English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 118295/149332 (79%)
Visitors : 78165110      Online Users : 702
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/158225


    Title: 必要假釋制度及相關處遇措施之研究
    Mandatory Parole and Prisoner's Treatment
    Authors: 謝如媛
    Contributors: 法律系
    Keywords: 假釋;必要假釋;社會內處遇;再犯;監獄超收;社會復歸;長刑期受刑人
    Parole;mandatory parole;conditional release;community treatment;recidivism;prison over‐crowding;rehabilitation;long‐term incarceration prisoner
    Date: 2017-10
    Issue Date: 2025-07-31 15:49:05 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 在刑罰嚴厲化的趨勢下，原本強調社會內處遇功能的假釋制度也受影響，而成為刑罰嚴厲化的一環，這使得假釋的門檻日趨嚴格，且假釋的運用也越來越消極，並進一步使我國監獄超收、長刑期人口增加等問題惡化，如此不僅造成機構內處遇的品質下降，也將影響機構與社會的妥當銜接，增加受刑人復歸社會的困難。過去針對假釋的研究，多集中在假釋的權利與救濟、假釋的審查與檢討，或者是假釋再犯的預測。而本研究將從政策面出發，以「必要假釋」（mandatory parole）制度與相關的處遇措施為研究對象，希望透過比較各國制度及實際的運作方法與成效，來對假釋做制度上的檢討。在必要假釋制度下，並不考慮「悛悔實據」之類的實質要件，只要受刑人具備形式要件，服滿一定的刑期，就必須予以假釋，因此應該有助於提升假釋的比率，另外也因假釋時間確定，機構與受刑人可提前準備復歸社會之銜接事宜並規劃在社會內的處遇，故對於相關處遇的探討亦為本研究之重點。本研究希望釐清假釋制度在刑事政策上的意義，探求社會內處遇落實的方法，並回到我國的法制及實務現狀，評估必要假釋制度在本土法制發揮功能的可能性，最後達到促進假釋制度的運用、減緩超收問題，並協助受刑人復歸社會之目的。
    There are several problems in Taiwan’s Parole system and practice. First, it becomes more and more difficult to get released by parole, in law and in practice. Second, the discretion of parole aboard has been criticized to be arbitrary. Third, because the “get tough” in parole and other crime policy, prison over‐crowding get more serious. We have good‐time system in Taiwan, but it’s early release without supervision. Besides, many prisoners are released without parole. It brings about the problem of recidivism and prison over‐crowding, but no good resolution has been taken, especially about parole. Mandatory Parole would be an option, but needs more discussion and examination. Besides, parole is an important way to improve community treatment. But to ensure it’s effects, we needs to pay more attention in it’s practices.
    Relation: 科技部, MOST104-2410-H004-072-MY2, 104.08-106.07
    Data Type: report
    Appears in Collections:[法律學系] 國科會研究計畫

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML21View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback