English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 111300/142216 (78%)
Visitors : 48336296      Online Users : 804
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 傳播學院 > 新聞學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/33263
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/33263


    Title: 科技化人際關係新圖像:MSN使用者運用在場訊息的分析
    Authors: 陳蓉萱
    Contributors: 方念萱
    陳蓉萱
    Keywords: 即時通訊軟體
    後設傳播
    符擔性
    溝通知能
    溝通主動權
    MSN Messenger
    Date: 2005
    Issue Date: 2009-09-17 15:55:16 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: MSN Messenger(以下簡稱MSN)為當前電子傳播科技的種類當中,廣受使用者青睞的溝通工具之一。透過這項電腦中介科技,可能衍生的人際互動議題,可謂添加了「人際溝通」這個研究領域的豐富性。本研究鎖定MSN的其中一項功能-「在場訊息」,或稱「線上狀態」,根據使用者運用這項機制的策略,本研究試圖勾勒出因應新傳播科技所發展的溝通型態。

    使用者透過在場訊息有機會向他人彰顯本身的「溝通可得性」。這個溝通的可得性同時指涉時間與空間的概念,亦即使用者「在不在?」以及「有沒有空?」根據先驅研究的初步發現,在場訊息讓使用者有探索的自由度;這個自由度植基於科技特有的「符擔性」,因而賦予使用者在限度之內挖掘科技本身的可能性。本研究特別關注的是具有過往互動歷史、由線下衍生到線上的人際關係;這種特性的關係型態在與科技特性交會之後,是否可能誘發人際互動的新視野?

    本研究同時採取人際網絡滾雪球法,以及透過網際網路公開招募的方式,總共募集21位受訪者。透過深度訪談的方式,發現在MSN的情境裡,「科技」與「關係」交會之後,在場訊息的功能因而衍生出新的使用意義,從單純表彰個人溝通可得性的工具,成為使用者之間用來衡量或評估人我關係親疏遠近的工具,透過介面特性反覆確認人我對於關係的定義。當這項機制的意義被延伸之後,使用者也產生因應之道,發展相關溝通策略。最後,回應本研究一開始所欲探討的,亦即運用MSN在場訊息對於人際互動的啟發。研究結果顯示,在新的科技中介溝通情境當中,使用者對於自身溝通主動權的看重與掌控。
    Reference: 《中國時報》(2005年9月26日):〈MSN情人〉,第E7版。
    吳筱玫(2003)。《網路傳播概論》。台北:智勝。
    陳向明(2005)。《社會科學質的研究》。台北:五南。
    畢恆達(2005)。《教授為什麼沒告訴我》。台北:學富。
    曾寶璐(2004)。〈手指世代來了 - 即時傳訊悄悄啟動人際關係革命〉,《商業周刊》,878:114-120。
    黃振家譯(2003)。《大眾媒體研究》。台北:學富。(原書:Wimmer, R. D., & Dominick, J. R.〔2000〕. Mass Media Research: An Introduction (6th ed.). Belmont, California: Wadsworth.)。
    《經濟日報》(2005年1月3日):〈MSN Messenger台灣網友最愛〉,第A14版。
    Adler, R. B., & Towne, N. (1999). Looking out/looking in: Interpersonal communication. Fort Worth Tex.: Harcourt Brace College Publishers. (9th edition).
    Adler, R. B., Rosenfeld, L. B., & Proctor II, R. F. (2004). Interplay: The process of interpersonal communication. New York: Oxford University Press. (9th edition).
    Alvestrand, H. (2002). Instant messaging and presence on the Internet. Internet Society. Retrieved November 11, 2002, from the World Wide Web:
    http://www.isoc.org/briefings/009/
    Anderson, P. A. (1993). Cognitive schemata in personal relationships. In S. Duck (Ed.). Individuals in relationships. Newbury Park, California: Sage Publications. (pp.1-29).
    Bateson, G. (1951). Information and codification: A philosophical approach. In J. Ruesch & G. Bateson (Eds.). Communication: The social matrix of psychiatry. New York: W. W. Norton.
    Bateson, G. (1951). Conventions of communication: Where validity depends upon belief. In J. Ruesch & G. Bateson (Eds.). Communication: The social matrix of psychiatry. New York: W. W. Norton.
    Bateson, G. (1958). Naven. Stanford: Stanford University Press. (2nd edition).
    Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
    Baxter, L. A., & Dindia, K. (1990). Marital partners’ perceptions of marital maintenance strategies. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 7, 187-208.
    Bochner, A. P., & Krueger, D. L. (1979). Interpersonal communication theory and research: An overview of inscrutable epistemologies and muddled concepts. In D. Nimmo (Ed.). Communication Yearbook 3. New Jersey: Transaction Books.
    Briton, D., & Taylor, J. (2001). Online workers’ education: How do we tame the technology? International Journal of Instructional Media, 28, 117-135.
    Burgoon, J. K. (1985). Nonverbal signals. In K. Miller (Ed.). Handbook of interpersonal communication. Beverly Hills, California: Sage.
    Burgoon, J. K., & Hale, J. L. (1984). The fundamental topoi of relational communication. Communication Monographs, 51, 193-214.
    Burgoon, J. L., Buller, D. B., Hale, J. L., & deTurck, M. A. (1984). Human Communication Research, 10, 351-378.
    Cooley, R. E., & Roach, D. A. (1984). A conceptual framework. In R. N. Bostrom (Ed.). Competence in communication: A multidisciplinary approach. Beverly Hills, California: Sage.
    Dickey, M. D. (2003). Teaching in 3D: Pedagogical affordances and constraints of 3D virtual worlds for synchronous distance learning. Distance Education, 24, 105-121.
    Dillard, J. P., Solomon, D. H., & Palmer, M. T. (1999). Structuring the concept of relational communication. Communication Monographs, 66, 49-64.
    Dindia, K. (1994). A multiphasic view of relationship maintenance strategies. In D. J. Canary & L. Stafford (Eds.). Communication and relational maintenance. California: Academic Press.
    Dindia, K., & Baxter, L. A. (1987). Strategies for maintaining and repairing marital relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 4, 143-158.
    Dindia, K., & Canary, D. J. (1993). Definitions and theoretical perspectives on maintaining relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10, 163-173.
    Duck, S. (1988). Relating to others. New York: Open University Press.
    Duck, S. (1994). The social action of relating: Talk and meaning. In S. Duck (Ed.). Meaningful relationships: Talking, sense, and relating. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.
    Duck, S. (1994). Steady as (S)he goes: Relational maintenance as a shared meaning system. In D. J. Canary & L. Stafford (Eds.). Communication and relational maintenance. San Diego, California: Academic Press.
    Fisher, B. A., & Adams, K. L. (1994). Interpersonal communication: Pragmatics of human relationships. New York: McGraw-Hill. (2nd edition).
    Fogel, A., & Branco, A. U. (1997). Metacommunication as a source of indeterminism in relationship development. In A. Fogel, M. C. D. P. Lyra, & J. Valsiner (Eds.). Dynamics and indeterminism in developmental and social processes. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Gaver, W. W. (1991). Technology affordances. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: Reaching through technology, pp. 79-84, New Orleans, Louisiana, United States.
    Goldsborough, R. (2005). Instant marketing. Community College Week, 17, 17.
    Gibson, J. J. (1986). The ecological approach to visual perception. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Guerrero, L. K., Eloy, S. V., & Wabnik, A. L. (1993). Linking maintenance strategies to relationship development and disengagement: A reconceptualization. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10, 273-283.
    Houghton, S., & Schmidt, A. (2005). Web-based chat vs. instant messaging: Who wins? Retrieved from the World Wide Web: www.onlinemag.net.
    Hutchby, I. (2001a). Conversation and technology. MA: Polity Press.
    Hutchby, I. (2001b). Technologies, texts and affordances. Sociology, 35, 441-456.
    Hutchby, I. (2003). Affordances and the analysis of technologically mediation: A response to Brian Rappert. Sociology, 37, 581-589.
    Issacs, E., Walendowski, A., Whittaker, S., Schiano, D. J., & Kamm, C. (2002). The characters, functions, and styles of instant messaging in the workplace. Proceedings of the 2000 ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work, pp. 11-20, November 2002. New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.
    Knapp, M. L. (1984). Interpersonal communication and human relationships. Newton, Massachusetts: Allyn and Bacon. (2nd ed.).
    Knapp, M. L., Daly, J. A., Albada, K. F., & Miller, G. R. (2002). Background and current trends in the study of interpersonal communication. In M. L. Knapp & J. A. Daly (Eds.). Handbook of interpersonal communication. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.
    Littlejohn, S. W. (1989). Theories of human communication. San Diego, California: Wadsworth. (3rd edition).
    Littlejohn, S. W., & Foss, K. A. (2005). Theories of human communication. Canada: Wadsworth. (8th edition).
    Martin, R. (1992). Relational cognition complexity and relational communication in personal relationships. Communication Monographs, 59, 150-163.
    McQuillen, J. S. (2003). The influence of technology on the initiation of interpersonal relationships. Education, 123, 616-623.
    Miller, G. R. (1976). Foreword. In G. R. Miller (Ed.). Explorations in interpersonal communication. Beverly Hills, California: Sage.
    Millar, F. E., & Rogers, L. E. (1976). A relational approach to interpersonal communication. In G. R. Miller (Ed.). Explorations in interpersonal communication. Beverly Hills, California: Sage.
    Nardi, B. A., Whittaker, S., & Bradner, E. (2000). Interaction and outeraction: Instant messaging in action. Proceedings of the 2000 ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work, pp.79-88, December 2000, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.
    Newlands, A., Anderson, A. H., & Mullin, J. (2003). Adapting communicative strategies to computer-mediated communication: An analysis of task performance and dialogue structure. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17, 325-348.
    Nierenberg, G. I., & Calero, H. H. (1973). Meta-talk: Guide to hidden meanings in conversation. New York: Trident Press.
    Parks, M. R. (1977). Relational communication: Theory and research. Human Communication Research, 3, 372-381.
    Parks, M. R., & Floyd, K. (1996). Making friends in cyberspace. Journal of Communication, 46, 80-97.
    Peng, S. L. (2002). Instant reply needed? Try instant messaging. Retrieved August 27, 2002, from the World Wide Web:
    http://www.instantmessagingplannet.com/public/article.php/1452851
    Riva, G. (2002). The sociocognitive psychology of computer-mediate communication: The present and future of technology-based interactions. Cyber Psychology & Behavior, 5, 581-598.
    Rogers, L. E. (1998). The meaning of relationship in relational communication. In R. L. Conville & L. E. Rogers (Eds.). The meaning of “relationship” in interpersonal communication. Westport: Praeger.
    Rogers, L. E., & Farace, R. V. (1975). Analysis of relational communication in dyads: New measurement procedures. Human Communication Research, 1, 222-239.
    Rogers, L. E., & Escudero, V. (2004). Theoretical foundations. In E. Rogers & V. Escudero (Eds.). Relational communication: An interactional perspective to the study of process and form. New Jersey: Laurence Erlbaum Associates.
    Ruesch, J. (1951). Communication and human relations: An interdisciplinary approach. In J. Ruesch & G. Bateson (Eds.). Communication: The social matrix of psychiatry. New York: W. W. Norton.
    Ruesch, J., & Bateson, G. (1951). Communication and the system of checks and balances: An anthropological approach. In J. Ruesch & G. Bateson (Eds.). Communication: The social matrix of psychiatry. New York: W. W. Norton.
    Saunders, C. (2002). IMing in the mists of prehistory. Retrieved December 20, 2002, from the World Wide Web:
    http://www.instantmessagingplabet.com/public/article/1560461
    Shimanoff, S. B. (1980). Communication rules: Theory and research. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
    Spitzberg, B. H., & Cupach, W. R. (1984). Interpersonal communication competence. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
    Stafford, L., & Canary, D. J. (1991). Maintenance strategies and romantic relationship type, gender and relational characteristics. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 8, 217-242.
    Thommesen, J. (2002). Conversation and technology – From the telephone to the Internet (book review). Information Technology & People, 15, 362-363.
    Trenholm, S., & Jensen, A. (2000). Interpersonal communication. New York: Oxford University Press. (4th edition).
    Watzlawick, P., Beavin, J. H., & Jackson, D. D. (1967). Pragmatics of human communication: A study of interactional patterns, pathologies, and paradoxes. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
    Walther, J. B. (2004). Language and communication technology: Introduction to the special issue. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 23, 384-396.
    Walther, J. B. (1992). Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A relational perspective. Communication Research, 19, 52-90.
    Walther, J. B., & Burgoon, J. K. (1992). Relational communication in computer-mediated interaction. Human Communication Research, 19, 50-88.
    Wilmot, W. W. (1987). Dyadic communication. New York: Random House. (3rd edition).
    Wood, J. T. (1995). Relational communication: Continuity and change in personal relationships. Belmont, California: Wadsworth.
    Wright, K. B. (2004). On-line relational maintenance strategies and perceptions of partners within exclusively Internet-based and primarily Internet-based relationships. Communication Studies, 55, 239-254.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    新聞研究所
    92451005
    94
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0924510052
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[新聞學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    51005201.pdf43KbAdobe PDF2771View/Open
    51005202.pdf111KbAdobe PDF2780View/Open
    51005203.pdf89KbAdobe PDF2888View/Open
    51005204.pdf107KbAdobe PDF2878View/Open
    51005205.pdf608KbAdobe PDF21371View/Open
    51005206.pdf445KbAdobe PDF22657View/Open
    51005207.pdf195KbAdobe PDF21125View/Open
    51005208.pdf556KbAdobe PDF21382View/Open
    51005209.pdf239KbAdobe PDF21115View/Open
    51005210.pdf91KbAdobe PDF21483View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback