| Reference: | 參考書
1. Edward Craig ed., Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, New York: Routledge, 1998.
(1) Charles A. Corr, “Wolff Christian, 1679-1754,” Vol. 9, 776-786.
(2) Daniel Garber, “Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm, 1646-1716,” Vol. 5, 541-562.
(3) Knud Haakonssen, “Thomasius (Thomas), Christian, 1655-1728,” Vol. 9, 376-380.
2. Michel Delon ed., Encyclopedia of the Enlightenment, London: Fitzroy Dearborn Publishers, 2001.
(1) Jean Mondot, “Germany,” Vol.1, 598-606.
3. Alan Charles Kors ed., Encyclopedia of the Enlightenment, New York: Oxford University Press, 2003.
(1) Hans Erick Bödeker, “Journals, Newspapers, and Gazettes: Germany,” Vol. 2, 313-315.
(2) Laurence Brockliss, “Universities,” Vol. 4, 205-207.
(3) François Duchesneau, “Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm von (1646-1716),” Vol. 2, 380-384.
(4) Ian Hunter, “Natural Law,” Vol. 3, 130-134.
(5) Manfred Kuehn, “Wolff, Christian (1679-1754),” Vol. 4, 263-266.
(6) Fania Oz-Salzberger, “Aufklärung,” Vol. 1, 100-103.
(7) Michael J. Seidler, “Pufendorf, Sanuel,” Vol. 3, 378-381.
(8) Simone Zurbuchen, “Thomasius, Christian,” Vol. 4, 161-162.
資料集
1. James Schmidt ed., What is Enlightenment?: Eighteenth-century Answers and Twentieth-century Questions, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1996.
(1) Carl Friedrich Bahrdt (translated by John Chrisyian Laursen), “On Freedom of the Press and Its Limits: For Consideration by Rulers, censors and Writers” (1787), 97-113.
(2) Johann Gottlieb Fiche (translated by Thomas E. Wartenberg), “Reclamation of the Freedom of Thought from the Princes of Europe, who Have Oppressed It until Now,” (1793), 119-142.
(3) Immanuel Kant (translated by James Schmidt), “An answer to the Question: What Is Enlightenment?”(1784), 58-64.
(4) Ernst Ferdinand Klein (translated by John Christian Laursen), “On Freedom of thought and of the Press: For Princes, Ministers, and Writers” (1784), 87-96.
(5) Friedrich Karl von Moser (translated by John Christian Laursen), “True and False Political Enlightenment,”(1792), 212-216.
(6) J. K. W. Möhsen (translated by James Schmidt), “What Is to be Done Toward the Enlightenment of the Citizenry,”(1783), 49-52.
(7) Andreas Riem (translated by Jane Kneller), “On Enlightenment: Is It and Could It Be Dangerous to the State, to Region, or Dangerous in General? A Word to Be Heeded by Princes, Statesmen, and Clergy” (1788), 168-188.
(8) Johann Heinrich Tieftrunk (translated by Arthur Hirsh), “On the Influence of Enlightenment on Revolutions,”(1794), 217-224.
(9) Christoph Martin Wieland (translated by Kevin Paul Geiman and James Schmidt), “A Couple of Gold Nuggets, from the… Watepaper, or Six Amswers to Six Questions,” (1789), 78-84.
(10) Moses Mendelssohn (translated by James Schmidt), “On the Question: What Is Enlightenment?”(1784), 53-57.
2. Paul Hyland ed., The Enlightenment: A sourcebook and reader,New York: Routledge, 2003.
(1) Frederick II, “Essay on the forms of Government,” (1777), 173-175.
專書
1. Derek Beales, Joseph II: In the Shadow of Maria Theresa 1741-1780, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.
2. Richard van Dülmen, The Society of the Enlightenment, Cambridge: Polity Press, 1992.
3. Klaus Epstein, The Genesis of German Conservatism, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1975.
4. John G. Gagliardo, Germany under the Old Regime, London: Longman, 1991, 177-180.
5. John G. Gagliardo, Reich and Nation: The Holy Roman Empire as Idea and Reality, 1763-1806, London: Bloomington, 1980.
6. Peter Gay, The Enlightenment: An Interpretation, The Rise of Modern Paganism, New York: Alfred. A. Knopf, 1967.
7. Dorinda Outram, The Enlightenment, New York: Cambridge University Press, 1995.
8. Thomas P. Saine, The Problem of Being Modern, or, The German Pursuit of Enlightenment from Leibniz to the French Revolution, Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 1997.
9. Rudolf Vierhaus (translated by Jonathan B. Knudsen), Germany in the Age of Absolutism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.
專文
1. Derek Beales, “Love and the Empire: Maria Theresa and her co-regents,” in Robert Oresko, G. C. Gibbs, and H.M. Scott ed., Royal and Republican Sovereignty in Early Modern Europe: Essays in Memory of Ragnhild Hatton, (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1997), 479-499.
2. Günter Birtsch (translated by Arthur Hirsh), “The Berlin Wednesday Society,” in James Schmidt ed., What is Enlightenment?: Eighteenth-century Answers and Twentieth-century Questions (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1996), 235-252.
3. T. C. W. Blanning, “The Enlightenment in Catholic Germany,” in Roy Porter and Mikulas Teich ed., The Enlightenment in National Context (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1981), 118-126.
4. T. C. W. Blanning, “Frederick the Great and Enlightened Absolutism,” in H. M. Scott ed., Enlightened Absolutism: Reform and Reformers in Later Eighteenth-century Europe, (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1990), 265-288.
5. Charles Ingrao, “The Problem of ‘Enlightened Absolutism’ and the German States,” Journal of Modern History 58, suppl. (1986), S161-180.
6. Charles Ingrao, “The Smaller German States,” in H. M. Scott ed., Enlightened Absolutism: Reform and Reformers in Later Eighteenth-century Europe, (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1990), 221-243.
7. H. B. Nisbet, “‘Was ist Aufklärung?’: The Concept of Enlightenment in Eighteenth-Century Germany,” in Journal of European Studies 12.2 (1982): 77-95.
8. Marc Raeff, “The Well-Ordered Police State and the Development of Modernity in Seventeenth-and Eighteenth-Century Europe: An attempt at a Comparative Perspective,” American Historical Review 80 (1975):1221-1243.
9. James Schmidt, “Introduction: What Is Enlightenment? A Question, Its Context, and Some Consequences,” in James Schmidt ed., What is Enlightenment?: Eighteenth-century Answers and Twentieth-century Questions (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1996), 1-44.
10. H. M. Scott, “Introduction: The Problem of Enlightened Absolutism,” in H. M. Scott ed., Enlightened Absolutism: Reform and Reformers in Later Eighteenth-century Europe, (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1990), 1-35.
11. H. M. Scott, “Reform in the Habsburg Monarchy, 1740-90, in H. M. Scott ed., Enlightened Absolutism: Reform and Reformers in Later Eighteenth-century Europe, (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1990),145-187.
12. Richard Tuck, “The ‘Modern’ Theory of Natural Law,” in Anthony Pagden, The Languages of Political Theory in Early-Modern Europe (New York : Cambridge University Press, 1987), 99-119.
13. James Tully, “Editor’s Introduction,” in Samuel Pufendorf’s On the Duty of Man and Citizen, edited by Michael Silverthrorne (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991), xiv-xxxvii.
14. Joachim Whaley, “The Protestant Enlightenment in Germany,” in Roy Porter and Mikulas Teich ed., The Enlightenment in National Context (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1981), 106-117.
15. Eberhard Weis, “Enlightenment and Absolutism in the Holy Roman Empire: Thoughts on Enlightened Absolutism in Germany,” Journal of Modern History 58, suppl. (1986), S181-197.
中文書目
1. 王世宗，《現代世界的形成：文明終極意義的探求》，台北：三民，2003。
2. 王曾才，《西洋近世史》，台北：正中書局，1976。
3. 楊豫，《西洋史學史》，台北：雲龍出版社，1998。
4. Ernst Cassirer著，李日章譯，《啟蒙運動的哲學》，台北：聯經，1984。
5. Peter Burke著，賈士蘅譯，《知識社會史》，台北：麥田，2003。
6. Peter Hanns Reill, “Science” in Encyclopedia of the Enlightenment, New York: Facts On File, 1996. 劉北成、王皖強編譯，《啟蒙運動百科全書》，上海：上海人民，2004。 |
