English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 110941/141868 (78%)
Visitors : 47537494      Online Users : 983
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 會計學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/30163
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/30163


    Title: 公司治理評等與公司績效關聯性之研究
    Authors: 方尹妏
    Contributors: 林宛瑩
    方尹妏
    Keywords: 公司治理
    公司價值
    經營績效
    股價報酬
    Date: 2005
    Issue Date: 2009-09-11 17:22:20 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究以2003年、2004年之國內非金融業上市公司為研究對象,嘗試從股權結構、董事會職責、董監事專業性及財務透明度四項組成構面建構一套衡量公司治理品質之公司治理評等系統,以探討公司治理評等表現與公司價值、公司經營績效及股價報酬間之關聯性。研究結果顯示,公司治理整體與四項組成構面表現愈佳之公司其公司價值愈高。在經營績效方面,無論以資產報酬率或是權益報酬率作為公司經營績效之衡量變數,公司治理綜合指標與公司之經營績效皆呈現顯著正相關,代表公司治理機制愈好,公司經營績效表現愈優異;且公司治理機制與當期或是次期股價皆有顯著正關係;但在股價報酬方面,除了董事會職責構面與次期股價報酬有顯著正相關外,公司治理綜合指標與其他組成構面與本期或次期之股價報酬皆無顯著關聯性存在。
    Based on a sample of non-banking firms listed on Taiwan Securities Exchange over the period of 2003 to 2004 , this thesis attempt to develop a Taiwan Corporate Governance Index ranking system (TCGI) and then explores the relationship of market value, operation performance, stock returns and the scores derived from TCGI which is composite of aspects of ownership structure, board responsibility, profession of the board and transparency of financial information. The empirical findings show that the TCGI score, measured as a whole or as individual aspects, is significantly and positively related to market value and operating performance, in terms of return on assets or return on equity. Finally, TCGI score is positively related to current and next year stock prices. However, with the exception of the board responsibility aspect, the other three aspects are found unrelated to stock returns of the current or next year.
    Reference: (一) 中文文獻
    (專書)
    葉銀華、李存修、柯承恩,2002,「公司治理評等系統」,台北市;商智文化出版。
    (碩博士論文)
    丁立平,2003,公司治理、會計資訊與公司價值關係之研究,台灣大學會計學研究所未出版碩士論文。
    丁秀儀,2004,上市公司公司治理,經營績效與機構投資人投資行為關聯性之研究,國立政治大學企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
    王大維,2003,公司治理相關要素與公司績效關聯性之研究-以台灣上市公司為例,淡江大學會計學系未出版碩士論文。
    王玉珍,2004,股權結構、董事會組成、資本結構與企業績效關係之研究,國立中央大學企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
    何幸芳,2003,獨立董監事對公司價值與盈餘資訊內涵影響之研究,私立輔仁大學金融研究所未出版碩士論文。
    何里仁,2003,公司治理之資訊透明度與績效評核關聯性之研究,私立逢甲大學會計與財稅研究所未出版碩士論文。
    林詩韻,2002,台灣上市公司股權結構與盈餘資訊內涵之關聯性研究,私立淡江大學會計學研究所未出版碩士論文。
    余招賢,1997,台灣股票市場風險、規模、淨值市價比、成交量週轉率與報酬之關係,國立交通大學管理科學研究所未出版碩士論文。
    洪世馨,2003,設立外部董事與企業經營績效之關係,國立成功大學會計學碩博士班未出版碩士論文。
    林尚志,2004,我國公司治理評等指標建立之研究,國立政治大學會計學研究所未出版碩士論文
    林淑棻,2003,公司股權結構、董事會組成結構以及財務政策與公司經營績效關係之研究,國立政治大學財務管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
    吳岳忠,2003,機構投資人、公司治理與公司價值之研究~以台灣電子業為例,私立東吳大學企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
    吳庭州,1997,股權結構、盈餘管理與盈餘資訊性之研究,輔仁大學管理學研究所碩士論文。
    吳祥福,2003,財務報表重編與董監獨立性/專業性之研究,國立政治大學會計學研究所未出版碩士論文。
    吳蕙雯,2001,公司治理對IPOs承銷價與上市後股價表現影響之研究,私立輔仁大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文。
    吳建頤,1999,董事會規模對公司價值的影響,國立中正大學財務金融研究所未出版碩士論文。
    馬瑜霙,2002,我國獨立董事與獨立監察人之屬性與盈餘管理之關聯性研究,國立政治大學會計學研究所未出版碩士論文。
    陳迪,2003,董事會、監察人特性與公司績效關聯性之再探討,國立政治大學會計學研究所未出版碩士論文。
    陳世崇,2001,資金成本、資本結構與企業股價報酬關聯性之探討,國立政治大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文。
    楊慧玲,2000,董事會結構及其變動對股東財富與經營績效影響之研究,朝陽科技大企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
    廖秀梅,2004,董事會結構特性與公司績效關係之研究-探討台灣家族控制企業因素的影響,國立台北大學會計學研究所未出版博士論文。
    張秀玉,2003,股權結構對盈餘資訊內涵之影響,私立中原大學會計學研究所未出版碩士論文。
    劉宴辰,1993,從代理理論觀點探究股權結構.董事會組成對企業財務績效影響之研究,私立淡江大學管理科學研究所未出版碩士論文。
    劉倩妏,2004,以投資人關係為目的之資訊揭露,國立中正大學企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
    游昀玲,2004,公司經營績效與代理問題對外部董監事聘任宣告效果影響之研究,朝陽科技大學財務金融碩士班未出版碩士論文。
    郭學平,2004,「台灣上市櫃公司自願性設置獨立董監事因素之研究」,國立政治大學會計學研究所未出版碩士班論文。
    (研究報告)
    林宛瑩、許崇源,2005,「台灣集團企業之控制型態與公司治理指標衡量之研究與建議」,討論稿,國立政治大學會計學系。
    許崇源、林宛瑩、戚務君,2006,建構台灣企業公司治理評等指標,國立政治大學商學院卓越計畫:「金融、會計、財務、保險領域整合平台」研究報告。
    (二)英文文獻
    Agrawal, A. 1990. Large shareholders and the monitoring of managers: the case of antitakeover charter amendments. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis. 25: 143-161.
    Ali, A., and P. Zarowin. 1992. The role of earnings leverl in annual earnings-returns studies. Journal of Accounting Research 30:286-296.
    Bai, C. E., Q. Liu., Frank. M. Song., and J. Zhang. Corporate governance and firm valuations in China. Faculty of Business and Economics. The university of Hong Kong.
    Bauer, R., N. GÄunster., and R. Otten. 2003. Empirical evidence on corporate governance in Europe The effect on stock returns, firm value and performance. . forthcoming in the Journal of Asset Management.
    Ball, R., S. Kothari, and A. Robin, 2000. The effect of international institutional factors on properties of accounting earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics 29: 1-51.
    Black, B. 2001. The corporate governance behavior and market value of Russian firms. Emerging Markets Review 2:89-108.
    Black, B. S., H. Jang. and W. Kim. 2005. Does corporate governance affect firm value? Evidence from Korea. ECGI - Finance Working Paper No. 103.
    Bhagat, S. and R. H. Jefferis. 1991. Voting power in the proxy process: the case of antitakeover charter amendments. Journal of Financial Economics30:193-225.
    Brown, L. D. and Caylor. M. L. 2004. Corporate governance and firm performance. Working Paper.
    Claessens, S., S. Djankov, J. Fan, and L. H. P. Lang. 1999. Expropriation of minority shareholder: evidence from East Asia. World Bank.
    Claessens, S., S. Djankov, J. Fan, and L. H. P. Lang. 2002 Disentangling the incentive and entrenchment effects of large shareholdings. Journal of Finance 57:2741-2771.
    Claessens, S., S. Djankov, and L. H. P. Lang. 2000. The separation of ownership and control in East Asian corporation. Journal of Financial Economics58:81-112.
    Credit Lyonnais Securities Asia Emerging Markets. 2002. CG Watch: corporate governance in emerging markets, Make me holy… but not yet!.
    Daines, R. and M. Klausner. 2001. Do IPO charters maximize firm value? Antitakeover protection in IPOs. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization17:83-120.
    Drobetz, W., A. Schillhofer., and H. Zimmermann. 2003. Corporate governance and expected stock returns :evidence from Germany. European Management 10(2):267-293.
    Fama, E. F. 1980. Agency problem and theory of the firm. Journal of Political Economy 88: 288-307.
    Fama, E. F., and M. C., Jensen. 1983. Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics 26:301-325.
    Fama, E. F. 1980. Agency problem and theory of the firm. Journal of Political Economy 88: 288-307.
    Fama, E. F. and M.H. Miller. 1972. The Theory of Finance, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.
    Fama, E. F. and K. R. French. 1993. The cross-section of expected stock returns. Journal of Finance 47 (January): 427-465.
    Fan, P. H., and T. J. Wong. 2002. Corporate ownership structure and the informativeness of accounting earnings in East Asia. Journal of Accounting and Economics 33:401-425.
    Francis, J., Lafond, P. M. Olsson, and K. Schipper. 2004. Cost of equity and earnings attributes. The Accounting Review 79(4)967-1010.
    Füerst, O. and S. H. Kang. 2000. Corporate governance, expected operating performance, and pricing. Working paper, Yale School of Management, New Haven.
    Gompers, A., L. Ishii., and A. Metrick. 2003.Corporate governance and equity prices Quarterly Journal of Economics 118(1):107-155.
    Huson, M., Parrino, R., and Starks, L. 2001. Internal monitoring mechanisms and CEO turnover: a long term perspective. Journal of Finance 56, 2265-2297.
    Jensen, M. and W, Meckling.1976. Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3:305-360.
    Jensen, M. C. 1993. The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control system. Journal of Finance 48:831-880.
    Johnson, S., R. F. La Porta., Lopez-de-Silances. Florencio., and A. Shleifer. 2000. Tunneling. American Economics Review 90:22-27
    Karpoff, J. M. 1987. The relation between price change and trading volume: a survey. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 22 (March): 109-126.
    Klapper. L. F. and I. Love. 2002. Corporate governance,investor protection and performance in emerging markets. World Bank Policy Research working paper 2818.
    La Porta, R., F. Lopez-de-Silanes, A. Shleifer, and R. W. Vishny. 2002. Investor protection and corporate valuation. Journal of Finance 57:1147-1170.
    Lei, C. H. and Frank. M. Song. 2004. Corporate governance and firm valuations: evidence from Hong Kong. Faculty of Business and Economics. The university of Hong Kong.
    Lemoon, M. L., and K. V. Lins. 2003. Ownership structure, corporate governance, and firm value: evidence from the East Asian financial crisis. Journal of Finance 58:1445-1468.
    Lins, K. V. 2003. Equity ownership and firm value in emerging markets. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 38:159-183.
    Leuz, C., and R. Verrecchia. 2004. Firms’ capital allocation choices, information quality, and the cost of capital. Working Paper, University of Pennsylvania..
    Lev, B.1983. Some economic determinants of the time-series properties of earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics 5:31-38.
    Lipe, R. 192001. The relation between stock returns and accounting earnings given alternative information. The Accounting Review 65:49-71.
    Mckinsey and Co.. Global investor opinion survey 2000.
    McConnell, J. and H. Servaes. 1990. Additional evidence on equity ownership and corporate value. Journal of Financial Economics 27:595-612.
    Morck, R., A. Shleifer, and R. W. Vishny. 1988. Management ownership and market valuation: an empirical analysis. Journal of Financial Economics 20, 293-315.
    Mitton, T.2001. A cross-firm analysis of the impact of corporate governance on the East Asian crisis. Journal of Financial Economics 64:215-241.
    Oviatt, B. M. 1988. Agency and transaction cost perspectives on the manager-shareholder relationship, incentives for congruent Interests. Academy of Management Review 13: 214-225.
    Ou, J., and S. Penman. 1989. Financial statement analysis and the prediction of stock returns. Journal of Accounting and Economics 11:295-329.
    Prowse, S. 1998. Corporate governance: Emerging issues and lessons from East Asia. Responding to the Global Financial Crisis-World Bank.
    Pound, J. 1988. Proxy contests and the efficiency of shareholder oversight. Journal of Financial Economics 20:237-265.
    Rajan, R., andL.Zingales. 1998. Which capitalism?Lessons from the East Asia crisis. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance11:40-48.
    Rosenstein, S. and J. G. Wyatt, 1997. Inside directors, board effectiveness, and shareholder wealth. Journal of Financial Economics 44: 229-250.
    Schellenger, M. H., D. D. Wood, and A. Tashakori. 1989. Board of director compensation, shareholder wealth, and dividend policy. Journal of Management 15:457-467.
    Shleifer, A. and R. Vishny. 1997. A survey of corporate governance. Journal of Financial Economics 52:737-783
    Standard & Poor’s. January. 2002. Standard & Poor’s Corporate Governance Scores: Criteria, Methodology and Definitions.
    Sloan, R. 1996. Do stock prices fully reflect information in accruals and cash flows about future earnings. Accounting Review 71:289-315.
    Spence, M. 1973. Job market signaling. Quarterly Journal of Economics 87: 355-374.
    World Bank, 1999. Corporate governance: A framework for implementation-overview. P5.
    Weisbach, M. S. 1988. Outside directors and CEO turnover. Journal of Financial Economics 20: 431-460.
    Yen, Y. H., T. S. Lee, and T. Woidtke. 2001. Family control and corporate governance:evidence for Taiwan. International Review of Finance 2:21-48.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    會計研究所
    93353005
    94
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0093353005
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[會計學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2210View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback