Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/30110
|
| Title: | 利用知識管理蓄積智慧資本-以以筆記型電腦廠商之工業設計部門為例
The Research of applying knowledge management to increase intellectual capital: an illustration of notebook companies’ ID center |
| Authors: | 賀楚芬
Ho, Chu Fen |
| Contributors: | 吳思華
Professor Se-Hwa Wu
賀楚芬
Ho, Chu Fen |
| Keywords: | 知識管理
知識創新
設計創新
工業設計
創新資本
智慧資本 |
| Date: | 2007 |
| Issue Date: | 2009-09-11 17:15:59 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 本研究欲藉由瞭解筆記型電腦產業的工業設計部門對知識管理理論的認識程度，企業內部對知識管理活動的實行規劃與具體落實內容以及其智慧資本的呈現態樣，進一步分析企業是否能夠藉由推行知識管理來正向增加企業的智慧資本與市場價值，以說明知識管理與智慧資本兩者的關係。
在現今的企業組織與產業環境當中，知識管理理論已經廣為企業所採納，更對企業應累積與強化其自身的智慧資本有所體認。企業若能透過推行「知識管理」，將內部細微繁雜的資訊、知識、經驗流程與作業活動透過機制保存並且進行流通與應用，將會對企業的運作效率以及創新能力有所幫助。尤其是本研究之研究對象-筆記型電腦廠商的工業設計部門，更是需要知識創新以及知識運用，以增強其設計能力以及創新能力。在筆記型電腦的產業競爭激烈，產品趨向同質化、標準化、與微毛利化，唯有透過優異的工業設計創新能力，結合生活美學、歷史文化、藝術、情緒感受以及使用者的新奇經驗等，才能創造差異，為產品賦予新的價值，另闢企業經營與產品競爭的新藍海。
本研究首先透過對過去專家學者所提出的文獻做探討，歸納出知識管理以及智慧資本的理論定義與兩者之間的關係。總結文獻探討所知，本研究認為智慧資本是知識管理活動的另一種報導模式，有助於知識管理成效之衡量，而知識管理活動則是活化知識、激發創新來增加智慧資本的重要方式。組織部門的智慧資本存量與發展重心會影響知識管理活動的內容與推行方式。而知識管理活動的推行越活絡，成效越好，智慧資本的內涵則越豐富。
而後將由文獻探討所建立之理論架構於筆記型電腦產業的實務運作環境中進行驗證。本研究於產業中挑選四家筆記型電腦廠商之工業設計部門，個別就其智慧資本存量以及在其組織中進行的知識管理活動進行個案研究，以呈現產業界的真實活動與完整的事實描述，並以知識管理與智慧資本的組成構面做跨個案的分析與比較。
總結文獻探討以及個案訪談與分析的結果，本研究之研究結論與建議如下:
一、筆記型電腦的工業設計部門能夠以知識管理活動累積智慧資本；部門內知識管理活動越豐富，對智慧資本累積也會有正向的影響。
二、智慧資本理論可以做為企業組織推行知識管理的參考架構。知識管理活動的內容可以根據企業組織智慧資本發展的重點進行規劃。
三、筆記型電腦廠商的產業定位與策略目標會直接影響工業設計部門智慧資本發展目標，進而影響知識管理活動的內容。
四、企業組織能夠透過知識管理增加其智慧資本，同時輔以智慧資本內涵的衡量系統，能夠瞭解知識管理活動推行之成效。但其價值較難以利用量化的財務性指標做評量。
五、企業組織或部門在導入知識管理，進行知識管理活動的同時，其本身也是一種知識創新。
六、本研究建議企業從管理階層到一般業務階層，都應加強知識管理與智慧資本理論的推廣與應用，以提升企業與組織知識含量以及知識創新能力。
七、建議先以單一部門試行的方式，推行知識管理活動與智慧資本衡量，之後再推行到事業單位而至企業整體。
八、建議在衡量企業的創新資本時，可先以智慧財產為財務性指標，反映於財務報表當中，可鼓勵部門為追求財務績效表現，而有積極創新的動力。
九、筆記型電腦廠商在產品設計時，第一步要做的是預防侵權，同時在追求智慧財產的數量之外，還要思考智慧財產的品質與管理，如授權交易與合作等。
十、關於後續研究之方向，建議可以針對組織內產生智慧資本後，是否有新的商業模式，能夠將組織內累積的無形資產與智慧資本做更廣泛的商業利用，如做為交易的標的進行利潤創造。另外有關利用創新成果以新的商業交易模式創造現金流的想法，則建議針對在科技產品的工業設計中，除了材質創新以及機電整合的技術創新可以具體的成為智慧財產進行交易授權之外，關於設計美學呈現「Fine Art」也應該積極思考授權交易的可能性以及實行模式。
The main purpose of this research is to discuss the relation between “Knowledge Management” and “Intellectual Capital” both in theory side and practical side in real business entities, enterprises, independent departments, or small organizations. By taking the Industrial Design departments for examples, this research is going to describe and define the different application plans and specific activities of Knowledge Management, and also present the stock and developing track of Intellectual Capital in the study cases, so as to infer that if enterprises can enhance their Intellectual Capital via applying Knowledge Management or not.
In nowadays, the Knowledge Management theory is adopted generally by many enterprises. They also realize the importance of accumulating the Intellectual Capital; it will be a key way to enhance their organization value and external competence. By applying Knowledge Management, enterprise can build up a practicable mechanism to store, file, consolidate their multifarious knowledge, including subtle data, information, know-how, experience, operation process for transferring and using, and it will be very helpful to elevate the operation efficiency and the ability of innovation.
First, learning from the current Knowledge Management and Intellectual Capital literatures and papers of many experts and scholars, this research generalize that Knowledge Management and Intellectual Capital is positive related. Intellectual Capital is a useful measure system to reveal the results and effects of Knowledge Management plan and activities. On the other hand, Knowledge Management is also an important method to activate internal knowledge content to encourage creation and innovation. However, for companies, organizations or departments, the Intellectual Capital focus and current stock will influence their Knowledge Management activity contents and implementation method. The more various activities to follow, the better quality and value of Intellectual Capital.
After constructing a theory hypothesis frame from literature studying, this research is going to apply the theory hypothesis into practical circumstances in ID departments of four Notebook companies, and tries to find out then summarize their daily operations, which are regard as the activities of Knowledge Management and the Intellectual Capital.
According to the case study findings, this research can describe the actual operations and daily works of each ID department, so as to analyze the relevance between Intellectual Capital stock and the Knowledge Management activities with theories structure separately, also the cross cases comparison to verify the generality in actual industry.
Summarize the results of literature study and specific case study, this research have the conclusion and recommendations as follow:
1. The ID department or ID center of NB companies are able to accumulate their Intellectual Capital via Knowledge Management activities; the more Knowledge Management activities, the more stock and better quality of Intellectual Capital.
2. Enterprises can take Intellectual Capital theory structure as a reference for Knowledge Management implementation. The content and detail items of these activities can be planed to focus on key elements of Intellectual Capital development.
3. Different industry position in value chain and strategy target will affect ID centers’ goal of Intellectual Capital development directly, then also affect the content of Knowledge Management Plan.
4. Enterprises or business organizations can increase their Intellectual Capital with Knowledge Management; also, by Intellectual Capital measure system, they also can understand the performance and influence of their Knowledge Management plan and activities. However, the created value for the organizations is difficult to measure with quantifiable financial index.
5. For enterprise and organizations, when they are implementing the Knowledge Management plan and activities, they modify the proper method to make it more smooth and inefficient; it is also creating precious knowledge so call knowledge innovation at the same time.
6. This research suggests that the enterprises and organization could pay more attention and resource to popularize the Knowledge Management and Intellectual Capital theory, so as to raise the internal knowledge base and innovation ability.
7. Following the suggestion above, companies can start Knowledge Management and Intellectual Capital measurement from small independent departments or teams first, then apply the successful experience and know how to whole business unit and whole company afterward.
8. For innovation capital measuring, departments or organizations could use the intellectual property to be a kind of financial index to reflect the profit value and contribution in financial statements. It could be realistic method to encourage the organization members have more motivation of innovation and creation for better financial performance.
9. For Product design of laptops, the first and most important step is to prevent Intellectual Property infringement, and the next step is to develop the quantity of intellectual property like patents. Besides, companies also need to pay more attention on the intellectual quality control and management, such as technology license and cooperation and so forth.
10. As for future deep going researches, there are two possible directions to follow. First, it is important to develop New business models so as to help companies and organizations to use or apply their intangible assets and Intellectual Capital in business operation extensively, not only increase the operating efficiency but also make more cash flow and actual profit. Second, we could derive more thoughts for intellectual property licensing. During the industrial design process of high-tech products, we should think the possibility to find more licensing targets like “Fine Art Design,” but not limit to the new material application or the technology integration for ME and EE. From the other side, we are also supposed to come up a practical model for Fine Art licensing to facilitate the real business trading and profit creating.
Key words: Knowledge Management, Knowledge creation, Knowledge innovation, Intellectual Capital, Intangible assets.
第一章 緒論 ..............................................1
第一節 研究背景與動機 .....................................1
第二節 研究目的與研究問題 ..................................4
第三節 研究範圍 ...........................................5
第四節 研究流程 ...........................................5
第二章 文獻探討 ...........................................7
第一節 知識管理 ...........................................7
第二節 智慧資本 ..........................................21
第三節 知識管理與智慧資本的結合 ............................42
第四節 小結 .............................................46
第三章 研究方法 ..........................................47
第一節 研究架構 ..........................................47
第二節 個案研究方法 .....................................48
第三節 研究設計 ..........................................49
第四節 研究限制 ..........................................53
第四章 筆記型電腦產業與工業設計分析.........................54
第一節 筆記型電腦產業介紹..................................54
第二節 新產品開發流程與工業設計程序.........................58
第三節 筆記型電腦之工業設計發展與管理趨勢....................60
第五章 個案研究...........................................63
第一節 A公司個案 .........................................63
第二節 B公司個案 .........................................76
第三節 C公司個案 .........................................89
第四節 D公司個案 ........................................101
第五節 個案分析 .........................................113
第六章 研究發現 .........................................126
第七章 結論與建議 .......................................136
第一節 研究結論 .........................................136
第二節 研究建議 .........................................140
參考文獻 .................................................143 |
| Reference: | 一、 中文部分:
王如晨(2005)，台灣IT代工業全面裂變 向左走還是向右走，第一財經日報。
朱道凱譯(1999)，Kaplan & Norton(1994)原著。平衡計分卡-資訊時代的策略管理工具(The Balance Scorecard)。台北，臉譜
吳安妮(2003), 智慧資本之衡量與平衡計分卡之關係，智慧資本與技術平價之課程教材
吳安妮(2003)，智慧資本之觀念與架構之探討，智慧資本與技術評價課程教材。
吳思華(1998)，策略九說。台北：臉譜。
吳思華(2000)，「網際網路智慧資本衡量與發展措施研究計畫」，資策會資訊市場情報中心。
吳思華(2001)， 知識經濟、知識資本與知識管理，知識資本在台灣。台北：遠流，頁15-17,24-25。
吳思華(2002)，「我國產業智慧資本先導性個案研究計畫」，財團法人資訊工業策進會
宋偉航譯(2001)，Stewart, Thomas A. (1997) 原著。智慧資本-資訊時代的企業利基。台北，智庫文化。
林良陽(2007)， 智慧資本與動態能耐對研發團隊創新績效的影響， 國立政治大學科技管理研究所博士論文。
林東清(2003)， 知識管理，台北：智勝書局，頁14-15, 頁97。
林大容譯(1999)，Leif Edvinsson, Michael S. Malone (1997)原著。智慧資本：如何衡量資訊時代無形資產的價值。台北，麥田出版。
莊弘鈺(2006)，創新活動下支智慧資本衡量系統：以IC設計公司為例，國立 政治大學智慧財產研究所碩士論文, 頁63-70.
陳木生(2002)， 知識管理下組織學習之研究 - 以盛餘公司為例，國立中山大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
馮浩廷(2004), 智慧財產證券化之研究， 國立政治大學智慧財產研究所碩士 論文, 頁18-19.
黃怡瑄(2008)，前瞻2008年台灣筆記型電腦產業發展趨勢， 台北：資策會市場研究中心
黃智銘,(2007) 聯想設工業設計中心 拚消費市場，台北，工商時報
劉江彬、黃俊英(2004)，智慧財產管理總論，台北：華泰文化
劉京偉譯(2000)，知識管理的第一本書，Arthur Andersen Business Consulting勤業管理顧問公司原著，商周出版社，譯自Arthur Andersen Business Consulting，Zukai Knowledge Management。
劉常勇(1999)，如何衡量你的企業智商，2008/5/2取自http://www.cme.org.tw/know/
蔡燿駿(2005)，贏明天的競爭：以設計力揮軍全球， e天下雜誌四月號。
賴彥豪(2001), 智慧資本之評量與知識管理活動－－兩個個案分析， 國立政 治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文，頁45-50。
二、 英文部分:
Arthur Andersen and APQC (1996), “The KM Assessment Tools: External Benchmarking Version”, Winter.
Arthur Andersen Business Consulting (1999), Zukai Knowledge Management, Tokyo: Toyo Kenizi.
Benbasat,I., Goldstein D. K.and Mead M. (1987), ”The Case Research Strategy in Studies of Information Systems”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 11, No. 3 (Sep., 1987), pp. 369-386 .
Bontis, N.(2001), “Assessing knowledge assets: A review of the models used to measure intellectual capital,” International Journal of Management Review, 3(1), p.41-60.
Bontis, N., Crossan, M, & Hulland, J. (2002.), “Managing an organizational learning system by aligning stocks and flows of knowledge”, Journal of Management Studies, 39(4): p.437-470.
Botkin J., Smart Business–How Knowledge Communities can Revolutionize Your Company, New York: The Free Press, 1999.
Brennan, N and Connell, B. (2000), ""Intellectual capital: current issues and policy implications``, paper presented at the 23rd Annual Congress of the European Accounting Association, Munich, 29-31 March.
Brooking, A. (1996.), Intellectual Capital：Core Asset for the Third Millennium Enterprise. p.13.
Brooking, A. (1997). Intellectual Capital, London: International Thomson Business Press.
Choo, C.W & N. Bontis (2002), “Sensemaking, Knowledge Creation, and Decision Making”, the Strategic Management of Intellectual Capital and Organizational Knowledge, New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Davenport, T. H. & Prusak, L.(1998). Working Knowledge: How Organization Manage What They Know, Harvard Business School Press.
Davenport, T. H.; Delong, D.W. and Beers M.C. (1998), “Successful Knowledge Management”, Sloan Management Review, summer, 1999.
Davenport, T.H. and Prusak, L. (1997), Information Ecology: Mastering the information and knowledge management, NY: Oxford Univ. Press.
De Long, D. W. & Fahey, L. (2000) “Diagnose cultural barriers to knowledge management,” Academy of Management Executive, 14(4): p.113-127
Demarest, Marc (1997),”Understanding Knowledge Management,” Long Range Planning, Vol.30, No.3 p.374-384.
Dretske, F. (1981), “The pragmatic dimension of knowledge,” Philosophical Studies 40, p.363.
Dzinkowski R. (2000.), “The measurement and management of intellectual capital: An introduction”, International Management Accounting Study, p.32-36.
Edvinsson, L & M. Malone (1997.), “Intellectual Capital Realizing Your Company’s True Value by Finding Its Hidden Roots”, Harper Collins Publishers, Inc.p.68-115.
Galbriath, J.K. (1969), The New Industrial State, Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Holtshouse, D. (1998), “Knowledge research issues,” California Management Review, Berkeley, 40(3), pp.277-280.
Johnson, W. (1999.), “An integrative taxonomy of intellectual capital：Measuring the stock and stock and flow of intellectual capital component in the firm”, Int. J. Technology Management, Vol.18. p.562-575.）
Joia, L.A., (2000),”Measuring intangible corporate assets-linking business strategy with intellectual capital,” Journal of Intellectual Capital, 1.1 (1), p.68-84.
Kaplan, R.S. & Norton, D. (1997), “The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action”, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Kim, D. H. (1993.), “The link between individual and organizational learning”, Sloan Management Review, Fall: p. 37-50.
Kotnour, T. "Determining the Benefit of Knowledge Management Activities." IEEE, 1997, p94-99.
Lynn, B. (1998.), “Performance evaluation in the new economy: bringing the measurement and evaluation of intellectual capital into the management planning and control system,” International Journal of Technology Management, Vol.16. p.171.
Machlup, F. (1962), The Production and Distribution of Knowledge in the United States. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Machlup, F., Mansfield, U. (Eds.) (1983). The Study of Information. Interdisciplinary Messages, New York: John Wiley, p.641-671.
McElroy, M. 2002. “Social innovation capital”, Journal of Intellectual Capital 3(1): p.32. )
Mouritsen, J., H. T. Larsen, P. N. Bukh, and M. R. Johansen. (2001.), “Reading an intellectual capital statement: Describing and prescribing Knowledge management strategies. “ Journal of Intellectual Capital 2(4): p.359-383.
Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5 (1), 14-37.
Nonaka, I. and Takeuchi, H. (1995.), “The Knowledge Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation”, New York: Oxford University Press.
Nonaka, I., (1991.), “The Knowledge Creating Company”, Harvard Business Review, Nov.-Dec.
Nonaka, I., and Konno, N.(1998.) The concept of "ba": Building a foundation for Knowledge creation. California Management Review, 40(3): p.40-55.
Nonaka, I., Toyama, R. & Konno, N. 2000. SECI, Ba and Leadership: A unified Model of Dynamic Knowledge Creation. Long Range Planning, 33: 5-34.
O’Dell, C. and Grayson, C.J. (1998.), “If Only We Knew What We Know: Identification and Transfer of Internal Best Practices,” California Management Review, 40(3), pp.154-173.
OECD (1996), The Knowledge-Based Economy, Paris.
Pan, S. L. & Scarbrough, H. (1999). “Knowledge management in practice: A case study.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 11, 259-275
Pan, S.L. and Scarbrough, H. (1999), “Knowledge management in practice: an exploratory case study”, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, Vol.11, No.3, pp.359-374.
Polanyi, M. (1967.), The Tactic Dimension. New York: M.E. Sharp Inc.
Rennie, M.,(1999), “Accounting for knowledge assets: Do we need new financial statement?” Int. J. Technology Management (18), p.648-659.
Roos, Goran, and Johan, R. “Measuring your company’s intellectual performance.” Long Range Planning (Jun 1997): pp. 413-426.
Roos, J., Roos, R., Edvinsson, L. and Dragonetti, N. (1998), “Intellectual Capital: Navigating in the New Business Landscape. ”, New York : New York University Press.
Roos, J. (1998) "Exploring the Concept of Intellectual Capital (IC)", Long Ranger Planning, February, Vol.31, p.150-153.
Saint-Onge (1996), Tactic Knowledge: The Key to the Strategic Alignment of Intellectual Capital Strategy and Leadership Vol.24, p.10-14.
Shin, M., Holden, T. and Schmidt, A. (2000), “From Knowledge theory to management practice: towards an integrated approach,” Information Processing and Management, Vol.37, p341.
Stewart, T. A. (1997) “Intellectual Capital: The New Wealth of Organizations. ”, New York: Bantam Doubleday Dell Publishing Group, Inc.
Stewart, Thomas A. "Your Company’s most valuable asset：Intellectual Capital", Fortune, October 3，pp.28-33, 1994.
Sullivan, P. (2000.), “Value-Driven Intellectual Capital”: How to Convert Intangible Corporate Assets into Market Value”, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. p.7.
Sullivan, P. H. (1998). “Profiting from Intellectual Capital - Extracting Value from Innovation”, New-York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Sveiby, K. E. (1997). “The New Organizational Wealth: Managing and Measuring Knowledge Based Assets.” San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Tiwana, A., (2000) “The Essential Guide to Knowledge Management：e-business and CRM applications”, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Ulrich, D. (1998), “Intellectual capital=competence x commitment,” Sloan Management Review, 39 (2), p.15-26.
Von Krogh, G. & Nonaka I. & Nishigushi T.(1998), The Knowledge Creation: A New Source of Value, California Management Review Vol 40, No.3 Spring 1998
Von Krogh, G. (1998), “Care in Knowledge Creation”, California Management Review
Von Krogh, G., Nonaka, I., & Aben, M. (2001.), “Making the most of your company`s knowledge: a strategic framework”, Long Range Planning, 34(4):p.421-439.
Von Krogh, G., Nonaka, I., and Ichijo, K. (1997) “Develop knowledge activists!” European Management Journal, 15:5, 475-483.
Wiig, K. M. (1993), Knowledge Management Foundation, Schema Press.
Yin, R.K. (1994), Case study research: Design and methods, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Zack, M. H. (1998), “Managing Codified Knowledge”, Sloan Management Review.40:4, p.45-48.
Zack, M. H. (1999), “Developing a Knowledge Strategy,” California Management Review 41:3, Spring.
三、 網際網路資料、新聞與產業報告:
IDC Report, (2008), Worldwide Personal PC Shipment Report, 2007 Q4 & 2008 Q1.
Yahoo HK ：http://hk.biz.yahoo.com/p/hk/prospect/index.html?s=0992，最後造訪日於2008/5/20.
台灣創意設計中心官方網站: http://www.tdc.org.tw/.最後造訪日於2008/5/12
姚總監個人網頁：http://www.lineoid.com/index.php/113，最後造訪日於2008/5/20
劉常勇知識管理資料庫：http://www.cme.org.tw/know/，
台灣代工產業介紹:http://www2.chihlee.edu.tw/96203/tradeshow2/E001.htm, 最後造訪日於2008/6/18. |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
智慧財產研究所
91361009
96 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0913610093 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [智慧財產研究所] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| index.html | 0Kb | HTML2 | 744 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
