English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 118940/150005 (79%)
Visitors : 83337777      Online Users : 5640
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/158946


    Title: 探討驗證行為與政治不實資訊辨識的關係:以政黨傾向與政治知識為調節變項
    Examining the Relationship between Verification and Political Misinformation Identification: The Moderating Roles of Party Affiliation and Political Knowledge
    Authors: 張聖雯
    Chang, Sheng-Wen
    Contributors: 施琮仁
    Shih, Tsung-Jen
    張聖雯
    Chang, Sheng-Wen
    Keywords: 不實資訊
    驗證行為
    政治不實資訊辨識
    政黨傾向
    政治知識
    Misinformation
    Verification
    Political misinformation identification
    Party affiliation
    Political knowledge
    Date: 2025
    Issue Date: 2025-09-01 14:26:49 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 近年關於個人資訊驗證行為(verification)的研究迅速增加,並被視為對抗不實資訊的關鍵策略:如果媒體使用者在接觸可疑資訊時主動進行驗證,那麼假訊息的影響力便可能降低。然而,過去研究多關注驗證行為的預測因素,較少探討驗證行為與不實資訊辨識之間的關聯,再者,如何測量不實資訊辨識能力也仍有爭議。本研究使用臺灣傳播調查資料庫第三期第一次資料,分析受訪者的政治不實資訊暴露、驗證行為與政治不實資訊辨識,探討不同面向的驗證行為是否能有效預測政治不實資訊的辨識能力,並考量政黨傾向與政治知識的影響。

    研究結果顯示,政治不實資訊暴露能夠預測不同面向驗證行為,但與政治不實資訊辨識無顯著相關;政治不實資訊暴露會增加民眾的機構面向外部驗證行為,進而提升整體政治不實資訊辨識,具間接中介效果。政黨傾向未調節驗證行為與整體政治不實資訊辨識之間的關係。政治知識在對驗證行為與政治不實資訊辨識之間的中介路徑具有部分調節效果,政治知識高者,愈有內部驗證與機構面向外部驗證行為,愈可能提高辨識整體政治不實資訊的可能。然而,針對個別政治不實資訊分析時,結果有所不同。本研究亦指出,政治不實資訊應依主題進行分類,而非視為可合併的同質性概念加以測量。
    To cope with the viral spread of misinformation, research on the concept of "verification" has rapidly increased and is considered a promising solution. The normative ideal is that if media users choose to verify suspicious news when encountering it, the threat of misinformation would be reduced. However, previous studies focused on the predictors of verification behavior, with less attention given to its relationship with the ability to identify misinformation. This study analyzes data from the 2022 third-wave survey of the Taiwan Communication investigating respondents’ experiences with fake news, verification behavior, and their ability to recognize political misinformation, while also considering the influence of political affiliation and political knowledge.

    The results indicate a significant correlation between perceived exposure to misinformation and verification behavior but no direct effect on the ability to recognize political misinformation. Among different types of verification behaviors, only institution-based external verification was found to be a significant predictor of political misinformation identification. Political knowledge partially influences the relationship between verification and misinformation identification, whereas party affiliation has no significant effect. This study also highlights the importance of classifying political misinformation by topic rather than treating it as a homogeneous construct in measurement.
    Reference: 台灣事實查核中心(2023)。〈【2023假訊息年度大調查】全文公開〉。取自 https://tfc-taiwan.org.tw/articles/9578
    施琮仁(2023)。〈從素養到行動: 探討公民線上推理能力與查證分享行為的關係〉。《資訊社會研究》 第45期,頁51-89。
    吳家豪(2024年4月2日)。〈媒體識讀54 / 國際事實查核日 Google在台4招打擊不實資訊〉。《中央社》。https://www.cna.com.tw/news/ahel/202404020066.aspx
    張卿卿(2023)。〈傳播調查資料庫第三期第一次(2022):傳播與公民社會:公民與政治傳播(D00240_1)【原始數據】。取自《中央研究院人文社會科學研究中心調查研究專題中心學術調查研究資料庫》,https://crctaiwan.dcat.nycu.edu.tw/AnnualSurvey.asp 。
    潘心儀、蔡宗漢(2018)。〈憑據猜答或盲目猜答?以政治知識測量為例〉。《東吳政治學報》,第36卷第2期,頁213-259。
    蘇思云、洪素津(2025年3月31日)。〈緬甸地震被指用AI影片播新聞 NCC:民視誤用已發更正〉,《中央社》。https://www.cna.com.tw/news/afe/202503310336.aspx
    World Economic Forum. (2025). Global Risks Report 2025. https://www.weforum.org/publications/global-risks-report-2025/in-full/
    Allcott H, Gentzkow M (2017) Social media and fake news in the 2016 election. Journal of Economic Perspectives. 31(2), 211–236.
    Altay, S. (2022). How Effective Are Interventions against Misinformation? PsyArxiv Preprints. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/sm3vk
    Altay, S., De Angelis, A., & Hoes, E. (2024). Media literacy tips promoting reliable news improve discernment and enhance trust in traditional media. Communications Psychology, 2(1), 74.
    Altay, S., & Acerbi, A. (2023). People Believe Misinformation is a Threat Because they Assume Others are Gullible. new media & society, 14614448231153379.
    Amazeen M. A. (2024). The misinformation recognition and response model: An emerging theoretical framework for investigating antecedents to and consequences of misinformation recognition. Human Communication Research, 50(2), 218–229
    Amazeen, M. A., & Krishna, A. (2023). Refuting misinformation: Examining theoretical underpinnings of refutational interventions. Current Opinion in Psychology, 101774.
    American Psychological Association. (2023, November 27). Psychological science can help counter spread of misinformation, says APA report. NewsWise. https://www.newswise.com/articles/psychological-science-can-help-counter-spread-of-misinformation-says-apa-report
    Aoun Barakat, K., Dabbous, A., & Tarhini, A. (2021). An empirical approach to understanding users' fake news identification on social media. Online Information Review, 45(6), 1080-1096.
    Ashley, S., Craft, S., Maksl, A., Tully, M., & Vraga, E. K. (2023). Can news literacy help reduce belief in COVID misinformation?. Mass Communication and Society, 26(4), 695-719.
    Austin, E. W. (2007). The message interpretation process model. In J. J. Arnett (Ed.), Encyclopedia of children, adolescents, and the media (pp. 535-536). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    Badrinathan, S. (2021). Educative interventions to combat misinformation: Evidence from a field experiment in India. American Political Science Review, 115(4), 1325–1341.
    Bago, B., Rand, D. G., & Pennycook, G. (2020). Fake news, fast and slow: Deliberation reduces belief in false (but not true) news headlines. Journal of experimental psychology: general, 149(8), 1608.
    Baptista, J. P., & Gradim, A. (2022). Who believes in fake news? Identification of political (a) symmetries. Social Sciences, 11(10), 460.
    Bauer, F., & Wilson, K. L. (2022). Reactions to China-linked Fake News: Experimental Evidence from Taiwan. The China Quarterly, 249, 21-46.
    Benton, J. (2024, January 8). Asking People to “Do the Research” on Fake News Stories Makes them Seem More Believable, ot Less. NiemanLab. https://www.niemanlab.org/2024/01/asking-people-to-do-the-research-on-fake-news-stories-makes-them-seem-more-believable-not-less
    Berlinski, N., Doyle, M., Guess, A. M., Levy, G., Lyons, B., Montgomery, J. M., ... & Reifler, J. (2023). The effects of unsubstantiated claims of voter fraud on confidence in elections. Journal of Experimental Political Science, 10(1), 34-49.
    Boulianne, S., Tenove, C., & Buffie, J. (2022). Complicating the resilience model: A four-country study about misinformation. Media and Communication, 10(3), 169-182.
    Brandtzaeg P.B., Følstad A., Chaparro Domínguez M.A. (2018). How journalists and social media users perceive online fact-checking and verification services. Journalism Practice, 12(9), 1109–1129.
    Chaiken, S., & Trope, Y. (1999). Dual-process theories in social psychology. Guilford Press.
    Chan, M. (2024a). News literacy, fake news recognition, and authentication behaviors after exposure to fake news on social media. new media & society, 26(8), 4669-4688.
    Chan, M. (2024b). Verification behaviors and countermeasures in the age of misinformation. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 101(1), 13-19.
    Chan, M., Lee, F. L., & Chen, H. T. (2024). Avoid or authenticate? A multilevel cross-country analysis of the roles of fake news concern and news fatigue on news avoidance and authentication. Digital Journalism, 12(3), 356-375.
    Chang, C. (2021). Fake News: Audience Perceptions and Concerted Coping Strategies. Digital Journalism, 9(5), 636-659.
    Ecker, U. K., Lewandowsky, S., Cook, J., Schmid, P., Fazio, L. K., Brashier, N., ... & Amazeen, M. A. (2022). The Psychological Drivers of Misinformation Belief and its Resistance to Correction. Nature Reviews Psychology, 1(1), 13-29.
    Ecker, U. K., Sze, B. K., & Andreotta, M. (2021). Corrections of Political Misinformation: No Evidence for an Effect of Partisan Worldview in a US Convenience Sample. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 376(1822), 20200145.
    Ecker, U. K., Tay, L. Q., Roozenbeek, J., Van Der Linden, S., Cook, J., Oreskes, N., & Lewandowsky, S. (2024). Why misinformation must not be ignored. American Psychologist.
    Edgerly, S., Mourão, R. R., Thorson, E., & Tham, S. M. (2019). When Do Audiences Verify? How Perceptions About Message and Source Influence Audience Verification of News Headlines. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699019864680
    Erlich, A., & Garner, C. (2023). Is pro-Kremlin disinformation effective? Evidence from Ukraine. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 28(1), 5-28.
    Flynn, D. J., Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2017). The nature and origins of misperceptions: Understanding false and unsupported beliefs about politics. Political Psychology, 38, 127-150.
    Fisher, C., Flew, T., Park, S., Lee, J. Y., & Dulleck, U. (2021). Improving trust in news: Audience solutions. Journalism Practice, 15(10), 1497-1515.
    Freiling, I., Krause, N. M., & Scheufele, D. A. (2023). Science and ethics of “curing” misinformation. AMA journal of ethics, 25(3), 228-237.
    Gallina, M. (2023). The concept of political sophistication: labeling the unlabeled. Political Studies Review, 21(4), 836-846.
    Garrett, R. K., & Bond, R. M. (2021). Conservatives’ susceptibility to political misperceptions. Science Advances, 7(23), eabf1234.
    Gupta, M., Dennehy, D., Parra, C. M., Mäntymäki, M., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2023). Fake news believability: The effects of political beliefs and espoused cultural values. Information & Management, 60(2), 103745.
    Humprecht, E., Esser, F., & Van Aelst, P. (2020). Resilience to Online Disinformation: A Framework for Cross-National Comparative Research. The International Journal of Press/Politics. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161219900126
    Jayakumar, S., Ang, B., & Anwar, N. D. (2021). Fake news and disinformation: Singapore perspectives. Disinformation and Fake News, 137-158.
    Jenke, L. (2023). Affective polarization and misinformation belief. Political Behavior, 1-60.
    Jerit, J., & Zhao, Y. (2020). Political misinformation. Annual Review of Political Science, 23, 77-94.
    Jones-Jang, S. M., Mortensen, T., & Liu, J. (2021). Does media literacy help identification of fake news? Information literacy helps, but other literacies don’t. American behavioral scientist, 65(2), 371-388.
    Khan, M. L. & Idris, I. K. (2019) Recognise misinformation and verify before sharing: a reasoned action and information literacy perspective. Behav. Inf. Technol. 38, 1194–1212.
    Kwek, A., Peh, L., Tan, J., & Lee, J. X. (2023). Distractions, analytical thinking and falling for fake news: A survey of psychological factors. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 1-12.
    Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological bulletin, 108(3), 480.
    Lazer, D. M., Baum, M. A., Benkler, Y., Berinsky, A. J., Greenhill, K. M., Menczer, F., ... & Zittrain, J. L. (2018). The Science of Fake News. Science, 359(6380), 1094-1096.
    Livingstone, S., Van Couvering, E., & Thumim, N. (2014). Converging traditions of research on media and information literacies: Disciplinary, critical, and methodological issues. In Handbook of research on new literacies (pp. 103-132). Routledge.
    Maertens, R.*, Götz, F. M.*, Golino, H. F., Roozenbeek, J., Schneider, C. R., Kyrychenko, Y., Kerr, J. R., Stieger, S., McClanahan, W. P., Drabot, K., He, J., & van der Linden, S. (2023). The Misinformation Susceptibility Test (MIST): A psychometrically validated measure of news veracity discernment. Behavior Research Methods. Advance online publication.
    Meel, P., & Vishwakarma, D. K. (2020). Fake news, rumor, information pollution in social media and web: A contemporary survey of state-of-the-arts, challenges and opportunities. Expert Systems with Applications, 153, 112986.
    Mehlhaff, I. D., Ryan, T. J., Hetherington, M. J., & MacKuen, M. B. (2024). Where Motivated Reasoning Withers and Looms Large: Fear and Partisan Reactions to the COVID‐19 Pandemic. American Journal of Political Science, 68(1), 5-23.
    Melki, J., Tamim, H., Hadid, D., Makki, M., El Amine, J., & Hitti, E. (2021). Mitigating infodemics: The relationship between news exposure and trust and belief in COVID-19 fake news and social media spreading. Plos one, 16(6), e0252830.
    Mourão, R. R., Thorson, E., Kryston, K., & Tunney, C. (2023). Predicting audience verification intention: The impact of partisanship, source, importance, and information familiarity on willingness to verify headlines. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 100(2), 308-331.
    Nachman, L., & Sung, W. (2023, December 19). What to Know about China’s Meddling in Taiwan’s Upcoming Election. Atlantic Council. https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/new-atlanticist/what-to-know-about-chinas-meddling-in-taiwans-upcoming-election/
    Nakov, P., & Da San Martino, G. (2020, November). Fact-checking, fake news, propaganda, and media bias: Truth seeking in the post-truth era. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: Tutorial Abstracts (pp. 7-19).
    NHK World. (2025, March 21). Finland’s fake news classes. NHK WORLD. https://www3.nhk.or.jp/nhkworld/en/news/backstories/3891/
    Nyhan, B. (2021). Why the backfire effect does not explain the durability of political misperceptions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(15), e1912440117.
    Orticio, E., Meyer, M. & Kidd, C. (2024). Exposure to detectable inaccuracies makes children more diligent fact-checkers of novel claims. Nat Hum Behav 8, 2322–2329.
    Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2019). Lazy, not biased: Susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning. Cognition, 188, 39-50.
    Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2021). Examining false beliefs about voter fraud in the wake of the 2020 Presidential Election. The Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review.
    Qu, Y., & Lu, S. (2025). A News Ecology Perspective to Information Verification: Examining the Effects of News Repertoire and News Capital. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 10776990251318636.
    Rathje, S., Roozenbeek, J., Van Bavel, J. J., & Van Der Linden, S. (2023). Accuracy and social motivations shape judgements of (mis) information. Nature Human Behaviour, 7(6), 892-903.
    Rauchfleisch, A., Tseng, T. H., Kao, J. J., & Liu, Y. T. (2023). Taiwan’s public discourse about disinformation: The role of journalism, academia, and politics. Journalism Practice, 17(10), 2197-2217.
    Reza, R., & Sunvy, A. S. (2023). The Role of fact-checking sites during the Israel-Palestine conflict. The Indonesian Journal of Communication Studies, 16(2), 122-134.
    Robertson C.T., Mourão R.R., Thorson E. (2020). Who uses fact-checking sites? The impact of demographics, political antecedents, and media use on fact-checking site awareness, attitudes, and behavior. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 25(2), 217–237.
    Rogers, R. W. (1975). A protection motivation theory of fear appeals and attitude change. Journal of Psychology, 91(1), 93–114.
    Roozenbeek, J., Culloty, E., & Suiter, J. (2023). Countering misinformation. European Psychologist.
    Roozenbeek, J., & van der Linden, S. (2018). The fake news game: Actively inoculating against the risk of misinformation. Journal of Risk Research, 22, 570–580.
    Roozenbeek, J., & Van der Linden, S. (2024). The Psychology of Misinformation. Cambridge University Press.
    Rúas-Araújo, J., Rodríguez-Martelo, T., & Fontenla-Pedreira, J. (2023). Disinformation and verification in a digital society: an analysis of strategies and policies applied in the European regional TV broadcasters of the CIRCOM network. Societies, 13(4), 81.
    Seib, P. (2021). Information at war: journalism, disinformation, and modern warfare. John Wiley & Sons.
    Singh, J. (2023). U.S. Based Disinfo Actors Spread Fear About Taiwan. Retrieve from https://www.hackingbutlegal.com/p/us-based-disinfo-actors-spread-fear-about-taiwan
    Stefanone, M. A., Vollmer, M., & Covert, J. M. (2019, July). In news we trust? Examining credibility and sharing behaviors of fake news. In Proceedings of the 10th international conference on social media and society (pp. 136-147).
    Spruyt, B., Rooduijn, M., & Zaslove, A. (2023). Ideologically consistent, but for whom? An empirical assessment of the populism-elitism-pluralism set of attitudes and the moderating role of political sophistication. Politics, 43(4), 536-552.
    Sun, Y. (2022). Verification upon exposure to COVID-19 misinformation: predictors, outcomes, and the mediating role of verification. Science Communication. 44(3), 261–291.
    Taber, C. S., & Lodge, M. (2006). Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American journal of political science, 50(3), 755-769.
    Tandoc, E. C., Lee, J., Chew, M., Tan, F. X., & Goh, Z. H. (2021). Falling for fake news: the role of political bias and cognitive ability. Asian Journal of Communication, 31(4), 237-253.
    Tandoc, E. C., Ling, R., Westlund, O., Duffy, A., Goh, D., & Zheng Wei, L. (2018). Audiences’ acts of authentication in the age of fake news: A conceptual framework. New media & society, 20(8), 2745-2763.
    Tandoc, E. C., & Seet, S. K. (2024). War of the words: How individuals respond to “fake news,”“misinformation,”“disinformation,” and “online falsehoods”. Journalism Practice, 18(6), 1503-1519.
    The Economist. (2024, May 04). Truth or lies? The Economist, 451, 10. Retrieved from https://proxyone.lib.nccu.edu.tw/login?url=https://www.proquest.com/magazines/truth-lies/docview/3049832725/se-2
    Van Bavel, J. J., Harris, E. A., Pärnamets, P., Rathje, S., Doell, K. C., & Tucker, J. A. (2021). Political psychology in the digital (mis) information age: A model of news belief and sharing. Social Issues and Policy Review, 15(1), 84-113.
    Vegetti, F., & Mancosu, M. (2020). The impact of political sophistication and motivated reasoning on misinformation. Political Communication, 37(5), 678-695.
    Walter, N., & Tukachinsky, R. (2020). A Meta-Analytic Examination of the Continued Influence of Misinformation in the Face of Correction: How Powerful is it, Why Does it Happen, and How to Stop it?. Communication research, 47(2), 155-177.
    Wang, A. H. E., Yeh, Y. Y., Wu, C. K., & Chen, F. Y. (2022). Media literacy and partisan convergence across social network sites. The Social Science Journal, 1-14.
    Watts, C., (2024.04.04) China tests US voter fault lines and ramps AI content to boost its geopolitical interests. Microsoft. Retrieve from https://blogs.microsoft.com/on-the-issues/2024/04/04/china-ai-influence-elections-mtac-cybersecurity/
    Weitz-Shapiro, R., & Winters, M. S. (2017). Can citizens discern? Information credibility, political sophistication, and the punishment of corruption in Brazil. The Journal of Politics, 79(1), 60-74.
    World Economic Forum. (2024). The Global Risks Report 2024, 19th Edition — Insight Report. Geneva: World Economic Forum.
    Xiao, X. (2022). Not doomed: examining the path from misinformation exposure to verification and correction in the context of COVID-19 pandemic. Telematics and Informatics, 74, 101890.
    Yarchi, M., Samuel-Azran, T., & Hayat, T. Z. (2023). Perceived Versus Actual Ability to Identify Fake News: Evidence From Israel’s 2019–2020 Elections. International Journal of Communication, 17-23.
    Yates, S., & Carmi, E. (2022). Citizens’ networks of digital and data literacy. In The Palgrave handbook of media misinformation (pp. 191-205). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
    Yu, R. P. (2024). Divides in News Verification: Antecedents and Political Outcomes of News Verification by Age. Digital Journalism, 1-21.
    Yu, W., & Shen, F. (2023). Mapping verification behaviors in the post-truth era: A systematic review. New Media & Society, 14614448231191138.
    Zaller, J. (2012). What nature and origins leaves out. Critical Review, 24(4), 569-642.
    Zhou, A., Yang, T., & González-Bailón, S. (2023). The puzzle of misinformation: Exposure to unreliable content in the United States is higher among the better informed. new media & society, 14614448231196863.
    Zhu, Q., Peng, T. Q., & Zhang, X. (2025). How Do Individual and Societal Factors Shape News Authentication? Comparing Misinformation Resilience Across Hong Kong, the Netherlands, and the United States. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 19401612251318838.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    傳播學院傳播碩士學位學程
    111464011
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0111464011
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[傳播學院傳播碩士學位學程] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    401101.pdf1436KbAdobe PDF3View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback