English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 117581/148612 (79%)
Visitors : 69787813      Online Users : 2570
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/158689


    Title: 網路酸民評論對消費者行為的影響:探究網紅推出之品牌
    The Impact of Online Trolling on Consumer Behavior: Examining Influencer Launched Brands
    Authors: 黃子益
    Huang, Tzu-Yi
    Contributors: 蔡葵希
    Christine Cook
    黃子益
    Huang, Tzu-Yi
    Keywords: 網路酸民
    網紅品牌
    網紅行銷
    購買意願
    品牌真實性
    粉絲認同
    Online Trolling
    Influencer Brands
    Influencer Marketing
    Purchase Intention
    Brand Authenticity
    Fan Identity
    Date: 2025
    Issue Date: 2025-08-04 15:03:42 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 隨著網紅逐漸從品牌代言轉型為品牌創立者,其事業變得容易受到網路酸民的攻擊,然而,由此產生的消費者行為仍有待探討。本研究以社會認同理論(Social Identity Theory)和計畫行為理論(Theory of Planned Behavior)為基礎,探討施虐型與道德型酸民言論如何影響消費者對網紅推出之品牌(ILBs)的購買意願。本研究透過一項線上實驗,讓 195 名參與者觀看一則由網紅發布的虛構產品貼文及底下的酸民留言,以評估其對消費者態度與購買意願的影響。結果顯示,兩種酸民言論類型均未對購買意願或態度產生顯著影響。然而,消費者態度是購買意願的強力預測指標,且前測證實兩種酸民言論均會降低網紅推出之品牌被感知到的真實性。
    研究結果顯示,消費者可能將針對網紅推出之品牌的酸民言論視為對其商業行為的評論,而非人身攻擊,因此未能觸發防衛身分認同的購買行為。本研究結論為,對網紅推出之品牌而言,培養品牌真實性與建立正面的消費者態度,比針對不同類型的網路酸民言論調整回應更能有效促進銷售。
    As influencers increasingly transition from endorsers to brand creators, their ventures become susceptible to online trolling, yet the resulting consumer behavior remains underexplored. This study, drawing from Social Identity Theory and the Theory of Planned Behavior, investigates how sadistic vs. moral trolling impacts purchase intentions for Influencer Launched Brands (ILBs). An online experiment was conducted with 195 participants who were exposed to trolling comments on a fictional product launch post by an influencer to assess the effects on consumer attitude and purchase intention. Results showed that neither trolling type significantly influenced purchase intentions or attitudes. However, consumer attitude strongly predicted purchase intention, and a pretest confirmed that both trolling types diminished the ILB’s perceived authenticity.
    Findings suggest consumers may view trolling of ILBs as commercial criticism, not a personal attack, failing to trigger identity-defensive purchasing. This study concludes that for ILBs, fostering authenticity and positive attitudes is more critical for driving sales than tailoring responses to specific types of online trolling.
    Reference: Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t
    Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1975). A Bayesian analysis of attribution processes. Psychological bulletin, 82(2), 261.
    Audrezet, A., De Kerviler, G., & Moulard, J. G. (2020). Authenticity under threat: When social media influencers need to go beyond self-presentation. Journal of business research, 117, 557-569.
    Bergström, V., & Fredriksson Johansson, J. (2023). Influencers' Own Brands: Investigating the Drivers of Young Female Followers' Purchase Intentions towards Influencers' Own Brands.
    Binns, A. (2012). DON'T FEED THE TROLLS! Managing troublemakers in magazines' online communities. Journalism practice, 6(4), 547-562.
    Buckels, E. E., Trapnell, P. D., & Paulhus, D. L. (2014). Trolls just want to have fun. Personality and Individual Differences, 67, 97–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.01.016
    Carlino, F., & Taylor, M. (2022). What do Consumers value about Influencer Launched Brands: the Proposition of Human Brand Publics.
    Cruz, A. G. B., Seo, Y., & Rex, M. (2018). Trolling in online communities: A practice-based theoretical perspective. The Information Society, 34(1), 15-26.
    Davis, F. D. (1985). A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and results (Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology).
    Drumm, S. (2021, July 28). What’s next for the big business of influencer-founded brands? Thingtesting. https://thingtesting.com/stories/influencer-founded-brands
    Dsouza, M. (n.d.). Why influencers should start building their own brands - ITP Live. ITP Live. https://itp.live/influencer/10272-why-influencers-should-start-building-their-own-brands
    Forgas, J. P., & George, J. M. (2001). Affective influences on judgments and behavior in organizations: An information processing perspective. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 86(1), 3-34.
    Geyser, W. (2023, November 15). What is an Influencer? – Social Media Influencers Defined [Updated 2024]. Influencer Marketing Hub. https://influencermarketinghub.com/what-is-an-influencer/
    Golf-Papez, M., & Veer, E. (2017). Don’t feed the trolling: rethinking how online trolling is being defined and combated. Journal of Marketing Management, 33(15-16), 1336-1354.
    Han, H., & Yoon, H. J. (2015). Hotel customers’ environmentally responsible behavioral intention: Impact of key constructs on decision in green consumerism. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 45, 22-33.
    Hamarta, E., Muhammed, A. K. A. T., & Deniz, M. (2021). Development of online trolling scale: Validity and reliability study. Turkish Psychological Counseling and Guidance Journal, 11(63), 457-470.
    Hardaker, C. (2010). Trolling in asynchronous computer-mediated communication: From user discussions to academic definitions.
    Hong, F. Y., & Cheng, K. T. (2018). Correlation between university students’ online trolling behavior and online trolling victimization forms, current conditions, and personality traits. Telematics and Informatics, 35(2), 397-405.
    Howard, K., Zolnierek, K. H., Critz, K., Dailey, S., & Ceballos, N. (2019). An examination of psychosocial factors associated with malicious online trolling behaviors. Personality and Individual Differences, 149, 309-314.
    Jonas, E., McGregor, I., Klackl, J., Agroskin, D., Fritsche, I., Holbrook, C., ... & Quirin, M. (2014). Threat and defense: From anxiety to approach. In Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 49, pp. 219-286). Academic Press.
    Kapitan, S., & Silvera, D. H. (2016). From digital media influencers to celebrity endorsers: attributions drive endorser effectiveness. Marketing letters, 27, 553-567.
    Komaç, G., & Çağıltay, K. (2019, November). An overview of trolling behavior in online spaces and gaming context. In 2019 1st International Informatics and Software Engineering Conference (UBMYK) (pp. 1-4). IEEE.
    Leonardelli, G. J., Pickett, C. L., & Brewer, M. B. (2010). Optimal distinctiveness theory: A framework for social identity, social cognition, and intergroup relations. In Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 43, pp. 63-113). Academic Press.
    Lou, C., & Yuan, S. (2019). Influencer marketing: How message value and credibility affect consumer trust of branded content on social media. Journal of interactive advertising, 19(1), 58-73.
    Magrizos, S., Lamprinakos, G., Fang, Y., & Drossos, D. (2021). Taking It a Step Further: ¬-When do Followers Adopt Influencers’ Own Brands? Review of Marketing Science, 19(1), 53–74. https://doi.org/10.1515/roms-2021-0003
    Maichum, K., Parichatnon, S., & Peng, K. C. (2016). Application of the extended theory of planned behavior model to investigate purchase intention of green products among Thai consumers. Sustainability, 8(10), 1077.
    McCorquodale, S. (2021). Influencer trolling is a growing problem. CORQ. https://corq.studio/insights/influencer-trolling-is-a-growing-problem-and-the-online-safety-bill-wont-be-enough-to-stop-it
    Moulard, J. G., Raggio, R. D., & Folse, J. A. G. (2016). Brand authenticity: Testing the antecedents and outcomes of brand management's passion for its products. Psychology & marketing, 33(6), 421-436.
    Mulcahy, R. F., Riedel, A., Keating, B. W., Beatson, A., & Campbell, M. (2023). I'd better say something! How empathy shapes bystander psychological reactance and intervention to online trolling of service organizations. Journal of Service Management.
    Müller, L.K., Mattke, J., & Maier, C. (2018). #Sponsored #Ad: Exploring the Effect of Influencer Marketing on Purchase Intention. Americas Conference on Information Systems.
    Nizri, E. (2022, June 27). Why are more influencers launching their own brands? Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbestechcouncil/2022/06/27/why-are-more-influencers-launching-their-own-brands/?sh=5940b1711ff9
    Nguyen, T. T. H., Nguyen, N., Nguyen, T. B. L., Phan, T. T. H., Bui, L. P., & Moon, H. C. (2019). Investigating consumer attitude and intention towards online food purchasing in an emerging economy: An extended TAM approach. Foods, 8(11), 576.
    Reysen, S., & Branscombe, N. R. (2010). Fanship and fandom: Comparisons between sport and non-sport fans. Journal of Sport Behavior, 33(2).
    Sanfilippo, M., Yang, S., & Fichman, P. (2017). Trolling here, there, and everywhere: Perceptions of trolling behaviors in context. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(10), 2313-2327.
    Sanfilippo, M. R., Fichman, P., & Yang, S. (2018). Multidimensionality of online trolling behaviors. The Information Society, 34(1), 27-39.
    Schiffman, L. G., and L. L. Kanuk. 2010. Consumer Behaviour, 10th ed. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.
    Sia, C. L., Lim, K. H., Leung, K., Lee, M. K., Huang, W. W., & Benbasat, I. (2009). Web strategies to promote internet shopping: is cultural-customization needed?. Mis Quarterly, 491-512.
    Statista. (2023, September 27). Global influencer marketing value 2016-2023. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1092819/global-influencer-market-size/
    Syrdal, H. A., Myers, S., Sen, S., Woodroof, P. J., & McDowell, W. C. (2023). Influencer marketing and the growth of affiliates: The effects of language features on engagement behavior. Journal of Business Research, 163, 113875.
    Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (2004). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In Political psychology (pp. 276-293). Psychology Press.
    Thacker, S., & Griffiths, M. D. (2012). An exploratory study of trolling in online video gaming. International Journal of Cyber Behavior, Psychology and Learning (IJCBPL), 2(4), 17-33.
    Tseng, T. H., & Wang, H. Y. (2023). Consumer attitudes and purchase intentions towards internet celebrity self-brands: an integrated view of congruence, brand authenticity and internet celebrity involvement. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 32(6), 863-877.
    Vinney, C., Dill-Shackleford, K. E., Plante, C. N., & Bartsch, A. (2019). Development and validation of a measure of popular media fan identity and its relationship to well-being. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 8(3), 296.
    Yang, B., & Nepomuceno, M. V. (2023). How Does Trolling Behavior Influence User's Decision: The Role of Self-identity (Doctoral dissertation, HEC Montréal).
    Zhang, H., Sun, J., Liu, F., & G. Knight, J. (2014). Be rational or be emotional: advertising appeals, service types and consumer responses. European Journal of Marketing, 48(11/12), 2105-2126.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    全球傳播與創新科技碩士學位學程
    112ZM1013
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0112ZM1013
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[全球傳播與創新科技碩士學位學程] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    101301.pdf1674KbAdobe PDF0View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback