Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/34241
|
| Title: | 集團企業股權結構複雜度與經營效益關聯性之探討 |
| Authors: | 黃靖雅 |
| Contributors: | 林宛瑩
黃靖雅 |
| Keywords: | 集團企業
股權結構複雜度
內部市場理論
決策控制力
Business groups
complexity of ownership structure
internal market theory
control |
| Date: | 2006 |
| Issue Date: | 2009-09-18 09:06:22 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 本論文以國內2001-2005年之上市櫃公司為研究對象，針對其轉投資層數與股權結構型態進行台灣集團企業股權結構複雜度與企業經營關聯性之研究。有別於集團企業之實證研究，一般均以比較集團與單一企業經營績效與公司價值，來間接推論集團化相關理論之合理性。本論文嘗試直接從形成集團企業之經濟因素著手，探討股權結構複雜度對於企業交易成本、融資成本與決策控制力等經營層面之影響，以期能更深入瞭解集團企業之成本與效益。實證結果顯示，集團企業股權結構複雜度之效益無法反映於較低之交易成本，但可反映於較低之融資利息成本。本論文之實證發現，集團企業形成複雜股權結構主要係基於財務而非營運之考量。最後在決策控制力方面，分析結果顯示，複雜股權結構與股份控制權有顯著的正向關係，為「東亞國家之最終控制者，傾向於透過金字塔結構或交叉持股，以較低現金流量極大化控制權」之說法，提供實證證據。
We explore the relationship between the complexity of a business group’s ownership structure and operation by using a sample of Taiwanese companies listed in Taiwan Stock Exchange and Over the Counter during 2001-2005. Instead of using Tobin’s q or ROA, we begin with the economic background of business group directly and discuss how the complexity of ownership structure influences the benefits and costs of business operation, such as operation cost, financing cost and ultimate control. Our empirical analysis indicates that the influence of complexity of ownership structure in operation cost is uncertain. According to related research in Taiwan, the main purpose of complexity of ownership structure is not for operation but for financing or restrictions of laws. This may be result in the insignificant effect on operating cost. Second, we find a positive and significant effect on financing cost. This result also supports the arguments about the purpose of complexity of ownership structure. Finally, our analysis offers empirical evidences that control is typically enhanced by
pyramid structures and cross-holdings among firms in East Asian countries. |
| Reference: | 一、中文部分
(專書)
王淑芬，2004，投資學，台北：華泰書局
中華徵信所，2006，台灣地區集團企業研究，台北：中華徵信所。
苗豐強，1997，雙贏策略---苗豐強策略聯盟的故事，台北：天下雜誌社。
(期刊)
沈中華、陳錦村與吳孟紋，2005，更早期預警模型：台灣銀行道德指標的建立及影響，管理學報，第二十二卷，第1期：1-28。
許振明，1999，企業交叉持股與改善之道，證交資料，第452期：1-8。
葉銀華、蘇裕惠、柯承恩與李德冠，2003，公司治理機制對於關係人交易的影響，
證券市場發展季刊，第15卷，第4期：69-106。
葉新民，2005，由公司法第一七九條之新修正條文論我國有關交叉持股之法律制度，臺北大學法學論叢，第57期：227-268。
林宛瑩與許崇源，2007，台灣集團企業之控股型態及公司治理衡量指標之研究與建議，交大管理學報，第27-2期(即將出刊)。
廖大穎，1999，論交叉持股制度—另類的財務操作與企業結合，月旦法學，第45期：89-98。
(碩博士論文)
毛治文，1999，內部關係人持股比例及其變動與上市公司購回庫藏股之
關連性研究，未出版碩士論文，文化大學會計研究所。
沈永偉，1999，企業相互轉投資以及股票購回動機之研究，未出版碩士論文，國立政治大學財務管理研究所。
紀虹琪，2001，從企業財務限制問題延伸探討集團企業內部資本市場的運作，未出版碩士論文，輔仁大學管理學研究所。
周宗穎，2001，集團企業公司間股權聯結基礎之研究，未出版博士論文，國立政治大學企業管理學研究所。
詹淑惠，2001，集團企業交叉持股變動長期績效之研究，未出版碩士論文，國立中正大學財務金融研究所。
廖曜生，2001，資源共享、企業控制策略與人力資源管理控制的角色: 台灣集團企業子公司的實證研究，未出版博士論文，國立成功大學企業管理學研究所。
蔡柳卿，2000，母子公司交叉持股之資訊內涵與經濟誘因之實證研究，未出版博士論文，國立政治大學會計學研究所。
二、英文部分
(Journal Paper)
Allen, J. W., and G. M. Phillips. 2000. Corporate equity ownership, strategic alliances,and product market relationships. The Journal of Finance 55 (6): 2791–2815.
Amseden, A. H., and T. Hikino. 1994. Project execution capability, organizationalknow-how and conglomerate corporate growth in late industrialization. Industrialand Corporate Change 3: 111-147.
Aoki, M. 1990. Toward an economic model of the Japanese firm. Journal of Economic Literature 28: 1–27.
Berger, G. P., and E. Ofek. 1995. Diversification’s effect on firm value. Journalof Financial Economics 37: 39-65.
Chang, S. J., and U. Choi. 1988. Strategy, structure and performance of Koreanbusiness groups: a transaction cost approach. The Journal of Industrial Economics37: 141-58.
Claessens, S., S. Djankov, and H. P. Lang. 2000. The separation of ownership and control in East Asian corporation. Journal of Financial Economics 58: 81-112.
Clarke, C. F. 1988. Using finance for competitive advantage. Long Range Planning 21: 63-69.
Clayton, M. J., and B. N. Jorgensen. 2005. Optimal cross holding with externalities and strategic interactions. Journal of Business 78: 1505–1522.
Genay, H. 1991. Japan’s corporate group. Economic Perspectives 15: 20-30.
Guillén M. F. 1997. Business groups in economic development. Academy ofManagement Best Paper Proceedings(57th Annual Meeting): 170–174.
__________. 2000. Business groups in emerging economies: a resource-based view.Academy of Management Journal 43: 362-380.
Gunduz, L., and E. Tatoglu. 2003. A comparison of the financial characteristics of
group affiliated and independent firms in Turkey. European Business Review 15:48-54.
Granovetter, M. 1995.Coase revisited: business groups in the modern economy.Industrial and Corporate Change 4: 93-130.
Heitor V. A., and D. Wolfenzon. 2006. A Theory of Pyramidal Ownership and Family
Business Groups. The Journal of Finance 61(6): 2637–2680
Hubbard, R. D., and J. D. Pahlia. 1999. A reexamination of the conglomerate mergerwave in the 1960s: an internal capital markets view. Journal of Finance 54: 1131-1152.
Hoshi, T., A. Kashyap, and D. Scharfstein. 1991. Corporate structure, liquidity and
investment: evidence from Japanese industrial groups. The Quarterly Journal ofEconomic : 33-60.
Khanna, T., and K. Palepu. 1997. Why focused strategies may be wrong for emergingmarkets. Harvard Business Review 75: 41-50.
_________, and ________. 2000a. Is group affiailation profitable in emergingmarkets? An analysis of diversified Indian business groups. Journal of Finance55: 867-891.
_________, and ________. 2000b. The future of business groups in emerging markets:long run evidence from Chile. Academy of Management Journal 43: 268-285.
_________, and J. W. Rivikin. 2001. Estimating the performance effects of businessgroups in emerging markets. Strategic Management Journal 22: 45-74.
________, and Y. Yafeh. 2005. Business groups and risk sharing around the world.Journal of Business 78: 301-340.
La Porta, R., F. Lopez-de-Silanes, A. Shleifer. 1999. Corporate ownership around theworld. Journal of Finance 54: 471-517.
Lamont, O. 1997. Cash flow and investment: evidence from internal capital markets.Journal of Finance 52: 83-109.
Leff, N. 1978. Industrial organization and entrepreneurship in developing countries:the economic groups. Economic Development and Cultural Change 26: 661-675.
Lewellen, W. G. 1971. A pure financial rationale for the conglomerate. Journal ofFinance 26: 563-574.
Markides, C. C., and P. J. Williamson. 1996. Corporate diversification andorganizational structure: a resource-based view. Academy of ManagementJournal 39: 340-367.
Peng, M. W., and P. S. Health.1996. The growth of the firm in planned economics in transition: institutions, organizations, and strategic choice. Academy of
Management Review 21: 492-528.
Prowse, S. 1999. Corporate governance and corporate finance in East Asia: what can
we learn from the industrialized countries? Banker’s Journal Malaysia109:3-22.
Rajan, R., H. Servaes, and L. Zingales. 2000. The cost of diversity: the
diversification discount and inefficient investment. The Journal of Finance 4:35-79.
Scharfstein, D., and J. Stein. 2000. The dark side of internal capital markets: divisional rent-seeking and inefficient investment. Journal of Finance 55: 2537-64
Shlefier, A., and R. Vishny. 1997. A survey of corporate governance. Journal ofFinance 52: 737-783.
Stein J. C. 1997. Internal capital markets and the competition for corporate resources.The Journal of Finance 52: 111-133.
Stulz, R. 1990. Managerial discretion and optimal financing policies. Journal ofFinancial Economics 26: 3-27.
Tabeta, N. 1998. The Kigyo Keiretsu organization and opportunism in the Japaneseautomobile manufacturing industry. Asia Pacific Journal of Management 15: 1-18.
Williamson, O. E. 1971. The vertical integration of production: market failureconsiderations. American Economic Review 61: 112-123.
_____________. 1979. Transaction-cost economics: the governance of contractualrelations.” Journal of Law and Economics 22: 233-261.
Weinstein D. E., and V. Yafeh. 1998. On the cost of a bank-centered financial system:evidence from the changing main bank relations in Japan. The Journal of Finance 53: 635-672.
Yeh, Y. H., T. S. Lee, and T. Woidtke. 2001. Family control and corporate governance: evidence for Taiwan. International Review of Finance 2: 21-48.
Ziebart, D., and S. Reiter. 1992. Bond ratings, bond yields and financial information.Contemporary Accounting Research 9: 252-282.
(Book)
Amsden, A. H. 1989. Asia’s next gaint: South Korea and late industrialization. NewYork: Oxford University Press.
Aoki, M. 1984. The economic analysis of the Japanese firm. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Coase, R. H. 1937. The nature of the firm. Economica 4: 386-405.
Encarnation, D. 1989. Dislodging multinationals: India’s Comparative Perspective.Ithaca, NY : Cornell University Press.
Evans, P. 1979. Dependent development. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Nakatani, I. 1984. The economic role of financial corporate grouping. In The EconomicAnalysis of the Japanese Firm, edited by Aoki, M. Amsterdam: North-Hohhand:227-258.
Orru, M., N. W. Biggart, and G. G. Hamilton. 1997. The economic organization ofEast Asian capitalism. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Pan, L. 1999. The encyclopedia of the Chinese overseas. Cambridge, MA: HarvardUniversity Press.
Porter, M. E. 1985. Competitive advantage – creating and sustaining superiorperformance. New York: The Free Press.
Strachan, H. 1976. Family and other business groups in economic development: theCase of Nicaragua. New York: Praeger.
Williamson, O. E.1975. Markets and hierarchies: analysis and antitrust implications.New York: Free Press.
_____________, and W. Ouchi. 1981a. The markets and hierarchies and visible hand
perspectives.” in Perspectives on Organization Design and Behavior, edited by
Andrew V., and J. William. New York: Wiley Interscience: 347-370.
_____________. 1985. The economic institution of capitalism. New York: The FreePress.
_____________. 1986. Economic organization: firms, markets and policy control.New York: New York University Press.
Fields, K. J. 1995. Enterprise and the state in Korea and Taiwan. Ithaca, NY: CornellUniversity Press.
(Working Paper)
Fan, P. H., T. J. Wong, and T. Zhang. 2005. The emergence of corporate pyramids inChina. Working paper, The Chinese University of Hong Kong.
Hermalin, B. E., and M. L. Katz. 2000. Corporate Diversification and Agency.Working paper, University of California at Berkeley
Holména, M., and P. Högfeldt. 2004. Pyramidal power. Working paper, Uppsala
University and Stockholm School of Economics.
Meyer, M., P. Milgrom, and D. Roberts. 1992. Organizational prospects, influencecosts, and ownership changes. CEPR Discussion Paper 665, London, Centre forEconomic Policy Research.
(Conference Paper)
Claessens, S., P. H. Fan, and H. P. Lang. 2002. The benefits and costs of groupaffiliation: evidence from East Asia. Discussion Paper 3364, Center for
Economic Policy Research.
George, R., M. R. Kabir, and S. Douma. 2004. Business groups and profit
redistribution: a boon or bane for firms. Discussion Paper 124, Tilburg University,
Center for Economic Research. |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
會計研究所
94353028
95 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0094353028 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [Department of Accounting] Theses
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
