English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 117578/148609 (79%)
Visitors : 70643005      Online Users : 10076
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/158699


    Title: 綠建築在不同經濟效益地區之溢價率分析 - 以臺北市為例
    Analysis of Green Building Premium Rates in Different Efficiency Areas – A Case Study of Taipei City
    Authors: 李鈺翔
    Lee, Yu-Hsiang
    Contributors: 朱芳妮
    Chu, Fang-Ni
    李鈺翔
    Lee, Yu-Hsiang
    Keywords: 綠建築
    特徵價格模型
    分量迴歸
    準地租
    Green building
    Hedonic pricing model
    Quantile regression
    Quasi rent
    Date: 2025
    Issue Date: 2025-08-04 15:07:34 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 隨著極端氣候事件頻繁發生,經濟發展與環境保護之間的衝突愈趨顯著,促使政府機關與企業部門日益重視永續發展與ESG指標的實踐。建築業作為資源消耗與碳排放的重要來源之一,綠建築遂成為推動低碳轉型與永續經濟的關鍵手段。多項研究指出綠建築價值的認知能夠體現在實際租金上,因此本研究除探討綠建築在臺北市商用辦公市場中是否具備租金溢價效應之外,旨在進一步分析其於不同租金區段之溢價程度與是否存在準地租之特性。
    透過蒐集財團法人臺灣建築中心與美國綠建築委員會所認證之EEWH與LEED綠建築資料,結合實際租金數據與建物屬性變數進行OLS以及分量迴歸分析,檢視綠建築標章對各分量租金之影響。實證結果顯示,綠建築在低經濟效益地區有著更高的溢價率,並且於高低租金分量皆顯著存在溢價現象,顯示在綠建築尚未高度普及之區域,具備綠標章者可藉由差異化策略獲得額外租金;分量迴歸中之低分量以及高分量皆具正向效果,呈現非線性關係。研究結論證實臺北市的綠建築租金溢價效果確實會受到量體增加而逐漸淡化,符合準地租理論之發展。此結果有助於釐清綠建築價值於不同市場區隔之展現方式,並為未來建築規劃與永續發展政策提供實證參考依據。
    Amid increasing occurrences of extreme climate events, the conflict between economic development and environmental protection has become more pronounced, driving both governmental agencies and corporate sectors to prioritize sustainable development and ESG practices. As a major contributor to resource consumption and carbon emissions, the building sector plays a critical role in achieving low-carbon transitions. Green buildings, in particular, have emerged as a key strategy for promoting sustainable economic growth. Existing studies suggest that the perceived value of green buildings is reflected in rental premiums.
    This study investigates whether green buildings exhibit rental premiums in Taipei’s commercial office market and further analyzes the variation in such premiums across different rent segments, exploring the potential presence of quasi-rent characteristics. By combining certified EEWH and LEED green building data with rental prices and building attributes, this research employs OLS and quantile regression models to assess the impact of green certification on rental distribution. The empirical results indicate that green buildings command higher premiums in economically less favorable areas, with significant positive effects observed at both lower and upper quantiles, suggesting a non-linear relationship. This implies that in regions where green buildings are less prevalent, certified buildings can capture additional rent through differentiation. Moreover, the diminishing premium with increased supply supports the quasi-rent hypothesis. These findings offer insights into how green building value manifests across market segments and provide empirical evidence to inform sustainable policy and urban planning.
    Reference: 一、中文參考文獻
    杜宇璇, 宋豐荃, 曾禹瑄, 葛仲寧, & 陳奉瑤. (2013). 臺北特徵價格模型之回顧分析. 土地問題研究季刊, 12(2), 44–57.
    林祖嘉, & 馬毓駿. (2007). 特徵方程式大量估價法在臺北不動產市場之應用. 住宅學報, 16(2), 1–22.
    林睿信. (2016). 綠建築標章對辦公商業大樓租金之影響. 國立政治大學財政學系研究所碩士學位論文.
    陳奉瑤, & 梁仁旭. (2018). 綠建築標章之溢價率分析—以新北市住宅大樓為例. 臺北土地研究, 21(1), 61–85.
    温世家, 山邉奈生, 荷世平, & 徐瑋澤. (2014). 綠建築消費者行為之模型與綠建築策略之意涵-基於對日本之實證研究. 中國土木水利工程學刊, 35(3), 309–318.
    黃名義, & 張金鶚. (1999). 臺北市辦公室市場租金之研究. 中華民國住宅學會第八屆年會論文集, 1, 77–93.
    彭逸偉. (2013). 綠建築對不動產價格之影響. 國立政治大學碩士論文.
    董呈煌, 李春長, 陳俊麟, & 吳韻玲. (2016). SVR與OLS在住宅價格預測正確率的比較. 住宅學報, 25(2), 31–51.
    楊雅婷. (2019). 綠認證對辦公大樓租金之影響-以臺北市為例. 國立政治大學地政學系碩士在職專班論文.
    楊經綸. (2011). 影響建築開發商申請綠建築標章之因素. 國立成功大學都市計畫學系碩士論文.
    蘇偉強, 劉庭如, 黃斐, & 陳奉瑤. (2013). 特徵價格法應用的差異分析. 土地問題研究季刊, 12(3), 55–68.

    二、外文參考文獻
    Akomea-frimpong, I., Jin, X., & Osei-kyei, R. (2022). Mapping Studies on Sustainability in the Performance Measurement of Public-Private Partnership Projects: A Systematic Review. Sustainability, 14(12), 7174.
    Allen, J. G., Macnaughton, P., Cedeno-Laurent, J. G., Flanigan, S. S., Eitland, E. S., & Spengler, J. D. (2015). Green Buildings and Health. Global Environmental Health and Sustainability, 2(3), 250–258.
    Altomonte, S., & Schiavon, S. (2013). Occupant Satisfaction in LEED and Non-LEED Certified Buildings. Building And Environment, 68, 66–76.
    Becker, G.S. (1965) A Theory of the Allocation of Time. Economic Journal, 75, 493-517.
    Bils, M., & Klenow, P. J. (1998). Using Consumer Theory to Test Competing Business Cycle Models. Journal of Political Economy, 106(2), 233–261.
    Bond, S. A., & Devine, A. (2016). Certification Matters: Is Green Talk Cheap Talk? The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 52, 117–140.
    Chegut, A., Eichholtz, P., & Kok, N. (2014). Supply, Demand and the Value of Green Buildings. Urban Studies, 51(1), 22–43.
    Chin, T. L. and Chau, K. W. (2003). A critical review of literature on the hedonic price model, International Journal for Housing and Its Applications, 27 (2), 145-165.
    Costa, O., Fuerst, F., Robinson, S. J., & Mendes-da-silva, W. (2018). Green Label Signals in an Emerging Real Estate Market. A Case Study of Sao Paulo, Brazil. Journal of Cleaner Production, 184, 660–670.
    Cooperman, A., Graebert, R., & Fischer, M. (2014). Shareholders and Clients as Catalysts for Energy Efficient Buildings in Banking. Energy Efficiency in Buildings, 4, 75–86.
    Court, A.T. (1939). Hedonic Price Indexes. The Dynamics of Automobile Demand, General Motors Corporation, 99-119.
    Deuble, M. P., & De dear, R. J. (2012). Green Occupants for Green Buildings: The Missing Link? Building and Environment, 56, 21–27.
    Dunse, N. and Jones, C. (1998). A hedonic price model of office rents, Journal of Property Valuation and Investment, 16(3), 297-312.
    Eichholtz, P., Kok, N., & Quigley, J. (2010a). Doing Well by Doing Good? Green Office Buildings. The American Economic Review, 100(5), 2492–2509.
    Eichholtz, P., Kok, N., & Quigley, J. (2010b), Sustainability and the Dynamics of Green Buildings, RICS Research, London.
    Eichholtz, P., Kok, N., & Quigley, J. m. (2013). The Economics Of Green Building. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 95(1), 50–63.
    Fesselmeyer, E. (2018). The Value of Green Certification in the Singapore Housing Market. Economics Letters, 163, 36–39.
    Fiorillo, P., & Santilli, G. (2024). The Influence of Shareholder ESG Performance on Corporate Sustainability: Exploring the Role of Ownership Structure. Finance Research Letters, 67, 105800.
    Follain, J. R., & Malpezzi, S. (1980). Dissecting Housing Value and Rent, Urban Institute, 249(17).
    Fuerst, F., Kontokosta, C., & Mcallister, patrick. (2014). Determinants of Green Building Adoption. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 41(3), 551–570.
    Fuerst, F., & McAllister, D. Patrick. (2011). Green Noise or Green Value? Measuring the Price Effects of Environmental Certification on office values. Real Estate Economics, 39(1), 45–69.
    Griliches, Z. (1961) Hedonic Price Indexes for Automobiles: An Econometric of Quality Change. The Price Statistics of the Federal Government, 173-196, NBER.
    Häkkinen, T., & Belloni, K. (2011). Barriers and Drivers for Sustainable Building. Building Research & Information, 39(3), 239–255.
    Hui, E. C., & Yu, K. (2020). The “Green Lemon” Problem - a Study of the Effect of Partial Disclosure of Poorer Assessment Ratings on Housing Prices. Journal of Cleaner Production, 271, 122242.
    Kim, S., Lim, B. T. h., & Kim, J. (2017). Green Features, Symbolic Values and Rental Premium – Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Procedia Engineering, 180, 41–48.
    Klein, B., & Leffler, K. B. (1981). The Role of Market Forces in Assuring Contractual Performance. Journal of Political Economy, 89(4), 615–41.
    Kok, N., & Jennen, M. (2012). The Impact of Energy Labels and Accessibility on Office Rents. Energy Policy, 46, 489–497.
    Lancaster, K.J. (1966) A New Approach to Consumer Theory. Journal of Political Economy, 74, 132-157.
    Leskinen, N., Vimpari, J., & Junnila, S. (2020). A Review of the Impact of Green Building Certification on the Cash Flows and Values of Commercial Properties. Sustainability, 12(7), 2729.
    Liao, W., & Zhao, D. z. (2019). The Selection and Quantile Treatment Effects on the Economic Returns of Green Buildings. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 74, 38–48.
    Macnaughton, P., Satish, U., Cedeno Laurent, Jose Guillermo, Flanigan, S., Vallarino, J., Coull, B., Spengler, J. D., & Allen, J. G. (2017). The Impact of Working in a Green Certified Building on Cognitive Function and Health. Building and Environment, 114, 178–186.
    Massimo, D. E., Paola, P. D., Musolino, M., & Malerba, A. (2022). Green and Gold Buildings? Detecting Real Estate Market Premium for Green Buildings through Evolutionary Polynomial Regression. Buildings, 12(5), 621.
    Matisoff, D., Noonan, D., & Flowers, M. E. (2016). Policy Monitor—Green Buildings: Economics and Policies. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 10(2), 329–346.
    Matisoff, D. C., Noonan, D. S., & Mazzolini, A. M. (2014). Performance or Marketing Benefits? The Case of LEED Certification. Environmental Science & Technology, 48(3), 2001–2007.
    McCord, M., Haran, M., Davis, P., & McCord, J. (2020). Energy Performance Certificates and House Prices: A Quantile Regression Approach. Journal of European Real Estate Research, 13(3), 409–434.
    Muth, R. F. (1966). Household Production and Consumer Demand Functions. Econometrica, 34(3), 699–708.
    Newsham, G. R., Veitch, J. A., & Hu, Y. V. (2018). Effect of Green Building Certification on Organizational Productivity Metrics. Building Research & Information, 46(7), 755–766.
    Pommeranz, C., & Steininger, B. I. (2021). What Drives the Premium for Energy-Efficient Apartments – Green Awareness or Purchasing Power? The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 62, 220–241.
    Qiu, Y., Su, X., & Wang, Y. (2017). Factors Influencing Commercial Buildings to Obtain Green Certificates. Applied Economics, 49(20), 1937–1949.
    Robinson, S., & McAllister, Pat. (2015). Heterogeneous Price Premiums in Sustainable Real Estate? An Investigation of the Relation between Value and Price Premiums. Journal of Sustainable Real Estate, 7(1), 1–20.
    Robinson, S. J., Simons, R. A., & Lee, E. (2017). Which Green Office Building Features Do Tenants Pay For? A Study of Observed Rental Effects. Journal of Real Estate Research, 39(4).
    Rosen, S. (1974) Hedonic Prices and Implicit Markets: Product Differentiation in Pure Competition. Journal of Political Economy, 82, 34-55.
    Sandoval, P., & Prakash, A. (2016). The Gold Rush: The Popularity of the Gold Tier in Leed Certification. Environmental Policy and Governance, 26(6), 543–555.
    Simcoe, T., & Toffel, M. W. (2014). Government Green Procurement Spillovers: Evidence from Municipal Building Policies in California. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 68(3), 411–434.
    Singh, A., Syal, matt, Grady, S. C., & Korkmaz, S. (2010). Effects of Green Buildings on Employee Health and Productivity. Am J Public Health, 100(9), 1665–1668.
    Tao, Y-T., Lin, M-D., & Khan, A. (2022). The Impact of CSR on Green Purchase Intention: Empirical Evidence from the Green Building Industries in Taiwan. Frontiers in Psychology, 13:1055505.
    Tjenggoro, F. N., & Prasetyo, K. (2018). The Usage of Green Building Concept to Reduce Operating Costs (Study Case of PT. Prodia Widyahusada). Asian Journal of Accounting Research, 3(1), 72–81.
    Tsai, IC. (2025). Willingness to Pay for Green Buildings Post COVID-19 Pandemic Outbreak: Differences between High- and Low-Income Areas and High- and Low-Price Settlements. Ann Reg Sci, 74(23).
    Yeganeh, A., Mccoy, A., Agee, P., Schenk, T., & Hankey, Steve. (2021). Green Housing or Green Gentrification? Virginia Tech, USA.
    Yoshida, J., Onishi, J., & Shimizu, C. (2017). Energy Efficiency and Green Building Markets in Japan. Energy Efficiency and the Future of Real Estate, 139–159.
    Zheng, S., Wu, J., Kahn, M. E., & Deng, YH. (2012). The Nascent Market for “Green” Real Estate in Beijing. European Economic Review, 56(5), 974–984.
    Zieba, M., Belniak, S., & Gluszak, M. (2013). Demand for Sustainable Office Space in Poland: The Results from a Conjoint Experiment in Krakow. Property Management, 31(5), 404–419.
    Zietz, J., Zietz, E. N., & Sirmans, G. S. (2008). Determinants of House Prices: A Quantile Regression Approach. J Real Estate Finan Econ,37, 317–333.

    三、網頁參考資料
    United Nations. Sustainable Development. MF THE SDGS A REALITY. https://sdgs.un.org/,取用日期:2024年8月13日
    U.S. Green Building Council. https://www.usgbc.org/,取用日期:2024年7月7日
    世邦魏理仕. https://www.cbre.com.tw/zh-tw,取用日期:2024年6月28日
    仲量聯行. https://wmonww.jll.com.tw/,取用日期:2024年6月28日
    財團法人臺灣建築中心. https://gb.tabc.org.tw/,取用日期:2024年8月13日
    國家發展委員會. 臺灣2050淨零排放路徑及策略總說明. https://www.ndc.gov.tw/Content_List.aspx?n=DEE68AAD8B38BD76,取用日期:2024年7月25日
    第一太平戴維斯. https://www.savills.com/prospects/themes-asia-a-slow-starter-in-the-green-lease-stakes.html,取用日期:2024年6月26日
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    地政學系
    112257022
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0112257022
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[地政學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    702201.pdf1125KbAdobe PDF0View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback