English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 112704/143671 (78%)
Visitors : 49748613      Online Users : 821
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/20230


    Title: 價值形式與統治形式:對社會契約論的一個馬克思式的理解
    Other Titles: Value-forms and Governance-forms a Marxian Understanding of the Theory of Social Contract
    Authors: 孫善豪
    Sun, Shan-hao
    Keywords: 價值形式;統治形式;馬克思;魯濱遜;霍布斯;洛克;盧梭
    value-form;governance-form;Marx;Robinson Crusoe;Hobbes;Locke;Rousseau
    Date: 2002-09
    Issue Date: 2008-12-30 14:45:57 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本文的主要論點有四:1.馬克思的四種價值形式,蘊含了四種統治形式;2.四種統治形式,又分別適應於笛福、洛克、霍布斯與盧梭關於社會或社會契約的論述;3.由於四種價值形式與統治形式是一個發展的整體。因此,當社會契約理論被納入這個發展整體來理解時,它們也就被「模式化」,而成為一個發展的序列;4.這個發展的序列不同於歷史的序列,因為在這個序列中,霍布斯被認為是洛克理論的進一步發展,而盧梭的理論則是霍布斯理論的倒退。此外,一個隱藏並有待進一步討論的課題是:如果馬克思提出價值形式是為了取消價值,那麼統治形式的提出是否也指向統治的消除?若是,則它如何可能?
    There are four main arguments in this essay: 1. Marx`s four value- forms imply four governance-forms, 2. the latter are suited to the discourses of social dimension of Defoe, Locke, Hobbes and Rousseau. 3. Since the value-forms and governance-forms are both a totality of development, the theories of social contract are "modelized" as a series of development in so far as they were understood in such way. 4. This series is different to a historical one: Hobbes` theory would be taken as an advance of Locke`s, and Rousseau`s theory as a degradation of Hobbes`. In addition, there is still another thesis hidden in this essay. If Marx`s formation of value-form is to abolish value, does it mean to abolish goverance when the goverance-form was established? If the answer is yes, how is it possible? This thesis is to be further developed.
    Relation: 政治與社會哲學評論,2,47-83
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[政治學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    4783.pdf1402KbAdobe PDF2833View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback