English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 111300/142217 (78%)
Visitors : 48258263      Online Users : 736
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 會計學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/30200
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/30200


    Title: 國內上市櫃公司員工認股權憑證發行時間點之研究
    Authors: 洪翌芳
    Hung , Yi-Fang
    Contributors: 郭弘卿
    洪翌芳
    Hung , Yi-Fang
    Keywords: 員工認股權憑證
    發行日
    季盈餘宣告日
    事件研究法
    Date: 2006
    Issue Date: 2009-09-11 17:26:36 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本文旨在探討當公司員工認股權憑證發行時點不固定時,管理階層是否會傾向將認股權憑證發行時點安排於公司股價低點,藉以增加認股權憑證之價值。本研究以2001年~2006年219家國內上市櫃公司518個員工認股權憑證為樣本,採用事件研究法來計算標準化累積平均異常報酬率(SCAR),藉以判斷事件的發生對於股價的影響。


    研究結果發現,員工認股權憑證發行日前存有股價下跌的現象,而在發行日到達了最低點,發行日之後股價漸漸回升,顯示公司的員工認股權憑證發行日確實有落在公司股價低點;此外,於員工認股權憑證發行日前宣告的季盈餘資訊內涵顯示出為壞消息的現象。然而,當董事長有權對認股權憑證發行日做決定,同時又取得認股權憑證者,會更有動機其將認股權憑證發行日訂在股價低點的現象並不顯著。
    Reference: (中文部份)
    沈中華、李建然,2000,事件研究法:財務與會計實證研究必備,台北:華泰文化事業公司。
    林秀芬,2004,我國員工認股權制度之研究,國立政治大學法律學系碩士班學士後法學組。
    林柏廷,2005,員工認股權、盈餘管理與公司治理,國立彰化師範大學會計硏究所碩士論文。
    吳珮瑜,2005,員工認股選擇權發放與盈餘宣告的時點關係,國立成功大學會計學系碩士論文。
    陳紫雲,2006,日益擴大之美國股票選擇權醜聞,會計研究月刊,第249期(8月):34-45。
    張心怡,2004,股票選擇權獎酬,風險承擔誘因與CEO持有意願,國立中興大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
    張嘉惠,2002,高科技公司發放員工認股權憑證對公司績效的影響-以台灣上市上櫃公司為例,私立真理大學財經研究所碩士論文。
    溫燕翔,2003,員工分紅入股與員工認股選擇權對公司績效與投資支出影響性研究,私立中原大學企業管理研究所。
    (英文部份)
    Aboody, D., and R. Kasznik. 2000. CEO stock option awards and the timing of corporate voluntary disclosures. Journal of Accounting and Economics 29 (May): 73-100.
    Agrawal, A., and G. Mandelker. 1987. Managerial incentives and corporative investment and financing decisions. Journal of Finance 42 (September): 823-837.
    Anderson, M., R. Banker and S. Ravindran. 2000. Executive compensation in the information technology industry. Management Science 46 (April): 530-547.
    Ball, R., and P. Brown. 1968. An empirical evaluation of accounting income numbers. Journal of Accounting Research 6 (Autumn): 159-178.
    Bartov, E., and P. Mohanram. 2004. Private information, earnings manipulations, and executive stock-option exercises. The Accounting Review 79 (October): 889-920.
    Berle, A., and G. Means. 1932. The modern corporation and private property. New York: MacMillan.
    Carpenter, J. N., and B. Remmers. 2001. Executive stock option exercises and inside information. Journal of Business 74 (October): 513-534.
    Conyon, M., and R. Freeman. 2000. Shared models of compensation and firm performance: UK evidence. Working Paper, University of Pennsylvania and London School of Economics.
    Core, J. E., and W. R. Guay. 1999. The use of equity grants to manage optimal equity incentive levels. Journal of Accounting and Economics 28 (December): 151-184.
    ________. 2001. Stock options plans for non-executive employees. Journal of Financial Economics 61 (August): 253-287.
    Lie, E. 2005. On the timing of CEO stock option awards. Management Science 51 (May): 802-812.
    Fama, E. F. 1980. Agency problems and the theory of the firm. Journal of Political Economy 88 (April): 288-308.
    Hanlon, M., S. Rajgopal, and T. Shevlin. 2003. Are executive stock options associated with future earnings? Journal of Accounting and Economics 36 (January): 3-44.
    Huddart, S., and M. Lang. 2003. Information distribution within firms: Evidence from stock options exercises. Journal of Accounting and Economics 34 (January): 3-41.
    Jensen, M., and K. Murphy. 1990. Performance pay and top-management incentives. Journal of Political Economy 98 (April): 225-264.
    Jensen, M., and W. Meckling. 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3 (October): 305-360.
    Patell, J. M. 1976. Corporate forecasts of earnings per share and stock price behavior: Empirical tests. Journal of Accounting Research 14 (Autumn): 246-276.
    Rajgopal, S., and T. Shevlin. 2002. Empirical evidence on the relation between stock option compensation and risk taking. Journal of Accounting and Economics 2 (June): 145-171.
    Shleifer, A., and R. Vishny. 1997. A survey of corporate governance. Journal of Finance 52 (June) : 737-783.
    Staiman, J., and K. Tompson. 1998. Designing and implementing a broad-based stock option plan. Compensation and Benefits Review 30 (July): 23-40.
    Yermack, D. 1997. Good timing: CEO stock option awards and company news announcements. The Journal of Finance 52 (June): 449-476.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    會計研究所
    94353023
    95
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0094353023
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[會計學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2404View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback