Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/33683
|
| Title: | 英國學派-被忽視的國際關係理論
English School- The Neglected International Relations Theory |
| Authors: | 李卓濤
Lee, Juo-Tau |
| Contributors: | 姜家雄
Chiang, Alex
李卓濤
Lee, Juo-Tau |
| Keywords: | 英國學派
理性主義
國際社會
現實主義
革命主義
國際體系
世界社會
實證主義
詮釋學
English School
Rationalism
International Society
Realism
Revolutionism
International System
World Society
Positivism
Interpretivism |
| Date: | 2004 |
| Issue Date: | 2009-09-17 17:52:08 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 國際關係也是社會關係的一環，對國際關係的研究必須植基於國家涉入的歷史、社會、文化等層面進行探求，否則很難對國際關係有著全貌的了解。在美國學界的實證主義長期宰制下，研究國際社會的英國學派長期受到忽視，隱沒於線性發展的歷史中。
為了發掘英國學派受到忽視的地位，本論文擬從下三點著手。首先，回溯英國學派的歷史起源、代表學者、名稱問題；再者，耙梳、整理英國學派的學術內涵，包括現實主義、理性主義及革命主義三個傳統，以及國際體系、國際社會及世界社會三個本體；第三、在美國實證主義的長期獨霸下，注重詮釋方法研究國際社會的英國學派是無法得到關注的。因此，這部分將從社會科學兩大陣營－實證主義及詮釋學著手，並進而帶入受實證主義籠罩的主流國際關係研究。本論文認為以實證主義研究具社會性的國際關係有其侷限，而多元、開放、重社會性的英國學派才能提供更完整的國際關係圖像。
本論文認為抱持多元開放、重視整體性、社會性、規範性的英國學派更能面對接踵而來的環境議題、全球化相關問題及人道干涉等全球性議題，如果正視國際關係也是社會關係的一部分，英國學派是能成為較適當的國際關係理論。
Social relations encompasses international relations so that the inquiry for international relations must embark on the historical, social, cultural context that states involved in. Otherwise we can’t envisage a comprehensive image of international relations. Under the dominance of positivism led by American international relations, English School, whose intellectual focus is International Society, has been neglected for a long period of time and immerged in the linear history.
For the sake of exploring English School, the thesis sets out three schemes. First, it retrospects the history, leading figures and label of English School. Second, it elucidates the arguments of English School, including the three ontologies- International System, International Society and World Society as well as three traditions, namely Realism, Rationalism and Revolutionism. Third, beginning with the discuss of Positivism and Interpretivism, the author argues Positivism has its limitation in societal international relations. Consequently, it is English School, which tilts toward an open and diverse inclination, that can tell a better story.
The author concludes that English School that stresses on holism, society and social norms can take on the upcoming global issues, such as environmental issue, globalization and humanitarian intervention. If we square up to the fact that international relations is a part of social relations, English School can be a more adequate international relations theory. |
| Reference: | 一、 中文
(一) 專書
石之瑜。《政治學的知識脈絡》。台北：五南，2001年。
石之瑜。《後現代的知識脈絡》。台北：元照，2002年。
丘宏達，《現代國際法》。台北：三民，2000年。
孔恩(Thomas S. Kuhn)，《科學革命結構》。台北：遠流 ，1994年。
林碧炤。《國際政治與外交政策》。台北：五南，1997年。
倪世雄。《當代國際關係理論》。台北：五南，2003年。
賽班。《西洋政治思想史》（A History of Political Theory）。李少軍、尚新建譯。台北：桂冠，1997年。
Michel Foucault著，《知識的考掘》。王德威譯。台北：麥田，1993年。
(二)、期刊論文
秦亞青，〈國際政治的社會建構－溫特及其建構主義國際政治理論〉，美歐季刊，第十五卷第二期，2001年。
龐中英，〈開放式的自主發展：對英國國際關係理論的一項觀察—思考中國國際關係理論的方向〉，國際政治，2003年第9期 ，2003年9月。
(三)、碩博士論文
黃旻華。〈國際關係批判理論的重建與評論：科學實存論的觀點〉。國立中山大學政治學研究所，1998年5月。
(四)、研討會論文
姜家雄。〈國際關係中的英國學派〉。國際關係之理論與實踐學術研討會。國立政治大學外交系主辦，2003年7月5日。
李卓濤。〈英國學派的歷史考掘〉。國際關係研究生論文發表會。國立政治大學外交系主辦，2004年5月28日。
二、 英文
(一) 專書
Adler, Emanuel, and Beverly Crawford, eds. Progress in Postwar International Relations. New York: Columbia University Press, 1991.
Alderson, Kai, and Andrew Hurrell, eds. Hedley Bull On International Society. Hampshire: Macmillan, 2000.
Baldwin, David A. ed. Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debat . New York: Columbia University Press, 1993.
Barry, Brian, Jack Hayward, Archie Brown, eds. The British Study of Politics in the Twentieth Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.
Bauer, Harry, and Elisabetta Brighi, eds. International Relations at LSE: A History of 75 Years. London: Millennium Publishing Group, 2003.
Baylis, John, and Steve Smith, eds. The Globalization of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations. New York: Oxford University Press, 1997.
Beer, Francis, and Robert Hariman. ed. Post-Realism: The Rhetorical Turn in International Relations. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press, 1996.
Berger, Peter, and Thomas Luckmann. The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. New York: Anchor Books, 1966.
Bernstein, Richard. The Restructuring of Social and Political Theory. London: Methuen, 1976.
Brown, Chris. Understanding International Relations. Hampshire: Macmillan, 1997.
Brown, Chris. International Relations Theory: New Normative Approaches. New York: Columbia University Press, 1992.
Bull, Hedley. The Anarchical Society. London: Macmillan, 1977.
Bull, Hedley, and Adam Watson. The Expansion of International Society. Oxford: Clarendon, 1984.
Bull, Hedley, Benedict Kingsbury and Adam Roberts. Hugo Grotius and International Relations. New York: Oxford University Press, 1990.
Burchill, Scott, ed. Theories of International Relations. Hampshire: Palgrave, 2001.
Butterfield, Herbert, and Martin Wight, eds. Diplomatic Investigation. London: Allen and Unwin,1966.
Buzan, Barry. From International to World Society?: English School Theory and the Social Structure of Globalisation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
Buzan, Barry, and Richard Little. International Systems in World History: Remaking the Study of International Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
Buzan, Barry, Charles Jones and Richard Little. The Logic of Anarchy: Neorealism to Structural Realism New York: Columbia University Press, 1993.
Carr, E.H. The Twenty Years` Crisis, 1919-1939: An Introduction to The Study of International Relations. London: Macmillan, 1956.
Cox, Michael. E. H. Carr: A Critical Appraisal. New York: Palgrave, 2000.
Czempid, Ernst- Otto, and James Rosenau, eds. Global Changes and Theoretical Challenges. Lexington: Lexington Book: 1989.
Delanty, Gerard. Social Science: Beyond Constructivism and Realism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1997.
Dougherty, James, and Robert Pfaltzgraff. Contending Theories of International Relation: A Comprehensive Survey. New York: Longman, 2001.
Dunne, Tim. Inventing International Society: A History of the English School. London: Macmillan, 1998.
Dyer, Hugh, and L eon Mangasarian eds. The Study of International Relations: The State of The Art. New York: St. Martin`s, 1989.
Finnemore, Martha. National Interests in International Society. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1996.
Ferguson, Yale, and Richard Mansbach. The Elusive Quest: Theory and International Politics. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 1988.
Foot, Rosemary, John Lewis Gaddis and Andrew Hurrell, eds. Order and Justice in International Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.
Fox, William, ed. Theoretical Aspects of International Relations. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1959.
Friedman, Gil, and Harvey Starr. Agency, Structure, and International Politics: From Ontology to Empirical Inquiry. London: Routledge, 1997.
George, Jim. Discourses of Global Politics: A Critical (Re) Introduction to International Relations. Boulder: Lynne Reinner, 1994.
Giddens, Anthony. The Constitution of Society: Outline of The Theory of Structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984.
Griffiths, Martin. Realism, Idealism and International Politics: A Reinterpretation. London: Routledge, 1992.
Guzzini, Stefano. Realism in International Relations and International Political Economy. London: Routledge, 1998.
Halliday, Fred. Rethinking International Relations. Vancouver: UBC Press, 1994.
Hobson, John. The State and International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
Hobson, John, ed. Historical Sociology of International Relations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002)
Hollis, Martin, and Steve Smith, Explaining and Understanding International Relations. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990.
Hollis, Martin. The Philosophy of Social Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
Holsti, K.J., The Dividing Discipline: Hegemony and Diversity in International Theory. Boston: Allen & Unwin, 1985.
Hopf, Ted. Social Construction of International Politics: Identities and Foreign Policies, Moscow, 1955 and 1999. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2002.
Jackson, Robert H. The Global Covenant: Human Conduct in A World of States. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000
Jackson, Robert, and Geroge Sorenren. Introduction to International Relations. Oxford University Press, 1999.
Kaplan, Morton. System and Process in International Politics. New York: R. E. Krieger, 1957.
Keohane, Robert. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984.
Keohane, Robert. International Institutions and State Power: Essays in International Relations Theory. Boulder: Westview, 1989.
Keohane, Robert. Neorealism and Its Critics. New York: Columbia University Press, 1986.
Kerlinger, Fred. Foundations of Behavioral Research. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1986.
Knorr, Klaus, and James Rosenau eds. Contending Approaches to International Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1969.
Krasner, Stephen, ed. International Regimes. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1982.
Kuhn, Thomas. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1970.
Lakatos, Imre. The Methodology Of Scientific Research Programmes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978.
Lakatos, Imre, and Alan Musgrave, eds. Criticism and The Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970.
Larkins, Jeremy, and Rick Fawn, eds. International Society After the Cold War: Anarchy and Order Reconsidered. Hampshire: Macmillan, 1996.
Lauterpacht, Elihu. ed. International Law: Being The Collected Papers of Hersch Lauterpacht. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970.
Light, Margot, and A. Groom, eds. International Relations: A Handbook of Current Theory. London: Frances Pinter, 1985.
Maghroori, Ray, and Bennett Ramberg. Globalism versus Realism: International Relations` Third Debate. Boulder: Westview, 1982.
Manning, Charles. The Nature of International Society. London: Macmillan, 1975.
Mayall, James, ed. The Community of States. London: Allen and Unwin, 1982.
Mayall, James. Nationalism and International Society. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1993.
Miller, J.D.B., and R.J. Vincent, eds. Order and Violence: Hedley Bull and International Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990.
Morgenthau, Hans. Dilemmas of Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1958.
Nardin, Terry. Law, Morality and the Relations of States. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1983.
Nardin, Terry and David Mapel, eds. Traditions of International Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.
Neumann, Iver, and Ole Wæver, eds. The Future of International Relations: Masters in the Making? London: Routledge, 1997.
Pojman, Louis. What Can We Know?: An Introduction to the Theory of Knowledge. Belmont: Wadsworth, 2001.
Osiander, Andreas. The State System of Europe, 1640-1990: Peacemaking and the Condition of International Stability. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994.
Rawls, John. A theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1971.
Roberson, B.A. ed. International Society and the Development of International Relations Theory. London: Pinter, 1998.
Rosenthal, Joel. Righteous Realist: Responsible Power and American Culture in the Nuclear Age. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 1991.
Reus-Smit, Christian. The Moral Purpose of the State: Culture, Social Identity, and Institutional Rationality in International Relations. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1999.
Scholte, Jan Aart. Globalization: A Critical Introduction. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 2000.
Sylvester, Christine. Feminist Theory and International Relations in a Postmodern Era. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.
Smith, Steve, ed. International Relations: British and American Perspectives. Oxford: Blackwell, 1985.
Smith, Steve, Ken Booth and Marysia Zalewski, eds. International Theory: Positivism and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
Smith, Steve, Ken Booth. International Relations Theory Today. University Park, Pa.: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1995.
Thompson, Kenneth. Masters of International Thought. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 1980.
Vincent, R. J. Foreign Policy and Human Rights: Issues and Responses. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.
Vincent, R. J. Human Rights and International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.
Walker, R.B.J. Inside/Outside: International Relations as Political Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.
Waltz, Kenneth. Man, the State and War: A Theoretical Analysis. New York: Columbia University Press, 1959.
Waltz, Kenneth. Theory of International Politics. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1979.
Watson, Adam. The Evolution of International Society. London: Routledge, 1992.
Wendt, Alexander. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
Wheeler, Nicholas. Saving Strange: Humanitarian Intervention in International Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
Wight, Martin. Systems of States. Leicester: Leicester University Press, 1977.
Wight, Martin. International Theory: The Three Traditions. London: Royal Institute of International Affairs, 1996.
Winch, Peter. The Idea of A Social Science and Its Relation to Philosophy. New York: Humanities Press, 1958.
(二) 期刊論文
Adler, Emanuel. “Seizing the Middle Ground: Constructivism in World Politics.” European Journal of International Relations 3, no.3 (1997): 319-363.
Alker, Hayward and Thomas Biersteker, “The Dialectics of World Order: Notes for a Future Archeologist of International Savior Faire.” International Studies Quarterly 28 (June 1984): 121-142
Ashley, Richard and R.B.J. Walker. “Speaking the Language of Exile: Dissident Thought in International Studies.” International Studies Quarterly 34 (September 1990):259-268.
Brown, Chris. “International Theory and International Society: The Viability of The Middle Way?” Review of International Studies 21 (April 1995): 183-196.
Brown, Chris. “International Political Theory－A British Social Science? ” British Journal of Politics and International Relations 2 (April 2000): 114-123.
Bull, Hedley. “The Theory of International Politics, 1919-1969.” In Brian Poter, ed., The Aberstwyth Papers: International Politics 1919-1969. London: Oxford University Press, 1972.
Buzan, Barry. “From International System to International Society: Structural Realism and Regime Theory Meet the English School.” International Organization 47 (Summer 1993): 327-352.
Buzan, Barry. “The English School: An Underexploited Resource in IR.” Review of International Studies 27 (July 2001): 471-488.
Buzan, Barry and Richard Little. “Why International Relations has Failed as An Intellectual Project and What to Do About It.” Millennium 30, no.1 (2001): 19-39.
Clark, Ian. “Legitimacy in a Global Order.” Review of International Studies 29 (December 2003): 75-95.
Copeland, Dale. “A Realist Critique of the English School.” Review of International Studies 29 (July 2003): 427-441.
Cox, Robert. “Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory.” Millennium 10, no.2 (1981): 126-155.
Czaputowicz, Jacek. ”The English School of International Relations and Its Approach to European Integration.” Studies and Analyses 2, no.2 (2003): 3-55.
De Almeida, João M. “Challenging Realism by Returning to History: The British Committee`s Contribution to IR 40 Years On.” International Relations 17 (August 2003): 273-302.
Dessler, David. ”What’s at Stake in the Agent-Structure Debate?” International Organization 43 (Summer 1989): 441-473
Deutscher, Tamara. “E.H. Carr – A Personal Memoir.” New Left Review 137 (Jan./ Feb. 1983): 78-86.
Devlen, Balkan, Patrick James and Ozgur Ozdarmar. “The English School, International Relations and Progress.” International Studies Review 7(June 2005): 171-197.
Dunne, Timothy. “International Society: Theoretical Promises Fulfilled?” Cooperation and Conflict 30 (June 1995): 125-154.
Dunne, Timothy. “Mythology or Methodology?: Traditions in International Theory.” Review of International Studies 19 (July 1993): 305-318.
Dunne, Tim. “Sociological Investigations: Instrumental, Legitimist and Coercive Interpretations of International Society.” Millennium 30 (January 2001): 67-91.
Dunne, Tim. “New Thinking on International Society.” British Journal of Politics and International Relations 3 (June 2001): 223-244.
Dunne, Tim. “Society and Hierarchy in International Relations.” International Relations 17 (September 2003): 303-320.
Dunne, Timothy and Nicholas Wheeler. “Hedley Bull’s Pluralism of the Intellect and Solidarism of the Will.” International Affairs 72, no.1 (1996): 91-107.
Epp, Roger. “The English School on the Frontiers of International Society: A Hermeneutic Recollection.” Review of International Studies 27 (July 2001): 47-63.
Evans, Tony and Peter Wilson. ”Regime Theory and the English School of International Relations: A Comparison.” Millennium 21, no.3 (1992): 329-351.
Fay, Brian and J. Donald Moon. “What Would an Adequate Philosophy of Social Science Look Like?” Philosophy of Social Science 7, no.3 (1977): 209-227.
Finnemore, Martha. “Exporting the English School?” Review of International Studies 27 (July 2001): 509-513.
Fox, William. “E.H. Carr and Political Realism: Vision and Revision.” Review of International Studies 11 (January 1985): 1-16.
Grader, Sheila. “The English School of International Relations: Evidence and Evolution.” Review of International Studies 14 (January 1988):29-44.
Guzzini, Stefano. ”Calling For a Less ’Brandish’ and Less ‘Grand’ Reconvention.” Review of International Studies 27 (July 2001): 495-501.
Hall, Ian. “Still the English Patient?: Closures and Inventions in the English School.” International Affairs 77 (October 2001): 931-942.
Halliday, Fred. “The Pertinence of International Relations.” Political Studies 38 (September 1990): 502-516.
Halliday, Fred. “International Society as Homogeneity: Burke, Marx and Fukuyama.” Millennium 21 (December 1992): 435-61.
Henderson, Conway. “Investigating International Society.” Global Society 15 (October 2001): 415-423.
Hill, Christopher. “R.J. Vincent (1943-90).” Political Studies 39 (March 1991): 158-160.
Hoffman, Stanley. “An American Social Science: International Relations,” Daedalus 106, no.3 (1977): 41-60.
Hollis, Martin and Steve Smith. ”Beware of Gurus: Structure and Action in International Relations.” Review of International Studies 17 (October 1991): 393-410.
Hopf, Ted. “The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory.” International Security 23 (Summer 1998): 181-185.
Howe, Paul. “The Utopian Realism of E.H. Carr.” Review of International Studies 20 (July 1994): 277-297.
Jackson, Robert. “Pluralism in International Political Theory.” Review of International Studies 18 (July 1992): 271-281.
James, Alan. “System or Society?” Review of International Studies 19, no.3 (1993): 269-288.
Jones, Charles. “Christian Realism and the Foundations of the English School.” International Relations 17 (September 2003): 371-387.
Jones, Roy. “The English School of International Relations: A Case for Closure.” Review of International Studies 7 (January 1981): 1-13.
Kaplan, Morton. “The New Great Debate: Traditionalism vs. Science in International Relations.” World Politics 19 (October 1966): 1-20.
Katzenstein, Peter, Robert Keohane and Stephen Krasner. “International Organization and the Study of World Politics.” International Organization 52 (Autumn 1998): 675-678.
Kissolewski, Janine. “Norms in International Society: English School Meets Constructivism.” paper presented at British International Studies Association conference. Bradford, December 2000.
Knudsen, Tonny. “Theory of Society or Society of Theorists? With Tim Dunne in The English School.” Cooperation and Conflict 35 (June 2000): 193-203.
Lapid, Yosef . “The Third Debate: On The Prospects of International Theory in a Post-Positivist Era.” International Studies Quarterly 33 (September 1989): 235-254.
Linklater, Andrew. “The Transformation of Political Community: E.H. Carr, Critical Theory and International Relations.” Review of International Studies 23 (July 1997): 321-338.
Lijphart, Arendt. “The Structure of the Theoretical Revolution in International Relations.” International Studies Quarterly 18 (March 1974): 41-74.
Little, Richard. “Neorealism and the English School: A Methodological, Ontological and Theoretical Reassessment.” European Journal of International Relations 1, no.1 (1995): 9-34.
Little, Richard. “The English School’s Contribution to the Study of International Relations.” European Journal of International Relations 6 (September 2000): 395-422.
Little, Richard. “The English School VS. American Realism: A Meeting of Minds or Divided by A Common Language.” Review of International Studies 29 (July 2003): 443-460.
Lyons, Gene. ”The Study of International Relations in Great Britain.” World Politics 38 (July 1986): 626-645.
Neufeld, Mark. “Interpretation and the ‘Science’ of International Relations.” Review of International Studies 19 (January 1993): 39-61.
Neumann, Iver. ”The English School and the Practices of World Society.” Review of International Studies 27 (July 2001): 503-507.
Rengger, N.J. “A City Which Sustains All Things?: Communitarianism and International Society.” Millennium 21 (December 1992): 353-369.
Rengger, N.J. “Serpents and Doves in Classical International Theory.” Millennium 17 (June 1988): 215-225.
Reus-Smit, Christian “Imagining Society: Constructivism and the English School.” British Journal of Politics and International Relations 4 (October 2002): 487-509.
Rosenberg, Justin. “The International Imagination: IR Theory and ‘Classical Social Analysis’.” Millennium 23 (March 1994): 85-108.
Ruggie, John. “What Makes the World Hang Together? Neo-Utilitarianism and the Social Constructivist Challenge.” International Organization 52 (Autumn 1998): 880-882.
Shapcott, Richard. “Conversation and Coexistence: Gadamer and the Interpretatuon of International Society.” Millennium 23 (March 1994): 57-83.
Shapcott, Richard. “IR as Practical Philosophy: Defining A ‘Classic Approach’.” British Journal of Politics and International Relations 6 (August 2004): 271-291.
Shaw, Martin.“Global Society and Global Responsibility: The Theoretical, Historical and Political Limits of ‘International Society’.” Millennium 21, no.3 (1993): 421-434.
Smith, Steve. “The Forty Years Detour: The Resurgence of Normative Theory in International Relations.” Millennium 21 (December 1992): 489-506.
Smith, Steve. “The Discipline of International Relations: Still An American Social Science?” British Journal of Politics and International Relations 2 (October 2000): 374-402.
Smith, Steve. “Singing Our World into Existence: International Relations Theory and September 11.” International Studies Quarterly 48 (September 2004): 499-515.
Strange, Susan. “Cave! Hic Dragones: A Critique of Regime Analysis.” International Organization 36 (Spring 1982): 479-496.
Suganami, Hidemi. “The Structure of Institutionalism: An Anatomy of British Mainstream International Relations.” International Relations 7, no.5 (1983): 363-381.
Suganami, Hidemi. “A New Narrative, A New Subject? Tim Dunne on the "English School.” Cooperation and Conflict 35 (June 2000): 217-226.
Suganami, Hidemi. “C. A. W. Manning and the Study of International Relations.” Review of International Studies 27 (January 2001): 91-107.
Suganami, Hidemi. “Alexander Wendt and the English School.” Journal of International Relations and Development 4 (December 2001): 403-423.
Suganami, Hidemi. “British Institutionalists, or the English School, 20 Years On.” International Relations 17 (September 2003): 253-271.
Suganami, Hidemi. “The International Society Perspective on World Politics Reconsidered.” International Relations of the Asia Pacific 2 (February, 2002): 1-28.
Vincent, John. ” Hedley Bull and Order in International Politics.” Millennium 17, no.2 (1988): 195-213.
Watson, Adam. “Systems of States.” Review of International Studies 16 (April 1990): 99-109.
Watson, Adam. “Foreword.” Review of International Studies 27 (July 2001): 467-470.
Wæver, Ole. “The Sociology of a Not So International Discipline: American and European Developments in International Relations.” International Organization 52 (Autumn 1998): 687-727.
Wæver, Ole. “Does the English School’s Via Media Equal the Contemporary Constructivist Middle Ground?” paper presented at the 24th annual conference of the British International Studies Association Manchester, 1999.
Wendt, Alexander. “The Agent-Structure Problem in International Relations Theory.” International Organization 41 (Summer 1987): 335-370.
Wendt, Alexander. ”Bridging the Theory/Meta-Theory Gap in International Relations.” Review of International Studies 17 (October 1991): 383-392.
Wendt, Alexander. ”Anarchy Is What States Make of It.” International Organization 46 (Spring 1992): 391-425.
Wight, Martin. “International Legitimacy. ” International Relations 4, no.1 (1972): 1-28.
Wight, Martin. “An Anatomy of International Thought.” Review of International Studies 13 (July 1987): 221-227.
Wilson, Peter. “The English School of International Relations: A Reply to Sheila Grader,” Review of International Studies 15 (January 1989): 51-52.
(三) 網路資源
http://www.leeds.ac.uk/polis/englishschool/
此網站為英國學派專屬學術網站
http://www.oup.co.uk/best.textbooks/politics/globalization2e/weblinks/
http://home.pi.be/~lazone/
http://workingpapers.org/interrelations.htm
http://csf.colorado.edu/isa/index.html |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
外交研究所
902530182
93 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0902530182 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [外交學系] 學位論文
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
