English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 118204/149236 (79%)
Visitors : 74329265      Online Users : 10626
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 財務管理學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/159341
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/159341


    Title: 價格資訊性與公司回購決策對股價的敏感度
    Price Informativeness and Share Repurchases Sensitivity to Stock Price
    Authors: 徐緯澔
    Hsu, Wei-Hao
    Contributors: 湛可南
    Chan, Konan
    徐緯澔
    Hsu, Wei-Hao
    Keywords: 股價資訊性
    股票回購
    管理者學習
    Tobin’s Q
    投資機會
    支付政策
    Stock Price Informativeness
    Share Repurchases
    Managerial Learning
    Tobin’s Q
    Investment Opportunities
    Payout Policy
    Date: 2025
    Issue Date: 2025-09-01 16:37:02 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究探討管理者在制定股票回購決策時,是否會納入股價中所蘊含的私人資訊。本文以Tobin’s Q 作為基於股價的訊號,檢驗股票回購對股價的敏感度是否會隨股價資訊性(Stock Price Informativeness, SPI)提高而增強。並進一步分析,較高的股價資訊性是否降低企業對內部現金流訊號的依賴,以及此學習效果是否在大型企業中更為顯著。
    基於1994年至2024年間美國上市公司之面板資料,實證結果支持上述假說:(i)當股價資訊性較高時,股票回購與Tobin’s Q的負向關係顯著更強,顯示管理者會從股價中學習市場所揭示的新投資機會資訊,並據以調整股票回購決策;(ii)股價資訊性的提升亦降低企業對自由現金流訊號的依賴;(iii)大型企業的管理者學習效果更為明顯。主要結論經由Fama–MacBeth橫斷面估計與Logit模型之檢驗下仍具穩健性。
    本研究的主要貢獻在於將管理者學習理論文獻延伸至股票回購決策,並提供一個以資訊條件為基礎的分配與投資機會關係之觀點。
    This study examines whether managers incorporate private information from stock prices when setting share repurchase policy. Using Tobin’s Q as the price-based signal, we test whether higher stock price informativeness (SPI) strengthens the sensitivity of share repurchases to stock price. We also assess whether SPI reduces reliance on internal cash flow signal and whether the learning effect is stronger for larger firms.
    Panel evidence for U.S. public firms from 1994 to 2024 supports these predictions: (i) the negative relation between repurchases and Tobin’s Q is significantly stronger when SPI is high, demonstrating that managers learn from stock prices about newly revealed investment opportunities and adjust share repurchase decisions accordingly; (ii) managers place less weight on free cash flow in price information-rich settings; (iii) and the moderating role of SPI is more pronounced among large firms. Main results are robust to standard specification checks, including Fama–MacBeth estimates and a logit specification for repurchase incidence.
    The primary contribution of this study is to extend the managerial learning literature to share repurchase decisions and to provide an information-conditioned view of the relation between payout and investment opportunities.
    Reference: Asker, J., Farre-Mensa, J., & Ljungqvist, A. (2015). Corporate investment and stock market listing: A puzzle? Review of Financial Studies, 28(2), 342-390.
    Bai, J., Philippon, T., & Savov, A. (2017). Have financial markets become more informative? Journal of Financial Economics, 122(3), 625-654.
    Ben-Nasr, H., & Alshwer, A. A. (2016). Does stock price informativeness affect labor investment efficiency? Journal of Corporate Finance, 38, 249-271.
    Bonaimé, A. A., Hankins, K. W., & Harford, J. (2020). Employee Stock Option Grants and Share Repurchases. Journal of Finance, 75(5), 2563–2608.
    Brav, A., Graham, J. R., Harvey, C. R., & Michaely, R. (2005). Payout policy in the 21st century. Journal of Financial Economics, 77(3), 483-527.
    Chan, K., & Chan, Y. K. (2014). Price informativeness and stock returns: Evidence from seasoned equity offerings. Journal of Financial Economics, 114(3), 501–519.
    Chen, Q., Goldstein, I., & Jiang, W. (2007). Price Informativeness and Investment Sensitivity to Stock Price. Review of Financial Studies, 20(3), 619–650.
    De Cesari, A., & Huang-Meier, W. (2015). Dividend changes and stock price informativeness. Journal of Corporate Finance, 35, 187-204.
    Dittmar, A. K. (2000). Why do firms repurchase stock? The Journal of Business, 73(3), 331–355.
    Durnev, A., Morck, R., Yeung, B., & Zarowin, P. (2003). Does greater firm-specific return variation mean more or less informed stock pricing? Journal of Accounting Research, 41(5), 797-836.
    Durnev, A., Morck, R., & Yeung, B. (2004). Value-enhancing capital budgeting and firm-specific stock return variation. Journal of Finance, 59(1), 65-105.
    Easterbrook, F. H. (1984). Two agency-cost explanations of dividends. American Economic Review, 74(4), 650-659.
    Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1993). Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. Journal of Financial Economics, 33(1), 3–56.
    Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (2001). Disappearing dividends: changing firm characteristics or lower propensity to pay? Journal of Financial Economics, 60(1), 3-43.
    Farre-Mensa, J., Michaely, R., & Schmalz, M. C. (2014). Payout Policy. Annual Review of Financial Economics, 6, 75-134.
    Faulkender, M., & Wang, R. (2006). Corporate financial policy and the value of cash. Journal of Finance, 61(4), 1957-1990.
    Ferreira, D., Ferreira, M. A., & Raposo, C. C. (2011). Board structure and price informativeness. Journal of Financial Economics, 99(3), 523–545.
    Fresard, L. (2012). Cash holdings and stock price informativeness. Journal of Finance, 67(3), 985-1023.
    French, K. R., & Roll, R. (1986). Stock return variances: The arrival of information and the reaction of traders. Journal of Financial Economics, 17(1), 5-26.
    Grullon, G., Paye, B., Underwood, S., & Weston, J. P. (2011). Has the propensity to pay out declined? Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 46(1), 1–24.
    Gutiérrez, G., & Philippon, T. (2016). Investment-less growth: An empirical investigation (NBER Working Paper No. 22897). National Bureau of Economic Research
    Jagannathan, M., Stephens, C. P., & Weisbach, M. S. (2000). Financial flexibility and the choice between dividends and stock repurchases. Journal of Financial Economics, 57(3), 355-384.
    Jensen, M. C. (1986). Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. American Economic Review, 76(2), 323-329.
    Kahle, K. M. (2002). When a buyback isn’t a buyback: Open market repurchases and employee options. Journal of Financial Economics, 63(2), 235-261.
    Kahle, K. M. (2017). Share repurchases, dividends, and firm characteristics. Journal of Financial Economics, 125(2), 236-259.
    Kahle, K. M., & Stulz, R. M. (2021). Is the US public corporation in trouble? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 35(3), 55-80.
    Lee, D. W., Shin, H.-H., & Stulz, R. M. (2021). Why does equity capital flow out of high Tobin’s q industries? The Review of Financial Studies, 34, 1867–1906.
    Morck, R., Yeung, B., & Yu, W. (2000). The information content of stock markets: Why do emerging markets have synchronous stock price movements? Journal of Financial Economics, 58(1-2), 215-260.
    Peyer, U., & Vermaelen, T. (2009). The nature and persistence of buyback anomalies. The Review of Financial Studies, 22(4), 1693–1745.
    Roll, R. (1988). R^2. Journal of Finance, 43(3), 541-566.
    Vermaelen, T. (1981). Common stock repurchases and market signaling: An empirical study. Journal of Financial Economics, 9(2), 139-183.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    財務管理學系
    112357037
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0112357037
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[財務管理學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    703701.pdf519KbAdobe PDF0View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback