English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 110944/141864 (78%)
Visitors : 48038849      Online Users : 848
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/34510


    Title: 經濟因素對民主政治之影響:量化與質化研究的結合
    Authors: 李欣儒
    Contributors: 郭承天
    李欣儒
    Keywords: 現代化理論
    民主化
    土耳其
    Modernization Theory
    Democratization
    Turkey
    Date: 2003
    Issue Date: 2009-09-19 15:31:41 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本文依據現代化理論之脈絡,探究總體經濟因素對於民主政治究竟存在何種影響,在方法論上則採取量化與質化的結合,以求各自擷長補短。
    為探究經濟因素究竟是影響民主政體的「建立」、已建立民主政體的「存續」、亦或民主程度的「提昇」。本文首先將各國依其民主化時程及宗教文化的不同,區分為第二波民主化國家、第三波民主化國家及伊斯蘭國家,據此建立三個次模型及一個總體模型,並利用總體經濟資料進行量化分析。研究結果發現,經濟因素對於民主政體的「建立」與否並無影響,但良好的經濟表現則有助於已建立之民主政體的「存續」及民主程度的「提昇」;亦即現代化理論的外生說獲得支持。
    為彌補量化研究之不足,本文並進一步以土耳其進行個案分析。個案分析的結果顯示,儘管影響土耳其民主政治發展的因素包含宗教勢力興起、經濟危機及軍方干政,但最根本的因素仍是經濟危機;在經濟危機之下,不論軍方或民間社會皆感受到壓力,民間轉向伊斯蘭教尋求安慰,軍方則藉安定社會與對抗宗教勢力等名義,發動政變而中止民主政治。
    Rested on the theories of modernization, this thesis inquired into how the macroeconomic performance influences the political development of democracy. The quantification and qualification approaches are adopted in the methodology for a complete perspective.
    In order to explore whether the economic performance influences the establishment of democratic regime, the sustenance of established democratic regime, and the elevation of democratic level, this thesis classifies the countries as the democratic countries in the second wave of democratization, the democratic countries in the third wave of democratization and Islamic countries according to the agenda of democratization and religious culture difference. Based upon the three categories, the author builds up three secondary models and one general model and puts the macroeconomic materials in the quantitative analysis. The findings discover that the economic performance has nothing to do with the establishment of democratic regime. However, the well-performed economy does help consolidate the established democratic regime and elevate the democratic level as well. The conclusion implies that the exogenous theory of Modernization theory is substantiated.
    In order to make up the insufficiency of the quantification research, the author takes Turkey for case study. The results reveal that the factors influencing the political development of democracy in Turkey include the rise of religious power, the economic crisis and the military intervention. Among the factors, the most crucial one is the economic crisis. Under the threat of economic crisis, the society turned to Islamism for consolation. Nevertheless, in the name of stable society and resistance to religious power, the military launched coup d`etat to interrupt the democracy.
    Reference: 英文部分
    Abootalebi, Ali R., 1995.
    “Democratization in Developing Countries: 1980-1989”, The Journal of Developing Areas, 29(4): 507-530.
    Abootalebi, Ali Reza, 2000.
    Islam and Democracy: State-Society Relations in Developing Countries, 1980-1994. NY & London: Garland Publishing, Inc.
    Ahmad, Feroz, 1993.
    The Making of Modern Turkey. London and New York: Routledge.
    Arat, Zehra F., 1988.
    “Democracy and Economic Development: Modernization Theory Revisited”, Comparative Politics, 24(4): 21-36.
    Ayubi, Nazih, 1991.
    Political Islam: Religion and Politics in the Arab World. London: Routledge.
    Bayar, Ali H., 1996.
    “The Developmental State and Economic Policy in Turkey”, Third World
    Quarterly, 17(4): 773-785.
    Benavot, Aaron, 1996.
    “Education and Political Democratization: Cross-National and Longitudial
    Findings”, Comparative Education Review, 40(4): 377-403.
    Berkes, Niyazi, 1998.
    The Development of Secularism in Turkey. London: Hurst & Co.
    Bollen, Kenneth A., 1980.
    “Issues in The Comparative Measurement of Political Democracy”, American
    Sociological Review, 45: 370-390.
    Bollen, Kenneth A. & Robert W. Jackman, 1985.
    “Economic and Noneconomic Determinants of Political Democracy in the
    1960s”, Research in Political Sociology, 1: 27-48.
    Birand, Mehmet A., 1991.
    Shirts of Steel: An Anatomy of the Turkish Armed Forces. London: I. B. Tauris.
    Brown, James, 1989.
    “The Military and Sociey: The Turkish Case”, Middle Eastern Studies, 25: 387-404.
    Brukhart, Ross E., 1997.
    “Comparative Democracy and Income Distribution: Shape and Direction of the
    Causal Arrow”, Journal of Politics, 59(1): 148-164.
    Bugra, Ayse, 1997.
    “The Claws of the Tigers”, Private View, 1(2): 50-55. 亦見
    http://www.tusiad.org/yayin/private/autumn97/html/bugra.html
    Burkhart, Ross E. & Michael S. Lewis-Beck, 1994.
    “Comparative Democracy: The Economic Development Thesis”, American
    Political Science Review, 88(4): 903-910.
    Burkhart, Ross E., 1997.
    “Comparative Democracy and Income Distribution: Shape and Direction of the Causal Arrow” Journal of Politics, 59(1): 148-164.
    Carapico, Sheila, 1997.
    “Introduction to Part One”, in Joel Beinin & Joe Stork (eds.), Political Islam: Essays from Middle East Report. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    Cinar, Menderes, 1997.
    “Rebuilding the Center: Mission Impossible?” Private View, 1(2): 50-55. 亦見
    http://www.tusiad.org/yayin/private/autumn97/html/Cinar.html
    Cizre, Umit, 2003.
    “Demythologyzing the National Security Concept: The Case of Turkey”, The
    Middle East Journal, 57(2): 213-228.
    Cizre-Sakallioglu, Umit & Erinc Yeldan, 2000.
    “Politics, Society and Financial Liberalization: Turkey in the 1990s”,
    Development and Change, 31(2): 481-508.
    Cutright, Phillips, 1963.
    “National Political Development: Measurement and Analysis”, American Sociological Review, 28: 253-264.
    Cutright, Phillips & James A. Wiley, 1969.
    “Modernization and Political Representation, 1927-1966”, Studies in Comparative International Development, 5: 23-41.
    Diamond, Larry, 1992.
    “Economic Development and Democracy Reconsidered”, in Gary Marks & Larry Diamond (eds.) Reexaming Democracy: Essays in Honor of Seymour Martin Lipset. CA: Sage Publications.
    Deegan, Heather, 1996.
    Third Worlds: The Politics of the Middle East and Africa. London and New York: Routledge. ch.2.
    Diamond, Larry, Juan J. Linz & Seymour M. Lipset, 1995.
    “Introduction: What Makes for Democracy?” in Larry Diamond, Juan J. Linz & Seymour M. Lipset (eds.), Politics in Developing Countries. Colorado: Lynne Rienner Publishers. 2nd edition.
    Dodd, Clemet H., 1990.
    The Crisis of Turkish Democracy. London: The Eothen Press. 2nd edition.
    Eckstein, Harry & Ted R. Gurr, 1975.
    Patterns of Authority: A Structural Basis for Political Inquiry. NY: A Wiley
    Interscience Publication.
    El-Solh, Raghid, 1993.
    “Islamist Attitudes Towards Democracy: A Review of the Ideas of al-Ghazali,
    al-Turabi and Amara”, British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies, 20(1): 57-63.
    Feng, Yi, 1995.
    “Regime, Polity, and Economic Growth: The Latin American Experience”,
    Growth and Change, 26(1): 77-104.
    Feng, Yi, 1997.
    “Democracy, Political Stability and Economic Growth”, Brithsh Journal of Political Science, 27(3): 391-418.
    Finer, Samuel E., 1988.
    The Man on Horseback: The Role of the Military in Politics. Boulder, Co.:
    Westview Press. 2nd edition.
    Gerber, Haim, 1987.
    The Social Origins of Modern Middle East. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publisher.
    Geyikdag, Mehmet Y., 1994.
    Political Parties in Turkey: The Role of Islam. NY: Praeger.
    Gurr, Ted R., Keith Jaggers, & Will H. Moore, 1990.
    “The Transformation of the Western State: The Growth of Democracy, Autocracy, and State Power Since 1800”, Studies in Comparative International Development, 25(1): 73-108.
    Hale, William, 1994.
    Turkish Politics and the Military. London and New York: Routledge.
    Heper, Metin, 1985.
    The State Tradition in Turkey. Walkington, England: The Eothen Press.
    Heper, Metin, 1990.
    “The Executive in the Third Turkish Republic, 1982-1989”, Governance, 3:
    299-319.
    Heper, Metin, 1992.
    “Consolidation Turkish Democracy”, Journal of Democracy, 3(3): 105- 117.
    Heper, Metin, 1997.
    “Islam and democracy in Turkey: Toward a Reconciliation?” Middle East
    Journal, 51(1): 32-45.
    Heper, Metin & Aylin Guney, 1996.
    “The Military and Democracy in the Third Turkish Republic”, Armed Forces and
    Society, 22(4): 619-642.
    Heper, Metin & Aylin Guney, 2000.
    “Military and the Consolidation of Democracy: The Recent Turkish Experience”,
    Armed Forces & Society, 26(4): 635-657.
    Heper, Metin and E. Fuat Keyman, 1998.
    “Double-Faced State: Political Patronage and the Consolidation of Democracy in
    Turkey”, Middle Eastern Studies, 34(4): 259-179.
    Howe, Marvine, 2000.
    Turkey Today: A Nation Divided over Islam’s Revival. UK: Westview Press.
    Huber, Evelyne, Dietrich Rueschemeyer & John D. Stephens, 1993.
    “The Impact of Economic Development on Democracy”, Journal of Economic
    Perspectives, 7(3): 71-85.
    Huntington, Samuel P., 1968.
    Political Order in Changing Societies. New Heaven & London: Yale University
    Press.
    Huntington, Samuel P., 1984.
    “Will More Countries Become Democratic?” Political Science Quarterly, 99(2):
    193-218.
    Jackman, Robert W., 1973.
    “On the Relation of Economic Development to Democratic Performance”, American Journal of Political Science, 17: 611-621.
    Jenkins, Gareth, 2003.
    “Muslim Democrats in Turkey?” Survival, 45(1): 45-66.
    Kaplan, Sam, 2002.
    “Din-U Devlet All Over Again? The Politics of Military Secularism and
    Religious Militarism in Turkey Following the 1980 Coup”, International Journal
    of Middle East Studies, 34(1): 113-127.
    Karakartal, Bener, 1985.
    “Turkey: The Army as Guardian of the Political Order”, in Christopher Clapham
    & George Philip (eds.), The Political Dilemmas of Military Regimes. London & Sydney: Croom Helm.
    Kogacioglu, Dicle, 2003.
    “Dissolution of Political Parties by the Constitutional Court in Turkey: Judicial
    Delimitation of the Political Domain”, International Sociology, 18(1): 258-176.
    Kramer, Heinz, 2000.
    A Changing Turkey: the Challenge to Europe and the United States. D.C.: The Brookings Institution.
    Lerner, Daniel, 1966.
    The Passing of Traditional Society: Modernizing the Middle East. London: Collier-Macmillan Limited. 3rd edition.
    Linz, Juan J. & Alfred Stepan, 1996.
    “Toward Consolidated Democracies”, Journal of Democracy, 7(2): 14-33.
    Lipset, Seymour M., 1959.
    “Some Social Requisites of Democracy: Economic Development and Political
    Legitimacy”, American Political Science Review, 53: 69-105.
    Lipset, Seymour M., Kyoung-Ryung Seong, and John Charles Torres, 1993.
    “A Comparative Analysis of the Social Requisites of Democracy”, International Social Science Journal, 45: 155-175.
    Londregan, John B. & Keith T. Poole, 1996.
    “Does High Income Promote Democracy ?” World Politics, 49: 1-30.
    Mardin, Serif, 1971.
    “Ideology and Religion in the Turkish Revolution”, International Journal of
    Middle East Studies, 2: 197-211.
    Meyer, James, H., 1999.
    “Politics as Usual: Ciller, Refah and Susurluk: Turkey’s Troubled Democracy”,
    East European Quarterly, 32(4): 489-502.
    Muller, Edward N., 1988.
    “Democracy, Economic Development, and Income Inequality”, American Sociological Review, 53: 50-68.
    Muller, Edward N., 1995.
    “Economic Determinants of Democracy”, American Sociological Review, 60:
    966-82.
    Nas, Tevfik, F., & Mark J. Perry, 2000.
    “Inflation, Inflation Uncertainty and Monetary Policy in Turkey: 1960-1998”,
    Contemporary Economic Policy, 18(2): 170-180.
    Noreng, Oystein, 1997.
    Oil and Islam, Social and Economic Issues. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
    O’Donnell, Guillermo A., 1973.
    Modernization and Bureaucratic-Authoritarianism--Studies in South American Politics. University of California, Berkeley.
    Onis, Ziya, 1997.
    “The Political Economy of Islamic Resurgence in Turkey: The Rise of the
    Welfare Party in Perspective”, Third World Quarterly, 18(4): 743-766.
    Onis, Ziya & Umut Turem, 2002.
    “Entrepreneurs, Democracy and Citizenship in Turkey”, published as European
    University Institute, Florance, Working Paper. 另見http://home.ku.edu.tr/~zonis/EntDemCit.pdf
    Ozbudun, Ergun, 1995.
    “Turkey: Crises, Interruptions, and Reequilibrations”, in Larry Diamond, Juan J. Linz & Seymour M. Lipset (eds.), Politics in Developing Countries. Colorado: Lynne Rienner Publishers. 2nd edition.
    Ozbudun, Ergun, 1996.
    “Turkey: How Far from Consolidation?” Journal of Democracy, 7(3): 123-138.
    Ozbudun, Ergun, 2000.
    Contemporary Turkish Politics: Challenges to Democratic Consolidation.
    Colorado: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
    Perry, Glenn E., 1987.
    “North Africa and the Middle East” in Robert Wesson (ed.), Democracy: A
    Worldwide Survey. NY: Praeger Publishers.
    Pipes, Daniel, 1983.
    In the Path of God: Islam and Political Power. NY: Basic Books.
    Przeworksi, Adam, 1986.
    “Some Problems in the Study of the Transition to Democracy” in Guillermo A.
    O’Donnell, Philippe C. Schimitter & Laurence Whitehead (eds.), Transitions from Authoritarian Rule. Baltimore and London: The John Hopkins University Press.
    Przeworski, Adam, 1991.
    Democracy and Market: Politics and Economic Reforms in Eastern Europe and
    Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Przeworski, Adam, Michael Alvarez, Jose A. Cheibub & Fernando Limongi, 1996.
    “What Makes Democracies Endure?” Journal of Democracy, 7(1): 39-55.
    Przeworski, Adam & Fernando Limongi, 1997.
    “Modernization-Theories and Facts”, World Politics, 49(2): 155-183.
    Prezworski, Adam, Michael Alvarez, Jose A. Cheibub & Fernando Limongi, 2000.
    Democracy and development: Political Institutions and Well-Being in the World, 1950-1990. UK: Cambridge University Press.
    Rouleau, Eric, 1997.
    “Turkey’s Dream of Democracy”, Foreign Affairs, 79(6): 100-114.
    Rubinson, Richard, & Dan Quinlan, 1977.
    “Democracy and Social Inequality: A Reanalysis”, American Sociological Review, 42: 611-623.
    Rustow, Dnakwart A., 1964.
    “The Military”, in Robert E. Ward & Dankwart A. Rustow (eds.), Political
    Modernization in Japan and Turkey. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
    Sadowski, Yahya, 1997.
    “The New Orientalism and the Democracy Debate”, in Joel Beinin & Joe Stork (eds.), Political Islam: Essays from Middle East Report, LA: University of California Press.
    Salt, Jeremy, 1999.
    “Turkey’s Military ‘Democracy’”, Current History, 98(625): 72-78.
    Sunar, Ilkay and Binnaz Toprak, 1983.
    “Islam in Politics: The Case of Turkey”, Government and Opposition, 18: 421-441.
    Tachau, Frank & Metin Heper, 1983.
    “The State, Politics and the Military in Turkey”, Comparative Politics, 16: 17-33.
    Taniyici, Saban, 2003.
    “Transformation of Political Islam in Turkey”, Party Politics, 9(4): 463-483.
    Vanhanen, Tatu, 1997.
    Prospects of Democracy: A study of 172 Countries. London: Routledge. ch.3, 4.
    Toprak, Binnaz, 1988.
    “The State, Politics, and Religion in Turkey”, in Metin Heper & Ahmet Evin (eds.), State, Democracy and the Military: Turkey in the 1980s. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
    Turan, Ilter, 1997.
    “The Democracy Anomalies: Why Some Countries that Have Passed Vanhanen’s
    Democratic Threshold Are Not Democracies”, in Tatu Vanhanen, Prospects of
    Democracy: A study of 172Countries. London: Routledge.
    Vatikiotis, P. J., 1988.
    Islam and the State. UK: Croom Helm.
    Waterbury, J., 1994.
    “Democracy without Democrats? The Potential for Political Liberalization in the
    Middle East”, in Ghassan Salame (ed.), Democracy without Democrats? The
    Renewal of Politics in the Muslim World. London: I. B. Tauris Publisher.
    Wesson, Robert, 1987.
    “Introduction”, in Robert Wesson (ed.), Democracy: A Worldwide Survey. NY:
    Praeger Publishers.
    Winham, G. R., 1970.
    “Political Development and Lerner’s Theory: Further Test of a Causal Model”, American Political Science Review, 64: 810-818.
    Yesiada, Birol, 2002.
    “The Virtue Party”, in Barry Rubin and Metin Heper (eds.), Political Parties in Turkey. London: Frank Cass.
    Yuksel, Edip, 1999.
    “Cannibal Democracies, Theocratic Secularism: The Turkish Version”, Cardozo
    Journal of International and Comparative Law, 7: 423-67. 另見:
    http://www.yuksel.org/e/law/cannibal.htm.
    繁體中文部分
    Almond, Gabriel A., & Sidney Verba,民國85年。
    《公民文化》。張明澍譯。台北:五南出版社。
    Dahl, Robert A., 民國78年。
    《多元政治:參與和反對》。張明貴譯。台北:唐山出版社。
    Huntington, Samuel P.,民國83年。
    《文明衝突與世界秩序的重建》。黃裕美譯。台北:聯經出版社。
    Huntington, Samuel P.,民國86年。
    《第三波》。劉軍寧譯。台北:五南出版社。
    Lipset, Seymour M.,民國71年。
    《政治人》。張明賢譯。台北:桂冠出版社。
    Moore, Barrington,民國80年。
    《民主與獨裁的社會起源:現代世界誕生時的貴族與農民》。拓夫譯。台北:桂冠出版社。
    Sen, Amartya,民國90年。
    《經濟發展與自由》。劉楚俊譯,台北:先覺出版社。
    郭承天,民國86年。
    《東亞民主化與經濟發展:政治經濟策略結構理論》。行政院國家科學委員會專題計畫,計畫編號:NSC86-2414-H004-017。
    黃旻華,民國91年。
    「伊斯蘭教真的被『妖魔化』了嗎?-一個整合既有經驗發現的論點」,《問題與研究》,41(4): 21-46。台北:國立政治大學國際關係研究中心。
    吳興東編著,2003。
    《土耳其史:歐亞十字路口上的國家》。台北:三民書局。
    Ayubi, Nazih N., 2003。
    「伊斯蘭教與民主」,收錄於D. Potter, D. Goldblatt, M. Kiloh & P. Lewis主編,王謙、李昌麟、林賢治、黃惟饒譯,《最新民主化的歷程》。台北:韋伯文化。
    Bromley, Simon, 2003。
    「中東特例:迷思或事實?」,收錄於Potter, D., D. Goldblatt, M. Kiloh & P. Lewis主編,王謙、李昌麟、林賢治、黃惟饒譯,《最新民主化的歷程》。台北:韋伯文化。
    簡體中文部分
    陳嘉厚,1989。
    《現代伊斯蘭主義》。北京:經濟日報出版社。
    彭樹智,1992。
    《二十世紀中東史》。北京:高等教育出版社。
    朱張碧珠,1996。
    《埃及穆斯林(回教徒)兄弟會之研究》。北京:三民書局。
    楊灝城、朱克柔主編,2000。
    《當代中東熱點問題的歷史探索:宗教與世俗》。北京:人民出版社。
    孫振玉,2001。
    《傳統與現實:土耳其的伊斯蘭教與穆斯林》。北京:民族出版社。
    王京烈主編,2003。
    《當代中東政治思潮》。北京:當代世界出版社。
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    政治研究所
    89252004
    92
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0892520041
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[政治學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    52004101.pdf76KbAdobe PDF2839View/Open
    52004102.pdf68KbAdobe PDF2854View/Open
    52004103.pdf102KbAdobe PDF21198View/Open
    52004104.pdf108KbAdobe PDF2797View/Open
    52004105.pdf152KbAdobe PDF21497View/Open
    52004106.pdf274KbAdobe PDF24580View/Open
    52004107.pdf310KbAdobe PDF21463View/Open
    52004108.pdf510KbAdobe PDF2877View/Open
    52004109.pdf601KbAdobe PDF21343View/Open
    52004110.pdf162KbAdobe PDF21036View/Open
    52004111.pdf158KbAdobe PDF21127View/Open
    52004112.pdf218KbAdobe PDF21627View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback