English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 118204/149236 (79%)
Visitors : 74351237      Online Users : 10117
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/159224


    Title: 台灣人工生殖機構網站凍卵文本分析
    A Textual Analysis of Egg Freezing Discourses on Taiwanese Assisted Reproductive Clinic Websites
    Authors: 王韻涵
    Wang, Yun-Han
    Contributors: 康庭瑜
    王韻涵
    Wang, Yun-Han
    Keywords: 凍卵
    社會性選擇凍卵
    適齡生育
    Egg freezing
    Social then elective egg freezing
    Appropriate reproductive age
    Date: 2025
    Issue Date: 2025-09-01 16:00:13 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究試圖探究女性如何「意識到」凍卵需求,採質性研究法,將人工生殖機構官方網站刊載之凍卵資訊視為文本,以「凍卵主題呈現」、「凍卵情境敘事」、「凍卵需求女性設定」進行分析。研究結果發現,人工生殖機構產製「意識到」凍卵的文本傳播,是循序漸進的資訊疊加,以具有醫療背景的平台,輸出專家宰制的訊息,潛移默化地向受眾植入自身生理與凍卵的關係連結。

    本研究提出「適齡」的時間急迫性是框架女性的社會性「自我審查」,以女性生理機能性的自然汰弱,製造未來可能會發生的問題臆測,透過產生女體焦慮的方式激發受眾主動解決問題的需求性,也就是說,被製造的問題本質取向是負面的,如此能解決問題的辦法就會是正向的,然而,社會性「自我審查」被以消費賦權的「選擇權」掩蓋,包裹成掌握生育自主的女性「自我覺察」,造就出社會一面傾倒式的凍卵正面向傳播,因此,本研究認為凍卵正面向傳播應當祛魅化的是:「適齡」性別敘事的傾斜,以及凍卵實踐生育自主性的「選擇權」主張。
    This study explores how women come to “realized” the need for egg freezing. Using a qualitative approach, it examines egg-freezing information published on the official websites of assisted reproduction institutions as textual data. The analysis focuses on three dimensions: the thematic framing of egg freezing, the narrative construction of egg-freezing scenarios, and the imagined profiles of women in need of the procedure. The findings suggest that these institutions employ a gradual accumulation of information to cultivate awareness, using medically authoritative platforms to disseminate expert-driven messages that subtly forge links between female physiology and the perceived necessity of egg freezing.

    The study contends that the “appropriate age” narrative operates as a form of social self-surveillance, prompting women to internalise reproductive timelines. By speculating on future risks stemming from the natural decline of female fertility, these discourses generate bodily anxiety that activates a desire for proactive problem-solving. In this framing, the constructed problem is inherently negative, thus positioning egg freezing as a rational, positive solution. Yet this form of surveillance is veiled in the language of consumer empowerment and framed as a matter of individual “choice,” rebranding social pressure as reproductive “self-awareness.” Consequently, public discourse around egg freezing becomes overwhelmingly affirmative. This study, therefore, calls for a demystification of two central narratives: the gendered bias of the “appropriate age” framework, and the framing of egg freezing as an expression of autonomous reproductive agency.
    Reference: 中文部分

    王秀雲、盧孳艷、吳嘉苓(2014)。〈性別與健康〉,陳瑤華主編《台灣婦女處境白皮書:2014》,頁242-250。台北市:女書文化。
    王宏仁譯(2020)。《消費社會學》。新台市:群學出版。(原書Corrigan, P [2010]. The Sociology of Consumption.)
    成令方、吳嘉苓(2005)。〈科技的性別政治理論和研究的回顧〉。《科技醫療與社會》。3:51-112。
    吳嘉苓(2000)。〈生殖自主篇〉,婦女新知編《一九九九女權報告》,頁93-102。台北市:財團法人婦女新知基金會。
    吳嘉苓(2002)。〈台灣的新生殖科技與性別政治,1950-2000〉。《台灣社會研究季刊》。45:1-67。
    李素楨(2004)。〈臺灣女性的生育自主權之問題與權利分析〉。《應用倫理研究通訊》。31:15-22。
    何思瑩(2014)。〈「非法」情境下的酷兒生殖——台灣女同志的人工生殖科技實作〉。《女學學誌:婦女與性別研究》。35:53-122。
    吳嘉苓、黃于玲、河政玉、陳韋宏、黃昱翔(2020)。〈公平近用、預防風險或增長人口?—助孕科技公費補助的日韓台比較〉。《臺灣民主季刊》。17(4):49-104。
    邱文聰(2007)。〈從「人工生殖法」的適用主體談生育自由的雙面性格〉。《法令月刊》。58(8):146-153。
    邱玟惠(2009)。〈人工生殖子女親子法制之檢討與修法建議〉。《臺大法學論叢》。38(8):271-348。
    柯惠娟、陳淑芬(2005)。〈接受不孕症治療合併卵巢過度刺激症候群病患照護經驗〉。《護理雜誌》。52(3):90-96。
    夏春祥(1997)。〈文本分析與傳播研究〉。《新聞學研究》。54:141-166。
    倪炎元(2013)。〈批判論述分析的定位爭議及其應用問題:以Norman Fairclough分析途徑為例的探討〉。《新聞學研究》。110:1-42。
    孫佳婷(2023)。〈當代生殖消費:以跨國大型商業精子銀行為考察對象〉。《台灣公共衛生雜誌》。42(1):17-29。
    張家榮(1999)。《台灣當代生殖科技的建構》。國立清華大學歷史研究所碩士論文。
    張文婷、譚璇璇(2021)。〈暫時性的生育延遲:適齡婚育青年對於女性凍卵的認識研究〉,《當代青年研究》,373(4):39-45。
    陳淑溫、余玉眉(2000)。〈接受人工生殖初次懷孕婦女於第一孕期之監測及維護行爲〉。《護理雜誌》。8(3):289-300。
    畢恆達(2004)。《空間就是性別》。台北市:心靈工作坊。
    陳婷玉(2010)。〈當媽媽眞好?流行婦幼雜誌的母職再現〉。《女學學誌》。26:33-86。
    陳其(2016)。《我國人工生殖法之受術主體限制對同性伴侶的影響: 性別議題、子女利益與實踐經驗》。清華大學科技法律研究所碩士論文。
    游美惠(2000)。〈內容分析、文本分析與論述分析在社會研究的運用〉。《調查研究——方法與應用》。8:5-42。
    彭月珠、周治蕙(2007)。〈停止人工協助生殖技術治療之不孕婦女的生活經驗〉。《實證護理》。3(4):319-327。
    傅大為(2005)。《亞細亞的新身體─性別、醫療與近代台灣》。新北市:群學出版。
    彭仁郁、王紹中譯(2019)。《臨床的誕生》。台北市:時報出版。(原書Foucault, M.
    [1963]. Naissance De La Clinique.)
    雷文玫(2013)。〈從臥房政治到公共政策:不孕與人工生殖技術治理的法規範變遷〉,王文基、李尚仁、林宜平、栗山茂久、祝平一、張哲嘉、張淑卿等17人編《東亞醫療史:殖民、性別與現代性》,頁261-275。台北市:聯經出版。
    虞希正、雷文玫、邱淑媞、鄧宗業(2021)。〈台灣人工生殖法立法前後五年生殖結果的比較〉。《台灣衛誌》。40(5):556-569。
    劉仲冬(1995)。〈國家政策之下的女性身體〉,劉毓秀主編《台灣婦女處境白皮書:1995》,頁221-254。台北市:時報文化。
    劉士永(2013)。〈日治時期臺灣公共衛生的發展與研究特徵〉,祝平一主編《健康與社會:華人衛生新史》,頁151-152。台北市:聯經出版。
    鍾玉珏譯(2022)。《父產科:孩子的健康不能只靠卵子,男性生殖醫學重磅登場》。台北市:時報出版。(原書Almeling, R. [2020]. Guynecology: the missing science of men's reproductive health.)
    蘇燦煮、鄧素文、楊雅玲(1994)。〈生殖科技治療受孕婦女孕期所執行之母性工作〉。《護理雜誌》。41(2):62-71。
    蘇燦煮、余玉眉、陳月枝(1998)。〈不孕婦女面對不孕及治療的困惑與護理需求〉。《護理雜誌》。45(3):15-20。
    蘇燦煮、楊雅玲、鄧素文(1997)。〈接受生殖科技治療婦女於確定受孕時之經驗感受與調適曆程〉。《護理雜誌》。5(2):104-114。
    蘇燦煮、陳月枝、楊友仕(2001)。〈接受人工生殖治療期間之身體症狀〉。《台灣醫學》。5(2):145-153。


    英文部分

    Bharadwaj, A. (2000). How some Indian baby makers are made: media narratives and assisted conception in India. Anthropology & Medicine, 7(1), 63-78.
    Baldwin, K., Culley, L., Hudson, N., Mitchell. H., Lavery, S. (2015). Oocyte cryopreservation for social reasons: demographic profile and disposal intentions of UK users. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 31(2), 239-245.
    Baldwin, K. (2017). ‘I suppose I think to myself, that's the best way to be a mother’: How ideologies of parenthood shape women's use of social egg freezing technology. Sociological Research Online, 22(2), 1-15.
    Barbey, C. (2017). Evidence of biased advertising in the case of social egg freezing. The new bioethics, 23(3), 195-209.
    Baldwin, K. (2018). Conceptualising women's motivations for social egg freezing and experience of reproductive delay. Sociology of Health & Illness, 40(5), 859-873.
    Baldwin, K. (2019). The biomedicalisation of reproductive ageing: reproductive citizenship and the gendering of fertility risk. Health, Risk & Society, 21(3), 1-16.
    Baldwin, K., Culley, L. (2020). Women's experience of social egg freezing: perceptions of success, risks, and 'going it alone'. Human Fertility, 23(3), 186-192.
    Bühler, N. (2021). When Reproduction meets Ageing: The Science and Medicine of the Fertility Decline.Bingley, UK:Emerald Group Publishing.
    Cockburn, C. (1981). The Material of Male Power. Feminist review, 9(1), 41-58.
    Corea, G. (1985). The Mother Machine: Reproductive Technologies from Artificial Insemination to Artificial Wombs. New York, NY: Harper Collins.
    Carroll, K., Kroløkke, C. (2018). Freezing for love: enacting 'responsible' reproductive citizenship through egg freezing. Culture, health & sexuality, 20(9), 992-1005.
    Campo-Engelstein, L., Aziz, R., Darivemula, S., Raffaele, J., Bhatia, R., Parker, W. M. (2018). Freezing fertility or freezing false hope? A content analysis of social egg freezing in US print media. AJOB Empirical Bioethics, 9(3), 181-193.
    Firestone, S. (1979). The dialectic of sex: the case for feminist revolution. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux. (2003).
    Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. New York, NY: Longman.
    Faircloth, C., Gürtin, B. Z. (2017). Fertile Connections: thinking across assisted reproductive technologies and parenting culture studies. Sociology, 52(5), 983-1000.
    Gürtin, B. Z., Morgan, L., O'Rourke, D., Wang, J., Ahuja, K. (2019). For whom the egg thaws: insights from an analysis of 10 years of frozen egg thaw data from two UK clinics, 2008–2017. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 36(6), 1069-1080.
    Gürtin, B. Z., Tiemann, E. (2021). The marketing of elective egg freezing: a content, cost and quality analysis of UK fertility clinic websites. Reproductive Biomedicine and Society Online, 12, 56-68.
    Harwood, K. (2009). Egg freezing: a breakthrough for reproductive autonomy? Bioethics, 23(1), 39-46.
    Hallgrimsdottir, H. K., Benner, B. E. (2014). ‘Knowledge is power’: risk and the moral responsibilities of the expectant mother at the turn of the twentieth century. Health, risk & society, 16(1), 7-21.
    Harper, J., Boivin, J., O'Neill, H. C., Brian, K., Dhingra, J., Dugdale, G., et al. (2017). The need to improve fertility awareness. Reproductive Biomedicine & Society Online, 4, 18-20.
    Kaltsas, A., Moustakli, E., Zikopoulos, A., Georgiou, I., Dimitriadis, F., Symeonidis, N. E., Markou, E., Michaelidis, M. T., Dung Mai Ba Tien., Giannakis, I., Ioannidou, M. E., Papatsoris, A., Tsounapi, P., Takenaka, A., Sofikitis, N., Zachariou, A. (2023). Impact of Advanced Paternal Age on Fertility and Risks of Genetic Disorders in Offspring. Genes, 14(2), 486.
    Martinelli, L., Busatta, L., Galvagni, L., Piciocchi, C. (2015). Social egg freezing: a reproductive chance or smoke and mirrors? Croatian Medical Journal, 56(4), 387-391.
    Mertes, H. (2015). Does company-sponsored egg freezing promote or confine women's reproductive autonomy? Journal of Assisted Reprodroduction and Genetics, 32(8), 1205-1209.
    Martin, L. J. (2010). Anticipating infertility: egg freezing, genetic preservation, and risk. Gender & Society, 24(4), 526-545.
    Murugesu, S., Kasavenb. L.S., Petriec, A., Vaseekarand, A., Jonesb, P. B., Bracewell-Milnese, T., Barcroftb, F. J., Grewalf, J. K., Getreug, N., Galazish, N., Sorbii, F., Sasoj, S., Jara Ben-Nagi. (2022). Does advanced paternal age affect outcomes following assisted reproductive technology? A systematic review and meta-analysis. RBMO 45(2), 283-331.
    O'Brien, M. (1983). The Politics of Reproduction. UK: Unwin Hyman.
    Oldenziel, R. (1999). Making Technology Masculine : Men, Women and Modern Machines in America, 1870-1945. Amsterdam, NL: Amsterdam University Press.
    Raymond, J. G. (1994). Women As Wombs: Reproductive Technology and the Battle over Women's Freedom. AU: Spinifex Press.
    Richards, S. E. (2013). Motherhood Rescheduled: The New Frontier of Egg Freezing and the Women Who Tried it. Durham, New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
    Takhar, J., Pemberton, K. (2019). Reproducing ‘rhetrickery’ in online fertility marketing: harnessing the rhetoric of the possible. Consumption, Markets and Culture, 22(4), 314-336.
    Takhar, J., Houston, H. R. (2021). Forty years of assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs): the evolution of a marketplace icon. Croatian Consumption Markets & Culture, 24(5), 468-478.
    Takhar, J. (2022). Communicative crises in the age of anxious reproduction and fertility preservation. Consumption Markets & Culture, 26(3), 201-216.
    van de Wiel, L. (2015). Frozen in anticipation: eggs for later. Women's Studies International Forum, 53, 119-128.
    Wang, B., Kesselheim, A. (2013). The role of direct to consumer advertising in patient consumerism. AMA Journal of Ethics, 15(11), 960-965.
    Waldby, C. (2015). 'Banking time': egg freezing and the negotiation of future fertility. Culture, Health &Sexuality, 17(4), 470-482.
    Waldby, C. (2019). The Oocyte Economy : The Changing Meaning of Human Eggs. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
    Yang, I. J., Wu, M. Y., Chao, K. H., Wei, S. Y., Tsai, Y. Y., Huang, T. C., Chen, M. J., Chen, S. U. (2022). Usage and cost-effectiveness of elective oocyte freezing: a retrospective observational study. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, 20(1), 1-123.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    傳播學院碩士在職專班
    110941016
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0110941016
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[傳播學院碩士在職專班] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    101601.pdf8974KbAdobe PDF0View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback