B. W., & Sousa-Filho, J. M. (2019). Board structure and environmental, social, and governance disclosure in Latin America. Journal of Business Research, 102, 220-227.
Jaworski, J., & Czerwonka, L. (2024). Profitability and working capital management: A meta-study in macroeconomic and institutional conditions. Decision, 51(1), 123-145.
Kieschnick, R., LaPlante, M., & Moussawi, R. (2011). Working capital management and shareholder wealth. Journal of Financial Economics, 98(3), 563-588.
Leogrande, A., Leogrande, D., & Costantiello, A. (2023). The impact of patent applications in the context of the ESG model at world level. HAL Open Science.
Menicucci, E., & Paolucci, G. (2022). Board diversity and ESG performance: Evidence from the Italian banking sector. Sustainability, 14(20), 13447.
Pham, C.-V., Liu, S.-F., & Chen, S.-H. (2024). Corporate ESG performance and intellectual capital: International evidence. Asia Pacific Management Review, 29(3), 306-346.
Rađenović, T., Krstić, B., Janjić, I., & Jovanović Vujatović, M. (2023). The effects of R&D performance on the profitability of highly innovative companies. Strategic Management, 28(3), 34-45.
Romano, M., Cirillo, A., Favino, C., & Netti, A. (2020). ESG (Environmental, Social and Governance) performance and board gender diversity: The moderating role of CEO duality. Sustainability, 12(21), 9298.
Su, J., & Ji, X. (2013). Power balance of equity and corporate performance. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (pp. 1019-1024). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
Tamimi, N., & Sebastianelli, R. (2017). Transparency among S&P 500 companies: An analysis of ESG disclosure scores. Management Decision, 55(8), 1660-1680.
Treepongkaruna, S., Kyaw, K., & Jiraporn, P. (2024). ESG controversies and corporate governance: Evidence from board size. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(5), 4218-4232.
Tung, L. T., & Binh, Q. M. Q. (2022). The impact of R&D expenditure on firm performance in emerging markets: Evidence from the Vietnamese listed companies. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 30(2), 447-465.
Velte, P. (2017). Does ESG performance have an impact on financial performance? Evidence from Germany. Journal of Global Responsibility, 8(2), 169-185. |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
經濟學系
112258043 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0112258043 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [經濟學系] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Description |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 804301.pdf | | 1477Kb | Adobe PDF | 0 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
