Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/159337
|
| Title: | 危機時代的泰國影視愛國主義敘事：三部歷史劇的文本分析
The Patriotic Narratives in Thai Film and Television during Times of Crisis: A Textual Analysis of Three Historical Dramas |
| Authors: | 段非
Fei, Tuan |
| Contributors: | 孫采薇
段非
Tuan Fei |
| Keywords: | 泰國影視
愛國主義
三位一體
想像共同體
文化治理
Thai film
Patriotism
Trinity
Imagined Communities
Cultural Governance |
| Date: | 2025 |
| Issue Date: | 2025-09-01 16:35:26 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 本研究透過文本分析三部泰國影視作品—《暹羅女王》（2001）、《泰王納黎萱》（2006–2015）與《天生一對》（2018），探討泰國影視劇如何在政治或社會危機下，運用劇情與敘事回應時代情境，並以「三位一體」（王室、宗教、泰族）元素建構愛國主義，以達政治目的。
研究動機來自2020年泰國學運後，社會對軍方與王室質疑日增，傳統愛國主義宣傳效果式微，「三位一體」意識形態面臨挑戰。考量影視作品作為國族建構與社會穩定的工具，本文聚焦四大研究問題：三位一體如何在劇中再現？影視如何與時代對話？愛國敘事呈現何種變化？並探討影視於文化治理中所扮演的角色。
研究方法採個案質性研究，並以王室、宗教、泰族三軸為分析指標。文獻回顧結合Anderson的「想像的共同體」、Dayan與Katz的「媒介事件」理論，說明媒體作為建構國族認同與宣傳工具的角色；另援引Ishii、Selway、Fong、Dressel、Sripokangkul等對「泰國性」、「三位一體」的研究，輔以Thongchai與Strate對「我者／他者」邊界的探討。
研究發現三部作品反映各時期的政治訴求與敘事策略。《暹羅女王》強化王室形象、重申穩定與國家利益；《泰王納黎萱》突顯王室、佛教、軍隊的不可分割，支持軍政府正當性與敵我區分；《天生一對》則透過懷舊與日常文化情境，柔性內化三位一體。這顯示影視作品中的愛國主義敘事並非固定，而是隨政治情境與社會焦慮不斷重構。政權在尋求穩定時，強化忠誠與敵意；在正當性不足時，則以文化認同與情感敘事重建基礎。整體而言，愛國敘事正由剛性轉向柔性，展現泰國政府透過娛樂媒介進行文化治理與價值導向的高度期待。
This study conducts a textual analysis of three Thai historical dramas—The Legend of Suriyothai (2001), King Naresuan (2006–2015), and Love Destiny (2018)—to explore how they respond to political or social crises through narrative strategies that reinforce patriotism “via the trinity of Monarchy, Religion, and Thai Ethnicity”.
The research is motivated by observations following the 2020 Thai protests, which revealed growing public skepticism toward the military and monarchy. In this context, traditional forms patriotic propaganda appeared less effective, suggesting that the ideological foundation of the trinity was being challenged.
Using a qualitative case study method, the analysis is informed by Anderson’s concept of Imagined Communities and Dayan and Katz’s theory of Media Events, alongside scholarship by Ishii, Selway, Fong, Dressel, Sripokangkul, Thongchai, and Strate.
Findings indicate distinct narrative strategies shaped by political needs. Suriyothai, sponsored by the monarchy, emphasizes royal authority and national unity. King Naresuan, backed by the military regime, portrays the inseparable linkage between the monarchy, Buddhism, and the military. Love Destiny reflects a shift to soft power, embedding patriotism in nostalgia and everyday culture.
These evolving portrayals suggest that “Thai-ness” is continuously redefined in response to changing political climates. The growing use of emotional, flexible narratives, over rigid, authoritarian tones, demonstrates the Thai state's increasing reliance on entertainment media to promote ideological cohesion and national stability. |
| Reference: | 一、 專書
英文文獻
Anderson, Benedict. 1983. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. Verso Books.
Chatterjee, P. 1993. The Nation and Its Fragments: Colonial and Postcolonial Histories. Princeton University Press.
Dayan, Daniel and Katz, Elihu. 1992. Media Events: The Live Broadcasting of History. Harvard University Press.
Ishii, Yoneo. 1986. Sangha, state, and society: Thai Buddhism in history. Kyoto: The Centre for Southeast Asian Studies.
Marshall, Andrew MacGregor. 2015. A Kingdom in Crisis: Thailand's Struggle for Democracy in the Twenty-First Century (Asian Arguments). Zed Books.
Matthew Hunt. 2021. Thai Cinema Uncensored. Thailand: Silkworm Books.
Miller, David. 2016. Strangers in our Midst: the Political Philosophy of Immigration. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Phongpaichit, Pasuk and Baker, Christ. 2000. Thailand’s Crisis. Chiang Mai: Silkworm Books.
Phongpaichit, Pasuk and Baker, Christ. 2022. A History of Thailand. 4th ed. Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press.
Reynolds, Craig. 2006. Seditious Histories: Contesting Thai and Southeast Asian Pasts. Seattle:University of Washington Press.
Strate, Shane. 2015. The Lost Territories: Thailand’s History of National Humiliation (Southeast Asia: Politics, Meaning, and Memory, 33). University of Hawaii Press.
Thongchai, Winichakul. 1997. Siam Mapped: A History of the Geo-Body of a Nation. University of Hawaii Press.
中文文獻
田霖，2023，《泰國史話》，北京：中國書籍出版社。
佐藤卓已，2004，《現代化傳媒史》，北京：北京大學出版社。
二、 專書論文
Stengs, Irene. 2020. “Dramatising Siamese independence: Thai postcolonial perspectives on kingship. In Aldrich, Robert and McCreery, Cindy eds., Monarchies and decolonization in Asia. pp.260-282. Manchester University Press.
三、 期刊論文
英文文獻
Boonhok, Saranpat. 2024. “Embodying ‘Thainess’ and the post-2006 Coup Crisis in Buppesannivas (Love Destiny)” South East Asia Research, 32(3): 304-323.
Chachavalpongpun, P. 2011. “The Necessity of Enemies in Thailand’s Troubled Politics: The Making of Political “Otherness.” Asian Survey, 51(6): 1019–1041.
Dressel, Bjoern. 2018. “Thailand’s Traditional Trinity and the Rule of Law: Can They Coexist?” Asian Studies Review, 42(2): 268-285.
Fong, Jack. 2009. “Sacred Nationalism: The Thai Monarchy and Primordial Nation Construction.” Journal Of Contemporary Asia, 39(4): 673-696.
Jirattikorn, Amporn. 2003. “Suriyothai: Hybridizing Thai National Identity through Film” Inter-Asia Cultural Studies, 4(2): 296-308.
Jory, Patrick. 2018. “Bupphesanniwat Fever: Gendered Nationalism And Middle-Class Views of Thailand's Political Predicament.” Sojourn-Journal of Social Issues in Southeast Asia, 33 (2): 440-456.
Lebedev, AA. 2016. “"Patriotism" Concept Realization: Content Formation, Lexical and Semantic Specifics In The Frame of The State Patriotic News TV Broadcasting (Using The Example of "Zvezda" Channel).” Theoretical and practical issues of journalism, 5(3): 396-408
Lewis, Glen. 2003. “The Thai Movie Revival and Thai National Identity” Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies, 17(1): 69-78.
Lin Tian and Xingchen Wang. 2024. “Cultural Strategies and National Expression in Overseas Dissemination of Chinese and Thai Films” International Communication of Chinese Cultur, 12(1).
McAndrew, Stephen. 2019. “Nationalism & Social Stability.” Journal of Ethical Urban Living, 2 (1): 93-110.
McCargo, Duncan. 2009. “Thai Politics as Reality TV.” Journal Of Asian Studies, 68(1): 7-19.
McCullough, M. E., Kilpatrick, S. D., Emmons, R. A., and Larson, D. B. 2001. “Is Gratitude a Moral Affect?”. Psychological bulletin, 127(2): 249-266.
Pookaiyaudom, Gulapish and Tan, Noel Hidalgo. 2020. “The Buppaesanniwas Phenomenon: ‘Thainess’ and National Identity as a Film Tourism Motivation.” Journal of Tourism and Cultural Change, 18(5): 497-513.
Rasul, Azmat and Proffitt, Jennifer M. 2017. “Promoting Patriotism Through Mediated Sports: Political Economy of Bollywood Sports Movies”. Communication review, 20(4): 225-245.
Selway, Joel. 2007. “Turning Malas Into Thai-Men: Nationalism, Ethnicity And Economic Inequality In Thailand.” South East Asia Research, 15(1): 53-87.
Sripokangkul, Siwach. 2021. “The Teaching of Royalist-Nationalist Civic Education And History in Thai Schools: Education for The Production of ‘Docile Subjects’.” Citizenship Teaching & Learning, 16(1): 115-140.
中文文獻
岡美穗子，2024，〈阿瑜陀耶的葡人代理貿易：從那萊王到泰沙王統治時期〉，《文化雜誌RC》，120： 186-193。
洪柏智、林盟凱，2015，〈論泰國國王拉瑪九世「知足經濟」思想之實踐與對泰國發展之啟發〉，《人文社會科學研究》，9（1）：42-65。
胡仲英、謝中琮，1999，〈金融風暴兩年後東亞經濟情勢之分析〉，《中國商銀月刊》，18（10）：1-16。
章宏、戴穎潔，2018，〈模式節目再生產中跨地多民族的華人共同體建構——以《中國好聲音》為例〉，《傳播與社會學刊》，44：85-110。
陳尚懋，2007，〈泰國金融改革的政治分析〉，《問題與研究》，46（2）：141-170。
謝國斌，2021。〈泰國的族群政策〉，《台灣國際研究季刊》，17（4）：67-94。
四、 學位論文
英文文獻
Moonsarn, Kittiya. 2020. “Combi-Nation: Thai Nation Building and National Identity in Thai TV Dramas With Northern Thai Focus.” UK: Ph. D. diss., The University of Leeds.
Suwannathat-Pian, K. 2004. “Film Media and Nationalism in Thailand.” Thailand: Master degree, University of Canterbury.
五、 新聞
英文文獻
Bangkok Post. 2020. “Govt won't win Oscar for army propaganda.” https://www.bangkokpost.com/opinion/opinion/1859979/govt-wont-win-oscar-for-army-propaganda, (Accessed on May 31, 2025).
BBC News. 2017. “Lese-majeste explained: How Thailand forbids insult of its royalty.” https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-29628191. (Accessed on May 31, 2025).
BBC News. 2020. “Thailand protests: Risking it all to challenge the monarchy.” https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-53770939. (Accessed on May 31, 2025).
Child, B. 2014. “Thai junta offers free tickets to nationalist film as gift to ‘return happiness’.”, The Guardian, https://www.theguardian.com/film/2014/jun/17/thai-junta-free-tickets-nationalist-film-patriotic (Accessed on May 31, 2025).
Film Archive (Public Organization). 2001. “สุริโยไท THE LEGEND OF SURIYOTHAI” [Suriyothai The Legend Of Suriyothai]. https://www.fapot.or.th/main/heritage/view/123. (Accessed on July 30, 2024).
Fuller, T. 2014. “Thailand to bring happiness to the people.” The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jun/04/thailand-to-bring-happiness-to-the-people. (Accessed on May 31, 2025).
Kingnaresuanmovie.com. 2007. “King Naresuan.” https://www.kingnaresuanmovie.com/.(Accessed on May 31, 2025).
Pantip. 2013. “หนังเรื่องสุริโยไท ทำไมรายได้เยอะจังครับ” [Why did the movie Suriyothai make so much money?]. https://pantip.com/topic/30343000.(Accessed on February 8, 2025).
Pantip. 2018. “ในสมัยกรุงศรีอยุธยา พระนเรศวรถือได้ว่าเป็นกษัตริย์ที่มีความโหดเหี้ยมใช่ไหมครับ?” [Why do Thai people respect Phra Naresuan?]. https://pantip.com/topic/37792500. (Accessed on February 8, 2025).
Pantip. 2019. “ถ้าเทียบตามหลักรัฐศาสตร์แล้ว ไม่ว่าจะสมัยไหน ถ้าปกครองด้วยระบบราชาธิปไตยหรือสมบูรณาญาสิทธิราชย์แล้ว เขาก็นับเป็นเผด็จการอย่างหนึ่งทั้งนั้นละครับ…” [The scene of shooting across the river in the movie Phra Nareswal, made up or based on the truth.]. https://pantip.com/topic/39186545. (Accessed on February 8, 2025).
Pipad, Krajaejun. 2018. “บุพเพสันนิวาส: ความรุ งเรืองในอดีตที่คนไทยทุกสมัยใฝ หา [Buppesannivas: The Glorious Past Which Thais of All Ages are Calling For].” BBC Thai. https://www.bbc.com/thai/thailand-43430043. (Accessed on February 8, 2025).
Prachatai. 2017. “Thailand's Military Junta Wants to Promote Nationalism with a Soap Opera Called ‘Love Missions’.” GlobalVoices. https://globalvoices.org/2017/12/23/thailands-military-junta-wants-to-promote-nationalism-with-a-soap-opera-called-love-missions/. (Accessed on February 8, 2025).
Prachatai. 2020. “[Full statement] The demonstration at Thammasat proposes monarchy reform.” Prachatai English. https://prachatai.com/english/node/8709. (Accessed on May 31, 2025).
Pubhtml5. 2012. “ภาษาพาที ประถมศึกษาปีที่ 6” (Language Pathi, Primary 6): https://pubhtml5.com/osfx/ccjm/ภาษาพาที_ประถมศึกษาปีที่6/. (Accessed on May 31, 2025).
Siamzone.com. 2008. “สรุปรายได้ภาพยนตร์ทำเงินที่เข้าฉายในบ้านเรา ปี 2550” [Summary of the grossing movies released in our country in 2007]. https://www.siamzone.com/movie/news/3791. (Accessed on May 31, 2025).
The Economist. 2018. “A historical soap reveals a lot about modern Thai politics.” https://www.economist.com/asia/2018/06/02/a-historical-soap-reveals-a-lot-about-modern-thai-politics (Accessed on May 31, 2025).
World Bank Group. 2001. “GDP per capita (current US$) – Thailand.” https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.CD?end=2023&locations=TH&start=2001 (Accessed on May 31, 2025).
ไทยรัฐออนไลน์(Thairath Online). 2014. “อันดับหนังไทยทำเงินตลอดกาล...หนังดังไม่ต้องดีจริงหรือ?” [The highest ranking of Thai movies that make money all the time... Do popular movies really not have to be good?]. https://web.archive.org/web/20220130005656/https://www.thairath.co.th/content/468808. (Accessed on July 30, 2024).
中文文獻
BBC News. 2016，〈泰國國王普密蓬逝世享年88歲〉，https://www.bbc.com/zhongwen/trad/world/2016/10/161011_thai_king_bhumibol_profile，查閱時間：2024/2/15。
BJ周，2020，〈泰國女力傳奇：從女扮男裝騎戰象的帝國嬌蘭，到挺身捍衛普吉島的姐妹花〉，《關鍵評論網》，https://www.thenewslens.com/article/132050，查閱時間：2025/5/31。
Fukuei，2025，〈從天神到人民的守護者：泰國君王頭銜的神聖之路〉，https://vocus.cc/article/6788bffbfd89780001e617fb，，查閱時間：2025/6/23。
Huang, Jack I.C，2019，〈【認真看東協】什麼是「泰國 4.0 」與「東部經濟走廊」？它們會如何改變泰國與東協？〉，《換日線》https://crossing.cw.com.tw/article/11481，查閱時間：2025/5/31。
Lin, Tidus，2016，〈拉瑪九世70年：泰王蒲美蓬辭世與國家後續發展〉，《南洋誌》。https://aseanplusjournal.com/2016/10/14/thai-king-bhumibol-adulyadej/，查閱時間：2025/5/31。
一路向南，2018，〈一路向南》泰劇《天生一對》：懷舊風助燃無限商機〉，《自由時報》，https://talk.ltn.com.tw/article/breakingnews/2394242，查閱時間：2025/5/31。
小小天下，2024，〈從亞洲“四小虎”到“中等收入陷阱”，泰國何以至此？〉，《鉅亨》，https://hao.cnyes.com/post/96725，查閱時間：2025/5/31。
工商時報，2022，〈一文看懂自泰國引爆的亞洲金融風暴〉，《工商時報》，https://www.ctee.com.tw/news/20220629700371-431001，查閱時間：2025/5/31。
王明亞，2016，〈媒介事件與新聞事件的分野及其薩滿教化〉，《人民網》，http://media.people.com.cn/BIG5/n1/2016/0928/c407409-28747251.html，查閱時間：2024/2/15。
周思宇，2020，〈專訪泰國學運領袖：無懼15年刑罰，為何他們激進喊出「王室改革」？〉，《報導者》，https://www.twreporter.org/a/thailand-student-protest-1，查閱時間：2025/5/31。
洪銘謙，2020，〈【泰國七大帝】從小被送到緬甸當人質，臥薪嘗膽後重新讓暹羅獨立的民族之父納瑞萱〉，《關鍵評論網》，https://www.thenewslens.com/feature/7kingsofsiam/137023，查閱時間：2025/5/31。
洪銘謙，2022，〈從泰國史詩《拉瑪堅》，認識國王、天神及阿修羅都敬畏的仙人「魯士」〉，《關鍵評論網》，https://www.thenewslens.com/article/169153，查閱時間：2025/5/31。
洪銘謙，2024，〈從泰劇《女王》與《天生一對2之命中注定》，認識阿瑜陀耶王國的興亡史〉，《關鍵評論網》，https://www.thenewslens.com/article/245376，查閱時間：2025/5/31。
看見泰國編輯團隊，2020，〈2020-2021泰國反政府運動懶人包，快速了解近年來最大規模泰國示威抗議〉，《看見泰國網》，https://visionthai.net/article/2020-thailand-protests/，查閱時間：2025/5/31。
，2023，〈看懂泰國政治！2001年到2023年大選和政變一次看〉，《看見泰國網》，https://visionthai.net/article/thai-election-timelines/#2014%E5%B9%B4%E5%B7%B4%E8%82%B2%E7%99%BC%E5%8B%95%E8%BB%8D%E4%BA%8B%E6%94%BF%E8%AE%8A%E6%8E%A5%E7%AE%A1%E6%94%BF%E6%AC%8A，查閱時間：2025/5/31。
徐子軒，2020，〈法政大學之火：自由幻夢...泰國學運「怒指泰王」的捨命冒險〉，《轉角國際》。https://global.udn.com/global_vision/story/8663/4787941，查閱時間：2025/5/31。
海德，2015，〈國際縱橫：諷刺泰王愛犬判監15年〉，《BBC News》，“https://www.bbc.com/zhongwen/trad/world/2015/12/151219_defaming_a_dog，查閱時間：2025/5/31。
張蘊之，2018，〈穿越劇《天生一對》，串連你我的歷史知識與文化傳承〉，《獨立評論》，https://opinion.cw.com.tw/blog/profile/379/article/6745，查閱時間：2025/5/31。
陳芊秀，2018，〈《天生一對》讓曼谷變空城！全國衝回家看劇...5大看點爆紅〉，《ET today星光雲》，https://star.ettoday.net/news/1136714，查閱時間：2025/5/31。
陳尚懋，2016，〈2006泰國軍事政變前後的紅黃對立〉，《看見泰國網》，https://visionthai.net/article/before-and-after-differences-of-conflicts-among-pad-and-udd-2006-military-coup-in-thailand/，查閱時間：2025/5/31。
陳尚懋，2020，〈一路向南：泰好看——泰國電影產業的政經分析〉，《自由時報》，https://talk.ltn.com.tw/article/breakingnews/3172694，查閱時間：2025/5/31。
陳彥霖，2017，〈一路向南》觀察泰國不可不懂「泰國性」：看不見改革的未來〉，《自由時報》，https://talk.ltn.com.tw/article/breakingnews/2221348#:~:text=%E5%9C%A8%E6%B3%B0%E5%9C%8B%EF%BC%8C%E5%82%B3%E7%B5%B1%E6%96%87%E5%8C%96%E5%8A%A0,%E5%BF%83%E6%84%8F%E8%80%8C%E6%8E%A1%E5%8B%95%E6%85%8B%E6%A8%99%E6%BA%96%E3%80%82，查閱時間：2025/6/23。
逸佚居，2021a，〈最強泰王納黎萱，與最後的戰象決鬥（上）：與緬甸王儲對決的儂薩萊之戰，各國文獻竟有10種版本〉，《關鍵評論網》， https://www.thenewslens.com/article/157851，查閱時間：2025/5/31。
逸佚居，2021b，〈最強泰王納黎萱，與最後的戰象決鬥（下）：火器傳入後破壞了公平性，也導致戰象決鬥的沒落〉，《關鍵評論網》， https://www.thenewslens.com/article/157853，查閱時間：2025/5/31。
黃兵，2019，〈泰國新電影史敘事的風格特色及藝術缺失〉，https://book.newdu.com/m/view.php?aid=142199，查閱時間：2024年6月10日。
黃嬿庭，2017，〈帕拉育的政治宣傳哲學：愛國團結、救救泰國〉，《關鍵評論網》，https://www.thenewslens.com/article/85597，查閱時間：2025/5/31。
楊俊業，2020a，〈「泰式幸福」背後的社會實況：泰國人真的幸福快樂嗎？〉，《關鍵評論網》，https://www.thenewslens.com/article/132863，查閱時間：2025/5/31。
楊俊業，2020b，〈十年泰國（下）：2020年的泰國學運，絕對是一次「承先啟後」的關鍵歷史事件〉，《關鍵評論網》， https://www.thenewslens.com/article/144149，查閱時間：2025/5/31。
楊俊業，2020c，〈泰國「大城」故事：從泰劇《天生一對》談暹羅二三事〉，《關鍵評論網》，https://www.thenewslens.com/article/132795，查閱時間：2025/5/31。
張媛，2013，〈重大事件電視直播與國家認同建構〉，《青年記者》，https://www.xwpx.com/article/2013/1206/article_30324.html，查閱時間：2024/2/15。
謝以萱，2017，〈《空洞的時間》：現代泰國、規訓的身體與鄉村保皇軍〉，《故事》，https://storystudio.tw/article/gushi/homogeneous-empty-time，查閱時間：2025/6/23。 |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
東亞研究所
111260006 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0111260006 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [東亞研究所] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Description |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 000601.pdf | | 2556Kb | Adobe PDF | 2 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
