資料載入中.....
|
請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/159251
|
| 題名: | 區塊鏈技術在碳權交易機制中的應用研究
A Study on the Application of Blockchain Technology in Carbon Trading Mechanisms |
| 作者: | 陳定廉
Chen, Ting-Lien |
| 貢獻者: | 柯玉佳
Ke, Yu-Jia
陳定廉
Chen, Ting-Lien |
| 關鍵詞: | 區塊鏈
碳權交易
Blockchain
Carbon-trading |
| 日期: | 2025 |
| 上傳時間: | 2025-09-01 16:06:58 (UTC+8) |
| 摘要: | 本研究探討了區塊鏈技術在碳權交易中的應用，旨在分析區塊鏈技術如何通過降低交易成本、提高透明度和可信度來優化碳權交易流程。研究運用寇斯的交易成本經濟學理論，探討了區塊鏈技術在減少碳權交易中的搜索成本、談判成本、執行成本和監督成本等方面的作用。通過質性訪談，訪談了兩家在碳權交易領域具有代表性的公司，了解了它們對區塊鏈技術的態度、應用經驗和面臨的挑戰。研究發現，區塊鏈技術在碳權交易中具有顯著的優勢，如提高交易效率、增強市場透明度和可信度等，但同時也面臨技術成熟度不足、法律法規不完善、市場接受度低等挑戰。基於研究結果，本文提出了一系列建議，包括加強技術研發、完善法律法規、提高市場教育等，以促進區塊鏈技術在碳權交易中的應用和發展。
This study explores the application of block-chain technology in carbon trading, aiming to analyze how block-chain can optimize the carbon trading process by reducing transaction costs and enhancing transparency and credibility. Drawing on Coase theory of transaction cost economics, the research examines the role of block-chain technology in lowering search costs, negotiation costs, execution costs, and monitoring costs within carbon trading. Through qualitative interviews, two representative companies in the carbon trading sector were interviewed to understand their attitudes toward block-chain technology, their application experiences, and the challenges they face. The study finds that block-chain offers significant advantages in carbon trading, such as improving transaction efficiency and enhancing market transparency and credibility. However, it also faces challenges including immature technology, incomplete legal and regulatory frameworks, and low market acceptance. Based on the findings, this paper proposes a series of recommendations, including strengthening technological development, improving legal and regulatory systems, and enhancing market education to promote the application and development of block-chain technology in carbon trading. |
| 參考文獻: | BCG. (2023). The start of CBAM: A major landmark for global trade and carbon accounting. https://www.bcg.com/publications/2023/how-cbam-will-reshape-the-global-tradin g-system
Ben-Sasson, E., Chiesa, A., Garman, C., Green, M., Miers, I., Tromer, E., & Virza, M. (2014). Zerocash: Decentralized anonymous payments from Bitcoin. IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, 459–474.
Bitcoin. (2009). Bitcoin. https://bitcoin.org
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Buterin, V. (2014). Ethereum white paper. https://blockchainlab.com/pdf/Ethereum_white_paper-a_next_generation_smart_ contract_and_decentralized_application_platform-vitalik-buterin.pdf
Coase, R. H. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica, 4(16), 386–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0335.1937.tb00002.x
Conti, M., Kumar, S., Lal, C., & Ruj, S. (2018). A survey on security and privacy issues of blockchain technology. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 21(2), 1–28.
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4308385
Ellerman, A. D. (2010). Pricing carbon: The European Union Emissions Trading Scheme. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0032329210373072
European Commission. (2005). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and to the Council. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/34693/344802/Commission-recommenda tion-COM-2005
Gold Standard. (2019). Market report 2019. https://empresaclima.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/3_market_report_2019_hd _compressed.pdf
Gold Standard. (2021). Blockchain for better: Untangling tokenisation and carbon markets. https://www.goldstandard.org/news/blockchain-for-better-untangling-tokenisation -and-carbon-markets
Gold Standard. (2024). Blockchain for better: Untangling tokenisation and carbon markets. https://www.goldstandard.org/news/blockchain-for-better-untangling-tokenisation -and-carbon-markets
Hamrick, K., & Gallant, M. (2017). Unlocking potential: State of the voluntary carbon markets 2017. Forest Trends’ Ecosystem Marketplace. https://forest-trends.org//wp-content/uploads/2017/07/doc_5591.pdf
ICAP.（2019）Emissions Trading Worldwide: ICAP Status Report 2019. https://icapcarbonaction.com/en/publications/emissions-trading-worldwide-icap-s tatus-report-2019
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.
McKinsey & Company. (2023). What is blockchain? McKinsey Explainers. https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/mckinsey-explainers/what-is-blockc hain
Nakamoto, S. (2008). Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system. https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf
Narassimhan, E., Gallagher, K. S., Koester, S., & Alejo, J. R. (2018). Carbon pricing in practice: A review of existing emissions trading systems. Climate Policy, 18(8), 967–991. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2018.1467827
Narayanan, A., Bonneau, J., Felten, E., Miller, A., & Goldfeder, S. (2016). Bitcoin and cryptocurrency technologies. Princeton University Press. https://www.lopp.net/pdf/princeton_bitcoin_book.pdf
Narayanan, A., & Clark, J. (2017). Bitcoin’s academic pedigree: The concept of cryptocurrencies is built from forgotten ideas in research literature. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3134434.3136559
Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP. (2025). Tokenized carbon credits: How blockchain is revolutionizing carbon markets. https://www.osler.com/en/insights/updates/tokenized-carbon-credits-blockchain-r evolutionizing-markets/
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). Sage. https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/qualitative-research-evaluation-methods/book2 32962
PwC. (2024). Carbon credit tokenisation. https://www.pwc.com/m1/en/publications/documents/2024/carbon-credit-tokenis ation.pdf
Sahay, A., Hughes, S., & Henretig, J. (2022, November 11). Beyond the buzz: What can blockchain do for carbon markets? RMI. https://rmi.org/beyond-the-buzz-what-can-blockchain-do-for-carbon-markets/
Schneider, L., Broekhoff, D., Füssler, J., La Hoz Theuer, S., & Kohli, A. (2019). Expert report Derik Broekhoff. https://www.clientearth.org/media/exyfip2p/productie-4-broekhoff-expert-report- v2-2-final.pdf
Schueffel, P., Groeneweg, N., & Baldegger, R. (2019). The crypto encyclopedia: Coins, tokens and digital assets from A to Z. https://www.heg-fr.ch/media/lbdfnyd1/schueffelgroenewegbaldegger2019_crypto -encyclopedia_eng.pdf
Stavins, R. N. (1995). Transaction costs and tradeable permits. https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/stavins/files/transaction_costs_jeem.pdf
Tapscott, D., & Tapscott, A. (2017). Blockchain revolution. https://itig-iraq.iq/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Blockchain_Revolution.pdf
United Nations. (1998). Kyoto Protocol. UN Treaty Database. https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/convkp/kpeng.pdf
UNFCCC. (2015). What is the Paris Agreement? https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/the-paris-agreement
Verra. (2020). Verified Carbon Standard. https://verra.org/programs/verified-carbon-standard/
Williamson, O. E. (1975). Markets and hierarchies: Analysis and antitrust implications. Free Press. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1496220
Williamson, O. E. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism: Firms, markets, relational contracting. Free Press. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1496720
World Bank. (2020). The World Development Report (WDR) 2020. https://thedocs.worldbank.org/en/doc/9dd9e6f69baba13ef40ce5076ad6a418-0330 322021/original/EDS25-Annual-Report-October-2020.pdf
World Bank. (2023). Annual Report 2023. https://thedocs.worldbank.org/en/doc/e0f016c369ef94f87dec9bcb22a80dc7-0330 212023/original/Annual-Report-2023.pdf
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage. https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/case-study-research-and-applications/book2501 50
Zhang, G., Chen, S. C.-I., & Yue, X. (2023). Blockchain technology in carbon trading markets: Impacts, benefits, and challenges—A case study of the Shanghai Environment and Energy Exchange . https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/13/3296
Zheng, Z., Xie, S., Dai, H., Chen, X., & Wang, H. (2018). An overview of blockchain technology: Architecture, consensus, and future trends. 2017 IEEE International Congress on Big Data, 557–564. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318131748_An_Overview_of_Blockch ain_Technology_Architecture_Consensus_and_Future_Trends
宜睿智慧。民113年10月22日，取自https://blog.edenred.com.tw/carbon-right
綠色和平。民113年10月7日，取自https://www.greenpeace.org/taiwan/update/30747/%E7%A2%B3%E6%AC%8A%E3%80%81%E7%A2%B3%E8%B2%BB%E3%80%81%E7%A2%B3%E7%A8%85%E6%98%AF%E4%BB%80%E9%BA%BC%EF%BC%9F%E7%A2%B3%E4%BA%A4%E6%98%93%E5%B8%82%E5%A0%B4%E5%A6%82%E4%BD%95%E9%81%8B%E4%BD%9C%EF%BC%9F/
經濟部台灣會展產業發展計畫。民114年4月11日，取自https://mice.meettaiwan.com/meettaiwan/netzero/%E7%A2%B3%E6%8E%92%E6%94%BE%E4%BA%A4%E6%98%93-2/
永續智庫CSRone。【碳權系列26】本土碳權交易全解析：手續費如何計算？。民113年8月15日，取自https://csrone.com/topics/8625
臺灣碳權交易所。碳權交易簡介。民113年10月17日，取自https://www.twse.com.tw/staticFiles/news/event/8a8216d69236c2e301929db7d50201a9.pdf
許惠珠（2003）。交易成本理論之回顧與前瞻。《中華技術學院學報》，28，1–16。http://aca.cust.edu.tw/pub/journal/28/28-8.pdf
家族辦公室Familiarize Docs. (2024). 交易成本經濟學定義、範例與趨勢。取自 https://docs.familiarize.com/zht/glossary/transaction-cost-economics/
邱祈榮，許庭瑋。（2022）。區塊鏈於碳交易制度之應用。《中華林學季刊》，55(1)，1–18。https://www.aat.org.tw/File/Web13/File/867.pdf
臺灣碳權交易所。（2024）。https://www.tcx.com.tw/zh/
工研院 (2021)。區塊鏈簡介與技術探討。民110年8月20日https://college.itri.org.tw/Home/InfoData/f6e19f2d-f81c-421c-bc36-ea6409ba0a5d/71910c07-d3f9-4235-a3a9-d7006b6456ea |
| 描述: | 碩士
國立政治大學
科技管理與智慧財產研究所
112364115 |
| 資料來源: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0112364115 |
| 資料類型: | thesis |
| 顯示於類別: | [科技管理與智慧財產研究所] 學位論文
|
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 |
描述 |
大小 | 格式 | 瀏覽次數 |
|---|
| 411501.pdf | | 1072Kb | Adobe PDF | 0 | 檢視/開啟 |
|
在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.
|
