English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 118252/149288 (79%)
Visitors : 75398281      Online Users : 1797
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/159065


    Title: 新興民主國家的轉型正義與威權繼任政黨
    Transitional Justice and Authoritarian Successor Parties in New Democracies
    Authors: 林佳玲
    Romero, Paula Perez
    Contributors: 蘇彥斌
    Su, Yen-pin
    林佳玲
    Paula Perez Romero
    Keywords: 轉型正義
    威權繼任政黨
    真相委員會
    刑事審判
    整肅
    人事清查
    Transitional Justice
    Authoritarian Successor Parties
    Truth Commission
    Criminal Trials
    Purge
    Vetting
    Date: 2025
    Issue Date: 2025-09-01 14:58:05 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本論文探討轉型正義對威權繼任政黨的影響。威權繼任政黨在許多第三波民主化國家中具有重要影響力，過去的研究對於威權繼任政黨的選舉表現提出許多不同解釋，例如從黨產的角度來分析，或是強調威權統治時期經濟成就的重要性。然而，目前少有研究探討轉型正義的實施如何影響威權繼任政黨的選舉表現。為彌補此研究缺口，本文主張，轉型正義政策主要透過削弱威權遺緒來影響威權繼任政黨的選舉表現，而其中削弱的機制包括否定前威權政權的正當性、以及瓦解其權力網絡。更重要的是，本文認為，轉型正義實施的越早，越能降低威權繼任政黨的選舉支持。為檢驗此一理論主張，本文採用混合方法進行實證分析。首先，就量化分析而言，本文聚焦40個有威權繼任政黨的第三波民主化國家，探討刑事審判、真相委員會、整肅、高層清洗與人事清查等轉型正義政策如何影響威權繼任政黨的選舉表現。本論文的國家層級資料分析結果顯示，一國若較早執行執行轉型正義、高層清洗與設立真相委員會，其威權繼任政黨會出現較差的選舉表現。就個人層級的資料分析結果而言，本研究發現若一國較早執行轉型正義及設立真相委員會，選民較不傾向支持威權繼任政黨。從了量化研究之外，本論文亦針對臺灣與秘魯進行深度的質化分析，透過訪談與歷史資料呈現本論文的理論機制。綜合而言，本論文拓展了威權繼任政黨的研究面向，從轉型正義政策的角度探討影響其長期發展的重要因素。同時，本論文所提供的跨國量化分析，對以往多偏重單一個案研究的轉型正義研究領域具有若干貢獻。
    This dissertation examines the impact of transitional justice on authoritarian successor parties. Authoritarian successor parties (ASPs hereafter) remain influential in many third-wave democracies. Previous research has provided various explanations for the electoral performance of ASPs in the post-authoritarian period, such as inherited financial assets and a record of economic prosperity. However, few studies have focused on how the implementation of transitional justice affects the electoral performance of ASPs. To fill the gap in the literature, this study argues that transitional justice can impact ASPs through the erosion of authoritarian legacies by delegitimising former authoritarian regimes and dismantling their networks of power. More importantly, it is argued that the sooner transitional justice is implemented, the more likely it is that the electoral support for ASPs will be undermined. To test this theoretical argument, empirical analyses using mixed methods were conducted. First, quantitative analyses were conducted using an original dataset that includes a sample of 40 third-wave democracies with prominent ASPs, and data on the urgency in implementing transitional justice and five individual instruments: criminal trials, truth commissions, purges, leadership purges, and vetting. At the country level, the results indicate that the early implementation of transitional justice, leadership purges, and truth commissions is associated with electorally weaker authoritarian successor parties. At the individual level, results support the detrimental impact of early implementation of transitional justice and truth commissions on citizens’ vote choice for ASPs. Second, qualitative analysis of two in-depth case studies was conducted: Taiwan and Peru. These cases illustrate the theory of this dissertation with data based on interviews and historical data. This dissertation advances the study of authoritarian successor parties by expanding the factors that affect their long-term success. Moreover, it contributes to the study of transitional justice, a field dominated by single case studies, from a quantitative perspective with a cross-country study.
    Reference: Abegaz, B. (2013). Political Parties in Business: Rent Seekers, Developmentalists, or Both? The Journal of Development Studies, 49(11), 1467–1483.
    Acemoglu, D., Robinson, J. A., & Verdier, T. (2004). Kleptocracy and Divide-and-Rule: A Model of Personal Rule. Journal of the European Economic Association, 2(2–3), 162–192.
    Act Governing the Recovery of Damage of Individual Rights during the Period of Martial Law, Legislative Yuan (1995). https://law.moj.gov.tw/ENG/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=A0000007
    Act on Promoting Transitional Justice, Legislative Yuan (2017). https://law.moj.gov.tw/ENG/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=A0030296
    Adams, W. C. (2015). Conducting Semi‐Structured Interviews. In K. E. Newcomer, H. P. Hatry, & J. S. Wholey (Eds.), Handbook of Practical Program Evaluation (pp. 492–505). Wiley.
    Agüero, F. (1998). Legacies of Transitions: Institutionalization, the Military, and Democracy in South America. Mershon International Studies Review, 42(2), 383–404.
    Alagappa, M. (2015). Introduction: Presidential Election, Democratization, and Cross-Strait Relations. In M. Alagappa (Ed.), Taiwan’s Presidential Politics: Democratization and Cross-Strait Relations in the Twenty-first Century. Routledge.
    Albertus, M. (2019). The Fate of Former Authoritarian Elites Under Democracy. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 63(3), 727–759.
    Albertus, M. (2023). The Political Price of Authoritarian Control: Evidence from Francoist Land Settlements in Spain. The Journal of Politics.
    Albertus, M., & Menaldo, V. (2018). Authoritarianism and the Elite Origins of Democracy. Cambridge University Press.
    Alemán, E., & Navia, P. (2009). Institutions and the legislative success of ‘strong’ presidents: An analysis of government bills in chile. Journal of Legislative Studies, 15(4), 401–419.
    Almeida, S. T. (2019). Security sector reform in transitions from military rule: Legacies of authoritarianism in Brazil. Journal of Human Rights, 18(2), 147–164.
    Ang, M., & Nalepa, M. (2019). Can Transitional Justice Improve Representation in New Democracies? World Politics, 71(4).
    Annan, K. (2004). The rule of law and transitional justice in conflict and post-conflict societies. United Nations Security Council.
    Arciniega Huby, A. (1994). Civil-military relations and a democratic Peru. Orbis, 38(1), 109–117.
    Arenhövel, M. (2008). Democratization and transitional justice. Democratization, 15(3), 570–587.
    Arnould, V. (2015). Transitional justice and democracy in Uganda: Between impetus and instrumentalisation. Journal of Eastern African Studies, 9(3), 354–374.
    Arnould, V., Herman, J., & Sriram, C. L. (2020). Do transitional justice measures help foster democratic security forces? Peacebuilding, 8(2), 178–197.
    Aukerman, M. J. (2002). Extraordinary Evil, Ordinary Crime: A Framework for Understanding Transitional Justice. Harvard Human Rights Journal, 1(15).
    Austin, R. C. (2015). Transitional Justice as Electoral Politics. In L. Stan & N. Nedelsky (Eds.), Post-Communist Transitional Justice: Lessons from Twenty-Five Years of Experience (pp. 30–50). Cambridge University Press.
    Bakiner, O. (2016). Truth Commissions: Memory, Power, and Legitimacy. University of Pennsylvania Press.
    Bakke, E., & Sitter, N. (2015). Where do parties go when they die? The fate of failed parties in the Czech Republic, Slovakia, and Hungary 1992–2013. East European Politics, 31(1), 1–22.
    Balasco, L. M. (2013). The Transitions of Transitional Justice: Mapping the Waves From Promise to Practice. Journal of Human Rights, 12(2), 198–216.
    Barahona de Brito, A. (2001a). Introduction. In A. Barahona de Brito, C. González‐Enríquez, & P. Aguilar (Eds.), The Politics of Memory: Transitional Justice in Democratizing Societies (pp. 1–39). Oxford University Press.
    Barahona de Brito, A. (2001b). Truth, Justice, Memory, and Democratization in the Southern Cone. In A. Barahona de Brito, C. González‐Enríquez, & P. Aguilar (Eds.), The Politics of Memory: Transitional Justice in Democratizing Societies (pp. 119–160). Oxford University Press.
    Barahona de Brito, A. (2010). Transitional Justice and Memory: Exploring Perspectives. South European Society and Politics, 15(3), 359–376.
    Barceló, J. (2018). Batons and ballots: The effectiveness of state violence in fighting against Catalan separatism. Research and Politics, 5(2).
    Barrenechea, R., & Vergara, A. (2023). Peru: The Danger of Powerless Democracy. Journal of Democracy, 34(2), 77–89.
    Barrington, L. W. (1997). “Nation” and “nationalism”: The misuse of key concepts in political science. PS - Political Science and Politics, 30(4), 712–716.
    Bates, G., Cinar, I., & Nalepa, M. (2017). Purges and Truth Revelation Procedures 1946-2016: Introducing a Transitional Justice Dataset. University of Chicago.
    Bates, G., Cinar, I., & Nalepa, M. (2020). Accountability by Numbers: A New Global Transitional Justice Dataset (1946-2016). Perspectives on Politics, 18(1), 161–184.
    Bateson, R. (2022). Voting for a Killer: Efraín Ríos Montt’s Return to Politics in Democratic Guatemala. Comparative Politics, 54(2), 203–228.
    Batto, N. F. (2018a). Cleavage structure and the demise of a dominant party: The role of national identity in the fall of the KMT in Taiwan. Asian Journal of Comparative Politics, 1–21.
    Batto, N. F. (2018b). The KMT coalition unravels: The 2016 elections and Taiwan’s new political landscape. In J. Sullivan & C. Lee (Eds.), A New Era in Democratic Taiwan: Trajectories and Turning Points in Politics and Cross-Strait Relations (pp. 10–34). Routledge.
    Batto, P. R. S. (2004). The consequences of democratisation on Taiwan’s daily press. China Perspectives, 51(1).
    Baumgärtner, M., & Müller, A.-K. (2023, July 27). Dangerous Liaisons: The True Proximity of Germany’s AfD To Neo-Nazis. Der Spiegel. https://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/dangerous-liaisons-the-true-proximity-of-germany-s-afd-to-neo-nazis-a-e69c51d3-4b3c-49d2-8d54-d7b0a19c3f9a
    Bell, J. O. N. (2019). Reconciling after Transitional Justice: When Prosecutions are not Enough, the Case of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Croatian International Relations Review, 84, 54–77.
    Bellows, T. J. (1996). The March 1996 Elections in the Republic of China on Taiwan. American Association of Chinese Studies, 3(2), 235–249.
    Benito Sánchez, A. B., & Lozano, W. (2012). Clientelistic stability and institutional fragility: The political system in the Dominican Republic (1978-2010). Latin American Perspectives, 39(6), 198–211.
    Bernhard, M., & Karakoç, E. (2007). Civil Society and the Legacies of Dictatorship. World Politics, 59(4), 539–567.
    Bertrand, J. (2002). Legacies of the Authoritarian Past: Religious Violence in Indonesia’s Moluccan Islands. Pacific Affairs, 75(1), 57–85.
    Birch, S. (2003). Electoral Systems and Political Transformation in Post-Communist Europe (Vol. 4, Issue 1). Palgrave Macmillan.
    Bochsler, D. (2010). The party system of Serbia. In V. Stojarová & P. Emerson (Eds.), Party Politics in the Western Balkans (pp. 99–118). Routledge.
    Borges, A. (2021). Authoritarian Inheritance, Political Conflict and Conservative Party Institutionalisation: The Cases of Chile and Brazil. Journal of Latin American Studies, 53(4), 767–793.
    Bormann, N.-C., & Golder, M. (2022). Democratic Electoral Systems around the world, 1946–2020. Electoral Studies, 78.
    Brosche, J., Fjelde, H., & Höglund, K. (2020). Electoral violence and the legacy of authoritarian rule in Kenya and Zambia. Journal of Peace Research, 57(1), 111–125.
    Burmester, I. (2024). Political parties and Russia’s escalation of the war in Ukraine: Consequences for left-wing parties in Moldova. Cambridge Review of International Affairs.
    Burron, N. (2012). Ollanta Humala and the Peruvian Conjuncture: Democratic Expansion or “Inclusive” Neoliberal Redux? Latin American Perspectives, 39(1), 133–139.
    Burt, J.-M. (2006). “Quien habla es terrorista”: The Political Use of Fear in Fujimori’s Peru. Latin American Research Review, 41(3), 32–62.
    Burt, J.-M. (2008). Fujimori on Trial. NACLA Report on the Americas, 41(3), 10–14.
    Burt, J.-M. (2009). Guilty as Charged: The Trial of Former Peruvian President Alberto Fujimori for Human Rights Violations. International Journal of Transitional Justice, 3(3), 384–405.
    Burt, J.-M. (2012). Accountability After Atrocity in Peru: The Trial of Former President Alberto Fujimori in Comparative Perspective. In N. Palmer, P. Clark, & D. Granville (Eds.), Critical Perspectives in Transitional Justice (pp. 119–146). Intersentia.
    Burzova, P. (2012). Towards a new past: Some reflections on nationalism in post-socialist Slovakia. Nationalities Papers, 40(6), 879–894.
    Cabestan, J.-P. (2017). Changing Identities in Taiwan under Ma Ying-jeou. In L. Dittmer (Ed.), Taiwan and China: Fitful Embrace (pp. 42–60). University of California Press.
    Calderón Bentin, S. (2018). The Politics of Illusion: The Collapse of the Fujimori Regime in Peru. Theatre Survey, 59(1), 84–107.
    Caldwell, E. (2018). Transitional Justice Legislation in Taiwan Before and During the Tsai Administration. Washington International Law Journal Association, 27(2), 449–484.
    Call, C. (2004). Is transitional justice really just? The Brown Journal of World Affairs, 11(1), 101–113.
    Camazón, A. (2023, January 16). Los homenajes al franquismo que Vox quiere salvar en Castilla y León: Placas, monumentos y elementos derruidos [The tributes to Francoism that Vox wants to preserve in Castilla y León: plaques, monuments, and demolished elements]. elDiario.es. https://www.eldiario.es/castilla-y-leon/sociedad/homenajes-franquismo-vox-quiere-salvar-castilla-leon-placas-monumentos-elementos-derruidos_1_9860069.html
    Cameron, M. A. (2006). Endogenous Regime Breakdown: The Vladivideo and the Fall of Peru’s Fujimori. In J. F. Carrión (Ed.), The Fujimori legacy: The rise of electoral authoritarianism in Peru (pp. 268–293). Pennsylvania State University Press.
    Capoccia, G., & Pop-Eleches, G. (2020). Democracy and Retribution: Transitional Justice and Regime Support in Postwar West Germany. Comparative Political Studies, 53(3–4), 399–433.
    Cárdenas, M., Páez, D., Rimé, B., & Arnoso, M. (2015). How Transitional Justice Processes and Official Apologies Influence Reconciliation: The Case of the Chilean ‘Truth and Reconciliation’ and ‘Political Imprisonment and Torture’ Commissions. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 26, 515–530.
    Carrión, J. F. (2001). Las elecciones peruanas de 2001: Desmantelando la herencia autoritaria [The 2001 Peruvian elections: Dismantling the authoritarian legacy]. Reflexión Política, 3(6).
    Carrión, J. F. (2006a). Introduction. In J. F. Carrión (Ed.), The Fujimori legacy: The rise of electoral authoritarianism in Peru (pp. 1–12). Pennsylvania State University Press.
    Carrión, J. F. (2006b). Public Opinion, Market Reforms, and Democracy in Fujimori’s Peru. In J. F. Carrión (Ed.), The Fujimori legacy: The rise of electoral authoritarianism in Peru (pp. 126–149). Pennsylvania State University Press.
    Casey, N. (2021, October 9). La derecha de España ve una oportunidad en el debate sobre la Conquista [The Spanish right sees an opportunity in the debate over the Conquest]. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/es/2021/10/09/espanol/espana-conquista-vox.html
    Casper, G. (1995). Fragile Democracies: The Legacies of Authoritarian Rule. University of Pittsburgh Press.
    Castañeda, E. (2012). The Indignados of Spain: A Precedent to Occupy Wall Street. Social Movement Studies, 11(3–4), 309–319.
    Castillo, M. (2017, December 25). ¿Hubo un acuerdo político entre PPK y el bloque fujimorista para indultar a Alberto Fujimori? [Was there a political agreement between PPK and the Fujimorista bloc to pardon Alberto Fujimori?]. CNN. https://cnnespanol.cnn.com/2017/12/25/alberto-fujimori-indulto-ppk-acuerdo-peru
    Cesarini, P. (2004). Legacies of Injustice in Italy and Argentina. In K. Hite & P. Cesarini (Eds.), Authoritarian Legacies and Democracy in Latin America and Southern Europe (pp. 159–190). University of Notre Dame Press.
    Chang, H.-C., & Holt, R. (2007). Symbols in Conflict: Taiwan (Taiwan) and Zhongguo (China) in Taiwan’s Identity Politics. Nationalism and Ethnic Politics, 13(1), 129–165.
    Chang, Y., & Lu, J. (2014). Language Stereotypes in Contemporary Taiwan: Evidence from an Experimental Study. Journal of East Asian Studies, 14, 211–248.
    Chang-Liao, N.-C., & Chen, Y.-J. (2019). Transitional Justice in Taiwan: Changes and Challenges. Washington International Law Journal, 28(3), 619–643.
    Chen, K. W. (2008). Disciplining Taiwan: The Kuomintang’s Methods of Control during the White Terror Era (1947-1987). Taiwan International Studies Quarterly, 4(4), 185–210.
    Chen, L.-H., Keng, S., & Wang, T. Y. (2009). 兩岸關係與2008年台灣總統大選：認同、利益、威脅與選民投票取向 Taiwan’s 2008 Presidential Election and Its Implications on Cross-Strait Relations: The Effects of Taiwanese Identity, Trade Interests and Military Threats. 選舉研究 Election Research, 16(2), 1–22.
    Chen, P. (2021). Taiwan’s need for new attitudes, aims, and actions to further economic growth. In J. T. Dreyer & J. deLisle (Eds.), Taiwan in the Era of Tsai Ing-wen: Changes and Challenges (pp. 64–84). Routledge.
    Chen, P., & Paris-Rodriguez, K. (2024). The Role of the 1992 Consensus and Taiwan’s 2024 Presidential Elections (pp. 1–23). East-West Center.
    Chen, Y., & Chin, J. (2023, August 19). Assets taken from KMT top NT$100bn. Taipei Times. https://www.taipeitimes.com/News/front/archives/2023/08/19/2003804959
    Cheng, T. (1997). Taiwan in 1996: From Euphoria to Melodrama. Asian Survey, 37(1), 43–51.
    Cheng, T. (2006). Strategizing Party Adaptation: The Case of the Kuomintang. Party Politics, 12(3), 367–394.
    Cheng, T., & Chu, Y. (2002). State-Business Relations in South Korea and Taiwan. In L. Whitehead (Ed.), Emerging Market Democracies (pp. 31–62). The Johns Hopkins University Press.
    Cheng, T. J., & Huang, T. (2018). Authoritarian Successor Parties in South Korea and Taiwan: Authoritarian Inheritance, Organizational Adaptation, and Issue Management. In J. Loxton & S. Mainwaring (Eds.), Life after Dictatorship: Authoritarian Successor Parties Worldwide (pp. 84–112). Cambridge University Press.
    Cheng, T., & Lin, C. (1999). Taiwan: A Long Decade of Democratic Transition. In J. W. Morley (Ed.), Driven by Growth: Political Change in the Asia-Pacific Region (pp. 224–255). Routledge.
    Chiang Kai-shek’s son gets top marks in UDN poll. (2003, January 14). Taipei Times.
    Chiu, C. (2010). Caomeizu de yishixingtai yu dui Zhonghua Minguo guoqi rentongdu guanxi zhi yanjiu [A Study on the Relationship between the Ideology of Taiwan’s “Strawberry Generation” and Their Identification with National Flag] [National Taiwan Normal University]. https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail/U0021-1610201315190561
    Choi, E. (2015). The Decline and Resurgence of the Kuomintang in Taiwan. Pacific Focus, 30(3), 415–436.
    Choi, S. Y. P., & David, R. (2012). Lustration Systems and Trust: Evidence from Survey Experiments in the Czech Republic, Hungary, and Poland. American Journal of Sociology, 117(4), 1172–1201.
    Chou, Y., & Nathan, A. J. (1987). Democratizing Transition in Taiwan. Asian Survey, 277–299.
    Chu, J. (2003). Zhongli shijian de lishi yiyi yu shehui dingwei – Yi ge lishi shehuixue de guancha [The historical significance and social positioning of the Chung-li Incident: A historical sociological observation]. Taiwan Jiyi [Taiwan Memory], 175–190.
    Chu, Y. (2015). Democratic Consolidation in the Post-KMT Era: The Challenge of Governance. In M. Alagappa (Ed.), Taiwan’s Presidential Politics: Democratization and Cross-Strait Relations in the Twenty-first Century. Routledge.
    Chu, Y.-H. (1999). A Born-Again Dominant Party? The Transformation of the Kuomintang and Taiwan’s Regime Transition. In H. Giliomee & C. Simkins (Eds.), The Awkward Embrace: One-Party Domination and Democracy (pp. 61–97). Harwood Academic Publishers.
    Chung, L., & Pan, J. (2014). KMT is again “world’s richest party.” Taipei Times. https://www.taipeitimes.com/News/taiwan/archives/2014/07/24/2003595820
    Cimpoeşu, D. (2014). The Evolution and Features of the Post-Totalitarian Political Regime in the Republic of Moldova (1990-2012). PLURAL. History. Culture. Society. Journal of History and Geography Department, „Ion Creangă” State Pedagogical University, 2(1–2).
    Cole, E. A., & Murphy, K. (2011). History Education Reform, Transitional Justice, and the Transformation of Identities. In P. Arthur (Ed.), Identities in Transition: Challenges for Transitional Justice in Divided Societies (pp. 334–368). Cambridge University Press.
    Collier, D. (2011). Understanding Process Tracing. PS: Political Science & Politics, 44(4), 823–830.
    Collyns, D. (2016, April 6). Thousands protest against presidential bid by daughter of corrupt former Peru leader. The Guardian.
    Comisso, E. (1995). Legacies of the Past or New Institutions? The Struggle Over Restitution in Hungary. Comparative Political Studies, 28(2).
    Compensation Act for Wrongful Trials on Charges of Sedition and Espionage during the Martial Law Period, Legislative Yuan (1998). https://law.moj.gov.tw/ENG/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=F0120018
    Conaghan, C. M. (2002). Cashing in on Authoritarianism: Media Collusion in Fujimori’s Peru. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 7(1), 115–125.
    Conaghan, C. M. (2005). Fujimori’s Peru: Deception in the Public Sphere. University of Pittsburgh Press.
    Connerton, P. (1989). How Societies Remember. Cambridge University Press.
    Cook, S. J., & Savun, B. (2016). New democracies and the risk of civil conflict: The lasting legacy of military rule. Journal of Peace Research, 53(6), 745–757.
    Copper, J. F. (2013). The KMT Returns to Power: Elections in Taiwan 2008 to 2012. Lexington Books.
    Copper, J. F. (2023). Taiwan’s November 2022 Mid-term Election: Before, After and Predictions for the 2024 Presidential Election. East Asian Policy, 15(02), 63–76.
    Correa, C. (2013). Reparations in Peru: From Recommendations to Implementation (pp. 1–32). International Center for Transitional Justice.
    Costa Pinto, A. (2006). Authoritarian legacies, transitional justice and state crisis in Portugal’s democratization. Democratization, 13(2), 173–204.
    Costa Pinto, A. (2008). Political Purges and State Crisis in Portugal’s Transition to Democracy, 1975–76. Journal of Contemporary History, 43(2), 305–332.
    Costa Pinto, A. (2011). The Authoritarian Past and South European Democracies: An Introduction. In A. Costa Pinto & L. Morlino (Eds.), Dealing with the Legacy of Authoritarianism (pp. 1–20). Routledge.
    Cottey, A., Edmunds, T., & Forster, A. (2005). Civil–Military Relations in Postcommunist Europe: Assessing the Transition. In A. Cottey, T. Edmunds, & A. Forster (Eds.), Civil-Military Relations in Post-Communist Europe (Issue 1). Routledge.
    Crabtree, J. (2001). The Collapse of Fujimorismo: Authoritarianism and its Limits. Bulletin of Latin American Research, 20(3), 287–303.
    Cruces, G., Fields, G. S., Jaume, D., & Viollaz, M. (2017). Growth, Employment, and Poverty in Latin America. Oxford University Press.
    Curry, J. L. (2007). When an Authoritarian State Victimizes the Nation: Transitional Justice, Collective Memory, and Political Divides. International Journal of Sociology, 37(1), 58–73.
    Dancy, G., Marchesi, B. E., Olsen, T. D., Payne, L. A., Reiter, A. G., & Sikkink, K. (2019). Behind Bars and Bargains: New Findings on Transitional Justice in Emerging Democracies. International Studies Quarterly, 63(1), 99–110.
    Danner, A. M., & Martinez, J. S. (2005). Guilty Associations: Joint Criminal Enterprise, Command Responsibility, and the Development of International Criminal. California Law Review, 93(1), 75–169.
    Dargent, E., & Muñoz, P. (2016). Peru: A Close Win for Continuity. Journal of Democracy, 22(4).
    David, R. (2003). Lustration Laws in Action: The Motives and Evaluation of Lustration Policy in the Czech Republic and Poland (1989-2001). Law & Social Inquiry, 28(2), 387–439.
    David, R. (2006). From Prague to Baghdad: Lustration Systems and their Political Effects. Government and Opposition, 41(3), 347–372.
    David, R., & Choi, S. Y. P. (2006). Forgiveness and Transitional Justice in the Czech Republic. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 50(3), 339–367.
    Davidović, M. (2021). Reconciling Complexities of Time in Criminal Justice and Transitional Justice. International Criminal Law Review, 21(5), 935–961.
    de Leeuw, S. E., Rekker, R., Azrout, R., & van Spanje, J. H. P. (2021). Are would-be authoritarians right? Democratic support and citizens’ left-right self-placement in former left- and right- authoritarian countries. Democratization, 28(2), 414–433.
    Decreto Supremo No 062-2004-PCM, President of the Republic (2004).
    Della Porta, D., Andretta, M., Fernandes, T., Romanos, E., & Vogiatzoglou, M. (2018). Institutional Legacies. In D. Della Porta, M. Andretta, T. Fernandes, E. Romanos, & M. Vogiatzoglou (Eds.), Legacies and Memories in Movements: Justice and Democracy in Southern Europe. Oxford University Press.
    Demidenko, E. (2013). Mixed Models: Theory and Applications with R. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
    Diamond, L. J. (1993). Causes and Effects. In L. J. Diamon (Ed.), Political Culture and Democracy in Developing Countries. Lynne Rienner Publishers.
    Dimitrijevic, N. (2008). Serbia After the Criminal Past: What Went Wrong and What Should be Done. International Journal of Transitional Justice, 2(1), 5–22.
    Dinas, E., & Northmore-Ball, K. (2019). The Ideological Shadow of Authoritarianism. Comparative Political Studies, 1–35.
    Doak, J. (2011). The Therapeutic Dimension of Transitional Justice: Emotional Repair and Victim Satisfaction in International Trials and Truth Commissions. International Criminal Law Review, 11(2), 263–298.
    Domenico, R. P. (1991). Italian Fascists on Trial, 1943-1948. University of North Carolina Press.
    Donovan, T. (2019). Authoritarian attitudes and support for radical right populists. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 29(4), 448–464.
    Duncan, G. (1987). Understanding Ideology. Political Studies, 35(4), 649–659.
    Durand Guevara, A. (2022). Resultados (no) deseados. Elecciones,democracia y nuevo tiempo político en Perú [(Un)intended results: Elections, democracy, and a new political era in Peru]. Estudios Latinoamericanos, 49, 17–25.
    Durazo Herrmann, J. (2010). Neo-Patrimonialism and Subnational Authoritarianism in Mexico. The Case of Oaxaca. Journal of Politics in Latin America, 2(2), 85–112.
    Duthie, R. (2007). Introduction. In A. Mayer-Rieckh & P. De Greiff (Eds.), Justice as Prevention: Vetting Public Employees in Transitional Societies (pp. 16–39). Social Science Research Council.
    El Gobierno desmantela la cúpula del Ejército retirando a 12 generales [The government dismantles the Army’s high command by retiring 12 generals]. (2000, November 28). El Mundo.
    El Gobierno retira al jefe de las Fuerzas Armadas, compañero de Montesinos [The government removes the head of the Armed Forces, Montesinos’ associate]. (2000, November 26). El Mundo.
    ElecData, Compendium of Electoral Data—Electoral assistance. (n.d.). Council of Europe. Retrieved May 10, 2023, from https://www.coe.int/en/web/electoral-assistance/elecdata
    Ellis, M. S. (1996). Purging the past: The Current State of Lustration Laws in the Former Communist Bloc. Law and Contemporary Problems, 59(4), 181–196.
    Elster, J. (1998). Coming to Terms with the Past. A Framework for the Study of Justice in the Transition to Democracy. European Journal of Sociology, 39(1), 7–48.
    Elster, J. (2004). Closing the Books. Transitional Justice in Historical Perspective. Cambridge University Press.
    Elster, J., Offe, C., & Preuss, U. K. (1998). Institutional Design in Post-Communist Societies: Rebuilding the Ship at Sea. Cambridge University Press.
    Encarnación, O. G. (2012). Justice in Times of Transition: Lessons from the Iberian Experience. International Studies Quarterly, 56(1), 179–192.
    Ensalaco, M. (1994). Truth Commissions for Chile and El Salvador: A Report and Assessment. Human Rights Quarterly, 16(4), 656–675.
    Er’erba shijian guojia dang’an quanbu jiemi, san yue yi ri qidong Er’erba shijian ji dongyuan kanluan shiqi zhengzhi dang’an neirong qingcha [All State Archives on the 228 Incident Declassified: Content Review of 228 Incident and Martial Law-Era Political Files Begins on March 1]. (2017, February 26). Guojia Fazhan Weiyuanhui [National Development Council]. https://www.ndc.gov.tw/nc_27_26929
    Estudios de Opinión: Informe de Resultados [Opinion Studies: Results Report] (Alberto Fujimori). (2024). Ipsos.
    Estudios de Opinión: Informe sobre Seguridad [Opinion Studies: Security Report]. (2024). Ipsos.
    European Journal of Political Research: Political Data Yearbook. (n.d.). Retrieved May 10, 2023, from https://politicaldatayearbook.com/
    Evans, M. (2018). A future without forgiveness: Beyond reconciliation in transitional justice. International Politics, 55(5), 678–692.
    Fell, D. (2005). Political and Media Liberalization and Political Corruption in Taiwan. The China Quarterly, 184, 875–893.
    Fell, D. (2011). More or Less Space of Identity in Taiwan’s Party Politics? In G. Schubert & J. Damm (Eds.), Taiwanese Identity in the 21st Century: Domestic, Regional and Global Perspectives. Routledge.
    Fell, D. (2021). Challengers to Mainstream Parties in Taiwan’s 2020 Elections. Taiwan Journal of Democracy, 17(1).
    Fell, D. (2024). Continuity and Change in Taiwan’s Historic 2024 National Elections (4). Prospects & Perspectives.
    Fell, D., & Chen, C. (2014). Lessons of Defeat and Success: Taiwan’s 2012 Elections in Comparative Perspective. Journal of Current Chinese Affairs, 43(3), 13–43.
    Fernández-Maldonado M., E., & Navarro T., D. A. (2016). ¿Protestas o movimientos sociales? Los casos de Keiko No Va y Peruanos contra el TPP [Protests or social movements? The cases of Keiko No Va and Peruvians against the TPP]. Perú Hoy, 29, 157–173.
    Ferrari Haines, A. E., & Angulo, M. J. A. (2016). Elecciones presidenciales peruanas 2016: La fuerza del antifujimorismo [2016 Peruvian presidential elections: The strength of anti-Fujimorismo]. Conjuntura Austral, 7(37), 67–80.
    Fetzer, J. S., & Soper, J. C. (2013). Confucianism, democratization, and human rights in Taiwan. Lexington Books.
    Finkel, S. E., Pérez-Liñán, A., & Seligson, M. A. (1990). The Effects of U.S. Foreign Assistance on Democracy Building, 1990-2003. World Politics, 59(3), 404–438.
    Fleischauer, S. (2007). The 228 Incident and the Taiwan Independence Movement’s Construction. China Information, 21(3), 373–401.
    Fletcher, L. E., Weinstein, H. M., & Rowen, J. (2009). Context, Timing and the Dynamics of Transitional Justice: A Historical Perspective. Source: Human Rights Quarterly, 31(1), 163–220.
    Flores-Macías, G. A. (2018). Mexico’s PRI: The Resilience of an Authoritarian Successor Party and Its Consequences for Democracy. In J. Loxton & S. Mainwaring (Eds.), Life after Dictatorship: Authoritarian Successor Parties Worldwide (pp. 257–284). Cambridge University Press.
    Frantzeskakis, N., & Sato, Y. (2020). Echoes of a fading past: Authoritarian legacies and far-right voting. Electoral Studies, 66, 1–10.
    Franzé, J., & Fernández-Vázquez, G. (2022). The Spanish Post-Fascist Right: The Unique Case of Vox. In G. Pereyra Doval & G. Souroujon (Eds.), Global Resurgence of the Right: Conceptual and Regional Perspectives. Routledge.
    Frazier, L. J. (2015). Amnesia: Cultural Memory, Reconciliation, and Communal Accountability in the Americas. Comparative American Studies An International Journal, 13(3), 146–160.
    Freedom in the World 2001—Peru. (2001). Freedom House.
    Freeman, M., & Hayner, P. B. (2003). Truth-Telling. In D. Bloomfield, T. Barnes, & L. Huyse (Eds.), Reconciliation after Violent Conflict. A Handbook (pp. 122–144). International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance.
    Freire, A., & Kivistik, K. (2018). Authoritarian legacies and mass left-right regime support in new democracies: The Baltic States and Southern Europe compared. Comparative European Politics, 16, 249–270.
    Fuentes, C. (2011). A Matter of the Few: Dynamics of Constitutional Change in Chile, 1990–2010. Texas Law Review, 89(7), 1741–1775.
    Fuentes, C. (2012). Chile: Democratization through Constitutional Reforms. In A. Schilling-Vacaflor & D. Nolte (Eds.), New Constitutionalism in Latin America: Promises and Practices. Routledge.
    Fuentes, C. (2015). Shifting the Status Quo: Constitutional Reforms in Chile. Latin American Politics and Society, 57(1), 99–122.
    Fujimori: New clashes after Peru ex-president is pardoned. (2017, December 26). BBC. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-42481281
    Fujimori y PPK defienden sus posiciones [Fujimori and PPK defend their positions] (202; Resumen de encuestas a la opinión pública, pp. 1–7). (2016). Ipsos. https://www.ipsos.com/sites/default/files/publication/2016-03/Opinion%20Data%2028Marzo%202016.pdf
    Fulda, A. (2020). The Struggle for Democracy in Mainland China, Taiwan and Hong Kong: Sharp Power and its Discontents. Routledge.
    Gallo, C. A., & Gugliano, A. A. (2020). Political Memory, Authoritarian Legacies, and the Quality of Democracy: Considerations for a Comparison Between Brazil and Argentina. Revista Del CESLA: International Latin American Studies Review, 25, 251–276.
    Gamboa, R., & Morales, M. (2016). Chile’s 2015 Electoral Reform: Changing the Rules of the Game. Latin American Politics and Society, 58(4).
    García Marín, I. (2016). Partidos políticos y producción legislativa enel Perú: 2006-2011 [Political parties and legislative production in Peru: 2006–2011]. Revista Chilena de Derecho y Ciencia Política, 7(1), 103–130.
    García Marín, I. (2021). Cambio político en entornos de elevada polarización: Perú y los efectos de su no-sistema de partidos [Political change in highly polarised environments: Peru and the effects of its non-party system]. In J. L. Estrada Rodríguez (Ed.), Democracia Latinoamericana: ¿Hacia Dónde Vamos? (pp. 199–216). Thoth Editora.
    García-Godos, J., & Félix, R. (2016). Peru: Beyond paradigmatic cases. In E. Skaar, J. García-Godos, & C. Collins (Eds.), Transitional Justice in Latin America. Routledge.
    Garretón, M. A. (1995). Redemocratization in Chile. Journal of Democracy, 6(1), 146–158.
    Garretón, M. A. (2003). Incomplete democracy: Political democratization in Chile and Latin America. University of North Carolina Press.
    Garrett, S. A. (2000). Models of Transitional Justice—A Comparative Analysis. Conference International Studies Association 40 Annual Convention, 1–15.
    Geddes, B., Wright, J., & Frantz, E. (2014). Autocratic Breakdown and Regime Transitions: A New Dataset. Perspectives on Politics, 12(2), 313–331.
    Gelman, A., & Hill, J. (2007). Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models. Cambridge University Press.
    George, A. L. (2019). Case Studies and Theory Development: The Method of Structured, Focused Comparison. In D. Caldwell (Ed.), Alexander L. George: A Pioneer in Political and Social Sciences (pp. 191–214). Springer.
    Golder, S. N. (2006). Pre-Electoral Coalition Formation in Parliamentary Democracies. British Journal of Political Science, 36(2), 193–212.
    Goldsmith, J., & Krasner, S. D. (2003). The Limits of Idealism. Daedalus, 132(1), 47–63.
    Goldstein, A. A., & Comellini, S. (2012). Medios y Política en América Latina: Una Comparación entre las Elecciones del Brasil 2006 y el Perú 2011 [Media and politics in Latin America: A comparison between the 2006 Brazil election and the 2011 Peru election]. Qu Ue Es St Ti Io On, 1(36).
    Goñez Cruz, C., & Cueto Saldívar, R. M. (2022). El antifujimorismo y la defensa de la democracia: Estudio sobre la conciencia política de jóvenes movilizados contra el fujimorismo en Lima [Anti-Fujimorismo and the defence of democracy: A study on the political awareness of youth mobilised against Fujimorismo in Lima]. PSOCIAL, 8(1).
    González Cueva, E. (2006). The Peruvian Truth and Reconciliation Commission and the challenge of impunity. In N. Roht-Arriaza & J. Mariezcurrena (Eds.), Transitional Justice in the Twenty-First Century: Beyond Truth versus Justice (pp. 70–93). Cambridge University Press.
    González, E., & Varney, H. (Eds.). (2013). Truth Seeking Elements of Creating an Effective Truth Commission. Amnesty Commission of the Ministry of Justice of Brazil.
    González-Enríquez, C. (2001). Decommunization and Political Justice in Central and Eastern Europe. In B. D. B. Alexandra, C. González Enríquez, & P. Aguilar (Eds.), The Politics of Memory: Transitional Justice in Democratizing Societies (pp. 218–247). Oxford University Press.
    González-Enríquez, C., Aguilar, P., & Barahona De Brito, A. (2001). Conclusions. In A. Barahona De Brito, C. González-Enríquez, & P. Aguilar (Eds.), The Politics of Memory: Transitional Justice in Democratizing Societies (pp. 303–314). Oxford University Press.
    González-Ocantos, E. (2015). Evaluations of human rights trials and trust in judicial institutions: Evidence from Fujimori’s trial in Peru. The International Journal of Human Rights.
    Gow, J., & Zveržhanovski, I. (2004). The Milošević Trial: Purpose and Performance. Nationalities Papers, 32(4), 897–919.
    Gricius, G. (2019). Transitional Justice: Lustration and Vetting in Ukraine and Georgia. Journal of Liberty and International Affairs, 5(2).
    Grzymala-Busse, A. (2002). The Effects of Communist Party Transformation on the Institutionalization of Party Systems. In A. Bozoki & J. T. Ishiyama (Eds.), The Communist Successor Parties of Central and Eastern Europe. M. E. Sharpe, Inc.
    Grzymala-Busse, A. (2019). Hoist on their own petards? The reinvention and collapse of authoritarian successor parties. Party Politics, 25(4), 1–14.
    Guillerot, J. (2019). Reparations in Peru: 15 Years of Delivering Redress. Reparations, Responsibility & Victimhood in Transitional Societies.
    Hadden, T. (2017). Transitional Justice and amnesties. In C. Lawther, L. Moffett, & D. Jacobs (Eds.), Research Handbook on Transitional Justice (pp. 358–376). Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
    Hadiz, V. R. (2007). The localization of power in Southeast Asia. Democratization, 14(5), 873–892.
    Haggard, S., & Kaufman, R. R. (1995). The Political Economy of Democratic Transitions. Comparative Politics, 29(3), 263–283.
    Hagopian, F. (1993). After Regime Change: Authoritarian Legacies, Political Representation, and the Democratic Future of South America. World Politics, 45(3), 464–500.
    Hagopian, F. (1996a). Traditional Politics and Regime Change in Brazil. Cambridge University Press.
    Hagopian, F. (1996b). Traditional Power Structures and Democratic Governance in Latin America. In J. I. Domínguez & A. F. Lowenthal (Eds.), Constructing Democratic Governance. Latin America and the Caribbean in the 1990s. Themes and Issues. The Johns Hopkins University Press.
    Han, C. (2019, February 24). Taiwan in Time: 228, after the apology. Taipei Times. https://www.taipeitimes.com/News/feat/archives/2019/02/24/2003710307
    Hanely, P. (2014). Transitional Justice in South Korea: One Country’s Restless Search for Truth and Reconciliation. East Asia Law Review, 9, 138–168.
    Hansen, T. O. (2016). The Time and Space of Transitional Justice. In Research Handbook on Transitional Justice. Edward Elgar Publishing.
    Harper, M. A. G. (2000). Economic Voting in Post-Communist Eastern Europe. Comparative Political Studies, 33(9), 1191–1227.
    Harrison, M. (2006). Legitimacy, meaning and knowledge in the making of Taiwanese identity. Palgrave Macmillan.
    Hartnett, S. J., Shaou-Whea Dodge, P., & Keränen, L. B. (2020). Postcolonial remembering in Taiwan: 228 and transitional justice as “The end of fear.” Journal of International and Intercultural Communication, 13(3), 238–256.
    Hassan, M. (2015). Continuity despite change: Kenya’s new constitution and executive power. Democratization, 22(4), 587–609.
    Haughton, T. (2003). “We’ll Finish What We’ve Started”: The 2002 Slovak Parliamentary Elections. Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, 19(4), 65–90.
    Haung, P. (2024). Taiwan’s 2024 Election: More about Taiwan, Less about China. Fletcher Forum of World Affairs, 48(2), 63–73.
    Hayner, P. B. (1994). Fifteen Truth Commissions—1974 to 1994: A Comparative Study. Human Rights Quarterly, 16(4), 597–655.
    Hayner, P. B. (2001). Unspeakable Truths: Confronting State Terror and Atrocity. Routledge.
    Heiduk, F. (2011). From guardians to democrats? Attempts to explain change and continuity in the civil-military relations of post-authoritarian Indonesia, Thailand and the Philippines. Pacific Review, 24(2), 249–271.
    Heiss, C. (2017). Legitimacy crisis and the constitutional problem in Chile: A legacy of authoritarianism. Constellations, 24(3), 470–479.
    Held, D. (2006). Models of Democracy. Polity Press.
    Hernandez, C. G. (1985). The Philippine military and civilian control: Under Marcos and beyond. Third World Quarterly, 7(4), 907–923.
    Hicken, A. (2011). Clientelism. Annual Review of Political Science, 14, 289–310.
    Hickey, D. V., & Niou, E. (2016). Taiwan in 2015: A Turning Point? Asian Survey, 56(1), 57–67.
    Hirai, A. (2020). Taiwan zhuanxing zhengyi zai shijie mailuo zhong de pubianxing yu weilai zouxiang [Rethinking Transitional Justice in Taiwan from the Comparative Perspective]. Dangchan Yanjiu [Journal for the Study of the Party Assets], 5, 25–61.
    Hite, K. (2005). Breaking the Silence in Post-Authoritarian ChiIe. In M. P. Friedman & P. Kenney (Eds.), Partisan Histories: The Past in Contemporary Global Politics (pp. 55–73). Palgrave Macmillan.
    Hite, K., & Cesarini, P. (Eds.). (2004a). Authoritarian Legacies and Democracy in Latin America and Southern Europe. University of Notre Dame Press.
    Hite, K., & Cesarini, P. (2004b). Introducing the Concept of Authoritarian Legacies. In K. Hite & P. Cesarini (Eds.), Authoritarian Legacies and Democracy in Latin America and Southern Europe (pp. 1–24). University of Notre Dame Press.
    Hite, K., & Morlino, L. (2004). Problematizing the Links between Authoritarian Legacies and “Good” Democracy. In K. Hite & P. Cesarini (Eds.), Authoritarian Legacies and Democracy in Latin America and Southern Europe (pp. 25–83). University of Notre Dame Press.
    Hollywood, D. M. (2007). The Search for Post-Conflict Justice in Iraq: A Comparative Study of Transitional Justice Mechanisms and Their Applicability to Post-Saddam Iraq. Brooklyn Journal of International Law, 33(1), 60–124.
    Holmes, J. S., & De Piñeres, S. A. G. (2002). Sources of Fujimori’s Popularity: Neo-liberal Reform or Ending Terrorism. Terrorism and Political Violence, 14(4), 93–112.
    Hong, J. Y., Park, S., & Yang, H. (2021). The Authoritarian Legacy of a Village Development Program on Authoritarian and Democratic Elections.
    Hood, S. J. (1997). The Kuomintang And The Democratization Of Taiwan. Routledge.
    Horne, C. M. (2014). The Impact of Lustration on Democratization in Postcommunist Countries. International Journal of Transitional Justice, 8(3), 496–521.
    Horne, C. M. (2015). The Timing of Transitional Justice Measures. In L. Stan & N. Nedelsky (Eds.), Post-Communist Transitional Justice: Lessons from Twenty-Five Years of Experience. Cambridge University Press.
    Horne, C. M. (2017). Transitional Justice: Vetting and Lustration. In C. Lawther, L. Moffett, & D. Jacobs (Eds.), Research Handbook on Transitional Justice (pp. 424–444). Edward Elgar.
    Horovitz, S. (2006). Transitional criminal justice in Sierra Leone. In N. Roht-Arriaza & J. Mariezcurrena (Eds.), Transitional Justice in the Twenty-First Century: Beyond Truth versus Justice (pp. 43–69). Cambridge University Press.
    Hou, K. (2015). A Tragic Ethnic Conflict in Post-war Taiwan: Reviewing the 228 Uprising Through the IMEP Model as the Primary Analytical Framework. East Asia, 32, 43–65.
    Hsiao, H.-H. M. (2016). 2016 Taiwan Elections: Significance and Implications. Orbis, 60(4), 504–514.
    Hsieh, J. F. (2016). Taiwan’s 2016 Elections: Critical Elections? American Journal of Chinese Studies, 23(1), 9–23.
    Hsieh, J. F., Lacy, D., & Niou, E. M. S. (1998). Retrospective and prospective voting in a one-party- dominant democracy: Taiwan’s 1996 presidential election. Public Choice, 97, 383–399.
    Hsieh, J., & Wu, M.-C. (2016). Zhuanxing zhengyi de sikao yu shijian [Perspectives on Taiwanese Indigenous Peoples’ Transitional Justice]. Taiwan Yuanzhuminzu Yanjiu Xuebao [Journal of the Taiwan Indigenous Studies Association], 6(3), 1–29.
    Hsu, S. (2018, September 13). Deputy chairman resigns from Transitional Justice. Taipei Times. https://www.taipeitimes.com/News/front/archives/2018/09/13/2003700317
    Huang, H. (2023). The Politics and Promise of Memory: The White Terror in Taiwan as Example. In C.-H. Wu (Ed.), Cultures of Memory in Asia: Dynamics and Forms of Memorialization (pp. 172–199). Routledge.
    Huang, Y. (2022, March 25). To advance, transitional justice needs the public. Taipei Times.
    Hung, C.-L. (2013). Media Control and Democratic Transition: Ongoing Threat to Press Freedom in Taiwan. China Media Research, 9(2), 83–93.
    Hunter, W. (1998). Negotiating civil-military relations in post-authoritarian Argentina and Chile. International Studies Quarterly, 42(2), 295–317.
    Huntington, S. P. (1991a). How countries democratize. Political Science Quarterly, 106(4), 579–616.
    Huntington, S. P. (1991b). The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. University of Oklahoma Press.
    Huyse, L. (2003a). Justice. In D. Bloomfield, T. Barnes, & L. Huyse (Eds.), Reconciliation After Violent Conflict. A Handbook (pp. 97–122). International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance.
    Huyse, L. (2003b). The Process of Reconciliation. In D. Bloomfield, T. Barnes, & L. Huyse (Eds.), Reconciliation After Violent Conflict. A Handbook (pp. 19–40). International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance.
    Hwang, J.-Y. (2016). Transitional justice in postwar Taiwan. In G. Schubert (Ed.), Routledge Handbook of Contemporary Taiwan (pp. 169–183). Routledge.
    Hyde, S. D., & Marinov, N. (2023). National Elections Across Democracy and Autocracy.
    Informe Final [Final Report]. (2003). Comisión de la Verdad y Reconciliación.
    Insisa, A. (2019). Taiwan 2019 and the 2020 Elections: Tsai Ing-wen’s Triumph. ASIA MAIOR, 185–213.
    Insisa, A. (2024). Taiwan 2023 and the 2024 Elections: A DPP partial victory after a contested electoral campaign. ASIA MAIOR, XXXIV.
    Inter-American Court orders Peru not to release Fujimori from prison. (2022, April 8). Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/world/americas/inter-american-court-orders-peru-not-release-fujimori-prison-2022-04-08/
    International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (IDEA). (n.d.). https://www.idea.int/data-tools
    Ishiyama, J. (2015). Regime Legacies and Governance in Post-Communist States. Taiwan Journal of Democracy, 11(2), 1–24.
    Ishiyama, J., & Quinn, J. J. (2006). African phoenix? Explaining the electoral performance of the formerly dominant parties in Africa. Party Politics, 12(3), 317–340.
    Istenič, S. (2012). The Role of Media in Democratic Consolidation of Taiwan and Slovenia. Asian and African Studies, 16(2), 67–77.
    Jacobs, J. B. (2012). Democratizing Taiwan. Brill.
    Jacobs, J. B. (2013). Whither Taiwanization? The Colonization, Democratization and Taiwanization of Taiwan. Japanese Journal of Political Science, 14(4), 567–586.
    Jacobs, J. B. (2016). The Kaohsiung Incident in Taiwan and Memoirs of a Foreign Big Beard. Brill.
    Jacobs, J. B. (2018). Myth and Reality in Taiwan’s Democratisation. Asian Studies Review, 43(1), 164–177.
    James, G., Witten, D., Hastie, T., & Tibshirani, R. (2021). An Introduction to Statistical Learning: With Applications in R (2nd ed.). Springer.
    Jankauskas, V., Eckhard, S., & Ege, J. (2023). Structured, Focused Comparison. In F. Badache, L. Kimber, & L. Maertens (Eds.), International Organizations and Research Methods: An Introduction (pp. 301–307). University of Michigan Press.
    Jelin, E. (2003). State Repression and the Labors of Memory. University of Minnesota Press.
    Jhee, B. (2008). Economic Origins of Electoral Support for Authoritarian Successors: A Cross-National Analysis of Economic Voting in New Democracies. Comparative Political Studies, 41(3), 362–388.
    Jiménez, B. (2010, October 1). Montesinos, ex asesor presidencial peruano, recibe 25 años de cárcel [Montesinos, former Peruvian presidential adviser, receives 25 years in prison]. El Mundo. https://www.elmundo.es/america/2010/10/02/argentina/1285981388.html
    Jiménez, B. (2011, May 27). Miles de personas marchan en Lima para pedir: “Dignidad, Fujimori nunca más” [Thousands march in Lima demanding: ’Dignity, never again Fujimori’]. El Mundo.
    Jiménez, B. (2016, June 1). Setenta mil personas marchan para decir “No” a Keiko Fujimori en Perú [Seventy thousand people march to say “No” to Keiko Fujimori in Peru]. El Mundo.
    Jofré, H., & Cabezas, J. M. (2025). Los Efectos de la Reforma Electoral de 2015 sobre el Sistema de Partidos Chileno [The effects of the 2015 electoral reform on the Chilean party system]. Dados, 68(3), 1–34.
    Johnson, D. E. W. (2020). Iraq: Seeking stability after Saddam. In P. R. Williams & M. Sterio (Eds.), Research Handbook on Post-Conflict State Building (pp. 420–429). Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.
    Jou, W. (2010). Political cleavages in Serbia: Changes and continuities in structuring left–right orientations. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 10(2), 187–206.
    Jowitt, K. (1993). New World Disorder: The Leninist Extinction. In Contemporary Sociology (Vol. 22, Issue 1). University of California Press.
    Junes, T. (2021, September 6). Whither Poland’s “Ministry of Historical Truth.” Balkan Insight. https://balkaninsight.com/2021/09/06/whither-polands-ministry-of-historical-truth/
    Kaeding, M. P. (2009). Taiwanized “New Taiwanese”: The Effect of Taiwanization on the 2008 Presidential Election Campaign of Ma Ying-Jeou. Asia-Pacific Social Science Review, 9(2), 1–20.
    Kagan, R. C. (1982). Martial law in Taiwan. Bulletin of Concerned Asian Scholars, 14(3), 48–54.
    Kang, W. J. (2018). The Past is Long-Lasting: Park Chung Hee Nostalgia and Voter Choice in the 2012 Korean Presidential Election. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 53(2), 233–249.
    Kauffman, C. (2005). Transitional Justice in Guatemala: Linking the Past and the Future. ISA South Conference, September, 1–27.
    Kenney, C. D. (2004). Fujimori’s Coup and the Breakdown of Democracy in Latin America. University of Notre Dame Press.
    Kezdi, G. (2003). Robust Standard Error Estimation in Fixed-Effects Panel Models. Hungarian Statistical Review, 9, 95–116.
    Kim, H. J. (2012). Structural Determinants of Human Rights Prosecutions After Democratic Transition. Journal of Peace Research, 49(2), 305–320.
    Kim-Leffingwell, S. (2023). Authoritarian Legacies and Partisan Bias in Corruption Voting. Journal of East Asian Studies, 53(2), 1–22.
    Kirby, P. (2022, September 25). Giorgia Meloni: Italy’s far-right wins election and vows to govern for all. BBC. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-63029909
    Kiss, C. (2006). The Misuses of Manipulation: The Failure of Transitional Justice in Post-Communist Hungary. Europe - Asia Studies, 58(6), 925–940.
    Kitschelt, H. (1995). Formation of Party Cleavages in Post-Communist Democracies: Theoretical Propositions. Party Politics, 1(4), 447–472.
    Kitschelt, H., & Singer, M. (2018). Linkage Strategies of Authoritarian Successor Parties. In J. Loxton & S. Mainwaring (Eds.), Life after Dictatorship: Authoritarian Successor Parties Worldwide (pp. 53–83). Cambridge University Press.
    Koskenniemi, M. (2002). Between Impunity and Show Trials. Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law Online, 6(1), 1–35.
    Kourvetaris, G. A., & Dobratz, B. A. (1981). Public opinion and civil‐military relations in Greece since 1974. Journal of Strategic Studies, 4(1), 71–84.
    Kozak, R. (2016, April 5). Peru Election: The Unlikely Political Endurance of the Fujimoris. Americas Quarterly.
    Kritz, N. (2009). Policy Implications of Empirial Research on Transitional Justice. In H. van der Merwe, V. Baxter, & A. R. Chapman (Eds.), Assessing the Impact of Transitional Justice: Challenges for Empirical Research. United States Institute of Peace.
    Krotoszynski, M. (2016). The Transitional Justice Models and the Justifications of Means of Dealing with the Past. Oñati Socio-Legal Series, 6(3), 584–606.
    Kurtz, M. J., & Brooks, S. M. (2008). Embedding Neoliberal Reform in Latin America. World Politics, 60(2), 231–280.
    Kymlicka, W. (2011). Transitional Justice, Federalism, and the Accommodation of Minority Nationalism. In P. Arthur (Ed.), Identities in Transition: Challenges for Transitional Justice in Divided Societies (pp. 303–333). Cambridge University Press.
    Lams, L. (2018). Issues Salience and Framing in the Taiwanese 2016 Presidential Election Campaign: An Analysis of the KMT and DPP Campaign Discourses. International Journal of Taiwan Studies, 1(2), 301–330.
    Landsman, S. (1997). Alternative Responses to Serious Human Rights Abuses: Of Prosecution and Trust Commissions. Law and Contemporary Problems, 59.
    Langston, J. K. (2017). Theorizing Authoritarian Party Survival. In Democratization and Authoritarian Party Survival: Mexico’s PRI (pp. 15–28). Oxford University Press.
    Laplante, L. J. (2014). Memory Battles: Guatemala’s Public Debates and the Genocide Trial of Jose Efrain Rios Montt. Quinnipiac Law Review, 32(3), 621–674.
    Laplante, L. J. (2016). From Theory to Practice: Implementing Reparations in Post-Truth Commission Peru. In B. R. Johnston & S. Slyomovics (Eds.), Waging War, Making Peace: Reparations and Human Rights. Routledge.
    Laplante, L. J., & Theidon, K. S. (2007). Truth with Consequences: Justice and Reparations in Post-Truth Commission Peru. Human Rights Quarterly, 29(1), 228–250.
    LaPorte, J., & Lussier, D. N. (2011). What Is the Leninist Legacy? Assessing Twenty Years of Scholarship. Slavic Review, 70(3), 637–654.
    Lassila, J., & Nizhnikau, R. (2023). Casting off Soviet chains? Conditions for the Ideological Renewal of Communist Successor Parties in Russia, Ukraine and Moldova since the 2010s. Journal of Eurasian Studies, 14(1), 53–66.
    Lawther, C., & Moffett, L. (2017). Introduction – Researching Transitional Justice: The Highs, the Lows and the Expansion of the Field. In C. Lawther, L. Moffett, & D. Jacobs (Eds.), Research Handbook on Transitional Justice. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
    LeBas, A. (2011). From Protest to Parties: Party-Building and Democratization in Africa. Oxford University Press.
    LeBas, A. (2018). The Survival of Authoritarian Successor Parties in Africa: Organizational Legacies or Competitive Landscapes? In J. Loxton & S. Mainwaring (Eds.), Life after Dictatorship: Authoritarian Successor Parties Worldwide (pp. 206–228). Cambridge University Press.
    Lee, Z. (2016). Qiye quanli yu minzhu: Taiwan qiye jituan er ling ling ba nian liwei xuanju de zhengzhi xianjin fenxi [Corporate Power and Democracy: An Analysis of Business Groups’ Campaign Contribution in the 2008 Legislator Election]. Taiwan Shehuixue [Taiwanese Sociology], 31(June), 99–139.
    Leebaw, B. A. (2008). The Irreconcilable Goals of Transitional Justice. Human Rights Quarterly, 95(1), 95–118.
    Lepesant, T. (2018). Taiwanese youth and national identity under Ma Ying-jeou. In J. B. Jacobs & P. Kang (Eds.), Changing Taiwanese Identities. Routledge.
    Leszczensky, L., & Wolbring, T. (2022). How to Deal With Reverse Causality Using Panel Data? Recommendations for Researchers Based on a Simulation Study. Sociological Methods and Research, 51(2), 837–865.
    Levitsky, S. (2011). Peru’s 2011 Elections: A Surprising Left Turn. Journal of Democracy, 22(4), 84–94.
    Levitsky, S. (2018). Peru: The Institutionalization of Politics without Parties. In Party Systems in Latin America: Institutionalization, Decay, and Collapse (pp. 326–355). Cambridge University Press.
    Levitsky, S., & Way, L. A. (2010). Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes After the Cold War. Cambridge University Press.
    Ley 20/2022, de 19 de octubre, de Memoria Democrática [Law 20/2022, of October 19, on Democratic Memory], BOE-A-2022-17099, Jefatura del Estado (2022). https://www.boe.es/eli/es/l/2022/10/19/20/con
    Ley 52/2007, de 26 de Diciembre, Por La Que Se Reconocen y Amplían Derechos y Se Establecen Medidas En Favor de Quienes Padecieron Persecución o Violencia Durante La Guerra Civil y La Dictadura [Law 52/2007, of December 26, Which Recognises and Expands Rights and Establishes Measures in Favour of Those Who Suffered Persecution or Violence during the Civil War and the Dictatorship], BOE-A-2007-22296 (2007). https://www.boe.es/eli/es/l/2007/12/26/52/con
    Ley Que Crea El Plan Integral de Reparaciones [Law Creating the Comprehensive Reparations Plan], 28592, Congreso de la República (2005).
    Li, F. (2008). 威權體制下的國民黨黨營企業 The Party-owned Enterprises Under the Authoritarianism of Kuomintang. 國史館學術集刊 Academic Journal of the National History Museum, 18, 189–220.
    Li, X. (2019). The history of Taiwan. Greenwood Publishing Group, Inc.
    Li, Y., & Zhang, E. (2016). Changing Taiwanese Identity and Cross-Strait Relations: A Post 2016 Taiwan Presidential Election Analysis. Journal of Chinese Political Science, 22(1), 17–35.
    Lijphart, A. (2012). Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries (2nd ed.). Yale University Press.
    Lin, G., & Wu, W. (2023). External and Internal Factors Shaping the Outcomes of 2024 Elections in Taiwan. China Review, 23(4), 1–15.
    Lin, J. (2015). Lunshu ruhe kuangxian xuanze? Tiaojian shi tongdu pianhao dui er ling yi er nian Taiwan zongtong xuanju de yingxiang [How Is Choice Constrained by Discourses? The Impact of Conditional Unification-Independence Preferences on Taiwan’s 2012 Presidential Election]. Zhengzhi Kexue Luncong [Taiwan Journal of Political Science], 63, 55–90.
    Lin, L. (2008). Bianqian yu tiaozhan: Jiejin hou de Taiwan baoye [A Historical Experiment with Deregulation: The Changes and Challenges of the Press after the Lifting of the Press Ban in Taiwan]. Xinwenxue Yanjiu [Mass Communication Research], 95, 183–212.
    Lin, S. (2017, August 27). KMT assets to be seized for unpaid fine. Taipei Times. https://www.taipeitimes.com/News/front/archives/2017/08/27/2003677254
    Lin, T.-M., & Chu, Y.-H. (2008). The Structure of Taiwan’s Political Cleavages toward the 2004 Presidential Election: A Spatial Analysis. Taiwan Journal of Democracy, 4(2), 133–154.
    Ling, Y.-L., & Ger, Y.-K. (2000). The Great Showdown: Taiwan’s Presidential Election in the Year 2000. American Journal of Chinese Studies, 7(1), 1–27.
    Linz, J. J. (1978). The Breakdown of Democratic Regimes: Crises, Breakdown and Reequilibrium. Foreign Affairs, 57(4).
    Lishi chongxian Jiang Jingguo Ma zongtong huainian zhanggan [History Revisited: President Ma Pays Tribute to Chiang Ching-kuo]. (2011, August 2). Gongshi Xinwen [PTS News]. https://news.pts.org.tw/article/113548
    Lleshi, S. (2023). Institutional Choice, Semi-loyal Political Parties, and the Trajectory of Political Polarization in Albania. Tirana Observatory, 293–307.
    Lo, S. (1997). Liberalization and Democratization in Taiwan: A Class and Functional Perspective. In L. Anek (Ed.), Democratization in Southeast and East Asia (pp. 215–236). Conference on Rapid Economic Growth and Democratization in East and Southeast Asia. Silkworm Books.
    Longman, T. (2006). Justice at the grassroots? Gacaca trials in Rwanda. In N. Roht-Arriaza & J. Mariezcurrena (Eds.), Transitional Justice in the Twenty-First Century: Beyond Truth versus Justice (pp. 206–228). Cambridge University Press.
    Los jóvenes se organizan para frenar el avance de Keiko Fujimori [Young people organise to stop the rise of Keiko Fujimori]. (2011, June 1). El País. https://elpais.com/internacional/2011/06/01/actualidad/1306879212_850215.html
    Los, M. (2010). A trans-systemic surveillance: The legacy of communist surveillance in the digital age. In K. D. Haggerty & M. Samatas (Eds.), Surveillance and Democracy (pp. 173–194). Routledge.
    Lovatón Palacios, D., & Arias Aróstegui, E. (2010). Informe Anual 2010 sobre Seguridad Ciudadana. El legado del gobierno de Alan García: Un país más inseguro [2010 Annual Report on Citizen Security: The legacy of Alan García’s government: A more insecure country]. Instituto de Defensa Legal.
    Lovell, D. W. (2001). Trust and the politics of postcommunism. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 34(1), 27–38.
    Loveman, B. (1994). “Protected Democracies” and Military Guardianship: Political Transitions in Latin America, 1978-1993. Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs, 36(2), 105–189.
    Loxton, J. (2015). Authoritarian successor parties. Journal of Democracy, 26(3), 157–170.
    Loxton, J. (2018a). Conclusion: Life after Dictatorship. In J. Loxton & S. Mainwaring (Eds.), Life after Dictatorship: Authoritarian Successor Parties Worldwide. Cambridge University Press.
    Loxton, J. (2018b). Introduction: Authoritarian Successor Parties Worldwide. In J. Loxton & S. Mainwaring (Eds.), Life after Dictatorship: Authoritarian Successor Parties Worldwide. Cambridge University Press.
    Loxton, J. (2021). Authoritarian vestiges in democracies. Journal of Democracy, 32(2), 145–158.
    Loxton, J., & Levitsky, S. (2018). Personalistic Authoritarian Successor Parties in Latin America. In J. Loxton & S. Mainwaring (Eds.), Life after Dictatorship: Authoritarian Successor Parties Worldwide (pp. 113–142). Cambridge University Press.
    Loxton, J., & Power, T. (2021). Introducing authoritarian diasporas: Causes and consequences of authoritarian elite dispersion. Democratization, 28(3), 465–483.
    Lubbers, M., Gijsberts, M., & Scheepers, P. (2002). Extreme Right-Wing Voting in Western Europe. European Journal of Political Research, 41, 345–378.
    Lupu, N. (2014). Brand Dilution and the Breakdown of Political Parties in Latin America. World Politics, 66(4), 561–602.
    Luque Talaván, M. (2003). La relaciones cívico-militares en el Perú actual. Cuadernos de Estrategia, 123, 189–218.
    Lutz, E., & Sikkink, K. (2001). The Justice Cascade: The Evolution and Impact of Foreign Human Rights Trials in Latin America. Chicago Journal of International Law, 2(1), 1–33.
    Lynch, M. (2023). “A Showpiece Gesture”: Strategic Legitimation and Commissions of Inquiry in Sri Lanka. Asian Journal of Peacebuilding, 11(2), 213–236.
    Lynch, M., & Marchesi, B. (2015). The Adoption and Impact of Transitional Justice. In L. Stan & N. Nedelsky (Eds.), Post-Communist Transitional Justice: Lessons from Twenty-Five Years of Experience (pp. 73–96). Cambridge University Press.
    MacWilliams, M. C. (2016). Who Decides When The Party Doesn’t? Authoritarian Voters and the Rise of Donald Trump. PS: Political Science & Politics, 49(04), 716–721.
    Magaloni, B. (2006). Voting for Autocracy: Hegemonic Party Survival and its Demise in Mexico. Cambridge University Press.
    Mahoney, J. (2012). The Logic of Process Tracing Tests in the Social Sciences. Sociological Methods & Research, 41(4), 570–597.
    Mako, S. (2021). Subverting Peace: The Origins and Legacies of de-Ba’athification in Iraq. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, 15(4), 476–493.
    Maldonado Prieto, C. (2002). Servicios de Inteligencia en Sudamérica. Estado de situación en una perspectiva comparada [Intelligence services in South America: State of affairs from a comparative perspective]. Instituto de Cooperación para la Seguridad Hemisférica (WHINSEC).
    Marandici, I. (2010, April). The Factors Leading to the Electoral Success, Consolidation and Decline of the Moldovan Communists’ Party (PCRM) during the Transition Period. 68th Midwest Political Science Association Annual Convention.
    Marandici, I. (2021). Nostalgic Voting? Explaining the Electoral Support for the Political Left in Post-Soviet Moldova. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 1–29.
    Maranhão Costa, A. T. (2011). Police brutality in Brazil: Authoritarian legacy or institutional weakness? Latin American Perspectives, 38(5), 19–32.
    Marinaccio, J., Remžová, D., & Chen, Y. (2023). Taiwan’s 2024 presidential election and its candidates: What to expect in foreign policy and cross-Strait relations? Central European Institute of Asian Studies (CEIAS).
    Masías Núñez, R., & Segura Escobar, F. (2006). Elecciones Peru, 2006: Complejidades y paradojas de una democracia aún vulnerable [Peru Elections, 2006: Complexities and paradoxes of a still vulnerable democracy]. Colombia Internacional, 64, 96–121.
    Mccargo, D. (2015). Transitional Justice and Its Discontents. Journal of Democracy, 26(2), 5–20.
    McClintock, C. (2006). Electoral Authoritarian Versus Partially Democratic Regimes: The Case of the Fujimori Government and the 2000 Elections. In J. F. Carrión (Ed.), The Fujimori legacy: The rise of electoral authoritarianism in Peru (pp. 242–267). Pennsylvania State University Press.
    McEvoy, K. (2007). Beyond Legalism: Towards a Thicker Understanding of Transitional Justice. Journal of Law and Society, 34(4), 411–440.
    McGuinness, D. (2024, May 13). Germany: Court says far-right AfD is suspected of extremism. BBC. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-69003733
    McNulty, S. (2018). Peru’s Struggle with the Fujimori Legacy. Current History, 117(796).
    Mégret, F., & Vagliano, R. (2017). Transitional Justice and Human Rights. In C. Lawther, L. Moffett, & D. Jacobs (Eds.), Research Handbook on Transitional Justice (pp. 95–116). Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
    Meléndez, C. (2022). The Post-Partisans: Anti-Partisans, Anti-Establishment Identifiers, and Apartisans in Latin America. Cambridge University Press.
    Méndez, J. E. (1997). Accountability for Past Abuses. Human Rights Quarterly, 19(2), 255–282.
    Mendez, J. E. (2010). Significance of the Fujimori Trial. American University International Law Review, 25(4), 649–656.
    Mendoza, M. (2022). La utilización política del terrorismo en la campaña presidencial peruana de 2021 [The political use of terrorism in the 2021 Peruvian presidential campaign]. Universitas, 36, 243–268.
    Miller, M. K. (2021). Don’t Call It a Comeback: Autocratic Ruling Parties after Democratization. British Journal of Political Science, 51(2), 559–583.
    Mishler, R., & Rose, W. (2007). Generation, Age, and Time: The Dynamics of Political Learning during Russia’s Transformation. American Journal of Political Science, 51(4), 822–834.
    Misztal, B. A. (1999). How not to deal with the past: Lustration in Poland. European Journal of Sociology, 40(1), 31–55.
    Misztal, B. A. (2003). Theories of Social Remembering. Open University Press.
    Mitchell, J. A. (1999, December 31). Review. Taipei Times. https://www.taipeitimes.com/News/front/archives/1999/12/31/0000017803
    Miyagusuku Miyasato, P. (2022). Elecciones peruanas 2021: Desinformación y modelos económicos en pugna [2021 Peruvian elections: Disinformation and competing economic models]. Centro de Estudios En Diseño y Comunicación, 91–105.
    Mo, Y. (2009, April 11). Ma praises Chiang Ching-kuo. Taipei Times.
    Moffett, L. (2017). Reparations in Transitional Justice: Justice or Political Compromise. Human Rights & International Legal Discourse, 11(1), 59–70.
    Moody, C. E., & Marvell, T. B. (2020). Clustering and Standard Error Bias in Fixed Effects Panel Data Regressions. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 36(2), 347–369.
    Mora, F. O. (2003). Paraguay: The Legacy of Authoritarianism. In F. O. Mora & J. A. K. Hey (Eds.), Latin American and Caribbean Foreign Policy (pp. 309–327). Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
    Morlino, L. (2007). Explaining Democratic Quality: How Relevant is the Authoritarian Legacy? Revista de Ciencia Política, 27(2), 3–22.
    Morlino, L. (2010). Authoritarian Legacies, Politics of the Past and the Quality of Democracy in Southern Europe: Open Conclusions. South European Society and Politics, 15(3), 507–529.
    Morse, Y. L. (2020). Rebuilding, rebranding, and competitive landscapes: A set-theoretic analysis of authoritarian successor parties. Democratization, 27(8), 1–19.
    Motamedi, M. (2023, December 18). Why Chileans rejected conservative constitution, and what’s next? Al Jazeera. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2023/12/18/why-chileans-rejected-conservative-constitution-and-whats-next
    Mueller, S. (2024). Bicameralism. In A. Vatter & R. Freiburghaus (Eds.), Handbook of Comparative Political Institutions (pp. 263–275). Edward Elgar Publishing.
    Mujica, J. (2014). La desactivación del Servicio de Inteligencia Nacional. De la salida del personal de inteligencia al desarrollo de las agencias privadas de inteligencia en el Perú [The deactivation of the National Intelligence Service: From the departure of intelligence personnel to the development of private intelligence agencies in Peru]. Revista de Ciencia Política y Gobierno, 1(2), 129–155.
    Munck, G. L., & Leff, C. S. (1997). Modes of Transition and Democratization: South America and Eastern Europe in Comparative Perspective. Comparative Politics, 29(3), 343–362.
    Muñoz, P. (2021). América Latina erupciona: Perú gira al populismo [Latin America erupts: Peru shifts toward populism]. Revista Elecciones, 20(22), 284–305.
    Nalepa, M. (2010). Skeletons in the Closet. Cambridge University Press.
    Nalepa, M. (2017). Purges, Truth Commissions, and Lustrations: The Long Term Consequences of Dealing with Authoritarian Legacies.
    Nalepa, M. (2022). After Authoritarianism. Transitional Justice and Democratic Stability. Cambridge University Press.
    Navarro, V. (2010). ¿Es el PP franquista? [Is the PP Francoist?]. El Plural.
    Nedelsky, N. (2004). Divergent Responses to a Common Past: Transitional justice in the Czech Republic and Slovakia. Theory and Society, 33, 65–115.
    Neundorf, A., & Pop-Eleches, G. (2020). Dictators and Their Subjects: Authoritarian Attitudinal Effects and Legacies. Comparative Political Studies, 53(12), 1839–1860.
    New Peruvian military pledges to obey civilian rule. (2001, April 18). Seattle Post-Intelligencer.
    Nguyen, A., & Matusitz, J. (2022). Interpersonal Relationships in the 1996–1997 Japanese Embassy Hostage Crisis in Peru: A View from Relational Development Theory. Journal of Applied Security Research, 17(1), 1–17.
    Nicholson, T. (2024, May 15). Roots of Robert Fico’s shooting lie in Slovakia’s bitter divides. POLITICO. https://www.politico.eu/article/prime-minister-robert-fico-shooting-attempted-assassination-slovakia-divisions/
    Nickson, A. (2025). The Legacies of the Stroessner Dictatorship in Paraguay. Current History, 124(859), 68–73.
    Niou, E., & Paolino, P. (2003). The rise of the opposition party in Taiwan: Explaining Chen Shui-bian’s victory in the 2000 Presidential election. Electoral Studies, 22(4), 721–740.
    Nohlen, D. (Ed.). (2005a). Elections in the Americas. A Data Handbook. Volume I: North America, Central America, and the Caribbean. Oxford University Press.
    Nohlen, D. (Ed.). (2005b). Elections in the Americas. A Data Handbook. Volume II: South America. Oxford University Press.
    Nohlen, D., Grotz, F., & Hartmann, C. (Eds.). (2001a). Elections in Asia and the Pacific. A Data Handbook: Volume I: Middle East, Central Asia and South Asia. Oxford Universitry Press.
    Nohlen, D., Grotz, F., & Hartmann, C. (Eds.). (2001b). Elections in Asia and the Pacific. A Data Handbook. Volume II: South East Asia, East Asia and the South Pacific. Oxford Universitry Press.
    Nohlen, D., Krennerich, M., & Thibaut, B. (Eds.). (1999). Elections in Africa. A Data Handbook. Oxford University Press.
    Nohlen, D., & Stöver, P. (Eds.). (2010). Elections in Europe. A Data Handbook. Nomos Publishers.
    North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge University Press.
    Nueva cúpula militar anti-Montesinos [New anti-Montesinos military leadership]. (2000, November 27). La Nación.
    Nugent, C. (2019, September 24). Why Is Spain Digging Up the Remains of Its Former Dictator Francisco Franco? TIME. https://time.com/5684966/spain-exhume-dictator-francisco-franco/
    Nugent, E. R. (2020). The Psychology of Repression and Polarization. World Politics, 72(2), 291–334.
    Núñez Seixas, X.-M. (2004). Sobre la memoria histórica reciente y el “discurso patriótico” español del siglo XXI [On recent historical memory and the Spanish “patriotic discourse” of the 21st century]. Historia Del Presente, 3, 137–156.
    Nunley, A. C. (n.d.). African Elections Database. Retrieved May 10, 2023, from https://africanelections.tripod.com/index.html
    Obando, E. (1998). Civil-Military Relations in Peru, 1980-1996: How to Control and Coopt the Military (and the consequences of doing so). In S. J. Stern (Ed.), Shining and Other Paths: War and Society in Peru, 1980-1995 (pp. 385–410). Duke University Press.
    Obando, M. (2024, September 12). A 24 años de los ‘vladivideos’: Así fue la revelación que derrumbó al gobierno de Alberto Fujimori [24 years after the “Vladivideos”: This was the revelation that brought down Alberto Fujimori’s government]. Infobae. https://www.infobae.com/peru/2024/09/11/a-24-anos-de-los-vladivideos-asi-fue-la-revelacion-que-derrumbo-al-gobierno-de-alberto-fujimori/
    O’Donnell, G. A., & Schmitter, P. C. (1986). Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Tentative Conclusions about Uncertain Democracies. The John Hopkins University Press.
    Ogasahara, M. (2018). Media Environments in the United States, Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan. In S. Kiyohara, K. Maeshima, & D. Owen (Eds.), Internet Election Campaigns in the United States, Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan. Palgrave Macmillan.
    Oliart, P. (1998). Alberto Fujimori: “The Man Peru Needed?” In S. J. Stern (Ed.), Shining and Other Paths: War and Society in Peru, 1980-1995 (pp. 411–424). Duke University Press.
    Ordered to jail, Peru’s Fujimori in hospital. (2018, April 10). DW. https://www.dw.com/en/peru-revokes-alberto-fujimoris-pardon-as-ex-president-hospitalized/a-45745048
    Orentlicher, D. F. (1991). Settling Accounts: The Duty to Prosecute Human Rights Violations of a Prior Regime. The Yale Law Journal, 100(8), 2537–2615.
    Pacek, A. C. (1994). Macroeconomic Conditions and Electoral Politics in East Central Europe. American Journal of Political Science, 38(3), 723–744.
    Palacios Cerezales, D. (2010). Repressive legacies and the democratisation of Iberian police systems. South European Society and Politics, 15(3), 429–448.
    Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2013). Purposeful Sampling for Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis in Mixed Method Implementation Research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533–544.
    Paniagua forma un gobierno multicolor integrado por técnicos [Paniagua forms a multicoloured government made up of technocrats]. (2000, November 25). La Voz de Galicia.
    Paredes. (2021, June 21). Cómo fue la captura en Venezuela de Vladimiro Montesinos, el polémico exasesor de Alberto Fujimori, hace 20 años [How the capture of Vladimiro Montesinos, the controversial former adviser to Alberto Fujimori, happened in Venezuela 20 years ago]. BBC News Mundo. https://www.bbc.com/mundo/noticias-america-latina-57171785
    Parline: The IPU’s Open Data Platform. (n.d.). Retrieved May 10, 2023, from https://data.ipu.org/
    Partido Republicano Institucional sustituye al FRG. (2013, January 26). Prensa Libre. https://www.prensalibre.com/guatemala/politica/partido-republicano-institucional-sustituye-frg_0_854314704-html/
    Pastor, M., & Wise, C. (1992). Peruvian Economic Policy in the 1980s: From Orthodoxy to Heterodoxy and Back. Latin American Research Review, 27(2), 83–117.
    Patin, K., & Sącz, N. (2022, September 6). Poland’s “Ministry of Memory” Is Skewing History. TIME. https://time.com/6208257/poland-ministry-of-memory-war-holocaust-history/
    Payne, L. A. (2008). Unsettling Accounts: Neither Truth nor Reconciliation in Confessions of State Violence. Duke University Press.
    Pereira, A. W. (2001). Virtual Legality: Authoritarian Legacies and the Reform of Military Justice in Brazil, the Southern Cone, and Mexico. Comparative Political Studies, 34(5), 555–574.
    Pereira, A. W. (2003). Explaining Judicial Reform Outcomes in New Democracies: The Importance of Authoritarian Legalism in Argentina, Brazil, and Chile. Human Rights Review, 4(April), 3–16.
    Pereira, A. W., & Ungar, M. (2004). The Persistence of the “ Mano Dura ”: Authoritarian Legacies and Policing in Brazil and the Southern Cone. Latin American Studies Association Congress, 1–34.
    Perlin, J. (2000). The Guatemalan Historical Clarification Commission Finds Genocide. ILSA Journal of International & Comparative Law, 6, 389–414.
    Perú destituye a su cúpula militar [Peru removes its military leadership]. (2000, November 26). BBC Mundo.
    Peru Economic Outlook. (2024). BBVA.
    Perú envía a prisión a siete militares del ‘Grupo Colina’ [Peru sends seven ‘Colina Group’ soldiers to prison]. (2024, November 30). DW. https://www.dw.com/es/per%C3%BA-env%C3%ADa-a-prisi%C3%B3n-a-siete-militares-del-grupo-colina/a-70926001
    Perú: General va a la cárcel por opinar [Peru: General sent to prison for expressing an opinion]. (1995, May 13). El Tiempo.
    Peru: Recovery from Crisis (Order Code RL30918; Analyst in Latin American Affairs Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division). (2002). The Congressional Research Service (CRS).
    Peruvian court approves prison release of ex-president Alberto Fujimori. (2022, March 17). The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/mar/17/alberto-fujimori-pardon-prison-release-peru-court
    Peruvian military chiefs offer to quit. (2001, April 17). BBC News.
    Ponce, A. F. (2023). Inestabilidad política, deterioro institucional y debilidad del sistema de partidos: Lecciones del caos peruano [Political instability, institutional deterioration, and weakness of the party system: Lessons from the Peruvian chaos]. Política y Gobierno, 30(2).
    Poole, D., & Rénique, G. (2000). Popular Movements, the Legacy of the Left, and the Fall of Fujimori. Socialism and Democracy, 14(2), 53–74.
    Pope, K., & Voget, S. (2020, September 3). South Korean Conservatives Rebrand Again in Attempted Makeover. The Diplomat. https://thediplomat.com/2020/09/south-korean-conservatives-rebrand-again-in-attempted-makeover/
    Pop-Eleches, G. (2008). A party for all seasons: Electoral adaptation of Romanian Communist successor parties. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 41(4), 465–479.
    Pop-Eleches, G., & Tucker, J. A. (2014). Communist socialization and post-communist economic and political attitudes. Electoral Studies, 33, 77–89.
    Pop-Eleches, G., & Tucker, J. A. (2020). Communist Legacies and Left-Authoritarianism. Comparative Political Studies, 53(12), 1861–1889.
    Popken, B. (2020). Vetting the Public Sector. In P. R. Williams & M. Sterio (Eds.), Research Handbook on Post-Conflict State Building (pp. 46–63). Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.
    Popkin, M., & Roht-Arriaza, N. (1995). Truth as Justice: Investigatory Commissions in Latin America. Law and Social Inquiry, 20(1), 79–116.
    Popovski, V., & Serrano, M. (2012). Transitional Justice Across Continents. In V. Popovski & M. Serrano (Eds.), After oppression: Transitional justice in Latin America and Eastern Europe (pp. 2–18). United Nations University Press.
    Posner, E. A., & Vermeule, A. (2004). Transitional Justice as Ordinary Justice. Harvard Law Review, 117(3), 761–825.
    Post, C. (2016, April 6). Tens of thousands march against Keiko Fujimori in Lima. Perú Reports.
    Presidential Office Indigenous Historical Justice and Transitional Justice Committee. (n.d.). Retrieved October 8, 2024, from https://indigenous-justice.president.gov.tw/EN
    Pridham, G. (2000). Confining conditions and breaking with the past: Historical legacies and political learning in transitions to democracy. Democratization, 7(2), 36–64.
    Prusak, C. T. (2010). The Trial of Alberto Fujimori: Navigating the Show Trial Dilemma in Pursuit of Transitional Justice. New York University Law Review, 85(3), 867–904.
    Putnam, R. D. (1973). The Political Attitudes of Senior Civil Servants in Western Europe: A Preliminary Report. British Journal of Political Science, 3(3), 257–290.
    Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. In The Civil Society Reader. Princeton University Press.
    Quilca Catacora, M. (2024, November 2). “Es absurdo pedir perdón”: Jefe del Grupo Colina, lanza amenazas en audiencia por casos Pativilca-La Cantuta [“It’s absurd to ask for forgiveness”: Head of the Colina Group issues threats during hearing on the Pativilca–La Cantuta cases]. Infobae. https://www.infobae.com/peru/2024/11/02/es-absurdo-pedir-perdon-jefe-del-grupo-colina-lanza-amenazas-en-audiencia-por-casos-pativilca-la-cantuta/
    Rahat, G., & Sznajder, M. (1998). Electoral Engineering in Chile: The Electoral System and Limited Democracy. Electoral Studies, 17(4), 429–442.
    Ramírez Zapata, I., & Scott-Insúa, R. (2019). From Victims to Beneficiaries: Shaping Postconflict Subjects through State Reparations in Peru. Latin American Perspectives, 46(5), 158–173.
    Ramiro, L. (2014). Support for radical left parties in Western Europe: Social background, ideology and political orientations. European Political Science Review, 8(1), 1–23.
    Ravishankar, N. (2009). The Cost of Ruling: Anti-Incumbency in Elections. Economic and Political Weekly, 44(10), 92–98.
    Rawnsley, G. D. (1997). The 1996 Presidential Campaign in Taiwan: Packaging Politics in a Democratizing State. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 2(2), 47–61.
    Rawnsley, G. D., & Rawnsley, M. T. (2012). The Media in Democratic Taiwan. In D. Blundell (Ed.), Taiwan since Martial Law: Society, Culture, Politics, Economy (pp. 395–417). University of California, Berkeley and National Taiwan University Press.
    Reich, G. M. (1998). The 1988 constitution a decade later: Ugly compromises reconsidered. Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs, 40(4), 5–24.
    Reyes, A. (2020). Spain vs. Catalonia: Normalizing democracy through police intervention. Social Semiotics, 30(4), 485–502.
    Riedl, R. B. (2018). Authoritarian Successor Parties in Sub-Saharan Africa: Into the Wilderness and Back Again? In J. Loxton & S. Mainwaring (Eds.), Life after Dictatorship: Authoritarian Successor Parties Worldwide (pp. 175–205). Cambridge University Press.
    Rigger, S. (1999). Politics in Taiwan: Voting for Democracy. Routledge.
    Rigger, S. (2021). Kuomintang agonistes: Party politics in the wake of Taiwan’s 2016 and 2020 elections. In J. T. Dreyer & J. deLisle (Eds.), Taiwan in the Era of Tsai Ing-wen: Changes and Challenges. Routledge.
    Rivera, T. C. (2002). Transition Pathways and Democratic Consolidation in Post-Marcos Philippines. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 24(3), 466–483.
    Robinson, O. C. (2014). Sampling in Interview-Based Qualitative Research: A Theoretical and Practical Guide. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 11(1), 25–41.
    Rocha, L., & Shad, N. (2023, December 7). Alberto Fujimori: Peru’s ex-president freed after 15 years in jail. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-67645016
    Roel Alva, L., & Díaz Giunta, R. (2022). La justicia transicional en el Perú: Avances y desafíos a 20 años de la Comisión de la Verdad y Reconciliación [Transitional justice in Peru: Progress and challenges 20 years after the Truth and Reconciliation Commission]. Anuario de Derecho Constitucional Latinoamericano, 517–542.
    Roht-Arriaza, N. (2019). Measures of Non-Repetition in Transitional Justice: The Missing Link? In P. Gready & S. Robins (Eds.), From Transitional to Transformative Justice. Cambridge University Press.
    Rosenn, K. S. (1990). Brazil’s New Constitution: An Exercise in Transient Constitutionalism for a Transitional Society. American Journal of Comparative Law, 38(4), 773–802.
    Ross, A. (2006). The Creation and Conduct of the Guatemalan Commission for Historical Clarification. Geoforum, 37(1), 69–81.
    Rothenberg, D. (2012). Afterword “No Room for Despair”: The Impact of the Guatemalan Truth Commission. In D. Rothenberg (Ed.), Memory of Silence: The Guatemalan Truth Commission Report. Palgrave Macmillan US.
    Rowen, I. (2019). The “Gaps” and Excesses of Transitional Justice in Taiwan—A Response to Caldwell. Washington International Law Journal, 28(3), 645–652.
    Rybář, M., & Deegan-Krause, K. (2008). Slovakia’s Communist successor parties in comparative perspective. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 41(4), 497–519.
    Sabino, C. (2007). Elecciones presidenciales en Guatemala (América Latina). Real Instituto Elcano.
    Salmenkari, T. (2017). Building Taiwanese history and memory from below: The role of social movements. Memory Studies, 1–15.
    Samatas, M. (2008). From Thought-Control to the Traffic-Control: CCTV Politics of Expansion and Resistance in Post-Olympics Greece. In M. Deflem (Ed.), Surveillance and Governance: Crime Control and Beyond (pp. 345–370). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
    Sanchez-Sibony, O. (2022). Democracy without Parties in Peru: The Politics of Uncertainty and Decay. Palgrave Macmillan.
    Sang-Hun, C., & Robles, P. (2025, March 10). How South Korea’s President Planned a Military Takeover, Then Blew It. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2025/03/10/world/asia/south-korea-martial-law-president-yoon.html
    Santander Joo, C. U., Domínguez Avila, C. F., & Ortega Breña, M. (2019). The Fall of the Alberto Fujimori Government. Latin American Perspectives, 46(5), 13–24.
    Santiváñez Vivanco, M. (2016). El Retorno del Fujimorismo [The Return of Fujimorismo]. Nueva Revista, 157, 116–123.
    Schafferer, C. (2004). The 2004 Presidential Election in Taiwan. Online Journal of the Austrian Association of East Asian Studies, 3(1).
    Schafferer, C. (2010). Consolidation of democracy and historical legacies: A case study of Taiwan. Journal of Contemporary Eastern Asia, 9(1), 23–41.
    Scharf, M. P. (2002). The Legacy of the Milosevic Trial. New England Law Review, 37(4), 915–934.
    Schleiter, P., & Tavits, M. (2018). Voter Reactions to Incumbent Opportunism. The Journal of Politics, 80(4), 1183–1196.
    Schubert, G. (2012). No Winds of Change: Taiwan’s 2012 National Elections and the Post-Election Fallout. Journal of Current Chinese Affairs, 41(3), 143–161.
    Seawright, J., & Gerring, J. (2008). Case selection techniques in case study research: A menu of qualitative and quantitative options. Political Research Quarterly, 61(2), 294–308.
    Sentencian en Perú a militares de un escuadrón de la muerte por dos matanzas de hace 32 años [Peru sentences soldiers from a death squad for two massacres 32 years ago]. (2024, November 30). SWI swissinfo.ch. https://www.swissinfo.ch/spa/sentencian-en-perú-a-militares-de-un-escuadrón-de-la-muerte-por-dos-matanzas-de-hace-32-años/88403168
    Serrano, M. (2012). Transitional Justice and Democratic Consolidation. In V. Popovski & M. Serrano (Eds.), After Oppression: Transitional Justice in Latin America and Eastern Europe (pp. 463–484). United Nations University Press.
    Seton-Watson, H. (1977). Nations and States: An Enquiry into the Origins of Nations and the Politics of Nationalism. Methuen & Co. Ltd.
    Share, D. (1987). Transitions to Democracy and Transition Through Transaction. Comparative Political Studies, 19(4), 525–548.
    Shattuck, T. J. (2019). Transitional Justice in Taiwan: A Belated Reckoning With The White Terror. Foreign Policy Research Institute.
    Sheahan, J. (2006). Redirection of Peruvian Economic Strategy in the 1990s: Gains, Losses, and Clues for the Future. In J. F. Carrión (Ed.), The Fujimori legacy: The rise of electoral authoritarianism in Peru (pp. 178–200). Pennsylvania State University Press.
    Sikkink, K., & Walling, C. B. (2007). The impact of human rights trials in Latin America. Journal of Peace Research, 44(4), 427–445.
    Slater, D., & Wong, J. (2013). The Strength to Concede: Ruling Parties and Democratization in Developmental Asia. Perspectives on Politics, 11(3), 717–733.
    Slater, D., & Wong, J. (2018). Game for Democracy: Authoritarian Successor Parties in Developmental Asia. In J. Loxton & S. Mainwaring (Eds.), Life after Dictatorship: Authoritarian Successor Parties Worldwide (pp. 284–313). Cambridge University Press.
    Snyder, J., & Vinjamuri, L. (2003). Trials and Errors: Principle and Pragmatism in Strategies of International. International Security, 28(3), 5–44.
    Solar, C. (2022). Trust in the military in post-authoritarian societies. Current Sociology, 70(3), 317–337.
    Sondrol, P. C. (1990). Intellectuals, Political Culture and the Roots of the Authoritarian Presidency in Latin America. Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration, 3(4), 416–437.
    Sørensen, G. (2010). Democracy and Democratization. In K. T. Leicht & J. C. Jenkins (Eds.), Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research (pp. 441–459). Springer.
    Sriram, C. L., & García-Godos, J. (2013). Conclusions and considerations for practitioners. In C. L. Sriram, J. García-Godos, J. Herman, & O. Martin-Ortega (Eds.), Transitional Justice and Peacebuilding on the Ground: Victims and Ex-Combatants. Routledge.
    Stan, L. (2013). Conclusion: Memory, Timing, and Democracy. In Transitional Justice in Post-Communist Romania (pp. 233–254). Cambridge University Press.
    Stojiljković, Z. (2011). Serbia in the Party Labyrinth. Serbian Political Thought, 1, 87–110.
    Stokes, S. C. (1997). Democratic Accountability and Policy Change: Economic Policy in Fujimori’s Peru. Comparative Politics, 29(2), 209–226.
    Stolojan, V. (2017). Transitional Justice and Collective Memory in Taiwan: How Taiwanese Society is Coming to Terms with Its Authoritarian Past. China Perspectives, 2, 27–35.
    Stradiotto, G. A., & Guo, S. (2010). Transitional Modes of Democratization and Democratic Outcomes. International Journal on World Peace, 27(4), 5–40.
    Sugano, A. (2022). The Rehabilitation Movement over the 2.28 Incident under KMT Rule (1987-1997): Reexamining the transition from “confrontation” to “reconciliation.” Journal of Contemporary East Asia Studies, 11(1), 162–181.
    Sullivan, J. (2016). Taiwan’s 2016 Presidential and Legislative Elections. Journal of the British Association for Chinese Studies, 6, 81–112.
    Sullivan, J. H., Warkentin, M., & Wallace, L. (2021). So many ways for assessing outliers: What really works and does it matter? Journal of Business Research, 132, 530–543.
    Szczerbiak, A. (2002). Dealing with the Communist Past or the Politics of the Present? Lustration in Post-Communist Poland. Europe - Asia Studies, 54(4), 553–572.
    Szczerbiak, A. (2015). Explaining Late Lustration Programs: Lessons from the Polish Case. In L. Stan & N. Nedelsky (Eds.), Post-Communist Transitional Justice: Lessons from Twenty-Five Years of Experience. Cambridge University Press.
    Taiwan’s Kuomintang party is broke and adrift. (2016, December 17). The Economist. https://www.economist.com/asia/2016/12/15/taiwans-kuomintang-party-is-broke-and-adrift
    Talamayan, F., & Candelaria, J. L. (2025). Populist desires, nostalgic narratives: The Marcos golden age myth and manipulation of collective memories on YouTube. Asian Journal of Political Science, 33(1), 55–73.
    Tan, A. C., & Yu, T. (2000). The December 1998 elections in Taiwan. Electoral Studies, 19(4), 615–646.
    Taylor, L. (2005). From Fujimori to Toledo: The 2001 Elections and the Vicissitudes of Democratic Government in Peru. Government and Opposition, 40(4), 565–596.
    Teehankee, J. C. (2022). The Legacy of the Kilusang Bagong Lipunan: Authoritarian Contamination in Philippine Party Politics (Working Paper Series No. 2022-01). La Salle Institute of Governance.
    Teitel, R. G. (2000). Transitional Justice. Oxford University Press.
    Templeman, K. (2018, September). Authoritarian Legacies, Party System Institutionalization, and the Taiwanese Democratic Miracle. World Congress of Taiwan Studies.
    Templeman, K. (2019). Taiwan’s January 2020 Elections: Prospects for China and the United States. Foreign Policy at Brookings.
    Templeman, K., Diamon, L., & Chu, Y. (2016). Taiwan’s Democracy Under Chen Shui-bian. In Y. Chu, L. Diamond, & K. Templeman (Eds.), Taiwan’s democracy challenged: The Chen Shui-bian years. Lynn Rienner Publishers.
    The Act Governing the Settlement of Ill-Gotten Properties by Political Parties and Their Affiliate Organizations, Legislative Yuan (2016). https://law.moj.gov.tw/ENG/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=A0030286
    The February 28 Incident Disposition and Compensation Act, Legislative Yuan (1995). https://law.moj.gov.tw/ENG/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=I0020013
    The International Foundation for Electoral Systems: IFES. (n.d.).
    Thelen, K. (1999). Historical institutionalism in Comparative Politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 2, 369–404.
    Thomson, J. (2023, June 22). Taiwanese rate authoritarian leader Chiang Ching-kuo best president. Taiwan News. https://www.taiwannews.com.tw/news/4925765
    Thorne, A. E. (2023, September 21). What Caused Peru’s Economic Downfall? Americas Quarterly.
    Touze, D. L., Silove, D., & Zwi, A. (2005). Can there be healing without justice? Lessons from the Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation in East Timor. Intervention, 3(3), 192–202.
    Tsai, C., & Chao, S.-C. (2008). Nonpartisans and Party System of Taiwan: Evidence from 1996, 2000 and 2004 Presidential Elections. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 43(6), 615–641.
    Tsai I. (2015, August 17). Zheng tong ren he, qixiang wanqian: Cai ti zhiguo wu da gaige [Good governance and social harmony, vibrant and full of change: Tsai proposes five major national reforms] [Speech]. https://www.ly.gov.tw/Pages/Detail.aspx?nodeid=12339&pid=157378
    Tsai, I., & Ngagen, C. (2016, January 8). President Tsai apologizes to indigenous peoples on behalf of government [Speech]. https://english.president.gov.tw/NEWS/4950
    Tsai, P.-L. (1999). Explaining Taiwan’s Economic Miracle: Are the Revisionists Right? Agenda: A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform, 6(1).
    Tucker, J. A. (2006). Regional Economic Voting: Russia, Poland, Hungary, Slovakia and the Czech Republic, 1990–1999. Cambridge University Press.
    Tuesta Soldevilla, F. (Director). (2000, December). TUESTA 2001 ONPE Primera presentación como jefe de ONPE [Tuesta 2001 ONPE first presentation as head of ONPE] [Video recording]. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lbozWgqSTKI
    Ulfe, M. E., & Ilizarbe, C. (2019). El indulto como acontecimiento y el asalto al lenguaje de la memoria en Perú [The pardon as an event and the assault on the language of memory in Peru]. Colombia Internacional, 97, 117–143.
    United Nations. (n.d.). Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Statistics Division. https://unstats.un.org/UNSDWebsite/
    United Nations. (2006). Rule-of-Law Tools for Post-Conflict States. Vetting: An Operational Framework. Office of The United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights.
    Uvsh, D. (2023). Party Politics, Unexpected Democratization, and Hopeful Consolidation in Mongolia. In J. C. Teehankee & C. Echle (Eds.), Rethinking Parties in Democratizing Asia (pp. 78–101). Routledge.
    Valincinan, S. (2016). Taiwan shehui miandui yuanzhuminzu de zhuanxing zhengyi zhi kongju fenxi [The Fear of Taiwan Society in the Process of Indigenous Transitional Justice]. Taiwan Yuanzhuminzu Yanjiu Xuebao [Journal of the Taiwan Indigenous Studies Association], 6(4), 171–178.
    VanDusky-Allen, J., & Heller, W. B. (2014). Bicameralism and the Logic of Party Organization. Comparative Political Studies, 47(5), 715–742.
    Vasilopoulos, P., Marcus, G. E., Valentino, N. A., & Foucault, M. (2018). Fear, Anger, and Voting for the Far Right: Evidence From the November 13, 2015 Paris Terror Attacks. Political Psychology.
    Vásquez Benavente, L. (2024, January 31). Vladimiro Montesinos recibe condena de 19 años de cárcel por masacres en casos Pativilca y La Cantuta [Vladimiro Montesinos receives 19-year prison sentence for massacres in the Pativilca and La Cantuta cases]. Infobae. https://www.infobae.com/peru/2024/01/31/vladimiro-montesinos-recibe-condena-de-19-anos-de-carcel-por-masacre-en-casos-pativilca-y-la-cantuta/
    Vehovar, V., Toepoel, V., & Steinmetz, S. (2016). Non-probability Sampling. In C. Wolf, D. Joye, T. W. Smith, & Y. Fu (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Survey Methodology. SAGE.
    Velásquez Villalba, F. (2023). Breaking history, building memory: The Peruvian bicentennial generation and the democratisation of democracy. Interface, 14(1), 46–80.
    Verdoy, A. (2011). Elecciones en el Perú (2011): Entre el continuismo y la construcción de una sola nación [Elections in Peru (2011): Between Continuity and the Construction of a Single Nation]. Razón Y Fe, 263(1352–1351), 333–338.
    Vergara, A. (2014). The Fujimori Regime through Tocqueville’s Lens: Centralism, Regime Change, and Peripheral Elites in Contemporary Peru. In P. Drinot (Ed.), Peru in Theory (pp. 19–48). Palgrave Macmillan.
    Vignolo Pérez, C. A. (2018). El colectivo No a Keiko, alcances y límites de las nuevas formas de protesta gestadas en las redes sociales [The No a Keiko collective: Scope and limits of new forms of protest born on social media]. Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú.
    Villa-Vicencio, C. (2000). Why Perpetrators Should Not Always Be Prosecuted: Where the International Criminal Court and Truth Commissions Meet. Emory Law Journal, 49(1), 205–222.
    Vinjamuri, L., & Snyder, J. (2015). Law and Politics in Transitional Justice. Annual Review of Political Science, 18, 303–327.
    Vuković, I. (2015). Political Dynamics of the Post-Communist Montenegro: One-Party Show. Democratization, 22(1), 73–91.
    Wachman, A. M. (1994). Taiwan: National Identity and Democratization. Taylor & Francis.
    Walker, M. U. (2014). Troubles with Truth Commissions: Putting the Moral Aims of Truth Commissions to the Fore. In S. E. Bird & F. M. Ottanelli (Eds.), The Performance of Memory as Transitional Justice. Intersentia.
    Walker, M. U. (2015). Troubles with Truth Commissions: Putting the Moral Aims of Truth Commissions to the Fore. In S. E. Bird & F. M. Ottanelli (Eds.), The Performance of Memory as Transitional Justice (pp. 7–21). Intersentia.
    Wang, F. (2018). Studies on Taiwan’s Ethnic Relations. International Journal of Taiwan Studies, 1(1), 64–89.
    Wang, F., Chang, R., & Shih, H. (2007, February 6). CKS statues’ removal nears completion. Taipei Times. https://www.taipeitimes.com/News/front/archives/2007/02/06/2003347859
    Wang, F., & Loa, I. (2007, December 6). Isolated clashes as hour nears for plaque removal. Taipei Times. https://www.taipeitimes.com/News/front/archives/2007/12/06/2003391294
    Wang, H. (2024). Women neng hejie gongsheng ma? Fansi Taiwan de zhuanxing zhengyi yu jiti jiyi [Can we reconcile and coexist? Reflections on transitional justice and collective memory in Taiwan]. In C.-S. Hsu (Ed.), Lishi jiyi de lunli: Cong zhuanxing zhengyi dao chaoke guoqu [The Ethics of Historical Memory: From Transitional Justice to Overcoming the Past]. Guoli Taiwan Daxue Chuban Zhongxin [National Taiwan University Press].
    Wang, T., & Chou, I.-H. S. (2010). The Emergence of Modern Constitutional Culture in Taiwan. National Taiwan University Law Review, 5(1), 1–38.
    Wang, V. W., & Ku, S. C. (2005). Transitional Justice and Prospect of Democratic Consolidation in Taiwan: Democracy and Justice in Newly Democratized Countries. Guojia Fazhan Yanjiu Qikan [Journal of National Development Studies], 4(2).
    Wang Y. (2023, March 17). Zhongzheng Jiniantang shi fou gaiming Chen Jianren: Zhuan’an xiaozu pinggu yanyi [Will Chiang Kai-shek Memorial Hall be renamed? Chen Chien-jen: A task force will assess and deliberate]. Zhongyang She [Central News Agency]. https://www.cna.com.tw/news/aipl/202303170118.aspx
    Welsh, H. A. (1996). Dealing with the Communist past: Central and East European Experiences after 1990. Europe-Asia Studies, 48(3), 413–428.
    Wiebelhaus-Brahm, E. (2007a). Transitional Justice, Civil Society, and the Development of the Rule of Law in Post-Conflict Societies. International Journal of Not-for-Profit Law.
    Wiebelhaus-Brahm, E. (2007b). Uncovering the Truth: Examining Truth Commission Success and Impact. International Studies Perspectives, 8(1), 16–35.
    Williams, K., Fowler, B., & Szczerbiak, A. (2005). Explaining lustration in Central Europe: A “post-communist politics” approach. Democratization, 12(1), 22–43.
    Wise, C. (2003). Reinventing the State: Economic Strategy and Institutional Change in Peru. The University of Michigan Press.
    Wise, C. (2006). Against the Odds: The Paradoxes of Peru’s Economic Recovery in the 1990s. In J. F. Carrión (Ed.), The Fujimori legacy: The rise of electoral authoritarianism in Peru (pp. 201–226). Pennsylvania State University Press.
    World Bank Open Data. (n.d.). https://data.worldbank.org
    Wright, T. (1999). Student Mobilization in Taiwan: Civil Society and Its Discontents. Asian Survey, 39(6), 986–1008.
    Wu, C. (2012). Charge Me if You Can: Assessing Political Biases in Vote-buying Verdicts in Democratic Taiwan (2000–2010). The China Quarterly, 211, 786–805.
    Wu, N. (2000). Ren de jingshen linian zai lishi biange zhong de zuoyong: Meilidao shijian he Taiwan minzhuhua [The Role of Moral Value in Political Change: Explaining Democratic Transition in Taiwan]. Taiwan Zhengzhi Xuekan [The Taiwanese Political Science Review], 4, 57–103.
    Wu, N. (2005). Transition without Justice, or Justice without History: Transitional Justice in Taiwan. Taiwan Journal of Democracy, 1(1), 1–24.
    Wu, N. (2006). Zhuanxing zhengyi he lishi jiyi: Taiwan minzhuhua de weijing zhi ye [Transitional justice and historical memory: The unfinished business of Taiwan’s democratization]. Sixiang [Reflexion], 2, 1–34.
    Wu, N. (2008). Shuxie “minzu” chuangshang: Ererba shijian de lishi jiyi [Writing “national” trauma: The historical memory of the February 28th Incident]. Sixiang [Reflexion], 8, 39–70.
    Wu, Y.-S. (2011). The Evolution of the KMT’s Stance on the One China Principle: National Identity in Flux. In G. Schubert & J. Damm (Eds.), Taiwanese Identity in the 21st Century: Domestic, Regional and Global Perspectives.
    Xidias, J. (2021). From Franco to Vox: Historical Memory and the Far Right in Spain. CARR Research Insight.
    Xu, D. (1997). The KMT Party’s Enterprises in Taiwan. Modern Asian Studies, 31(2), 399–413.
    Yadav, V. (2023). Authoritarian Institutions and Democratic Lessons. Political Research Quarterly, 76(2), 784–800.
    Yan, C. I. N. (2020). The 2020 Taiwan Presidential Elections: Was Hong Kong the Biggest Factor? New Zealand Journal of Asian Studies, 22(1), 1–18.
    Yan, H. T. (2022). The Road to Durable Democracy: Dominant Party Regimes, Party Politics and Democratic Survival. Democratization, 29(8), 1496–1517.
    Yang, D. M.-H., & Chang, M.-K. (2010). Understanding the Nuances of Waishengren: History and Agency. China Perspectives, 2010(3).
    Yoshida, K. (2009). Taiwan’s long road to democracy: Bitter taste of freedom. Edward Elgar Publishing.
    Yoshiyuki, O. (2024). Analysis of the 2024 Taiwan Presidential Election. Asia-Pacific Review, 31(1), 123–143.
    Yu, C. (2017). Parties, Partisans, and Independents in Taiwan. In C. H. Achen & T. Y. Wang (Eds.), The Taiwan Voter. University of Michigan Press.
    Yu, C. (2021). Taiwan in 2020. Asian Survey, 61(1), 83–89.
    Zalaquett, J. (1990). Confronting Human Rights Violations Committed by Former Governments: Applicable Principles and Political Constraints. Hamline Law Review, 13.
    Zartman, I. W. (2019). Analyzing Intractability. In I William Zartman: A Pioneer in Conflict Management and Area Studies. Essays on Contention and Governance (pp. 225–238). Springer Nature Switzerland.
    Zaverucha, J. (1993). The Degree of Military Political Autonomy During the Spanish, Argentine and Brazilian Transitions. Journal of Latin American Studies, 25(2), 283–299.
    Zaverucha, J. (1998). The 1988 Brazilian Constitution and its authoritarian legacy: Formalizing democracy while gutting its essence. Journal of Third World Studies, 15(1), 105–124.
    Zaverucha, J. (2000). Fragile democracy and the militarization of public safety in Brazil. Latin American Perspectives, 27(3), 8–31.
    Zhonghua Minguo Tongji Zixun Wang [National Statistics of the Republic of China]. (n.d.). https://www.stat.gov.tw/
    Zongtong ti fanzhi Zhongguo tongzhan celue Guomindang: Jiejie fangong xing lüse kongbu [President Proposes Countermeasures Against China’s United Front Strategy; KMT Accuses DPP of Using Anti-Communism as a Pretext for Green Terror]. (2025, March 15). Focus Taiwan. https://www.cna.com.tw/news/aipl/202503150131.aspx
    Description: 博士
    國立政治大學
    亞太研究英語博士學位學程(IDAS)
    107265509
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0107265509
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[亞太研究英語博/碩士學位學程(IDAS/IMAS)] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    550901.pdf3519KbAdobe PDF0View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback