English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 117578/148609 (79%)
Visitors : 70648225      Online Users : 10181
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/158281


    Title: 碳權交易系統與廠商風險:網絡分析
    Emissions trading scheme participation and firm risks: network analysis
    Authors: 賀瑋年
    HO, WEI-NIEN
    Contributors: 何靜嫺
    賀瑋年
    HO, WEI-NIEN
    Keywords: 歐盟碳排放交易系統(EU ETS)
    閾值網絡
    企業風險
    企業風險管理(ERM)
    風險傳播
    EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS)
    Threshold Network
    Firm Risk
    Enterprise Risk Management (ERM)
    Risk Transmission
    Date: 2025
    Issue Date: 2025-08-04 12:51:58 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究探討歐盟碳排放交易系統(EU ETS)中企業之間的連結如何影響風險的傳播。我 們建構了三種類型的網絡:短期視角的碳權交易網絡、長期視角的股價報酬網絡,以及兩者結 合的混合網絡。透過分析企業在這些網絡中的位置(中心性指標),本研究探討其對財務風險、 基本面風險及 ESG 風險的影響。研究結果顯示,具有較高中心性的企業往往成為財務與環境 風險的關鍵傳播節點,進一步放大市場不確定性。然而,在策略、財報可靠性與整體企業風險 管理(ERM)風險方面,高中心性企業則展現出穩定市場的作用,有助於減緩風險的傳遞。在 混合網絡中,合規風險成為顯著因素,顯示企業的法規遵循能力在平衡風險流動中扮演重要角 色。此外,ERM 的穩定效果在混合網絡中更為顯著。這些發現填補了現有碳市場風險傳播研 究的空白,並為企業風險管理與政策制定提供了重要見解,特別是在監管高度連結企業方面。
    This study examines how connections between firms in the European Union Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) influence the spread of risks. We build three types of networks: a short-term view permit trading network, long-term view stock return networks, and combined mixed networks. By analyzing firms’ positions (degrees of centrality) in these networks, the study explores their impact on financial risks, fundamental risks, and ESG risks. The results show that firms with higher centrality often act as key points for spreading financial and environmental risks, amplifying market uncertainties. However, for strategy, reporting, and total Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) risk, highly central firms tend to play a stabilizing role, helping to slow down risk transmission. In the mixed network, compliance risk becomes a significant factor, suggesting that firms’ ability to comply with regulations is critical in balancing the flow of risks. Furthermore, the stabilizing effect of ERM is even stronger in the combined network. These findings fill a gap in existing research on how risks spread in carbon markets and provide valuable insights for firm risk management and policymaking, especially regarding the oversight of highly connected firms.
    Reference: Anger, N. & Oberndorfer, U. (2008). Firm performance and employment in the EU emissions trading scheme: An empirical assessment for Germany. Energy Policy, 36, 12-22.

    Benlemlih, M., Shaukat, A., Qiu, Y., & Trojanowski, G (2018). Environmental and social disclosures and firm risk. Journal of Corporate Finance, 35, 297-309.

    Brock, A. & Hommes, H. (1998). Heterogeneous beliefs and routes to chaos in a simple asset pricing model. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, 22(8-9), 1235-1274.

    Carbone, S., Giuzio, M., Kapadia, S., Krämer, J., Nyholm, K., & Vozian, K. (2022). The low-carbon transition, climate commitments and firm credit risk. Sveriges Riksbank Working Paper Series, 409.

    Carratù, M., Chiarini, B., & Piselli, P. (2020). Effects of European emission unit allowance auctions on corporate profitability. Energy Policy, 144, 111584.

    Chan, H., Li, S. & Zhang, F. (2013). Firm competitiveness and the European Union emissions trading scheme. Energy Policy, 63, 1056-1064.

    Colmer, J., Martin, R., Muûls, M., & Wagner, U. (2023). Does Pricing Carbon Mitigate Climate Change? Firm-Level Evidence from the European Union Emissions Trading Scheme. NBB Working Paper, 438.

    D’Arcangeloa, F. & Galeotti, M. (2025). Environmental policy and investment location: The risk of carbon leakage in the EU ETS. Energy Policy, 202, 114587.

    Dawid, H., Harting P., Hoog, S., & Neugart, M. (2019). Macroeconomics with heterogeneous agent models: fostering transparency, reproducibility and replication. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 29, 467-538.

    Dechezleprêtre, A., Nachtigall, D., & Venmans, F. (2018). The joint impact of the European Union emissions trading system on carbon emissions and economic performance. OECD Economics Department Working Papers, 1515.

    Dewaelheynsa, N., Schoubben, F., Struyfs, K., & Hulle C. (2023). The influence of carbon risk on firm value: Evidence from the European Union Emission Trading Scheme. Journal of Environmental Management, 344, 118293.

    Duan, Y., Hu, G., & Mclean, R. (2010). Costly arbitrage and idiosyncratic risk: Evidence from short- sellers. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 19, 564-579.

    Ferrara, A. & Giua, L. (2022). Indirect cost compensation under the EU ETS: A firm-level analysis. Energy Policy, 165, 112989.

    Gordon, L., Loeb, M., & Tseng, C. (2009). Enterprise risk management and firm performance: A contingency perspective. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 28(4), 301-327.

    Gupta, N., Shah, J., Gupta, S., & Kaul, R. (2021). Causal Impact of European Union Emission Trading Scheme on Firm Behaviour and Economic Performance: A Study of German Manufacturing Firms. arXiv econ, 2108.07163.

    Horvey, S. & Ankamah, J. (2020). Enterprise risk management and firm performance: Empirical evidence from Ghana equity market. Cogent Economics, 8(1), 1840102.

    Hoyt, R. & Liebenberg, A. (2003). The Determinants of Enterprise Risk Management: Evidence from the Appointment of Chief Risk Officers. Risk Management & Insurance Review, 6(1), 37–52.

    Hoyt, R. & Liebenberg, A. (2011). The Value of Enterprise Risk Management: Evidence from the U.S. Insurance Industry. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 78(4), 795-822.

    Jo, H. & Na, H. (2012). Does CSR reduce firm risk? Evidence from controversial industry sectors. Journal of Business Ethics, 110, 441-456.

    Johnson, V., Khurana, I., & Reynolds, J. (2002). Audit-firm tenure and the quality of financial reports. Contemporary Accounting Research, 19(4), 637–660.

    Joltreau, E. & Sommerfeld, K. (2019). Why does emissions trading under the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS) not affect firms’ competitiveness? Empirical findings from the literature. Climate Policy, 19(4), 453-471.

    Jones, J. (1991). Earnings management during import relief investigation. Journal of Accounting Research, 29(2), 193–228.

    Klemetsen, M., Rosendahl, K., & Jakobsen, A. (2016). The impacts of the EU ETS on Norwegian plants’ environmental and economic performance. Discussion Papers, 833.

    Lambertides & Tsouknidis (2024). Climate regulation costs and firms’ distress risk. Financial Markets, Institutions & Instruments, 33(1), 3–30.

    Lechner, P. & Gatzert, N. (2018). Determinants and value of enterprise risk management: empirical evidence from Germany. The European Journal of Finance, 24(10), 867-887.

    Makridou, G., Doumpos, M., & Galariotis, E. (2019). The financial performance of firms participating in the EU emissions trading scheme. Energy Policy, 129, 250–259.

    Malik, M., Zaman, M., & Buckby, S. (2020). Enterprise Risk Management and Firm Performance. Role of the Risk Committee. Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics, 16(1), 100178.

    Marin, G., Marino, T., & Pellegrin, M. (2018). The Impact of the European Emission Trading Scheme on Multiple Measures of Economic Performance. Environmental and Resource Economics, 71, 551–582.

    Martin, R., Muûls, M., Preux, L., & Wagner, U. (2014). Industry Compensation under Relocation Risk: A Firm-Level Analysis of the EU Emissions Trading Scheme. American Economic Review, 104(8), 2482–2508.

    McShane, M., Nair, A., & Rustambekov, E. (2011). Does Enterprise Risk Management Increase Firm Value? Journal of Accounting Auditing & Finance, 26(4), 641-658.

    Naegele, H. & Zaklan, A. (2019). Does the EU ETS cause carbon leakage in European manufacturing? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 93, 125–147.

    Ross, S., Westerfield, R., & Jordan, B. (2010). Fundamentals of Corporate Finance. McGraw-Hill Irwin, 9th edition.

    Sharpe, W. (1964). Capital assets prices: A theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk. The Journal of Finance, 19, 425-442.

    Verde, S. (2020). The impact of the EU emissions trading system on competitiveness and carbon leakage: the econometric evidence. Journal of Economic Surveys, 34(2), 320–343.

    Zou, Xiang., Isa, Che., & Rahman, M. (2019). Valuation of Enterprise Risk Management in the Manufacturing Industry. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 30(11-12), 1389-1410.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    經濟學系
    112258027
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0112258027
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[經濟學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    802701.pdf1310KbAdobe PDF0View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback