政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/34308
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 112704/143671 (78%)
Visitors : 49753160      Online Users : 1082
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/34308


    Title: 探討大學實驗室之持續創新
    How do the university laboratories conduct persistent creation and innovation?
    Authors: 戴君玲
    Tai,Chun-Ling
    Contributors: 李仁芳
    Lee,Jen-Fang
    戴君玲
    Tai,Chun-Ling
    Keywords: 大學實驗室
    持續創新
    多代傳承
    傳統與學風
    研究領域
    university laboratory
    persistent creation and innovation
    traditions and academic atmosphere
    research area
    talents
    Date: 2003
    Issue Date: 2009-09-18 09:20:20 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 大學，一向被視為知識的殿堂；大學裡的實驗室，更是激盪新概念、產生新知識的重要場域。因此，大學實驗室可說是知識殿堂裡的智慧泉源；新的知識，不論是對於基礎科學的貢獻，或是應用技術的開發，都可以不斷地在那裡被製造出來。
    為了明瞭大學實驗室裡持續創新的樣貌，特別是經過多代傳承、創新成果仍如湧泉般不斷出現的實驗室，本研究針對已在科學界屹立不搖一百三十三年的卡文迪什實驗室與八十三年的台大藥理學教室，進行分析後發現：維持優良的傳統與學風、仔細選擇研究領域並用心地開拓與經營、選擇優秀人才並加以培育，是他們得以歷經艱困草創期、成長期與轉型期，經過多代的傳承，仍在不同研究時期或領域都能獨領風騷的三項重要因素。
    「傳統與學風」所保存的是實驗室的核心價值觀；這些核心價值是用以支持創新的土壤。「研究領域的開拓與經營」則須掌握大環境的變化，選擇適合發展的領域，並依據手中的資源擬定經營策略；這樣做即可保持身段的柔軟、不斷刺激進步。「人才的選擇與培育」則提供了足量的優質人力，可以執行創造的工作。
    Universities are considered as the knowledge palace while the laboratories therein are the most important places where surging the new concepts and producing knowledge. Therefore, the university laboratories become the wellspring of knowledge. Both basic and applied researches produced therein will contribute to the domain knowledge.
    In order to realize why some university laboratories can conduct persistent creation and innovation, two cases which have long history during several generations were analyzed; one is the Cavendish Laboratory of Cambridge University, U.K. and another one is the Pharmacology Laboratory of National Taiwan University, College of Medicine. Both laboratories are considered as the outstanding ones with very good performance in frontier researches. Moreover, many great scientists including Nobel Prize Laureates and Academicians were educated and trained in these laboratories. Most important of all, each generation of these laboratories kept producing creative and innovative accomplishments as well as the long-lived companies do in the business world.
    The main findings of this research are: 1. retaining the excellent traditions and academic atmosphere; 2. choosing research area carefully and managing it attentively; 3. selecting outstanding talents and educating them, are the key success factors to foster the university laboratories toward incessant innovation. First of all, the traditions and academic atmosphere they preserved are considered to be the core values which cultivate the emerging of creation as well as innovation. Moreover, these long-lived laboratories devoted themselves to the research areas which had been chosen very carefully based on the macro-environment and resources they had in hands. By doing so, they can keep on going forwards. Nevertheless, a lot of talents are necessary for implementing researches in these laboratories. After all, great creation or innovation could not come true without the elite.
    Reference: 中文文獻
    1. Bernal, J.D. 著，伍況甫 譯(1981)。《歷史上的科學》。北京：科學出版社。
    2. Brand, S. 著，白方平 譯(1999)。《MIT媒體實驗室》。台北：天下遠見出版股份有限公司。
    3. Collins, J.& Porras, J. I. 著，真如 譯(民90)。《基業長青：企業永續經營的準則》。台北：智庫出版社。
    4. Collins, J. 著，齊若蘭 譯(民91)。《從A到A+：向上提升，或向下沉淪?企業從優秀到卓越的奧秘》。台北：遠流出版社。
    5. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity. NY: HarperCollins. 杜明城 譯(民 88)。《創造力》。台北：時報文化出版企業股份有限公司。
    6. Dauphinais, G.W., Means, G., Price, C. (2000). Wisdom of the CEO: 29 Global Leaders Tackle Today`s Most Pressing Challenges. John Wiley & Sons .鄭俐 譯(2002)。《CEO 的眼界》。台北：商周出版公司。
    7. Drucker, P. F. (1985). Innovation and Entreprenership - Practice and Principles, New York: Harper & Row. 蕭富峰、李田樹 譯(2002)。《創新與創業精神：管理大師談創新實務與策略》。台北：臉譜出版、城邦文化股份有限公司。
    8. Kanigel, R. 著，潘震澤、朱業修 譯(1998)。《天才的學徒：建構叱吒風雲的科學王朝》。台北：天下文化出版股份有限公司。
    9. Leonard-Barton, D. 著，王美音 譯(民87)。《知識創新之泉：智價企業的經營》。台北：遠流出版公司。
    10. Mintzberg, H. 著，上官 譯(2000)。《閔茲伯格談管理》。台北：中天出版。
    11. Ng Aik Kwang(黃奕光) 著，王蒇真 譯(2003)。《Asian創造力：為什麼西方人比東方人有創造力？》。台北：天下文化出版股份有限公司。
    12. Nonaka, I. & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge-Creating Company. UK: Oxford University Press. 楊子江、王美音譯(1997)。《創新求勝—智價企業論》。台北：遠流出版公司。
    13. Porter, M. E. (1990). The Competitive Advantage of Nations. New York: The Free Press. 李明軒、邱如美譯(1996)。《國家競爭優勢》。台北：天下遠見出版有限公司。
    14. Sulston, J. & Ferry, G. 著，潘震澤、杜默 譯( 2003)。《生命的線索》。台北：時報文化出版企業股份有限公司。
    15. Yin, R. K. 著(1994)，尚榮安 譯(2001)。《個案研究》。台北，弘志文化事業。
    16. Zuckerman, H. (1977). Scientific elite: Nobel laureates in the United States. NY: Maclillan Publishing Co. Inc. 周葉謙、馮世則 譯(1993)。《科學界的精英—美國的諾貝爾獎金獲得者》。北京：商務印書館。
    17. 王思峰（2002）。教育部創造力與創意設計教育師資培訓計畫-教材編撰-商學類-組織類子計畫子模組「社群創造力」結案報告。
    18. 王俊人(2001)。《從組織創新觀點探討國內大學生物醫學實驗室》。台北：輔仁大學管理學研究所論文。
    19. 王昭懿(2001)。《大學實驗室創新平台之研究--以台灣醫學工程領域實驗室為例》。台北：政治大學科技管理研究所論文。
    20. 李仁芳(民 82)。《管理心靈》。台北：輔仁大學管理學研究所。
    21. 李仁芳(民 90)。創新CEO--聽聞內心鼓聲前進的人。台北：白金世紀雜誌「知識管理專欄」2001年夏季號。
    22. 李仁芳(民 90)。創造心靈的狂野與優雅。台北：白金世紀雜誌「知識管理專欄」2001年秋季號。
    23. 李仁芳(民 91)。去垂直權力距離化與組織創新。台北：數位時代雙週刊，2002年7月1日。
    24. 李明瑱、林靜靜(民91)。《台灣的良知—李鎮源教授》。台北：商周出版公司。
    25. 李憲璋(2002)。《大學實驗室組織平台與知識流通之研究─以八間光電領域之實驗室為例》。台北：政治大學科技管理研究所論文。
    26. 林偉文(2002)。《國民中小學學校組織文化、教師創意教學潛能與創意教學之關係》。台北：政治大學教育學研究所論文。
    27. 徐千惠(2002)。《大學實驗室特性、組織平台與情境及知識創造--以OLED材料合成相關實驗室為例》。台北：政治大學科技管理研究所論文。
    28. 國立台灣大學醫學院藥理研究所 編(民 89)。《張傳烱教授榮退紀念錄》。台北：國立台灣大學醫學院藥理研究所。
    29. 陳意文(2002)。《Amabile理論內涵初步報告》。台北：政治大學科技管理研究所報告(未發表)。
    30. 張復閔(2001)。《知識領域特性、組織平台與情境對大學內部實驗室知識創造的影響》。台北：輔仁大學管理學研究所論文。
    31. 曾立欣(2002)。《大學實驗室的人力資源管理與知識創造-以學術卓越與工業創新的IC設計實驗室為例》。台北：政治大學科技管理研究所論文。
    32. 曾靜梅(2002)。《研究生玩興、幽默、創意態度、所知覺系所創造氛圍與創造力之關係》。台北：政治大學教育學研究所論文。
    33. 楊玉齡、羅時成(民85)。《台灣蛇毒傳奇》。台北：天下文化出版股份有限公司。
    34. 楊玉齡、羅時成(1999)。《肝炎聖戰--台灣公共衛生史上的大勝利》。台北：天下文化出版股份有限公司。
    35. 楊玉齡(民91)。《一代醫人杜聰明》。台北：天下文化出版股份有限公司。
    36. 楊佳珮(2003)。《跨領域整合大學實驗室之核心能力與知識創造活動之研究：以台大微奈米機電系統實驗室為例》。台北：政治大學科技管理研究所論文。
    37. 劉美明(民75)。微光願逗學窗明-悼念杜聰明博士。台北：聯合月刊第五十七期。
    38. 蔡啟通(民86)。《組織因素、組織成員整體創造性與組織創新之關係》。台北：台灣大學商學研究所論文。
    39. 蕭仁閔、歐陽惠華、李仁芳(2000)。德國科技政策--產、學、研合作網路。《歐洲科技政策個案研究(一)，經濟部產業技術資訊服務推廣計畫》，頁93-118。台北，經濟部。
    40. 閻康年(1999)。《卡文迪什實驗室：科學革命的聖地》。中國保定：河北大學出版社。
    41. 簡文娟(民88)。《組織創新氣候評鑑量表之建立-以高科技產業為實證研究對象》。桃園：中央大學人力資源管理研究所論文。
    英文文獻
    1. Amabile, T.M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity. NY: Springer-Verlag.
    2. Amabile, T.M. (1996). Creativity in Context. Westview Press / Perseus Books Group, Boulder CO.
    3. Amabile, T.M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J. and Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 1154-1184.
    4. Amabile, T.M. (1997). Motivating creativity in organizations: On doing what you love and loving what you love. California Management Review, 40(1), 39-58.
    5. Beecham, M. A. & Cordey-Hayes, M. (1998). Partnering and knowledge transfer in the U.K. motor industry. Technovation, 18(3), 191-205.
    6. Blackett, P.M.S. (1972). Notes and Records of the Royal Society of London, 27(1), 59.
    7. Bragg, W.L. (1969). What Makes A Scientist? Royal Institution of Great Britain Proceedings, 42, 407-8.
    8. Brannock, J.C. & Denny, A.M. (1998). Basic Guidelines for University-Industry Research Relationships. SRA Journal, 30(1/2), 57-62.
    9. Brown, W. B. & Karagozoglu, N. (1989). A Systems Model of Technological Innovation. IEEE Transaction on Engineering Management, 36(1), 5-16.
    10. Chacke,G. K. (1988). Technology Management- Application to Corporate Markets and Military Mission. New York: Praeger.
    11. Chatterji, D. (1996). Accessing external sources of technology. Research Technology Management, 39(2), 48-56.
    12. Coccia, M. (2004). Spatial metrics of the technological transfer: Analysis and strategic management. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 16(1), 31-51.
    13. Cohen, W.M. & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128-152.
    14. Crowther, J. G. (1974). The Cavendish laboratory, 1874-1974. NY: Science History Publications .
    15. Csikszentmihalyi, M. & Wolfe, R. (2000). New conceptions and research approaches to creativity: Implications of a systems perspective for creativity in education. In Heller, K. A., Monk, F. J., Sternberg, R. J. & Subotnik, R. F. (Eds.)(2000). International Handbook of Giftedness and Talent. p.81-94. NY: Elsevier.
    16. Dirac, P. (1984). Blackett and the Positron. In Hendry, J. (Eds.)(1984), Cambridge physics in the thirties. p.62. UK: Adam Hilger Ltd.
    17. Ettlie, J.E. (2000). Managing Technological Innovation. New York; Chichester, [England]: John Wiley & Sons (SEA) Pte., Ltd.
    18. Eve, A. S. (1939). Being the Life and Letters of Lord Rutherford, UK: Cambridge.
    19. Frambach, R. T. & Schillewaert, N. (2002). Organizational Innovation Adoption: A Multi-level Framework of Determinants and Opportunities for Future Research. Journal of Business Research, 163-176.
    20. Frankle, E. G. (1990). Management of technology change. Kluwer Academic.
    21. Geisler, E. (2001). Explaining the generation and performance of intersector technology cooperation: A survey of the literature. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 13(2), 195-206.
    22. Helfat, C. E., (1997). Know-how and asset complementarity and dynamic capability accumulation: The case of R&D. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 339-360.
    23. Kay, W.A. (1963). Recollections of Rutherford. NY.
    24. Lambe, C. J., & Spekman, R. E. (1997). Alliances, External Technology Acquisition, and Discontinuous Technological Change. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 14, 102-116.
    25. Larsen, E. (1962). The Cavendish Laboratory, Nursery of Genius. NY: Franklin Watts Inc.
    26. Leonard-Barton, D. & Straus, S. (1997). Putting Your Company`s Whole Brain to Work. Harvard Business Review Article, July 01, 1997.
    27. Levy, N.S. (1998). Managing high technology and innovation. NJ: Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River.
    28. Litwin, G. H. & Stringer, R. A. (1968). Motivational and Organization Climate. MA: Harvard University Press.
    29. Maxwell, J. C. Introductory lecture on experimental physics. In Garber, E., Brush, S. G., Everitt, C.W.F.(Eds.)(1986). Maxwell on molecules and gases. p. 242. Cambridge: MIT.
    30. Mayer, R.E. (1999). Fifty years of creativity research. In Sternberg, R.J. (Eds.)(1999). Handbook of Creativity. New York: Cambridge. 449-460.
    31. Mott, N.F. (1986). A life in science. London: Taylor & Francis.
    32. Smith, D. (2000). Knowledge Creation A Source of Value. Canada: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
    33. Pauling, L. (1974). Molecular basis of biological specificity. Nature, 248, 769-771.
    34. Pippard, A.B. (1962). Cavendish problem papers in classical physics. UK: Cambridge University Press.
    35. Pippard, A.B. (1972). Reconciling physics with reality. UK: Cambridge University Press.
    36. Santoro, M.D. (2000). Success breeds success: The linkage between relationship intensity and tangible outcomes in industry-university collaborative venture. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 11(2), 255-273.
    37. Thomas, J. M., Sir Phillips. D. (1990). Selections and Reflections: The legacy of Sir Lawrence Bragg. London: The Royal Institution of Great Britain.
    38. Wen, J. & Kobayashi, S. (2001). Exporing collaborative R&D network: some new evidence in Japan. Research Policy, 30(8), 1309-1319.
    39. Wilson, D. (1983). Rutherford: Simplest genius. MA: MIT.
    40. Woodman, R. W., Sawyer, J. E., & Griffin, R. W. (1993). Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Academy of Management Review, 18, 293-321.
    41.http://www-outreach.phy.cam.ac.uk/camphy/laboratory/laboratory_index.htm，2004年5月17日瀏覽。
    42. The new physical laboratory of the University of Cambridge (1874). Nature, X(243), 139-142.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    科技管理研究所
    90359029
    92
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0090359029
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[Graduate Institute of Technology and Innovation Management] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    35902902.pdf115KbAdobe PDF2745View/Open
    35902903.pdf155KbAdobe PDF21107View/Open
    35902904.pdf105KbAdobe PDF2738View/Open
    35902905.pdf159KbAdobe PDF2708View/Open
    35902906.pdf527KbAdobe PDF21231View/Open
    35902907.pdf310KbAdobe PDF21326View/Open
    35902908.pdf658KbAdobe PDF21301View/Open
    35902909.pdf492KbAdobe PDF21087View/Open
    3590291.pdf42KbAdobe PDF2636View/Open
    35902910.pdf173KbAdobe PDF2703View/Open
    35902911.pdf345KbAdobe PDF2794View/Open
    35902912.pdf107KbAdobe PDF2782View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback