Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/32398
|
| Title: | 建商不動產表價與議價策略之探討--景氣時機、個案區位、建商類型、及推案屬性分析 |
| Authors: | 鄒欣樺 |
| Contributors: | 張金鶚
鄒欣樺 |
| Keywords: | 建商行為
訂價策略
市場追隨策略
市場區隔策略 |
| Date: | 2005 |
| Issue Date: | 2009-09-14 13:53:24 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 一般產品常以表價高低或價格折扣策略作為對外促銷手法，房地產市場議價策略普遍存在，但議價空間為內在未知。過去研究以中古屋賣方訂價為主，且將議價空間視為因變數，對建商訂價與議價空間之相互關連性與策略應用的討論較為不足。本文運用3SLS聯立模型發現表價與議價空間影響因果為正向，每坪表價、議價空間率調升1％，議價空間率、表價每坪會調升0.27％及5.5萬元。
關於建商表價與議價策略的討論，國內尚缺乏專文，本文將表價與議價策略決策分為兩階段論述，並以二項式logistic模型討論建商表價與議價策略。建商較少採用價格區隔策略，與近代行銷理念趨向消費者區隔取向不同，在房地產實行市場區隔訂價策略是否能降低風險或提升報酬，則有待進一步研究。主流產品，競爭對象多，會以高表價作出區隔，高議價空間來減低交易失敗率；流動性高市場傾向榨取訂價以獲得更多利潤，非因預計需求的情況決策，較受總體因素影響。
Firms often use asking prices and discount rates as their strategies of promoting products. So do real estate developers. Previous literatures mainly focus on the relationship of asking prices and discount rates of existing houses sold by homeowners or brokers, but ignore the interrelationship and strategy of them of new houses sold by developers. First, using 3SLS model, this paper finds that there is a positive effects between asking price and discount rate. For instance, the increase of 10,000 NTD per ping of asking prices raises 0.27% of discount rate, in the other side, the increase of 1% of discount rate brings up 55,000 NTD per ping.
Next, we use binomial logistic model to analyze developers’ asking prices and discount rates strategies by regarding them as two-steps decision makings. The finding is developers still prefer going rate pricing as their marketing approach. The effectiveness of segmented pricing to reduce risk or raise return needs to be tested in the future. Third, due to high competitiveness of main stream products, developers intend to take high asking prices and discount rates to increase the probability of transaction. Last but not least, developers affected by macro-factors in a high liquidity period like to take skimming pricing strategy to grab more profits. |
| Reference: | □ 中文文獻
李春長（1996）， 「房地產仲介市場賣方訂價與成交價和銷售期間關係之研究」，中央研究院經濟論文，第二十四卷第四期，頁591-616。
李泓見、張金鶚（2005），「從不同住宅類型探討面積與單價之關係」，中華民國住宅學會第十四屆年會論文集。
阮如舫（2005），房地產行銷。台北：五南出版事業股份有限公司。
林育聖，張金鶚（2004），「建商訂價行為之研究—探討不同類型建商訂價行為之差異」，中華民國住宅學會第十三屆年會論文集。
林祖嘉(1992)，「台灣地區房租與房價關係之研究」，台灣銀行季刊第43卷第1期，頁279-312。
林祖嘉、林素菁（2006），「住宅次市場定義合理性之探討：因素分析法之運用」，中華民國住宅學會第十五屆年會論文集。
林秋瑾(1996)，「穩健性住宅租金模式之探討-異常點之分析」，住宅學報第四期，頁51-72。
林秋瑾、楊宗憲、張金鶚（1996），「住宅價格指數之研究—以台北市為例」，住宅學報第四期，頁1-30。
波特 (Porter, Michael E.)著（1980），蔡正雄譯，競爭策略，台北市：華泰， 民80再版。
張金鶚(2003)，房地產投資與市場分析，台北：華泰出版事業股份有限公司。
張雅慧 (2002)，「租賃住宅之需求彈性與所得彈性」，成功大學都市計畫研究所碩士論文。
陳心怡(2002)，「台北都會區住宅次市場之界定及交互關係探討」，成功大學都市計畫研究所碩士論文。
馮先勉、張玉貞（1995），房地產行銷實務，台北：華泰書局。
楊宗憲（2004），「住宅市場分析的三個議題 產品定位、餘屋、第二屋之研究」，政治大學地政系博士論文。
賴鳴美、彭建文（2005a），「賣方訂價策略對銷售期間之影響分析」，2005年不動產經營與實務學術研討會論文集。
賴鳴美、彭建文（2005b），「表價與市價偏離度對不動產流動性影響之分析」，中華民國住宅學會第十四屆年會學術研討會論文集。
□ 英文文獻
Allen,M.T. and Dare,W.H.(2004)”The Effects of Charm List Ptices on House Transaction Prices”,Real Estate Economics,32,(4),695-713.
Anglin,P. M.（1997）,”Determinants of Buyer Search in a Housing Market”, Real estate Economics, 25,（4）,pp567-589.
Anglin,P. M.,Rutherford,R.C.,and Springer,T.M.（2003）,”The Trade-off Between the Selling Price of Residential Properties and Time on Market：The Impact of Price Setting”, Journal of Real estate Finance and Economics, 26,（1）,pp95-111.
Arnold M. A.,（1999）”Search ,Bargaining and Optimal Asking Prices”,Real estate economics,fall; 27（3）,pp453-476.
Bourassa S. C.,Hamelink F,Hoesli M,MacGregor B(1999),”Defining Housing Submarkets” Journal of Housing Economics ,8, pp 160-183.
Cannon and Morgan(1991)”A Strategic Pricing Framework”Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing ,6（3-4）, pp59-70.
Cubbins J.（1974）”Price,Quality,and Selling Time in the Housing Market.”Applied Economics, 6（2）,pp171-187.
Dale-Johnson D,（1982）”An Alternitive Approach to Housing Market Segmentation Using Hendonic Data”, Journal of Urban Economics , l, pp311-322.
Dolan, R J.and Simon H.（1997），Power pricing : how managing price transforms the bottom line。UK：Simon & Schuster Ltd.
Goodman A. C. and Thibodeau T. G., （1998 ）“Housing Market Segmentation”, Journal of Housing Economics , 7, pp 121-143.
Grigsby, W., baratz, M., Galster, G. and Maclennan, D. (1987) “The Dynamic of
Neighborhood Change and Decline”, Progress in Planning, 28(1),pp 1-76.
Harding J. P., Knight J. R., Sirmans C. F.,（2003）”Estimating Bargaining Effects in Hedonic Models:Evidence from the Housing Market”,Real estate Economics, 31（4）, pp601-623.
Herrin W. E.,Knight J. R.,Sirmans C. F.,（2004）”Price Cutting Behavior in Residential Markets”, Journal of Housing Economics,13, pp95-207.
Kolter,P.and Armstrong G.（2003），Principles of marketing,10th ed。New Jersey：Prentice Hall.
Leishman,C.(2001)”House Building and Product Differentiation：An Hendonic Price Approach ”,Journal of Housing and Built Environment, 16,pp131-152.
Miller,N.G.，(1982)，Residential Property Hedonic Pricing Model：A Review，Research in Real Estate，Vol.12，pp.31-56
Ong S.E, Cheng F J, Boon B and Sing T F,（2003）”ACADEMIC PAPERS ：Oligopolistic Bidding and Pricing in Real Estate Development：Experimental Evidence” , Journal of Property and Investment & Finance, 21（2）, pp.154-189.
Springer,T.M.(1996),”Single-Family Housing Transaction:Seller Motivations , Prices,and Marketing Time”, Journal of Real estate Finance and Economics, 13,（3）,pp237-254.
Wilhelmsson M.（2004）, “A method to derive housing sub-markets and reduce spatial-dependency”, Property Management. Bradford, 22（3-4）,pp276-289.
Yavas,A. and Yang, S.X.(1995)”The Strategic Role of Listing Price in Marketing Real estate:Theory an Evidence”,AREUEA Journal ,23(3),pp347-368. |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
地政研究所
93257012
94 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0093257012 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [地政學系] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| index.html | 0Kb | HTML2 | 326 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
