English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 109952/140891 (78%)
Visitors : 46240267      Online Users : 927
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 理學院 > 心理學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/32468
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/32468


    Title: 有沒有關係有關係?—語意訊息對記憶重組錯誤形成的影響
    Authors: 劉慧美
    Huei-Mei Liu
    Contributors: 顏乃欣
    Nai-Shin Yen
    劉慧美
    Huei-Mei Liu
    Keywords: 記憶重組錯誤
    語意透明度
    字頻
    詞頻
    Date: 2002
    Issue Date: 2009-09-17 13:11:53 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究以三個實驗來檢驗,當學習和測驗項目之間除了有知覺重疊外,若再加上語意重疊,究竟是會增加參與者成功提取正確回憶的機會,從而降低記憶重組錯誤的發生,還是反而會增加其發生的機會。在實驗一、二中,研究者分別操弄測驗項目的語意透明度與詞頻(實驗一)或字頻(實驗二),發現當測驗項目是組合詞時,和測驗項目為成語詞的情境相較之下,參與者會產生較多記憶重組與特徵錯誤。詞頻和字頻對於記憶重組錯誤的影響則呈現相反的趨勢:高詞頻比低詞頻的測驗項目容易使參與者產生錯誤記憶,但高字頻卻比低字頻的測驗項目更不容易使參與者產生錯誤記憶。由於實驗一和實驗二對於語意重疊與否是透過語意透明度加以操弄,而過去的文獻中顯示,語意透明的組合詞和語意不透明的成語詞,二者在詞義提取的歷程上又有不同,前者會觸動字元的單位,但後者不會,因此,實驗一、二中所觀察到,組合詞比成語詞容易產生重組錯誤的效果,除了增加語意重疊的原因之外,亦有可能是由於二者在心理歷程上的差異所導致。因此,實驗三中使用組合詞作為實驗材料,改為以組成重組項目的單字出現在學習與測驗階段中的字義異同,以在知覺重疊之外操弄語意重疊的有無,結果發現,當組成重組項目的單字出現在學習與測驗階段中代表的意義不相同時,參與者幾乎不會產生記憶重組錯誤。因此,綜合三個實驗的結果來看,當學習與測驗項目間同時具有知覺和語意重疊時,會比當二者間只有知覺重疊時,更容易使得參與者產生記憶重組錯誤。
    Reference: 參考文獻
    中文詞知識庫小組(1994)。中文書面語頻率詞典。中央研究院技術報告No.94-01。
    中文詞知識庫小組(1995)。注音檢索現代漢語字頻表。中央研究院技術報告No.95-01。
    李佳穎(1995)。漢語組合詞與成語詞在心理辭典中的表徵方式。國立中正大學心理學研究所未發表之碩士論文。
    沙克特(Schacter, D. L.; 2001/2002)。「記憶七罪」(The seven sins of memory: How the minds forgets and remembers,李明譯)。台北:大塊文化。
    高千惠(2001)。語意與連結促發作用對中文字彙辨識的影響。國立政治大學心理學研究所未發表之碩士論文。
    梁美雅(1992)。中文組合性詞與成語性詞的辨識歷程。國立清華大學語言學研究所未發表之碩士論文。
    陳紹祖(1993)。漢語構詞歷程在閱讀歷程中對語意促發效應的影響。國立中正大學心理學研究所未發表之碩士論文。
    黃金蘭(2002)。項目特定與關係性訊息對錯誤記憶的影響。國立台灣大學心理學研究所未發表之博士論文。
    Baddley, A. D. (1966). Short-term memory for word sequences as a function of acoustic, semantic, and formal similarity. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 362-365.
    Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
    Bartlett, J. C., & Searcy, J. H. (1998, November). Configural processing and binding in recognition of faces. Paper presented at the 39th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Dallas, TX.
    Bransford, J. D., & Franks, J. J. (1971). The abstraction of linguistic ideas. Cognitive Psychology, 2, 331-350.
    Carmichael, L., Hogan, H. P., & Walters, A. A. (1932). An experimental study of the effect of language on the reproduction of visually perceived form. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 15, 73-86.
    Conrad, R. (1964). Acoustic confusions in immediate memory. British Journal of Psychology, 55, 75-84.
    Deese, J. (1959). On the prediction of occurrence of particular verbal intrusions in immediate recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 17-22.
    Ebbinghaus, H. (1885/1964). Memory: A contribution to experimental psychology. New York: Dover.
    Gardiner, J. M. (1988). Functional aspects of recollective experience. Memory and Cognition, 16, 309-313.
    Gardiner, J. M., & Java, R. I. (1990). Recollective experience in word and nonword recognition. Memory and Cognition, 18, 23-30.
    Gardiner, J. M., & Java, R. I. (1991). Forgetting in recognition memory with and without recollective experience. Memory and Cognition, 19, 617-623.
    Gardiner, J. M., & Parkin, A. J. (1990). Attention and recollective experience in recognition memory. Memory and Cognition, 18, 579-583.
    Ghatala, E. S., Levin, J. R., Bell, J. A., Truman, D. L., & Lodico, M. G. (1978). The effect of semantic and nonsemantic factors on the integration of verbal units in recognition memory. Journal of Memory and Language: Human Learning and Memory, 4(6), 647-655.
    Guttentag, R.E., & Carroll, D.(1994). Identifying the basis for the word frequency effect in recognition memory. Memory, 2, 255-273.
    Hirshman, E., Fisher, J., Henthorn, T., Arndt, J., & Passannante, A. (2002). Midazolam amnesia and dual-process models of the word-frequency mirror effect. Journal of Memory and Language, 47, 499-516.
    Jacoby, L. L. (1991). A process dissociation framework: separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Journal of Memory and Language: 30, 513-541.
    Jacoby, L. L., & Dallas, M. (1981). On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 110, 306-340.
    Johnson, M. K., Bransford, J. D., & Solomon, S. K. (1973). Memory for tacit implications of sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 98, 203-205.
    Jones, T. C., & Atchley, P. (2002). Conjunction error rates on a continuous recognition memory test: Little evidence for recollection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 374-379.
    Jones, T. C., & Jacoby, L. L. (2001). Feature and conjunction errors in recognition memory: Evidence for dual-process theory. Journal of Memory and Language, 45, 82-102.
    Jones, T. C., Jacoby, L. L., & Gellis, L. A. (2001). Cross-modal feature and conjunction errors in recognition memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 44, 131-152.
    Joordens, S., & Hockley, W. E. (2000). Recollection and familiarity through the looking glass: When old does not mirror new. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1534-1555.
    Kroll, N. E. A., Knight, R. T., Metcalfe, J., Wolf, E. S. & Tulving, E. (1996). Cohesion failure as a source of memory illusions. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 176-196.
    Li, C. & Thompson, S. A. (1981). Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
    Mandler, G. (1980). Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrences. Psychological Review, 87, 252-271.
    Marslen-Wilson, W., Tyler, L. K., Waksler, R., & Older, L. (1994). Morphology and meaning in the English lexicon. Psychological Review, 101, 3-33.
    McDermott, K. B. & Watson, J. M. (2001). The rise and fall of false recall: The impact of presentation duration. Journal of Memory and Language, 45, 160-176.
    Melton, A. W., & Irwin, J. M. (1940). The influence of degree of interpolated learning on retroactive inhibition and the overt transfer of specific responses. American Journal of Psychology, 53, 173-203.
    Rajaram, S. (1993). Remembering and knowing: Two means of access to the personal past. Memory and Cognition, 21,89-102.
    Reder, L. M., Nhouyvanisvong, A., Schunn, C. D., Ayers, M. S., Angstadt, P., & Hiraki, K.(2000). A mechanistic account of the mirror effect for word frequency: A computational model of remember-know judgments in a continuous recognition paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 294-320.
    Reinitz, M. T., & Demb, J. B. (1994). Implicit and explicit memory for compound words. Memory and Cognition, 22, 687-694.
    Reinitz, M. T., Lammers, W. J., & Cochran, B. P. (1992). Memory conjunction errors: Miscombination of stored features can produce illusions of memory. Memory and Cognition, 20, 1-11.
    Reinitz, M. T., Morrisey, J., & Demb, J. B. (1994). The role of attention in face encoding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 161-168.
    Reinitz, M. T., Verfaellie, M., & Millberg, W. P. (1996). Memory conjunction errors in normal and amnesic subjects. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 286-299.
    Roediger, H. L. III, & McDermott, K. B. (1995). Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 803-814.
    Roediger, H. L. III, & McDermott, K. B. (2000). Tricks of memory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9, 123-127.
    Roediger, H. L., Welden, M. S., & Challis, B. H., (1989). Explaining dissociations between implicit and explicit measures of retention: A process account. In H. L. Roediger & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), Varieties of memory and consciousness: Essays in Honor of Endal Tulving (pp. 3-41). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    Rubin, S. R., Van Petten, C., Glisky, E. L., & Newberg, W. M. (1999).Memory conjunction errors in younger and older adults: Event-related potential and neural psychological data. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 16, 459-488.
    Schacter, D. L. (1996). Searching for Memory: the Brain, the Mind, and the Past. New York: Basic Books.
    Seamon, J. G., Luo, C. R., & Galo, D. A. (1998). Creating false memories of words with or without recognition of list items: Evidence for nonconscious processes. Psychological Science, 9, 20-26.
    Sulin, R. A., & Dooling, D. J. (1974). Intrusion of a thematic idea in the retention of prose. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 103, 255-262.
    Thomson, D. M., & Tulving, E. (1970). Associative encoding and retrieval: Weak and strong cues. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 86, 255-262.
    Tulving, E. (1972). Episodic and semantic memory. In E. Tulving & W. Donaldson (Eds.), Organization of Memory (pp. 381-403). New York: Academic Press.
    Tulving, E. (1985). Memory and consciousness. Canadian Psychologist, 26, 1-12.
    Tulving, E., & Thomson, D. (1973). Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psychological Review, 80, 352-373.
    Underwood, B. J., & Zimmerman, J. (1973). The syllable as a source of error in multisyllable word recognition. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 701-706.
    Underwood, B. J., Kapelak, S. M., & Malmi, R. A. (1976). Integration of discrete verbal units in recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 2, 293-300.
    Underwood, J. (1965). False recognition produced by implicit verbal responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70, 122-129.
    Wagner, A. D., & Gabrieli, J. D. E. (1998). On the relationship between recognition familiarity and perceptual fluency: Evidence for distinct mnemonic processes. Acta Psychologica, 98, 211-230.
    Yonelinas, A. P. (1994). Receiver-operating characteristics in recognition memory: Evidence for a dual-process model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 1341-1354.
    Yonelinas, A. P. (1997). Recognition memory ROCs for item and associative information: the contribution of recollection and familiarity. Memory and Cognition, 25, 747-763.
    Yonelinas, A. P., Kroll, N. E. A., Dobbins, I., Lazara, M., & Knight, R. T. (1998). Recollection and familiarity deficits in amnesia: Convergence of remember-know, process dissociation, and receiver characteristic data. Neuropsychology, 12, 323-339.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    心理學研究所
    88752008
    91
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0088752008
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[心理學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    75200801.pdf38KbAdobe PDF2874View/Open
    75200802.pdf40KbAdobe PDF21072View/Open
    75200803.pdf47KbAdobe PDF2952View/Open
    75200804.pdf65KbAdobe PDF23272View/Open
    75200805.pdf70KbAdobe PDF23248View/Open
    75200806.pdf83KbAdobe PDF21132View/Open
    75200807.pdf79KbAdobe PDF21075View/Open
    75200808.pdf78KbAdobe PDF21166View/Open
    75200809.pdf55KbAdobe PDF21192View/Open
    75200810.pdf53KbAdobe PDF21652View/Open
    75200811.pdf80KbAdobe PDF21011View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback