English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 112704/143671 (78%)
Visitors : 49753280      Online Users : 1100
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/34283


    Title: 組織知識系統的存在與演化
    Being and Becoming of Knowldege System of Organization
    Authors: 林文鼎
    Lin, Wen Ting
    Contributors: 劉江彬
    Liu, Paul C. B.
    林文鼎
    Lin, Wen Ting
    Keywords: 知識系統
    耗散結構
    蓄積結構
    新陳代謝
    同化作用
    異化作用
    Konwledge System
    Dissipative Structure
    Preservative structure
    Metabolism
    Anabolism
    Catabolism
    Date: 2007
    Issue Date: 2009-09-18 09:15:18 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本論文是以有生命的開放系統的觀點來描述與解釋組織內的資訊、知識、及智慧財產的整體作為一個知識體的存在與演化方式,以有別於目前許多學者以智慧資本偏向靜態觀點對於組織的知識的存在方式的描述。以系統科學與生理學及非線性的觀點來看待組織之內的知識價值累積過程,以有別於 Nonaka與 Takeuchi等以偏向機械論的觀點來看待組織內的知識形成過程。

    本論文提出一個組織的知識系統理論,描述每一個存活著的經濟「組織」都有一個它賴以維生的「知識系統」,稱為「組織知識系統」。組織在處理資訊的同時,組織身實體部份發生的改變,其實是它的知識系統的知識價值新陳代謝發生在先所造成。理論的發展從Galarbith(1971)的組織處理資訊的方程式出發,以量子物理學家Schrödinger(1944)提出生物以負熵維生的理論及Wiener(1948)提出資訊是負熵的理論為依據,將Prigogine的耗散結構方程式轉換,得到「組織知識系統」是知識價值的「蓄積結構」的方程式。透過生理系統與知識系統的類比說明組織知識系統的知識價值的改變是其內部的同化作用與異化作用的總合。經由非線性模擬方程式的設計與模擬參數的組合選擇,模擬知識系統的知識價值在不同生命週期的變化,來說明知識系統的存在與演化方式。本論文研究的貢獻包括:

    一、 在理論發展上,成功的將Galarbith的組織處理資訊的理論、Prigogine的耗散結構理論、Schrödinger的生物以負熵為食的理論及Wiener資訊等於負熵的理論,此四個理論整合為本論文的知識系統理論。
    二、 在認識論的層次上,以活的開放系統的觀點描述組織裡的整個知識體的存在與演化方式。本體論的層次上,透過系統模擬及生理系統類比使知識系統的本體存在方式在認識論給出之後能被確立本體的存在。在方法論的層次上,由知識價值蓄積結構方程與非線性方程式的建立與聯結,使知識系統的知識價值在生命週期之中的變化的描述可被數量化。
    三、 以知識系統內的新陳代謝類比清楚的說明整個知識系統的知識價值蓄積在不同生命週期階段的改變,是同化作用與異化作用的共同結果。
    四、 知識系統的新陳代謝現象可由一個簡潔的非線性疊代方程式清楚說明,使以模擬來驗證直覺成為可能。

    關鍵字:知識系統、耗散結構、蓄積結構、新陳代謝、同化作用、異化作用。
    This dissertation applies and extends a living open system view of organization in description and interpretation of being and becoming of knowledge body of organization,which is a metaphysical part of organization and constituted by information、knowledge and intellectual properties as elements of a living open system。This study provides a dynamic view of existence of knowledge in organization which is to critic and differentiate with contemplated intellectual capital theory with tendency toward a static aspect。System science approach、physiological analogy and non-linear model were applied in this study for describing the process of preservation of knowledge value in organization which is different with previous studies of Nonaka and Takeuchi with tendency toward the mechanic aspect of knowledge formation process in organization。

    A theory of knowledge system of organization was developed which claimed every living economic organization who want to survive must rely on its knowledge system survive first。 Organization processes information,its physical part also is changing at the same time which is driving by knowledge value metabolism happened first in its knowledge system。To build the theory,a information processing theory (Galarbith, 1971)、a theoretical view of organism rely on feeding on negative entropy to survive (Schrödinger, 1944) and a theory of information is equal to negative entropy (Wiener, 1948) were integrated for converting the equation of dissipative structure theory of Prigogine to a equation of preservative structure theory of knowledge value of organization。On the analogy of knowledge system as a physiological system to interpret knowledge value change of knowledge system is the net of its system internal new knowledge value formation (termed anabolism) and existing knowledge value decay (termed catabolism)。Then this study uses non-linear equations to build mathematical models and selects different sets of simulation parameters to simulate knowledge value change in different life cycle stages of knowledge system to demonstrate being and becoming of knowledge system。The contributions of this study are:

    1.On theory building,theories of Galarbith, Schrödinger, Wiener and Prigogine were successfully integrated into a theory of knowledge system of organization。
    2. On the epistemological level,a living open system view was adopted to clearly describe the being and becoming of knowledge system of organization。On the ontological level,the physiological system analogy and non-linear system simulation make it is able to ensure the existence of knowledge system of organization。On the methodology level,the equation of preservation of knowledge value of knowledge system of organization was constructed and extended to linkage with non linear equations, make it feasible to qualitatively describe the knowledge value change in the whole life cycle of knowledge system of organization。
    3. With an analogy of metabolism of physiological system and knowledge system of organization,it can be clearly explained that the knowledge value change of knowledge system is its sum of the system internal effect of anabolism and catabolism。
    4. Metabolism of knowledge system can be clearly described via a concise non-linear equation,which makes it feasible to prove intuition by mathematical simulation。

    Key Words:Knowledge System、Dissipative Structure、Preservative Structure、Metabolism、Anabolism、Catabolism。
    Reference: 中文文獻
    王俊如、林文鼎、于卓民(2002),「多點競爭的僵固性分析」,中山管理評論,第九卷,第四期,595-620。
    吳思華,詹文男,吳安妮,林宛瑩,彭火樹,王文英,張朝清(2002)「我國資訊產業智慧資本評價之研究」,經濟部技術處學界科專非技術領域學術研討會論文集。
    吳家鱗(1993),法律邏輯學,台北:五南出版社。
    吳國盛(1995),科學的歷程,湖南:科學技術出版社。
    李仁芳、花櫻芬(1997),「技術知識類型與知識交流網路模型」,科技管理學刊,第二卷第一期,75-121。
    李真(2001)譯,形而上學(亞里是多德原著),台北:正中書局。
    汪維揚(2001),以系統動力學探討自組織團隊的認知機制,國立中山大學資訊管理系博士論文。
    林文鼎、劉江彬(2002),「從中國大陸半導體產業發展規劃 – 論台灣對中國大陸的投資政策」,收錄於:中國大陸科技政策個案研究(二),政大科技管理研究所。
    林克椿(1999),生物物理學,湖北:華中師範大學出版社。
    界屋太一(1987),智價革命,台北:遠流出版社。
    胡金麟(2000),細胞流變學,北京:科學出版社。
    涂瑞德(1998),技術特質、產品團隊特性與組織動態能耐關連之研究,國立政治大學科技管理研究所碩士論文。
    陳川正(2000),非營利組織的認同管理:以基督教的系胞小組模式等教會為例,國立政治大學企管系博士論文。
    陳朝福(2002),組織轉型研究- 新科學典範的創造性演化觀點,國立台灣大學商學研究所博士論文。
    湛塵華、沈小峰(1998),普利高津的耗散結構理論,陜西:科學技術出版社。
    黃俊英、劉江彬(1998),智慧財產之法律與管理(二版),台北:華泰書局。
    趙橋梁(1999),知識經濟與國際關係,北京:社會科學文獻出版社。
    劉江彬、徐小波(1999),以知識為本的人力資本與產業、法治的價值鏈,理律法律事務所。
    蔡紹洪、彭仕政、越行知、伍進(1998),耗散結構與非平衡相變原理及應用,貴州:科技出版社。
    蕭瑞麟(2005),「質性研究方法」,質性研究發表會 國立政治大學商學院, 2005年12月6日於政大商學院舉辦。
    魏宏森、曾國屏(1999),系統論,北京:清華大學出版社。
    中文譯著
    Bertalanffy, Ludwig von(1952)Problems of Life:An Evaluation of Morder Biology(生命問題),吳曉江譯,北京商務印書館(1999)。
    Bill Gates(1999),Business @ The speed of thought (數位神經系統),樂為良譯,商周出版。
    Bloor,David(1991)Knowledge and Social Imagery(知識與社會意象),艾彥譯,北京 東方出版社(2001)
    Connerton,Paul(1989)How Societies Remenber(社會如何記憶),納日碧力戈譯,上海人民出版社(2000)。
    Coveney, Peter & Highfield, Roger(1992)The Arrow of Time(時間之箭)。江濤、向守平合譯,藝文印書館。
    Drucker, Peter(1993),Post Capital Society(後資本主義社會),傅振焜譯,時報出版。
    Drucker,Peter(1999),California Management Review,Vol .41,No.2 (知識工作者必備手冊),張玉文、林佳蓉、林季蓉譯,遠見出版。
    Einstein, A. L. Infeld(1938)The Evolution of Physics(物理學的進化)。周肇威譯,湖南教育出版社,1999年8月第1版。
    Lazlo.E(1986)Evolution the Grand Synthesis(進化-廣義綜合理論),閔家胤譯,北京 社會科學文獻出版社。
    Leonard-Barton(2001),Wellspring of Knowledge(知識創新之泉),王美音譯,遠流出版。
    Magretta,Joan(2002)What Management Is(管理是什麼),李田樹譯,天下文化出版社(2003)。
    Manizer,Klaus(1994)Thinking in Complexity(複雜性中的思維),曾國屏譯,北京 中央編譯出版社(1999)。
    Mclellan,David(1986)Ideology(意識形態),施忠連譯,桂冠圖書公司(1997)
    Neuman, Lawrence W.(1997)Social Research Methods:Qualitative and Quantitative Approach(社會研究方法- 質化與量化取向),朱柔若譯,台北 揚智文化。
    North,Douglass C.(1981)Structure and Change in Economic History(經濟史的結構與變遷)劉瑞華譯,時報文化出版社。
    Paiget,Jean(1971)Biology an Knowledge:An Essay on the Relations between Organic Regulations. and Cognitive Processes.(生物學與認識),尚新建、杜麗燕、李浙生譯,北京三聯書店(1989)。
    Paiget,Jean(1972)The Principles of Genetics Epistemology(發生認識論原理),王憲鈿譯,北京商務印書館(1997)。
    Polanyi,Michael(1958)Personal Knowledge(個人知識),許譯民譯,貴州人民出版社(2000)。
    Popper,Karl R.(1972)Objective Knowledge:An Evolutionary Approach(客觀知識:一個進化論的研究),程實定譯,結構群。
    Schrödinger(1944)What is life? & Mind and Matter(生命是什麼),仇萬煜、左蘭芬譯,貓頭鷹書房(2000)
    Shulman ,Seth (1999),Owning the Future(知識的戰爭),無書榆譯,聯經出版。
    Vromen, Jack J(1995)Economic Evolution:An enquiry into the fundations of new institutional economics(經濟演化)李振明,劉社建,齊柳明譯,北京 經濟科學出版社。
    Waldrop, M. Mitchell(1992)Complexity: The Emerging Science at the Edge of Order and Chaos.(複雜:走在秩序與混沌的邊緣),齊若蘭譯,天下文化(1994)。
    Whitehead, Alfred North(1932)Science and Modern World(科學與現代世界),傅佩榮譯,台北 立緒(2000)。
    Yin, Robert K.(1994)Case Study Research(個案研究)尚榮安譯,弘智文化(2001)
    Znaniecki,F(1940)The Social Role of the Man of Knowledge(知識人的社會角色),鄭斌祥譯,南京 譯林出版社(2000)。
    許光泰(1995)馬克思的「競爭」觀念,中國大陸研究,第38卷,第8期,民國84年8月。
    英文文獻
    Amit, R., & Schoemaker, P.J.H. (1993), “Strategic assets and organizational rent,” Strategic Management Journal, 14(1):33-36.
    Anderson, P. (1999) “Complexity Theory and Organization Science,” Organization Science, 10(3): 216-232.
    Arrow ,K.J. (1962), “Economic Wlefare and the Allocation of Resources for Innovations,” in R. R. Nelson (ed) The Rate and Direction of Incentive Activity:Economic and Social Factors, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
    Arther, W. B. (1999), The End of Economic Certainty, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
    Arthur De Vany(1998),How Much Information is there in an Economic Organization and Why Can’t Large Ones be Optimal? The Brazilian Electronic Journal of Economics, Issue 1, No.1.
    Barlow, J.P. (1994), The Economy of Ideas, Wired 2(3) pp. 85, March.
    Barrie,E. (1998), The Practice of Social Research (8th ed), Belmont, California: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
    Barzel,Y. (1997), Economic Anylsis of Property Rights, (2nd ed), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Baum, J.A.C.& Singh, J.V. (1994), “Organization-Environment Coevolution,” In Evolutionary Dynamics of Organization, N.Y.:Oxford University Press, 379-402.
    Bertalanffy, Ludwig von (1952), Problems of Life:An Evaluation of Modern Biology, NY: John Wiley and Sons.
    Bertalanffy, Ludwig von (1968), General System Theory, London: Allen Lane.
    Bogatyrev, N.R. (2004), “A Living Machine,” Journal of Bionics Engineering, Vol.1 No.,79-87.
    Bontis, N., Dragonetti, N.C., Jacobsen K., & Roos, G. (1999), “The knowledge toolbox: A review of the tools available to measure and manage intangible resources,” European Management Journal,17, 391-402.
    Booth R,(1998), “The measurement of intellectual capital.Management,” Accounting, CIMA, Vol. 76, No 10, London.
    Bourdieu,P (1992), Loic Wacquant, Invitation to Reflective Sociology, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    Brooking,A. (1996), Intellectual Capital, London: International Thomason Business Press.
    Burt,R. (1992), Structure Holes, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
    Chandler, A. D., Jr. (1990), Scale and Scope: The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism, Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
    Coase, R. H. (1937), “The Nature of the Firm,” Economica, 4(4), 386-405.
    Collis, DJ. & Montgomery, C.A. (1995), “Competing on resources,” Harvard Business Review, 73(4), 118-128.
    Collis, DJ. & Montgomery, C.A. (1998), “Creating Corporate advantage,” Harvard Business Review, 76(3), 70-83.
    Daft,R.L.,& Lewin, A.Y. (1993), “Where Are the Theories for the New Organizational Forms? An Editorial Essay,” Organization Science, 4,4, i - vi.
    Davenport, T. & Prusak, L. (1998), Except of Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage what They Know, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
    Dzinkowski, R. (2000), “The measurement and management of intellectual capital an Introduction,” Management Accounting, Feb, 32-36.
    Edvissson, L. & Sullivan, P. (1996), “Developing a Model for Managing Intellectual Capital,” European Management Journal, 14(4), 356-364.
    Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989), “Building Theories from Case Study Research,” Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550.
    Galarbith, J. R. (1977), Organizational Design. 地點: Addison-Wesley Press.
    Grandstand, O. (1994), The Economic of Technology. Amsterdam: Elservier Science Publisher.
    Jantsch, Erich. (1980), The Self-Organizing Universe, New York: Pergamon
    John, F.(2000), “Is there a role for transaction cost economics if we view firms as complex adaptive systems?” Contemporary Economic Policy, 18(4), 369-385.
    Johnson, W. H.A (1999), “An integrative taxonomy of intellectual capital: measuring the stock and flow of intellectual capital components in the firm,” International Journal of Technology Management, 18, 562-575.
    Joia, L.A.(2000), “Measuring intangible corporate assets: Linking business strategy with intellectual capital,” Journal of Intellectual Capital, 1, 68-84.
    Knight, D. J. (1999), “Performance measures for increasing intellectual capital,” Strategy & Leadership, 27, 22-27.
    Kuhn, T. S. (1962), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, University of Chicago Press.
    Kurgman,P. (1994), “The Myth of Asia’s Miracle,” Foreign Affair, Vol. 73,(Nov.-Dec.).
    Leff, H. S., Andrew, R. (1990) Maxwell’s Demon Entropy, Information, NJ Princeton University Press.
    Leuw, S.E.van der (2001), Modelling Social Dynamics in terms of information flows. NJ Princeton University Press, .
    Lovejoy, O (1970), The Great Chain of Being, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
    Machlup, F (1962), The Production and Distribution of Knowledge in the United States. NJ: Princeton University Press.
    Mahoney J.T., Pandian, J.R. (1992), “The resource-based view of the firm within the conversation of strategic management.” Strategic Management Journal, 13(5) 363-380.
    Makadok, R. (2001) “Toward a synthesis of the resource-based view and dynamic-capability views of rent creation.” Strategic Management Journal, 22, 387-401.
    Mannheim, K. (1936), Ideology and Utopia, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
    Manville, B. (1999), “Complex Adaptive Knowledge Management: A Case from Mckinsey & Company,” chapter5 in The Biology of Business: Decoding the Natural Law of Enterprise. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
    Martin, L.W. H. (1998), “The Confusion of the Capitals: Surveying the Cluttered Landscape of Intellectual Capital and Terminology.” Chapter 6th in Profiting from Intellectual Capital: Extracting Value from Innovation, Patrick H. Sullivan. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
    Mowery, D. C., Nelson, R. R., Sampat, B. N, Zideonis, A. A. (2001), “The growth of patenting and licensing by U.S. Universities: an assessment of the effects of the Bayh-Dole act of 1980,” Research Policy, 30,99-119.
    Nelson, R. R. & Winter, S.G. (1982), An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, MA: Harvard University Press.
    Nonaka, I. & Takaouchi, H. (1995), The Knowledge Creating Company. Oxford University Press.
    Nowotny, H. & Taschwer, K. (1996), The Sociology of the Sciences, An Elgar Reference Collection Cheltenham UK. Bookfield,US.
    OECD (1996), The Knowledge Base Economy, Paris.
    OECD (1999), Employment and Growth in the Knowledge-Based Economy, Paris.
    Douglas R White (2001)” Emergence,Transformation and decay in socio-natural systems”, The Abisko Workshop held at the Abisko Research Station,Sweden.
    Penrose, E.T. (1959), The Theory of the Growth of the Firm, NY: Wiley.
    Petrash, G. (1996), “Dow’s Journey to a Knowledge Value Management Culture.” European Management Journal, 14, 365-373
    Platt, J. (1992), “Case Study in Amercian Methodological thought,” Current Sociology, 40, 17-18.
    Prigogine, I. (1997), The End of Certainty: Time, Chaos, and the New Laws of Nature. NY: The Free Press.
    Putnam, R. (1993), Making Democracy Work, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
    Ramusen, E, (1994), Game and Information: An Introduction to Game Theory, Cambridge: Blackwell Publisher.
    Rindfleisch, A. & Heide, J. B. (1997), “Transaction Cost Analysis: Past, Present, and Future Applications,” Journal of Marketing, 61(4), 30-54.
    Roos, G. & Roos, J. (1997), “Measuring your company’s intellectual performance,” Long Range Planning, 3, 413-426.
    Rosenkopf, L. & Tushman, M.L. (1994), “The Coevolution of Technology and Organization,” In Evolutionary Dynamics of Organizations, NY: Oxford University Press, 403-424.
    Ryan, Michael P. (1998), Knowledge Diplomacy: Global Competition and the Politics of Intellectual Property, Booking Institution Press.
    Sarvery,Miklos (1999), “Knowledge Management and Competition in the Consultating Industry,” California Management Review, 41(2), pp. 95-107.
    Schumpeter, Joseph A. (1934), The Theory of Economic Development, Transaction Publishers (Fifth Priting1997).
    Sena, J. & Shani, A. (1999), “ Intellectual Capital and Knowledge Creation: Towards an alternative Framework,” Knowledge Management Hand Book, Edited by J. Liebowitz, NY: CRC Press.
    Stengers, I. & Prigogine, I. (1986), Order out of Chaos, NY: Bantam Books.
    Teece,D.J, Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997), “Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management,” Strategic Management Journal, 18(7),509-533.
    Whitehead, A. N. (1929), Process and Reality, NY: Free Press.
    Wiener, Robert (1948), Cybernetic or control and communication in the animal and machine. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1961, 2nd edition; 1st edition, 1948.
    Williamson, Oliver E (1975), Market and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications, N.Y.: The Free Press.
    Williamson, Oliver E (1985), The Economic Institutions of Capitalism:Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting, N.Y.: The Free Press
    Description: 博士
    國立政治大學
    科技管理研究所
    87359507
    96
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0087359507
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[科技管理研究所] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    35950701.pdf48KbAdobe PDF2759View/Open
    35950702.pdf75KbAdobe PDF2801View/Open
    35950703.pdf91KbAdobe PDF2936View/Open
    35950704.pdf74KbAdobe PDF21086View/Open
    35950705.pdf38KbAdobe PDF2830View/Open
    35950706.pdf84KbAdobe PDF2794View/Open
    35950707.pdf58KbAdobe PDF2883View/Open
    35950708.pdf114KbAdobe PDF2951View/Open
    35950709.pdf238KbAdobe PDF21418View/Open
    35950710.pdf399KbAdobe PDF21285View/Open
    35950711.pdf453KbAdobe PDF21095View/Open
    35950712.pdf200KbAdobe PDF21025View/Open
    35950713.pdf495KbAdobe PDF21434View/Open
    35950714.pdf200KbAdobe PDF2855View/Open
    35950715.pdf316KbAdobe PDF2958View/Open
    35950716.pdf184KbAdobe PDF2989View/Open
    35950717.pdf154KbAdobe PDF21165View/Open
    35950718.pdf154KbAdobe PDF21123View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback