English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 111300/142217 (78%)
Visitors : 48259492      Online Users : 786
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 會計學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/30160
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/30160


    Title: 委託書徵求事件與公司經營績效、股權結構及盈餘管理關聯性之研究
    Authors: 吳曉寧
    Contributors: 汪泱若
    吳曉寧
    Keywords: 委託書徵求
    控股結構
    治理特性
    盈餘管理
    proxy solicitation
    ownership structure
    governance characteristics
    earnings management
    Date: 2004
    Issue Date: 2009-09-11 17:22:01 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究以2002至2004年非金融業之臺灣上市櫃公司為研究對象,從經營績效、股權結構及公司治理特性等觀點,探討企業發生委託書徵求事件之決定性因素、經營績效及其與盈餘管理行為之關聯性,並進一步分析企業特質對企業從事常態性委託書徵求行為之影響。就委託書徵求事件之決定性因素而言,本研究發現,整體績效表現愈差、獲利能力愈差、現金股利發放愈少、內部人持股比率愈低、董監事質押比率愈高、最終控制者之股份控制權愈低、席次偏離股份控制權程度愈大之企業,發生委託書徵求事件之機率愈高。經營績效之實證結果顯示,徵求委託書、利用金字塔及交叉持股之控股結構、控制權偏離所有權程度愈大之企業,當期之經營績效較差。前述實證結果亦適用於常態性徵求委託書之企業。至於委託書徵求事件與盈餘管理行為之關聯性而言,委託書徵求為企業從事盈餘管理行為之誘因之一,尤其在常態性徵求委託書之情況更為顯著。企業之董監事質押比例愈高、負債比率愈高、席次控制權偏離盈餘分配權程度愈大、控股結構複雜度(金字塔結構或交叉持股)愈高,其盈餘管理幅度較高。
    Based on a sample of non-baking corporations listed on Taiwan Securities Exchange and Over the Counter over the period of 2002 to 2004, this thesis first investigates the determinants and operation performance of proxy solicitation behavior, followed by examining the relationship between proxy solicitation and earnings management. In addition, the characteristics of companies that appeal to proxy solicitation on a regular basis are also studied. The empirical results show that companies with poorer overall performance, poorer profitability, lower cash dividend payout ratio, lower insiders shareholdings, higher share pledge ratio by the board members, lower control rights, and higher deviation in control rights from cash flow rights, are more likely to apply proxy solicitation. The empirical findings also indicate that companies with proxy solicitation, pyramid and cross-holdings structures, and higher deviation in control rights from cash flow rights, tend to have worse operating performance for the current period. The findings aforementioned can also apply to the companies that repeatedly employ proxy solicitation. This research documents that proxy solicitation is strongly associated with earnings management behavior, especially for companies that apply proxy solicitation repetitively. Companies with higher share pledge ratio by the board members, higher debt ratio, higher deviation in control rights from cash flow rights and employing pyramid and cross-holdings structures, are found to be associated with higher magnitude of earnings management.
    Reference: 一、中文部份
    (專書)
    葉銀華、李存修、柯承恩,2002,公司治理與評等系統,台北市:智商文化出版。
    王文宇,2000,公司與企業法制,台北市:元照出版有限公司。
    (期刊)
    王育慧,2004,少數股東之保護-論引進股東提案權,證券暨期貨月刊,第22卷第二期:60-72。
    許崇源、李怡宗、林宛瑩、鄭桂蕙,2003a,控制權與盈餘分配權偏離之衡量(上),貨幣觀測與信用評等雙月刊,第42期(7月):15-31。
    _______, 2003b,控制權與盈餘分配權偏離之衡量(下),貨幣觀測與信用評等雙月刊,第43期(9月):11-26。
    許崇源、林宛瑩、郭學平、林尚志,2003,複雜交叉持股之典範-力霸東森集團,貨幣觀測與信用評等雙月刊,第44期(11月):36-59。
    陳慶文、李崑進,1995,委託書收購對公司經營績效影響之探討,證券市場發展季刊,第七卷第一期,125-177
    葉銀華,2002,台灣公司治理的問題與改革之道,證券暨期貨管理,第20 券第11期:1-16。
    劉連煜,1995,委託書徵求人之資格及其代理股數限制規定之檢討,法律評論第61卷第9、10期合刊:2-7。
    鄭丁旺,2004,委託書徵求制度該大翻修了,會計研究月刊,第221期(5月):14-15。
    (研討會論文集)
    林宛瑩、許崇源、戚務君,2005,盈餘模糊度、控制權偏離與財務報表重編,二OO四會計理論與實務研討會論文集,國立政治大學會計系。
    (碩博士論文)
    王大維,2003,公司治理相關要素與公司績效關聯性之研究-以台灣上市公司為例,私立淡江大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文。
    王文玫,1998,委託書爭奪戰,經營權變動對股東財富之影響,國立政治大學企業 管理學系碩士班未出版論文。
    王麗惠,1992,委託書收購對經理人職位安全之影響-台灣股票上市公司實證,國立中央大學財務管理學系碩士班未出版論文。
    何里仁,2003,公司治理之資訊透明度與績效評核關聯性之研究,私立逢甲大學會計與財稅研究所未出版碩士論文。
    李心倩,1997,董監事改選抗爭決定因素之探討,私立東海大學管理學系碩士班未出版論文。
    李欣倩,1997,董監事改選抗爭決定因素之探討,私立東海大學管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
    汪青萍,1993,委託書收購、經理人職位異動暨股東財富實證關係之探討,國立中央大學財務管理學系碩士班未出版論文。
    林玉霞,2002,臺灣上市公司代理問題、公司治理與股東價值之研究,私立中原大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文。
    林尚志,2004,我國公司治理評等指標建立之研究,國立政治大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文。
    林青如,1992,委託書收購決定因素之探討--相關文獻回顧與臺灣實証研究,國立中央大學財務管理學系碩士班未出版論文。
    林重印,1997,股權結構對委託書爭奪戰結果之影響,國立中正大學會計學系碩士班未出版論文。
    洪聰敏,2004,委託書徵求與董監改選對會計資訊與公司價值影響之研究,私立中原大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文。
    翁淑育,2000,臺灣上市公司股權結構、核心代理問題與公司價值之研究,私立輔仁大學金融研究所未出版碩士論文。
    馬瑜霙,2003,我國獨立董事與獨立監察人之屬性與盈餘管理之關聯性研究,國立政治大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文。
    高宏鎰,2004,委託書決定因素及委託書與盈餘管理之關聯性研究,私立中原大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文。
    高蘭芬,2002,董監事股權質押之代理問題對會計資訊與公司績效之影響,國立成功大學會計研究所未出版博士論文。
    許武利,2001,委託書爭奪戰對股東財富之影響,國立中山大學財務管理學系碩士班未出版論文。
    郭學平,2004,臺灣上市櫃公司自願性設置獨立董監事因素之研究,國立政治大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文。
    陳弘韋,2002,委託書使用規則修正對委託書徵求發生機率之影響-台灣地區上市公司之實證分析,朝陽科技大學財務金融系碩士班未出版論文。
    陳宏姿,2001,董監事結構與企業經營績效關聯之研究,國立政治大學會計系未出版碩士論文。
    陳玠汶,2003,企業控制權爭奪機制之研究-以開發金融控股公司為例,大葉大學事業經營研究所未出版論文。
    陳智逢,1996,公司控制市場之委託書收購-經營績效與股東財富再檢定,國立中正大學財務金融學系碩士班未出版論文。
    彭筱倩,2004,盈餘管理與公司治理關聯性之研究-以我國財務危機公司為例,國立政治大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文。
    曾紀明,1995,委託書收購對公司經營績效暨股東財富影響之研究,國立臺灣大學財務金融研究所未出版碩士論文。
    黃鈺光,1993,我國上市公司董事會特性與經營績效之研究,國立台灣大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文。
    楊淑清,1996,委託書收購事件與公司經營績效-以台灣地區上市公司為例,國立中正大學會計學系碩士班未出版論文。
    楊慧玲,2002,董事會結構及其變動對股東財富與經營績效影響之研究,朝陽大學企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
    楊麗弘,2000,台灣上市公司股權結構與經營績效之研究-由董監事持股質押效果論之,長庚大學管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
    詹玉霞,2003,盈餘管理與公司治理對財務報告重編影響之研究,私立東吳大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文。
    蕭鋼柱,1996,委託書收購對公司經營績效影響之研究,國立中興大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文。
    駱筱惠,2000,委託書收購、董監改選結果與高階經理異動-台灣地區上市公司之實證研究,朝陽科技大學財務金融系碩士班未出版論文。
    羅陽春,2001,我國上市公司董監改選前盈餘管理行為之研究,國立政治大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文。
    (研究報告)
    涂一卿,2002,台灣企業公司治理特性的比較分析-所有權結構的初步性探討,國科會專案研究計劃。
    (網頁資料)
    行政院金融監督管理委員會證券期貨局 http://www.sfb.gov.tw/
    全國法規資料庫 http://law.moj.gov.tw/
    委託書公告相關資料免費查詢系統 http://free.sfi.org.tw/
    二、英文部分
    (Journal paper)
    Austin, D. V. 1965. Proxy Contests and Corporate Reform. Financial Executive (July):20-30.
    Bartov, E, F. A. Gul, and J. Tsui. 2001. Discretionary-accruals models and audit qualifications. Journal of Accounting and Economics 30: 421-452.
    Claessens, S., S. Djankov and L.H.P. Lang. 2000. The separation of ownership and control in East Asian corporation. Journal of Financial Economics 58(October/November):81-112.
    Claessens, S., S. Djankov, J.P.H. Fan and L.H.P. Lang. 2002. Disentangling the incentive and entrenchment effects of large shareholdings. Journal of Finance 57(December):2741-2772.
    Collins, Daniel W. and DeAngelo, Linda. 1990. Accounting Information and Corporate Governanve:Market and Analyst Reactions to Earnings of Firms Engaged in Proxy Contests. Journal of Accounting and Economics 13:213-247.
    DeAngelo, H. and L. DeAngelo. 1989. The Role of Proxy Contest in the Governance of Publicly Held Corporations. Journal of Financial Economics 23:29-59.
    DeAngelo, Linda. 1986. Accounting numbers as market valuation substitutes:A study of management buyouts of public stockholders. The Accounting Review 61(July):400-421.
    DeAngelo, Linda. 1988a. Managerial Competition, Information Costs and Corporate Governance:The Use of Accounting Performance Measures in Proxy Contests. Journal of Accounting and Economics 10:3-36.
    Dechow, P. M., R. G. Sloan and A. P. Sweeney. 1996. Causes and consequences of earnings manipulation:An analysis of firms subject to enforcement actions by the SEC. Contemporary Accounting Research 13(Spring):1-36.
    Dechow, P. M., R. G. Sloan, and A. P. Sweeney. 1995. Detecting earnings management. The Accounting Review(April): 193-226.
    Dodd, P. and J.B. Warner. 1983. On Corporate Governance:A Study of Proxy Contests. Journal of Financial Economics 11:401-438.
    Duvall, Richard M and Austin, Douglas V., 1965. Predicting the Results of Proxy Contests. Journal of Finance 20(September):464-471.
    Faccio, M., and L. H. P. Lang. 2002. The Separation of Ownership and Control: An Analysis of Ultimate Ownership in Western European Corporations. Journal of Financial Economics 65: 365-395.
    Friedlan, J. M. 1994. Accounting choice of issuers of initial public offerings. Contemporary Accounting Research 11(Summer):1-31.
    Hancock, G.D. and M. Mougoue,1991. The Impact of Financial Factors on Proxy Contest Outcome. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting 18:541-551.
    Heally, P. M. 1985. The effect of bonus schemes on accounting decisions. Journal of Accounting and Economics 7(April):85-107.
    Ikenberry, D and J. Lakonishok. 1993. Corporate Governance through the Proxy Contest:Evidence and Implications. Journal of Business 66:405-435.
    Jensen, M. C. and R. S. Ruback. 1983. The market for corporate control:The scientific evidence. Journal of Financial Economics 11(April):5-50.
    Jensen, M. C. and W. H. Meckling. 1976. Theory of the firm:Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3(October):305-360.
    La Porta, R., F. Lopez-de-Silanes and A. Shleifer. 1999. Corporate ownership around the world. Journal of Finance 54(April):471-517.
    La Porta, R., F. Lopez-de-Silanes, A. Shleifer, and R. W. Vishny. 2002. Investor Protection and Corporate Valuation. Journal of Finance 57: 1147-1170.
    Lang, M., and R. Lundholm. 1993. Cross-sectional determinants of analyst ratings of corporate disclosures. Journal of Accounting Research 31 (Autumn): 246-271.
    Manne, Henry G., 1965. Mergers and the Market for Corporate Control. Journal of Political Economy 73:110-120.
    Mukherjee, T.K. and O. Varela, 1993. Corporate Operating Performance around the Proxy Contest. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting 20:417-425.
    Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, 1998. Global corporate governance principal. Paris:OECD.
    Pound, John, 1988. The Efficiency of Shareholders Voting:Evidence from Proxy Contests. Journal of Financial Economics 20:237-265.
    Watts, R., and J. Zimmerman. 1986. Positive accounting theory. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.:Prentice-Hall.
    _____. 1990. Positive accounting theory: A ten-year perspective. The Accounting Review 65 (January): 131-156.
    Yeh, Y.H., T.S. Lee, and T. Woidtke, 2001. Family Control and Corporate Governance: Evidence for Taiwan. International Review of Finance 2:21-48.
    Yermack, D. 1996. Higher Market Valuation of Companies with a small Board of Directors. Journal of Financial Economics 40:185-211.
    (Conference paper)
    Chen, Y., and S. Y. Hu. 2002. The Controlling Shareholder’s Personal Stock Loan and Firm Performance. 2002 NTU International Conference on Finance. Taipei, Taiwan.
    Lee, T. S. and Y. H.Yeh. 2001. Corporate Governance and Financial Distress : Evidence from Taiwan. 2001 Asia Pacific Finance Association Conference.Bangkok, Thailand.
    Yeh, Y. H. 2001. Do the Controlling Shareholder Enhance Corporate Value? The 14th Annual Australasian Finance and Banking Conference. Sydney, Australia.
    Yeh, Y. H. 2002. Board Composition and the Separate of Ownership from Control. Taiwan. The 2002 Asia Pacific Finance Association Annual Conference.Tokyo, Japan.
    Yeh, Y. H., and T. S. Lee. 2002. Corporate Governance and Corporate Equity Investments: Evidence from Taiwan. The 9th Global Finance Conference.Beijing, China.
    (Book)
    Berly, A. A. and Means, G. C. 1932. The Modern Corporation and Private Property, New York:MacMillan
    (Dissertation)
    Austin, Douglas V., 1964. The Causes of Proxy Contests:An Empirical Study, 1956-1960. Ph. D. dissertation, Indian University
    (Website)
    U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission http://www.sec.gov
    OECD http://www.oecd.org/home/
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    會計研究所
    92353004
    93
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0092353004
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[會計學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2539View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback