English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 118658/149719 (79%)
造訪人次 : 80168198      線上人數 : 1898
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧:
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號",以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋,建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位,可獲得較完整資料
  • 進階搜尋
    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/159424


    題名: 聽音辨位:Podcast創作者與協作者的稟性分析
    Locating Through Listening: A Dispositional Analysis of Podcast Creators and Co-creators
    作者: 李貞錚
    Lee, Chen-Cheng
    貢獻者: 陳宗文
    Chen, Tzung-Wen
    李貞錚
    Lee, Chen-Cheng
    關鍵詞: 真誠感
    聲音實作
    語氣策略
    稟性分析
    場域理論在地化
    Sense of Authenticity
    Vocal Practice
    Vocal Strategy
    Dispositional Analysis
    Localization of Field Theory
    日期: 2025
    上傳時間: 2025-09-01 17:00:14 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 「Podcast就是要夠reel!」真誠,經常被視為判斷Podcast節目優劣的關鍵標準。然所謂真實或誠懇,僅是情感的自然流露嗎?本研究以Bourdieu場域理論為基礎,採稟性分析切入Podcast創作者的聲音實作與語氣策略。透過半結構式深度訪談十位創作者與協作者,輔以節目文字介紹與公開講座內容等次級資料進行補充觀察,本研究指出,Podcast創作者所感知與展演的真誠感(authenticity)是一種社會實作——是創作者依據其社會位置、可支配資本與聲音稟性,在語音風格鬥爭中呈現「相對位置的真誠」。研究進一步歸納五類創作者與協作者位置,包括:廣電專業型創作者、個人職業型創作者、業餘興趣型創作者、組織型節目製作人與策展型制度參與者,描繪五種相應類型的「真誠感」展演形式。不同類型的創作者既得利於其資本條件也受制於其限制,展現雙重性。

    本研究提出三項命題:(一)創作者的語音實作,展現其稟性與資本的結構性差異;(二)從場域中的擾動現象觀察場域理論應用的操作潛力(三)創作者以語氣策略回應場域規則。Podcast語氣風格的多樣化,尤其是真誠感的多種形式,並非個體理性能完全決定,而是由能動者對場域規則的理解、各項資本掌握程度與聲音品味的鬥爭所共同構成。本研究試圖補足現有文獻對聲音風格政治的忽略,並落實Bourdieu場域理論在非法國語境與新興數位文化中可行的轉化方式。
    “Podcast has to be real!” In podcast culture, authenticity is often treated as a key standard of quality. But is such authenticity merely a natural expression of emotion? This study draws on Bourdieu’s field theory and employs a dispositional approach to analyze the vocal practices and vocal strategies of podcast creators in Taiwan. Based on ten semi-structured in-depth interviews with both creators and co-creators, supplemented with secondary sources such as program descriptions and public talks, this study argues that the sense of authenticity perceived and performed by podcast creators is a form of social practice—one that is shaped by their social position, available capital, and vocal dispositions, and enacted as a “positional authenticity” within ongoing struggles over vocal style. The study identifies five positions—broadcast professionals, full-time individual creators, hobbyist creators, organizational producers, and curatorial institutional actors—including both creators and co-creators, each associated with a distinct mode of authenticity performance. Different types of actors simultaneously benefit from their capital conditions while being constrained by them, thereby exhibiting a dual character in their practices.

    It advances three propositions: (1) creators’ vocal practices reflect structural differences in their habitus and capital compositions; (2) disturbances in the field reveal the potential for locally adapting field theory; and (3) vocal strategies are concrete responses to the implicit rules of the field. The diversity of podcast vocal styles—particularly in their forms of authenticity—is not merely the result of individual rational choice, but emerges from creators’ interpretations of field-specific rules, their relative command of various capitals, and their struggles over vocal taste. This study seeks to address the current gap in the literature regarding the politics of vocal style and demonstrates the potential for applying Bourdieu’s field theory in non-French contexts and emerging digital cultures.
    參考文獻: 文化部,2024,〈中華民國一百十三年度廣播金鐘獎獎勵要點〉。
    皮耶・布迪厄(Pierre Bourdieu)著, 邱德亮譯,2023,《區判:品味判斷的社會批判》。台北:麥田。
    __, 蔣梓驊譯,2003,《實踐感》。南京:譯林。
    __,林志明譯,2016,《布赫迪厄論電視》。台北:麥田。
    __,陳宗文譯,2022,《馬內的象徵革命:藝術場域的誕生》。台北:群學。
    __,陳逸淳譯,2012,《所述之言:布赫迪厄反思社會學文集》。台北:麥田。
    皮耶・布迪厄(Pierre Bourdieu)與 華康德(Loic J. D. Wacquant)著, 李猛與李康譯,2009,《布赫迪厄社會學面面觀》。台北:麥田。
    吉見俊哉著,李尚霖譯,2013,《「聲」的資本主義》。台北:群學。
    弗里德里希・基特勒(Friedrich A.Kittler)著,邢春麗譯,2017,《留聲機、電影、打字機》。上海:復旦。
    華特.班雅明 (Walter Benjamin)著,莊仲黎譯, 2019,《機械複製時代的藝術作品:班雅明精選集》。台北:商周。
    查爾斯・泰勒(Charles Taylor)著,程煉譯, 2021,《現代性的隱憂》。南京:南京大學出版社。
    吳修銘著,黃庭敏譯,2018,《注意力商人》。台北:天下雜誌。
    呂紹理,2002,〈日治時期台灣傳播工業與收音機市場的形成(1928-1945)〉。《國立政治大學歷史學報》第19期,pp.297-334。
    林純,2021,《有來賓更好嗎?提升Podcast節目中之擬社會互動》。世新大學口語傳播暨社群媒體學系碩士論文。
    哀曉培,2021,《耳朵裡的新戰場! Podcast 內容產製策略分析》。國立政治大學傳播學院碩士論文。
    馬克斯.霍克海默(Max Horkheimer)與提奧多.阿多諾( Theodor Adorno) 著, 林宏濤譯,2023,《啟蒙的辯證》。台北:商周。
    陳端慧,2023,《多媒體時代下廣播經營聽眾的參與感》。國立政治大學傳播學院碩士論文。
    黃俊銘,2019,〈音樂如何社會?從阿多諾(Adorno)到德諾拉(DeNora):閱讀《音樂社會學導論》、《日常生活中的音樂》〉。《台灣傳播學刊》Vol.36 pp.275-288。
    __,2022,〈年輕人如何使用音樂?朝向愛好者的中介社會學〉。《新聞學研究》Vol.153 pp.93-139。
    黃偲瑜,2021,《應用Podcast融入英語教學對國小學童在學習態度與學習動機之影響》。國立台北教育大學課程與教學傳播科技研究所碩士論文。
    愛彌爾・涂爾幹(Durkheim, E.)著,渠東汲譯,2006,《宗教生活的基本形式》。上海:人民。
    葉俞君、梁卓堯、陳瀅與丁維欣,2021,〈「聆聽」博物館:Podcast如何與聽眾建立關係?〉。《科技博物》Vol.25:4 pp.47-73。
    潘玲娟,2009,〈Podcast(播客)的興起對傳統廣播的影響〉。《復興崗學報》Vol.94 pp.105-122.
    蔡依璇、李台源、范修語與宋佩遙,〈59廣播金鐘/唐綺陽土星回歸 勇奪首屆Podcast生活風格大獎〉,上網日期2025年5月2日,檢自:https://hakkanews.tw/2024/10/12/59-broadcast-admiralty/
    蔡偉鼎,2017,〈數位複製時代的靈光消逝論〉。《國立政治大學哲學學報》,Vol.38 pp.121-158.
    蔡瑋帆,2021,《以使用與滿足理論探討播客閱聽眾收聽意圖》。輔仁大學大眾傳播學研究所碩士論文。
    聲浪(SoundOn),2021,《2021 年度聲音經濟報告書》。
    __,2023,《2023 年度聲音經濟報告書》。
    謝佳玟,2021,《女性製作主持Podcast性節目之經驗探究》。國立高雄師範大學性別教育研究所碩士論文。
    Aspers, Patrik and Beckert, Jens, 2011, The Worth of Goods: Valuation and Pricing in the Economy. UK:Oxford University Press.
    Callon ,Michel, 1998, “The Embeddedness of Economic Markets in Economics”. The Sociological Review.46(1)
    Dijck, van, 2013a, The culture of connectivity: A Critical History of Social Media.UK:Oxford University Press.
    ___, 2013b, “ ‘You have one identity’ : performing the self on Facebook and LinkedIn”. Media Cult. Soc. 35(2):199–215.
    Fox, Kim & Ebada, Yasmeen, 2022, “Egyptian female Podcasters: shaping feminist identities”.Learning, Media and Technology.47(1):53-64.
    Henri Lefebvre (A), Gerald Moore, Stuart Elden (T), 2013, Rhythmanalysis. UK:Bloomsbury.
    Interactive Advertising Bureau (IAB), 2024. Podcasting in the creator economy: A long-term opportunity. Interactive Advertising Bureau. https://www.iab.com/insights/iab-Podcasting-in-the-creator-economy-guide-august-2024/
    Vrikki, Photini & Malik, Sarita, 2019, “Voicing lived-experience and anti-racism: Podcasting as a space at the margins for subaltern counterpublics”.Popular Communication.17(4):273-287.
    Lundströma, Markus & Lundström, Tomas, 2023, “ Podcast ethnography”. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 24(3):289-299.
    Lindgren, Mia, 2021, “ Intimacy and Emotions in Podcast Journalism: A Study of Award-Winning Australian and British Podcasts ”. Journalism Practice. 17(2):1-16
    Morri, Jeremy Wade, 2021, Podcasting. US: Polity.
    Nielsen, 2021, Podcast Audiences, Growing in Diversity, are the New Audio Opportunity.https://www.nielsen.com/zh/insights/2021/Podcasting-today-2/
    ___, 2023, As Podcast advertising grows, brand lift data can help brands demystify the ROI of their spending. https://www.nielsen.com/insights/2023/as-Podcast-advertising-grows-brand-lift-data-can-help-brands-demystify-the-roi-of-their-spending/
    Pérez-Alaejos, María-de-la-Peña-Mónica, Terol-Bolinches, Raúl and Barrios-Rubio, Andrés , 2022, “Podcast production and marketing strategies on the main platforms in Europe, North America, and Latin America. Situation and perspectives”. El Profesional de la Informacion 31(5):1699-2407.
    Regelski, Thomas A. , 2007, “Amateuring in music and its rivals“. Action, Criticism, and Theory for Music Education. 6(3):22-50.
    Rime, Jemily, Pike, Chris, and Collins, Tom, 2022, “ What is a Podcast? Considering innovations in Podcasting through the six-tensions framework”. Convergence. 28(5): 1260 – 1282.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    社會學系
    110254014
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0110254014
    資料類型: thesis
    顯示於類別:[社會學系] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 大小格式瀏覽次數
    401401.pdf3245KbAdobe PDF6檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋