Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/33466
|
| Title: | 選言主義與錯覺
Disjunctivism and Illusion |
| Authors: | 翟君剛
Chai ,Chun Kang |
| Contributors: | 林從一
Lin ,Chung I
翟君剛
Chai ,Chun Kang |
| Keywords: | 知覺
選言主意
錯覺
表徵主義
幻覺
perception
disjunctivism
illusion
representationalism
hallucination |
| Date: | 2008 |
| Issue Date: | 2009-09-17 16:48:45 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 選言主義在這個論文當中是指在知覺哲學當中的一個特定的理論。它最核心的主張是我們應該拒斥真實知覺與不真實知覺之間所分享的共同性，目的是為了防止懷疑論的攻擊。本篇論文的目的就是為了辯護這種立場的一個版本。
在我討論選言主義之前，我會在第一章先勾勒知覺哲學的議題的大概。在第二章，我會批評三種不同的表徵主義作為解釋知覺經驗的現象特質的理論。在第三章，我會討論麥克•馬丁的選言主義。由於他的立場過於極端，他的理論反對所以共同性在真實知覺與不真實知覺之間，並且蘊含在幻覺情況下，我們是無法知覺到任何的現象特質的。在最後一章，我會說明並且辯護我的立場。我的立場是宣稱知覺經驗具有表徵內容，用來說明現象特質，並且堅守選言主義的立場，解釋真實經驗與不真實經驗的現象特質不是訴諸相同的說明。我的主張看似不太融貫，因為知覺經驗的現象特質若是可以由表徵內容全部解釋，那為什麼還需要外在世界的對象呢。我會在本篇論文中說明為什麼我的主張是融貫的。
Disjunctivism, in this thesis, refers to a specific position in philosophy of perception. The kernel of disjunctivism is that we should reject certain commonalities between veridical perception and non-veridical perception in order to preserve the relation between our perceptual experience and the world. The aim of this thesis is to defend one version of this position.
Before I discuss the disjunctivism, I articulate the problem of perception in Chapter I and criticize three versions of intentionalism in Chapter II. Then, in Chapter III, I reject Mike Martin’s extreme position of disjunctivism. I defend my only theory in the last chapter that consists in the disjunctivists’ main concern that perception is in a relation to the external world (in order to resist the skeptics) and the intentionalists’ insight that the phenomenal character of experience is wholly explained by the intentionality of experience. My thesis prima facie sounds not coherent. It is because if the phenomenal character of experience can be wholly explained by the intentionality, it is not necessary to take the external objects into account. I will articulate why and how my thesis is coherent in this essay. |
| Reference: | Alston, W. 1999. ‘Back to the Theory of Appearing’. Philosophical Perspectives, 13.
Block, Ned. 1996. ‘Mental Paint and Mental Latex’, in E. Villanueva (ed.),
Philosophical Issues 7 (Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview): 19-49.
---1997. ‘Inverted Earth’ in N. Block, O. Flanagan and G. Güzeldere
(eds.), The Nature of Consciousness (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
---forthcoming. ‘Mental Paint’ in M. Hahn and B. Ramberg (eds.), Others on Burge: 10 Essays With Responses From Tyler Burge (Cambridge, MA: MIT
Press).
Brewer, B., 1999. Perception and Reason, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
— 2008. ‘How to Account for Illusion.’ In Disjunctivism: Perception, Action, and Knowledge, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Burge, T. 1977. ‘Belief De Re’ in Journal of Philosophy, 74.
Byrne A. and Logue H. forthcoming. ‘Either/Or: Disjunctivism for Dummies’.
---2006. ‘Color and the Mind-Body Problem.’ Dialectica. 60 (3):223-244.
Campbell, J. 2002. Reference and Consciousness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chalmers, David (1996), The Conscious Mind (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Crane, T. 2006. ‘Is There a Perceptual Relation?’. in Szabó Gendler, T. and Hawthorne J., eds. 2006.
Dennett, Daniel. 1993. ‘Quining Qualia’ in A. Marcel and E. Bisiach, eds, Consciousness in Modern Science, Oxford University Press 1988. Reprinted in W. Lycan, ed., Mind and Cognition: A Reader, MIT Press, 1990, A. Goldman, ed. Readings in Philosophy and Cognitive Science, MIT Press, 1993.
Davidson, D. 1987. ‘Knowing One`s Own Mind’ in Subjective, Intersubjective, Objective. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.
Gaskin, Richard. 2006. Experience and the world`s own language: a critique of John McDowell`s empiricism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Gendler, Tamar, and John Hawthorne. 2006. Perceptual experience. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Grice, H.P. 1961. ‘The Causal Theory of Perception’. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplement, Vol. 35.
Harman, Gilbert. 1990. ‘The Intrinsic Quality of Experience’. in J. Tomberlin, ed., Philosophical Perspectives vol. 4, Ridgeview Publishing Co.
Hawthorne, J. and Kovakovich, K. forthcoming. ‘Disjuncitivsm’.
Hellie, Benj. 2005. ‘Noise and Perceptual Indiscriminability.’ Mind. 114 (455):481-508.
Hinton, J. M. 1967a. ‘Visual Experiences’, Mind, 76: 217-27.
---1967b. ‘Experiences’, Philosophical Quarterly, 17: 1-13. Hinton, J. M. (1967c). ‘Illusions and Identity’, Analysis, 27: 65-76.
---1973. Experiences. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
---1980. ‘Phenomenological Specimenism’, Analysis, 40: 37-41.
Huemer, Michael. 2001. Skepticism and the Veil of Perception (Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield).
Jackson, Frank. 1977. Perception: A Representative Theory (Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press).
Johnston, M. 2004. ‘The obscure object of hallucination’. Philosophical Studies, 120.
Lewis, D. 1980. ‘Veridical hallucination and prosthetic perception’. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 58
Marr, D. 1982. Vision: A computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman.
Martin, M. 2006. ‘On Being Alienated’. in Szabó Gendler, T. and Hawthorne J., eds. 2006.
—2004. ‘The Limits of Self-Awareness’. Philosophical Studies, 120.
—2002. ‘The Transparence of Experience’. Mind and Language, 17.
---2002. ‘Particualr Thoughts & Singular Thought’, in A. O’Hear(ed.), Logic, Thought and Language. Cambridge, U.K. ; New York : Cambridge University Press.
McDowell, J. 1998. Meaning, Knowledge, & Reality. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
---1982 ‘Criteria, Defeasibility, and Knowledge’, in Meaning, Knowledge, & Reality.
—1986. ‘Singular Thought and the Extent of Inner Space’ in Meaning, Knowledge, & Reality.
—1994. Mind and World, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
—1995 ‘Knowledge and the Internal’ in Meaning, Knowledge, & Reality.
Noë, A. 2004. Action in Perception. Cambridge: The MIT Press
Palmer, S. 1999. Vision Science: From Photons to Phenomenology. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Pylyshyn, Z. 2003. Seeing and Visualizing: It’s Not What You Think. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Robinson, H. 1994. Perception. London: Routledge.
Searle, J. 1983. Intentionality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sellars, W. 1956. ‘Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind’, in Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. I, ed. by H. Feigl and M. Scriven. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Siegel, S. 2005. ‘The Contents of Perception’. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2006/entries/perception-contents/>.
—2004. ‘Indiscriminability and the Phenomenal’. Philosophical Studies, 120.
---2008. ‘The Epistemic Conception of Hallucination’ in Disjunctivism: Perception, Action, and Knowledge, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Smith, A.D. 2002. The Problem of Perception. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Snowdon, P. 1981. ‘Perception, vision and causation’ Aristotelian Society Proceedings New Series, 81.
---1990. ‘The Objects of Perceptual Experience’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supp. Vol. 64: 121-50.
---2005. ‘The Formulation of Disjunctivism: A Response to Fish’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 105: 129-41.
Stolar, D. 2004. “The argument from diaphanousness.” In: M. Ezcurdia, R. Stainton and C. Viger (eds) New Essays in the Philosophy of Language and Mind. Supplemental volume of The Canadian Journal of Philosophy. Calgary: University of Calgary Press, 341-90.
Sturgeon, S. unpublished. ‘Reflective Disjunctivism’.
Szabó Gendler T. and Hawthorne J., eds. 2006. Perceptual Experience. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Thau, M. 2004. ‘What is Disjunctivism?’ Philosophical Studies, 120: 193-253.
Travis, C. 2004 .‘The Silence of the Senses’. Mind, 113.
--- forthcoming, ‘Frege, Father of Disjunctivism’, Philosophical Topics.
Tye, M. 1995. Ten Problems of Consciousness: A Representational Theory of the Phenomenal Mind. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Williamson, T. 2000. Knowledge and Its Limits. Oxford: Oxford University Press. |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
哲學研究所
93154002
97 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0093154002 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [哲學系] 學位論文
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
