Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/159171
|
| Title: | 漢娜．鄂蘭的政治思想與當代人權概念
Hannah Arendt’s Political Philosophy and The Contemporary Concept of Human Rights |
| Authors: | 何育睿
Ho, Yu Jui |
| Contributors: | 葉浩
Yeh, Hao
何育睿
Ho, Yu Jui |
| Keywords: | 漢娜．鄂蘭
人權
擁有權利的權利
共同世界
愛世界
社會契約論
自由觀
Hannah Arendt
Human rights
A right to have rights
Common world
Amor mundi
Social contract
Freedom |
| Date: | 2025 |
| Issue Date: | 2025-09-01 15:28:37 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 本文旨在探討漢娜．鄂蘭的政治思想對於當代人權概念的啟發。透過對於當代人權概念幾個主要理論困境的分析，本文發現當代人權概念深植於社會契約論的傳統之中，並主張契約論預設的「個人主義式自由觀」以及「主權政治架構」—也就是鄂蘭所謂「垂直社會契約」架構，是導致當代人權概念無法實現其自身期待的根本原因。本文以鄂蘭「政治本體論」的視角重新詮釋「擁有權利的權利」概念，認為唯有透過恢復「共同世界」作為人言說與行動的重要場所、重拾人作為「政治行動者」的能動性，人權概念賴以建立的「本體論基礎」才有被重建的可能性。據此，本文主張以「愛世界（amor mundi）」作為觀看並與世界互動的根本態度，才是確保當代人權概念得以實踐其自身的重要基礎。
This thesis investigates the theoretical dilemmas surrounding the contemporary concept of human rights and seeks to reconstruct a so-called “ontological foundation” through Hannah Arendt’s notion of “the right to have rights.” It argues that modern human rights discourse is deeply shaped by the tradition of social contract theory, which presupposes an individualistic conception of freedom and a sovereign-centric political framework. These presuppositions result in a conceptual deadlock between what human right claims itself could achieve and what it actually achieves. The thesis contends that Arendt’s idea of “the right to have rights” is not merely a political appeal for stateless individuals but an ontological proposition that underscores the necessity of a “common world” wherein human dignity and freedom are manifested through action and speech. Through revisiting Arendt’s political ontology, this study demonstrates that human rights are only practicable when the conditions for political agency and intersubjective worldliness are restored. Ultimately, the thesis asserts that beyond legal and institutional design, it is the way individuals relate to the world and others—an attitude of “amor mundi”—that enables the meaningful realization of human rights today. |
| Reference: | 西文參考資料：
Arendt, H. (1961). Between past and future : six exercises in political thought. New York: Viking Press.
Arendt, H. (1972). Crises of the Republic. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Arendt, H. (1973). The Origin of Totalitarianism. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.
Arendt, H. (1981). The Life of the Mind, One Volume Edition. New York: Mariner Books.
Arendt, H. (1990). Philosophy and Politics. Social Research, 57(1), pp. 73-103.
Arendt, H. (1994). Essays in understanding, 1930-1954 : formation, exile, and totalitarianism. New York: Schocken Books.
Arendt, H. (1998). The Human Condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Benhabib, S. (2004). “The right to have rights”: Hannah Arendt on the contradictions of the nation-state. In S. Benhabib, The Rights of Others Aliens, Residents, and Citizens (pp. 49-70). Connecticut: Cambridge University Press.
Berkowitz, R. (2011). Hannah Arendt on human rights. In T. Cushman, Handbook of Human Rights (pp. 59-67). New York: Routledge.
Biggar, N. (2020). What's wrong with rights? Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Birmingham, P. (2006). Hannah Arendt and Human Rights: The Predicament of Common Responsibility. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
Blitz, B. K. (2017). The state and the stateless: The legacy of Hannah Arendt reconsidered. In T. Bloom, K. Tonkiss, & P. Cole, Understanding Statelessness (pp. 70-84). London: Routledge.
Chiba, S. (1995, Summer). Hannah Arendt on Love and the Political: Love, Friendship, and Citizenship. The Review of Politics, pp. 505-535.
Cotter, B. (2005). Hannah Arendt and “the Right to Have Rights”. In A. F. Lang, & J. Williams, Hannah Arendt and International Relations (pp. 95-112). New York: Palgrave Macmillan New York.
DeGooyer, S., Hunt, A., Maxwell, L., Moyn, S., & Taylor, A. (2018). The Right to Have Rights. New York: Verso.
Ferguson, L. (2022). From Love to Care: Arendt’s Amor Mundi in the Ethical Turn. Political Theory, 50(6), pp. 939-963.
Gündoğdu, A. (2014). Statelessness and the right to have rights. In P. Hayden, Hannah Arendt Key Concepts. New York: Routledge.
Gündoğdu, A. (2015). Rightlessness in an Age of Rights: Hannah Arendt and the Contemporary Struggles of Migrants. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Griffin, J. (2008). On Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Heuser, S. (2008, July 5). Is There a Right to Have Rights? The Case of the Right of Asylum. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 11, pp. 3-13.
Hirsch, A. L., & Nathan , B. (2017, September 10). The Right to Have Rights as a Right to Enter: Addressing a Lacuna in the International Refugee Protection Regime. Human Rights Review, 18, pp. 417-437.
Hiruta, K. (2019). Hannah Arendt, Liberalism, and Freedom from Politics. In K. Hiruta, Arendt on Freedom, Liberation, and Revolution (pp. 17-45). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Kiess, J. (2016). Hannah Arendt and Theology. New York: Bloomsbury T&T Clark.
Mrovlje, M. (2014). Narrating and understanding. In P. Hayden, Hannah Arendt Key Concepts (pp. 66-84). London: Routledge.
Mullhall, S., & Swift, A. (1996). Liberals and Communitarians. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell;.
Nickel, J. W. (2012, 7). Reviewed Work: On Human Rights by James Griffin. The Philosophical Review, pp. 461-464.
Parekh, S. (2004). A meaningful place in the world: Hannah Arendt on the nature of human rights. Journal of Human Rights, 3(1), pp. 41-52.
Parekh, S. (2008). Hannah Arendt and the challenge of modernity : a phenomenology of human rights. New York: Routledge.
Peeters, R. (2009, September). Truth, Meaning and the Common World: The Significance and Meaning of Common Sense in Hannah Arendt’s Thought. Ethical Perspectives, 16(3), pp. 337-359.
Roessler, J. (2022, November 3). The Concept of World Alienation in Hannah Arendt. Arendt Study, 7, pp. 139-163.
Smith, W., & Zhang , S. (2019). Resisting Injustice: Arendt on Civil Disobedience and the Social Contract. In K. Hiruta, Arendt on Freedom, Liberation, and Revolution (pp. 115–138). London: Palgrave MacMillan.
Taraborrelli, A. (2024). Hannah Arendt and Cosmopolitanism. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
Tasioulas, J. (2007). The Moral Reality of Human Rights. In T. Pogg, Freedom from Poverty as a Human Right: Who Owes What to the Very Poor? (pp. 75-101). New York: Oxford University Press.
VOLLRATH, E., & Fantel, H. (1977, Spring). Hannah Arendt and the Method of Political Thinking. Social Research, pp. 106-182.
中文參考資料：
鄂蘭漢娜. (2021). 過去與未來之間：政治思考的八場習練. 台北市: 商周出版.
鄂蘭漢娜. (2022). 極權主義的起源. 台北市: 商周出版.
葛里芬詹姆士. (2015). 論人權. 南京市: 譯林出版社. |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
政治學系
110252018 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0110252018 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [政治學系] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Description |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 201801.pdf | | 1844Kb | Adobe PDF | 0 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
